|
re:.1
I am not very technical at describing what I read but I shall try.
I would say that the mechanisim (if that is what you call it) used
in the ,previously listed, articals would be very symbolic. That
is ,in Julian May's series, most of the major events were mapped
to real geological events that theoreticaly happened about 6 million
years ago. Events in the story caused certain thing to happen that
the results of which (at least some of them) can be seen today in
Europe. Ie: meteorite created lakes ,rivers ,historical events
with regard to the mediteranean basin. In the short Nina G. artical
all of the major symbols refere to the bible. Each event in the
story can be mapped to an occurenced in the biblicaly recorded times.
All of the above mapped events are not the same as the original
happening or situation .
I just thought that this way of portraying factual or other well
known event into different situations is quite interesting.
Others that may have seen these peices may be able to help me out
with the more technical definition of this.
s davies
syd aust
|
| Although I got REAL bored with Julian May by the time I finished
the Pliocene trilogy, I agree that it was interesting to observe
the artful way May gave "explanations" for lots of the fairy/troll
etc. legends that linger into modern times. Reminds me of the
comparisons I've read of the Noah's Ark story with various other
legendary and mythological flood stories from varied cultures.
It's a great realm for speculation -- who (if anyone) might have
preceded us on the planet...and could it have been - US!?
(Wouldn't THAT archeological evidence blow lots of minds!)
By the way, although I did get bored, I do recommend Julian May
for at least one read! Her ideas are worth it. (What can I say
-- I guess I have a short attention span!)
Sherry
|