[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | Arcana Caelestia |
Notice: | Directory listings are in topic 2 |
Moderator: | NETRIX::thomas |
|
Created: | Thu Dec 08 1983 |
Last Modified: | Thu Jun 05 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 1300 |
Total number of notes: | 18728 |
626.0. "The Forge of God" by SHORTY::REDFORD () Wed May 25 1988 23:40
by Greg Bear
Tor SF, first printing Sept '87, paperback June '88 (but Wordsworth
in Cambridge gets things early)
A catastrophe novel that's only worth reading for the
ending. Arthur Gordon, ex-Presidential Science Advisor, hears some
odd news at a cocktail party: Europa has disappeared. The sixth
moon of Jupiter has suddenly vanished. Other portents appear: a
new volcanic cinder cone appears in Death Valley that isn't on
any of the charts, and a clone of Ayers Rock appears in the Australian
outback. Signs, of course, of alien invasion, but one of the most
spectacularly destructive invasions I've ever read of. The novel
follows Gordon and a handful of other characters in the traditional
"Lucifer's Hammer" style.
Unfortunately, most of the characters ring false and too much
time is spent on them. We're forced to put up with this uninteresting
crew while the events of the invasion take place. It's like being
stuck in a bus with a crowd of chattering tourists as magnificent
scenery rolls by. The plot, too, is riddled with holes. Bear
has a couple of interesting ideas here, but they're more suited
to a novella than a 500 page novel.
This seems to be a consistent problem of his. "Blood Music" had
some extraordinary scenes of intelligent bacteria living in a
world wholly defined by chemical gradients, but he drifted off
into vague mysticism at the end. In "Eon" he had several striking
images: the infinite Eighth Chamber, and Axis city with its
population half corporeal and half in City Memory, but the plot
had too many jarring transitions. The first half is a
straightforward space battle, and the second is a wild swing among
alternate universes. It seems like he gets a vision and then tries to
wrap a book around it. What's frustrating is that the visions are
often good but the wrappings poor. He puts a diamond into bubblepack and
corrugated cardboard. The climactic scene of "The Forge of God"
almost, but not quite, makes the rest of the book worthwhile.
/jlr
More discussion after the spoiler formfeed:
What bothered me most is that the events of the first half of the
book are casually thrown away later on. The creature in Death
Valley and the robots in Australia are just dismissed as ruses.
Why should the aliens bother with ruses? They had nothing to do
with their scheme for destroying the planet. They didn't distract
the human race from their plans, because their plans were
unstoppable and indetectable. The whole first section is just
filler, as far as I can tell. Where are the editors at Tor when
he needs them?
Even the core idea of the book (destroying the planet by mutually
annihilating masses of neutronium and anti-neutronium at the core)
has problems. Where did they get all that anti-neutronium from?
It represents a fantastic amount of energy, an amount equal to the
entire output of the Sun for 30 seconds. They couldn't have made
it in the solar system without our noticing. If they have that
kind of technology, why are they bothering with the Earth at all?
Why not mine asteroids, or comets, or even dwarf stars? There's
far more matter available there, and it's far easier to get to.
For that matter, why did the aliens bother with all those
H-bombs in the ocean trenches? Wasn't one means of wrecking the
planet enough?
Also, why didn't the neutronium masses shoot up out the other
side of the Earth when they fell? Why didn't the friendly aliens
shoot another mass of neutronium at them to skew their orbits
up above the surface where they could be captured? The whole
friendly aliens thing was too pat. They came light-years to save
us, but came two weeks too late. They eat trillions of tons
of Europa in a matter of hours and then sit idle for four
months while the neutronium nears the Earth.
Basically, Bear just wanted to blow up the world. A planet has
so much potential energy tied up in its mass that it takes
something bizarre like anti-neutronium to do it. He added the
deus ex machina friendly aliens so he could have some human
spectators. He wanted to stress the horror and tragedy of
the death of the Earth, and so spent a lot of time on characters
who could then be killed. I admire the idea, but Larry Niven
did it better in "Inconstant Moon" at one tenth the length.
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
626.1 | I did not like the ending | HYDRA::BIRO | | Fri Jun 03 1988 14:08 | 33 |
| RE:0
> A catastrophe novel that's only worth reading for the
> ending.
I did not like the ending, it was exactly as I had
speculated from the information given in the story.
I like the first half as it laid the ground work for
a very interesting possiblity that the first contact
would be both good and bad at the same time but it
ends without ever touching on the subject.
I liked "EON" but I am glad I only paid the SF book club
price for this one.
More discussion after the spoiler formfeed:
> Unfortunately, most of the characters ring false and too much
I would have expected a panic or people not working but the
oh-well thats the way it will be while Rome burns.... only the blowing up of
the volcanic cinder cone and a one man effort of hunting Metal Spiders
with a baseball bat were close to my view reality. People would have
paniced first then given up.
The book had may possible ending and I got hooked on the first half
thinking I would get an insight into the bad/good aliens and how the
first contact would happen etc. At least in "EON" Bear had as you mention
several striking images: the infinite Eighth Chamber, Axis city , etc. and
then explored them, but just blowing up the world and acting like mechanical
robots for the law was not very interesting.
|
626.2 | EON II? | DELNI::HALLOWELL | | Tue Sep 06 1988 02:33 | 4 |
|
I'm told that there will be a sequel to EON. Any more news?
Rikk
|
626.3 | Eternity, by Greg Bear | CISM::FADDEN | | Wed Jun 13 1990 16:27 | 6 |
| Wow, this is extremely late, and has probably been answered before
- but I checked for keywords and titles, and saw no mention of the
sequel, which is entitle _Eternity_. I enjoyed it immensely. Not
as "hard" as _Eon_, but just as captivating and interesting.
- Steve
|