T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
615.1 | Mumble. More hackery. | BENTLY::MESSENGER | An Index of Metals | Mon May 09 1988 14:40 | 20 |
| I watched it. And, as usual, television ruins S/F.
Major gaffes:
1. Humans populating the galaxy with supralight spacecraft
contemporary to 1988 earth. Hmm, what's wrong here? There
is considerable evidence that humans (Homo Sapiens Terra)
evolved on earth. This conflict has to have a real explanation,
or I'm not interested (I suspect it won't).
2. A "human" who has an alcohol-like reaction to caffiene? No
way. Even *sand-fleas* react to caffiene like humans.
3. A medical technician on a prison ship who explains her knowledge
of American English with "All of us who involved with Earth
contact must know 5 of your languages." What _is_ her job,
anyway? Medtech or human contact expert? Earth can't possibly
be that important without more explanation (which, again,
we almost certainly won't get).
- HBM
|
615.2 | | NUTMEG::BALS | The Trash Heap has spoken. Nyaaah! | Mon May 09 1988 15:04 | 10 |
| Some more gaffes ...
The female alien resembles a female human mammal down to the mammary
glands which the viewers last night had titillating (sorry) glimpses
of. Yet she apparently has no knowledge of the sexual act, making
one wonder what all that equipment is for (kinda like fins on a
Chevy).
Why do all the aliens speak AmerEnglish among themselves (total
immersion?)?
|
615.3 | Translated? | ATSE::WAJENBERG | Make each day a bit surreal. | Mon May 09 1988 15:08 | 11 |
| Re .2
I didn't see it, but the usual reason for foreigners speaking English
among themselves in a movie is so the audience can follow them,
with a translation implied. Otherwise, you have to fall back on
subtitles (as indeed the "Star Wars" and "Star Trek" movies sometimes
do). Of course, if our earthly cop OVERHEARS the aliens chatting
among themselves, and understands it, without having learned Alienese,
then we have a gaffe.
Earl Wajenberg
|
615.4 | Don't throw in the TOWEL, you may need it. | OPUS::BUSCH | | Mon May 09 1988 18:09 | 9 |
| < Note 615.2 by NUTMEG::BALS "The Trash Heap has spoken. Nyaaah!" >
< Why do all the aliens speak AmerEnglish among themselves (total
< immersion?)?
See how well it was done? You never even noticed the babel fish hidden in the
amplifier of your TV. ;^)
Dave
|
615.5 | First invading lizards, now this... | DICKNS::KLAES | Know Future | Mon May 09 1988 18:24 | 8 |
| Do you think that SIOT was made just so that they could get
some more use out of the expensive props from V?
And why do I have the bad feeling that this piece of garbage
masquerading as SF is going to get turned into a series?
Larry
|
615.6 | Watchable, but not if you have better things to do. | SNDCSL::SMITH | William P.N. (WOOKIE::) Smith | Mon May 09 1988 20:30 | 31 |
| Well, there were a few inconsistancies, but for mindless entertainment
(how I define TV) it wasn't bad. It did seem like a 2 hour movie
stretched to 4....
Minor details:
When she took off after the creature, she brought along this laser
rifle that (at close range) can cause it pain. Are they going to hurt
it until it leaves the planet?
They have been listening to satellite and broadcast voice so they know
English, but they don't know our auditory range, as evidenced by the
fact that she couldn't believe he couldn't hear the scanner. I have
visions of them speaking with a 19KHz pilot tone and L-R information in
an inaudible (to us) subcarrier. :+) BTW: The stereo effect was a
bit exagerated....
She can read minds but doesn't seem to be able to understand anything
he says to her, or why people "do that with their bodies". She has
never had coffee before but then wants to go out for cappacino(sp?).
The creature seems to not only be a shape-changer, but a
mind-controller, energy being, immensely strong, and just about
omniscient. I have grave doubts about their stopping it without a
convenient miracle.
All in all, though, (like V and Battlestar Galactica and Buck Rogers
and Star Trek: Next Generation on and on) it's better than average
quality for TV. Not up to the old Star Trek or Max Headroom, but
no contest against Married_with_no_brain, or The Charmings, or...
Willie
|
615.7 | Nit-pick | LESLIE::LESLIE | Andy `{o}^{o}' Leslie, CSSE Europe | | Tue May 10 1988 03:32 | 10 |
| > < Note 615.2 by NUTMEG::BALS "The Trash Heap has spoken. Nyaaah!" >
> Some more gaffes ...
> The female alien resembles a female human mammal down to the mammary
> glands which the viewers last night had titillating (sorry) glimpses
> of. Yet she apparently has no knowledge of the sexual act, making
> one wonder what all that equipment is for (kinda like fins on a
> Chevy).
Well, no, not really. Breasts aren't related to the sexual act,
but to the feeding of young.
|
615.8 | Don't bother... | UCOUNT::BAILEY | Corporate Sleuth | Tue May 10 1988 15:24 | 30 |
| I can't believe I sat through the whole thing!
This program was a bad combination of Alien/s, Invasion of the Body
Snatchers, and all the (numerous) episodes of Star Trek where something
"took over" the body of one of the crew. The nits are innumerable,
and the production quality was totally in how it looked -- the script
was sad!
For those who were smart enough to read through the showing, (rather
than watch), I feel compelled to warn you that the evil Alien, which
had already survived several explosions, was "destroyed" by crashing
the prison spaceship into the (earth) ocean -- a crash which our
human heros survivied without a scratch. I can't help but be
suspicious that they will test the ratings and decide whether to
make this a weekly invasion into prime time. The protagonists are
nice to look at, but I can't say much more in favor of regular viewing!
Isn't it sad that they managed to lure some of us unsuspecting sf
fans, probably all the Stephen King-type horror fans, certain suspense
show lovers and maybe the generally curious with promos that were
better than the show itself? Now we may be inflicted with even
more third-rate tv. With all the wonderful sf short stories (or
longer works) out there to draw from, all the great effects possible
now, and a large audience of readers and viewers who would love
something great, you'd think somebody would see a profit in making
sf worth watching! (H-m-m-m, the DEC Production Company???)
Oh, Well, maybe next time...
Sherry
|
615.9 | too much belief to suspend | NOETIC::KOLBE | Peace is Disarming | Tue May 10 1988 16:13 | 12 |
|
I had a feeling of deja vu through the entire show (of course I'm
one of the fools that watched the whole thing) like I was seeing
parts of other stories. Even the bit with the hands seems like a
joke that has appeared in a SF story I've read before.
I agree there were too many nits that didn't make sense. If the
creature is so fast it could kill and autopsy a human in 20secs
why couldn't it kill them in the sewer before they knew where it
was. Lucky for earth that omnipotent aliens are too dumb to ever
win. But then again, bad guys with machine guns can never hit the
A-team either. liesl
|
615.10 | RE 615.9 | DICKNS::KLAES | Know Future | Tue May 10 1988 16:20 | 5 |
| Having sex using only the hands goes back to BARBARELLA and
STAR TREK, at least.
Larry
|
615.11 | Nuke 'em from orbit | WINERY::THOMAS | The Code Warrior | Tue May 10 1988 16:47 | 7 |
| The point that got to me was, if the creature was so dangerous why
even keep it around at all? Why not drop it into a black hole or
give it a one-way ticket to the surface of star? It didn't seem
like the girl's culture had qualms about killing.
For example, if you had the last pod (from Alien, Aliens) would
you preserve it or destroy it?
|
615.12 | I can't believe I watched the whole thing! | SNDCSL::SMITH | William P.N. (WOOKIE::) Smith | Tue May 10 1988 21:41 | 10 |
| I really couldn't deal with the ending. How do you kill an alien,
relentless, mind_controlling, shape_changing Zenomorph that can
dig through concrete faster than a man can run, can survive impacts,
explosions, laser pulse rifles and even portable laser cannon?
Why you just hold it's widdow head under water till it dwowns....
Crash it into the ocean? That had to be the most hare_brained idea
ever. How about the surface of the moon?
Willie
|
615.13 | Vindicated | BMT::MENDES | Free Lunches For Sale | Tue May 10 1988 23:56 | 8 |
| Thank you, one and all! I watched maybe 15 minutes of this and walked
out, convinced it would be a mixture of "The Terminator" and "Alien".
However, having been produced for TV, it would show no imagination
and at best, a bunch of second-hand special effects.
It appears from your comments that I guessed right!
- Richard
|
615.14 | Not another Series | STARCH::WHERRY | Software Commandoes Ltd. | Wed May 11 1988 00:41 | 9 |
|
I hate to admit it, but I watched the whole thing too. One point
occurred to me and am sure others thought of it as well, but those
people never proved that they killed the xenomorph, and can you
say sequel or series -itis? Sure, I knew you could. Not being
familiar with the TV world or anything, but maybe the mini-series
was also being considered as a pilot or something.
brad's two cents worth
|
615.15 | Inconsistencies, Inc. | DICKNS::KLAES | Know Future | Wed May 11 1988 11:16 | 109 |
| Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf-lovers
Path: decwrl!ucbvax!pasteur!ames!ll-xn!husc6!m2c!ulowell!cg-atla!granger
Subject: Ripping Apart "Something is Out There"
Posted: 10 May 88 13:14:50 GMT
Organization: Compugraphic Corp. Wilmington, MA
Well, I finished watching "Something is Out There" last night.
Nothing more than an abysmally bad rip-off of "Aliens" and "The
Hidden", if you ask me. The only thing that I liked was the
interaction between the cop and the cute alien. Unfortunately, this
looked like a series pilot, disturbingly reminiscent of "V". Anyway,
here is a list of gripes about the film, in hopes that someday,
someone will make a movie and remember what I don't like :-).
1. Simple math error. The genius alien says it's about 5 kilometers to
the shuttle. When asked for it in miles, she says it's 2 miles. Last I
knew, 5 kilometers was 3.1 miles.
2. When she was abandoning the ship, we heard the alarm system say "4
minutes to decompression, 10 minutes to turbo-nuclear purge." Okay,
what the heck is a turbo-nuclear purge? Maybe it was thermo-nuclear,
but it's still stupid. And why was she so worried about decompression
once she was in the shuttle? Doesn't that just mean the ship is losing
atmosphere? Apparently not, since during decompression there were
explosions all over the place. If the ship blows up when it
decompresses, why warn people about the foobar-nuclear purge, anyway?
3. The alien is "a xenomorph - a shape-changer". Gee, sounds familiar,
doesn't it? Of course, as discussed here a while back, a "xenomorph"
is a new or unknown form. I don't know what the proper term would be
(weak on my etymology sometimes), but I would have been more convinced
by "polymorph", "multimorph", "transmorph", or if they really wanted
to get cute, "deltamorph" (after all, delta is often used to show
change, although this could also mean it's triangle-shaped).
4. The alien claims that she's fluent in English. In fact, she's so
good, she uses expressions like "Why on Earth...", and yet she's never
heard of pajamas, which is a fairly common word.
5. Even more ridiculous, she claims to be human, but doesn't
understand sex as we know it. Come on, even if they use strictly "in
vitro" birth techniques, chances are they still have reproductive
organs, and *not* in their hands. Besides, even if they don't have
Earth-style sex themselves, they should have learned about it by
watching all that Earth television.
6. Why does the creature, which previously moved at incredibly high
speeds and killed in seconds, stand there and bellow when it finds
them in the sewers? Oh, right, it wanted to "take her mind". And
later, at the labs, when it was chasing them, they managed to outrun
it? Sure.
7. And that detector gadget she had. Why did she have to wave her hand
over it the whole time? Granted, such a design might be possible, but
it's also stupid. I mean, if I was using a detector like that to track
a dangerous creature, I'd want a weapon in the other hand.
8. How did the creature dispose of enough bulk to fit inside a human,
and then regain it at will? Right, it curled up real small. I mean,
suspension of disbelief is one thing, but that's ridiculous.
9. When it broke into the apartment, why didn't it destroy the pulse
rifle? It was obviously intelligent.
10. When it was inside the male scientist's body, it seemed to have
trouble speaking, yet a few minutes (maybe a couple hours?) later, it
was using the woman's body completely naturally.
11. How did the stun pistol blow up the chemical/fuel tanks? Okay,
maybe it had different settings, like phasers on STAR TREK. But how
did Jack know which one to use?
12. How could something as big as the alien prison ship ("as big as a
battleship") hang around in orbit without drawing a lot of attention?
In fact, what were they doing over Earth in the first place? Prison
ships wouldn't usually be doing research on other planets.
13. If the ship decompressed (at least in the normal sense), why were
all the bodies intact when they went back up? [Actually, it is a myth
that human(oid) bodies explode when exposed to the vacuum of space. In
reality of course it would kill you, but your body would essentially
mummify instead of going to pieces. - LK]
14. Why crash the ship into the ocean? Why not the Moon? Why not send
it into the Sun, or deep space (well, maybe the creatures could have
taken it over in that much time).
15. The ship sinks like a rock, but the two humans get out with no
oxygen or decompression. And if they were so confident they could get
out alive, why didn't they think the creatures would?
16. If something the size of a battleship dropped into the ocean from
orbit, wouldn't it make some waves? The water looked pretty calm when
they broke the surface.
17. Lastly, why would the normal ships be heading directly toward the
crash site? I would think that if a UFO the size of a battleship
suddenly fell out of orbit, the idea would be to proceed with caution,
not full speed ahead.
Well, call me a nitpicker, but these were just to much to
overlook, either technically or in terms of bad plotting. Did anyone
else make the mistake of watching this movie? What did you think?
Pete Granger ...!{decvax,ulowell,ima,ism780c}!cg-atla!granger
"Why do you always serve venison and fish on Valentine's Day?"
"Because I love you hart and sole."
|
615.16 | Greek and Latin | ATSE::WAJENBERG | Make each day a bit surreal. | Wed May 11 1988 12:17 | 17 |
| Re .15
Good nits. To answer the linguistic one, "xenomorph" is composed
of Greek roots and would decode to English as "strange shape."
To Hellenize "shape-shifter," you'd call it a "metamorph," as in
"metamorphosis," a Greek synonnym for the Latin "transformation."
You could therefore call the thing a "transformer" and run the risk
of law suit from a toy manufactuer. "Polymorph" and "multiform"
(both meaning "many-shape") would also do.
As to crashing into the sea, yeah, I'd have picked the moon too.
But I *think* I heard them blurt something about finding a housing
on the ship that would survive the crash. Presumably this protects
them while the BEM gets smashed. Not that this looked plausible,
given how gentle the crash looked and how tough the BEM looked.
Earl Wajenberg
|
615.17 | Bet your sweet *ss there will be one | POLAR::BARKERS | | Wed May 11 1988 17:26 | 4 |
| RE .14(?)
I overheard on _Entertainment Tonight_ (yes yes I know ... quality
source) that a series has already been planned.
|
615.18 | You're all right, but I'll still watch it | HPSCAD::KNEWTON | This Space For Rent | Thu May 12 1988 10:41 | 16 |
| Well, I watched it and thought it was pretty good. I've seen worse
(Japanese Godzilla movies and the like). I was disapointed with
the creature and the way it changed it's shape. It didn't actually
change shape. It just used bodies as covering for it's original
shape. I did like the effect of the peoples eyes changing black
just before it burst out.
It was still good SF entertainment, not great, but o.k.. I managed
to get past all the inconsistancies. If it becomes a series I'll
probably watch if it's not up against something I like better.
With my luck, it will probably be put on opposite a show I really
like, mean while there will still be a couple of nights that there
will be nothing on that I want to watch.
Kathy
|
615.19 | Somebody call Hal Clement... | QRTRS::KIER | Mike DTN 432-7715 @CYO | Thu May 12 1988 13:40 | 9 |
| I didn't watch it and from the first couple of descriptions in
this topic I had hoped it would be a visualization of Hal
Clement's _Needle_. _Needle_ would make a great miniseries/series
both from a F/X standpoint (letters crossing the host's visual
field, a couple of pounds of green jelly oozing into/out of the
skin, wounds the don't bleed, etc.) as well as being a potentially
good story - a classic detective framework.
Mike
|
615.20 | RE 615.19 | DICKNS::KLAES | Know Future | Thu May 12 1988 15:33 | 8 |
| Last year's SF film, THE HIDDEN, is based on Hal Clement's story,
NEEDLE (See Topic 540), and I am assuming that SIOT was an attempt
to copy and cash in on THE HIDDEN. I seriously doubt those people
who made SIOT know about Clement's NEEDLE, or even Clement for that
matter.
Larry
|
615.21 | A nit, perhaps... | AKOV11::BOYAJIAN | Monsters from the Id | Fri May 13 1988 03:51 | 8 |
| re:.19
THE HIDDEN was *not* "based on" NEEDLE. It may have imitated
the book to the point of possible plagiarism (Ellison thought
so enough to call Clement about it), but it was not "based on"
the novel.
--- jerry
|
615.22 | Solution! | SNDCSL::SMITH | William P.N. (WOOKIE::) Smith | Fri May 13 1988 07:24 | 6 |
| A friend of mine figured out how the creature might have miraculously
survived the destruction of the ship. All it had to do was to Zenomorf
[sic] into a human, and since it was obvious that humans could survive
the crash......... :+)
Willie
|
615.23 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Wed May 18 1988 10:39 | 29 |
| Of course it stunk (most of us seem to agree on that) but there are a few
points that defuse some of the objections.
1) The cop and the woman crashed into the ocean rather than the moon
because they had no shuttle to leave the ship. Rather than do the
honorable thing and die while killing the creature, they chose a plan
that would return them to earth.
2) They planned to survive the crash by hiding in the strongest part of
the ship, the cell the creature had occupied, but they also planned
to blow out the back end of the cell to escape drowning.
Also, how did they close the maximum security cell from the inside?
The old "slip through the doors before they quite close" cliche
came through again.
3) Let's also say that part of their job was earth research,
since they were going to be in the neighborhood.
The biggest gaffe I saw hasn't yet been mentioned: They return to
a "decompressed" ship to find things can still burn and mist and smoke
hang liesurely in the air. Also, was the artificial gravity still
working in the defunct ship while it orbited?
The rip-off source I recall is a late 40s/ early 50s short story about a guy
who illegally imports a ravenous "xenomorphic" extraterrestrial creature
that escapes and is about to breed. The illegal researcher dispatches a clone
of himself to track it down and kill it. The subplot is how the clone
decides to displatch his prime as well and take over.
Anybody remember the story I mean?
- tom]
|
615.24 | Stand by for another turbo-nuclear purge :-) | FENNEL::BALS | The Trash Heap has spoken. Nyaaah! | Wed May 18 1988 10:54 | 4 |
| It was related in today's BOSTON GLOBE that the SOMETHING IS OUT
THERE series is on NBC's Fall schedule.
Fred
|
615.25 | "Good Night, Mr. Henderson"? | ATSE::WAJENBERG | Make each day a bit surreal. | Wed May 18 1988 11:00 | 15 |
| Re .23
I recall a story about a monster-hunting clone on the old "Outer
Limits" series. I believe it was called "Good Night, Mr. Henderson."
The clone only had part of the original's memories copied over and
so had no copy of the last few years of dissipation and corruption.
As a result, he was a rather nicer person than the original (plus
or minus a homicidal tendency or so, but then the original was going
to blow HIM away when his function was over).
The monster, as I recall, looked like a ground sloth with a buzzard's
head and did not have any gruesome or subtle tricks -- it was just
fast, tough, strong, and cunning.
Earl Wajenberg
|
615.27 | Planned Obsolesence | ATSE::WAJENBERG | Make each day a bit surreal. | Wed May 18 1988 14:15 | 4 |
| Yes, but the original didn't do it, his friend at the duplication
agency did.
Earl Wajenberg
|
615.28 | Bring Back MAX! | SNDCSL::SMITH | William P.N. (WOOKIE::) Smith | Wed May 18 1988 18:34 | 15 |
| re: .23
There's a flaw in your logic, but maybe chronological continuity
isn't required of TV. :+) The original plan was to set the ship
on a collision course with something that would destroy the creature
[I'd still go for the moon myself], destroy the shuttle that the
xenomorph had been using, and escape in the remaining shuttle.
Unfortunately, the cop destroyed the 'good' shuttle when he attacked
the xenomorph in the landing bay, so they had to ride the ship down.
Like I said, after the first part I thought it had possibilities
and was worth watching, but after that silly ending I think I'll
find something else to do with my time when the series is on.
Willie
|
615.29 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Fri May 20 1988 10:20 | 18 |
| re: .26, .27
That's exactly the story I remember, but I didn't want to include the
spoiler ending in my description. Anybody have a name or author for it?
re: .28
Yeah, the order is questionable - when did she program the autopilot
and when did they destroy the other shuttle?
Actually, the order lends some creedence to the story. If they'd
known what to do, they wouldn't have destroyed either shuttle
until after they had committed the ship to crash, just to protect their
escape. Suppose the creature had sneaked around behind them
and stolen their shuttle? The way they did it (stupidly) reflects the
pressure they were under, and the shoot-from-the-hip way their plan was
developed.
- tom]
|
615.30 | | SSDEVO::OAKEY | Building Yesterday's Tomorrows, Today | Fri May 20 1988 13:01 | 10 |
| >> That's exactly the story I remember, but I didn't want to include the
>> spoiler ending in my description. Anybody have a name or author for it?
Yhea, that was pretty tacky of me... I'm usually good at the formfeed
spoiler warnings but my mind must have been OTL. I've deleted the
reply.
Sorry about that, folks...
Roak
|
615.31 | | 21001::BOYAJIAN | Monsters from the Id | Fri May 20 1988 15:36 | 16 |
| re:.29
I haven't been following this note, since I didn't watch the movie
in question, and since .26 has been deleted, I'm not sure what story
was mentioned in it.
However, assuming that it's the same story that Earl mentioned in
.25 that was adapted for THE OUTER LIMITS, then the story is "Good
Night, Mr. James", written by the recently late Clifford Simak.
It originally appeared in GALAXY, March 1951, and has been reprinted
in two of Simak's collections: ALL THE TRAPS OF EARTH (a.k.a. THE
NIGHT OF THE PUDDLY) and SKIRMISH: THE GREAT SHORT FICTION OF CLIFFORD
D. SIMAK. It also appeared in a few anthologies. Incidentally, the
OUTER LIMITS adaptation was titled "The Duplicated Man".
--- jerry
|
615.32 | Chronology to Hollywood means time travel... | SNDCSL::SMITH | William P.N. (WOOKIE::) Smith | Fri May 20 1988 18:27 | 13 |
| The order went something like:
1) While he shot up the control panel of the Xenomorph's shuttle,
she was off programming the autopilot and then locking the course
in.
2) They both went to the weapons locker for some more ineffective
firepower, and when they arrived in the shuttle bay the monster
was there ahead of them. Mush_for_brains then wildly cut loose
with his pulse-cannon, and since he seems incapable of hitting the
creature, took out the one remaining shuttle instead.
Willie
|
615.33 | not dead | TFH::MARSHALL | hunting the snark | Wed Aug 10 1988 17:10 | 9 |
| Yes, this really is a series, NBC has announced the premiere dates
for its fall season, and _Something..._ is in there.
/
( ___
) ///
/
|
615.34 | Another one bites the dust... | MTWAIN::KLAES | Saturn by 1970 | Tue Oct 25 1988 15:22 | 31 |
| Did anyone see the premiere of SIOT Friday night? If not, don't
worry, you didn't miss a thing. Take away Ta'ra, the attractive
blond extraterrestrial (aren't they all?), and you have a sub-standard
MIAMI VICE clone, not a science ficiton series by any means.
To pick just a few nits, as the series deserves little attention
otherwise: I was amused at how Ta'ra and her human male cop partner
left the laser pistol and bullet/laser-proof suit just laying together
on a table in the warehouse they use for making such devices (to end
up being stolen by the villain in the process), then Ta'ra coming back
later and desperately trying to find them. Her partner asks if she
misplaced it, and Ta'ra answers "Do you think I'd be so careless with
such a weapon?!" Which is why she left it in the open in the first
place...
The other amusing thing is, once the villain (Oh, how they tried
to make him like the Terminator) is wearing the suit, which does
not cover his head, no one thinks to shoot him in his one most
vulnerable area, even after repeated attempts to shoot through his
suit!
One article written up on SIOT by TV GUIDE made me really laugh:
You see, Ta'ra's race "does it" (wink, wink, nudge, nudge) exclusively
with their hands (I presume they use the old fashioned method for
making little ones?), and the magazine commented that Ta'ra and
her male partner will no doubt have their hands full. :^)
Someday the networks will make an intelligent SF series again...
Larry
|
615.35 | Dream on... | MTAIRY::KIER | Mike DTN 432-7715 @CYO | Wed Oct 26 1988 13:05 | 4 |
|
> Someday the networks will make an intelligent SF series again...
Uh oh, now you've crossed over into Fantasy :-)
|
615.36 | SIOT Cancelled (I think) | DELNI::ROSENBERG | Every day's a new day... | Thu Dec 29 1988 18:27 | 4 |
| I believe that SIOT has been cancelled.
See...the marketplace does work!
|