T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
526.1 | We can dream, can't we? | PROSE::WAJENBERG | Tis the voice of the lobster. | Wed Sep 23 1987 10:51 | 17 |
| You're probably right about it's never seeing the light of day (or
dark of the the theater), but wouldn't it be great if it did? Not
only is it an SF classic, it has several interesting an appealing
characters. I mean, of course, the robots. Powell and Donovan
are nothing much in the way of characters. Susan Calvin, of course,
is quite good.
I wonder what they would do for special effects? You'd want occasional
outer-space backdrops and futuristic cities, but the main things
would be futuristic interiors and the robots. I've never seen a
knight-in-armor-style robot costume that looked convincing, with
the possible exception of C-3P0, so I'd hope they'd do something
more elegant, like actors in, say, uniforms or wet-suit coveralls
with metal or plastic masks. Best of all would be an assortment
of R2-D2ish critters.
Earl Wajenberg
|
526.2 | | VAXRT::CANNOY | The seasons change and so do I. | Wed Sep 23 1987 11:12 | 11 |
| Is this the version of the script that starts out at Susan Calvin's
funeral?
Back in, oh, '77 or '78, I was at a very small con and was able to
watch Ellison writing the script (literally over his shoulder). I
even have a numbered copy of the first 30 pages of it. It's packed away
now, but as I remember, it's *good*. Even then, he didn't have much
hope of it being made into a movie, but, well, he *was* getting paid
for it ;-) and so was doing his usually good job.
Tamzen
|
526.3 | RE: .2 | NUTMEG::BALS | Even the monkey needs a raincoat | Wed Sep 23 1987 12:47 | 3 |
| Yes. And yes, it's *good.*
Fred
|
526.4 | a script is available | TSG::MAYNARD | Rich Maynard 296-6751 | Fri Sep 25 1987 14:00 | 7 |
| The newest SCRIPT CITY catalog Ive received has an I,Robot script
advertized. It is marked as unreleased 1985. Ive ordered a copy
and let you know what it's like when I get it. SCRIPT CITY advertizes
in most issues of STARLOG.
Rich
|
526.5 | | NUTMEG::BALS | Even the monkey needs a raincoat | Fri Sep 25 1987 14:25 | 18 |
| It'll be interesting to find whether this is Ellison's script or
done by someone else. If it *is* Ellison's, it may also be
being sold without his or the studio's permission. In any case,
the script is also available in Asimov's, as I said, and that one
is with Ellison's permission.
This isn't a shot at SCRIPT CITY, since I know nothing about them,
nor for that matter of any of the other businesses that sell scripts.
But I have heard from various people - including authors - that there
is a black market for illegally-obtained scripts, and that the practice
should be frowned upon by the consumer. It is after all, either
the author's or studio's property. So, caveat emptor, and all
that ... Again, that isn't meant to be a reflection upon SCRIPT
CITY. The fact that they do advertise in STARLOG probably means
that they're okay, as STARLOG is pretty good about keeping ripoff
artists and the like from advertising in the magazine.
Fred
|
526.6 | it is Ellisons script | TSG::MAYNARD | Rich Maynard 296-6751 | Fri Oct 30 1987 22:24 | 25 |
| Just received my script from SCRIPT CITY. To answer your question
Fred it is the Harlan Ellison version dated July 27,1978. I've
compared it to the first section in the November issue of IAsf and
they match. To answer the earlier concern about boot-leg scripts,
I've had three dealings with SCRIPT CITY in the last two years and
they seem to be on the level. The scripts are Xeroxed, but I'm willing
to bet they are legal since they've been in buisiness at least since
1985. I haven't had a chance to read through yet, but it is thicker
than most scripts; indicating that this could have been a long movie,
if filmed as is. (disclaimer: I am not associated with SCRIPT CITY
in any way other than being a customer)
One interesting point I'd like to make about scripts here. Scripts
frequently give a different perspective of a movie, since they are
written with all the scenes included. It's also interesting to
see how a movie evolves from script to screen. For instance if
any of you have seen the script of _Raider of the Lost Ark_ you
would notice that the scrips ending is quite different from the
movie and also includes elements that were placd in the second
movie _Temple of Doom_. At any rate it will be interesting to see
if the script matches the version released to IAsf.
Rich
|
526.7 | I Robot... | NRADM::WILBUR | | Mon Jun 06 1988 17:09 | 10 |
|
I thought I read that "I Robot" the Movie was cancelled?
True? False?
and if so... Maybe it should have been a TV series.
All those short stories could have made a season.
|
526.8 | | FENNEL::BALS | Nice girls don't explode | Tue Jun 07 1988 09:59 | 11 |
| RE: .7
Maybe you should go back and re-read my original note .0. What we're
talking about is Harlan Ellison's *unproduced* movie script for
"I, Robot." It was never "cancelled," since it never got to the
production stage. And at present, there's no plans to produce it.
I doubt it would have made an acceptable TV series, given the way
television usually treats science fiction.
Fred
|
526.9 | art of titles | TFH::MARSHALL | hunting the snark | Tue Jun 07 1988 10:31 | 16 |
| re .8:
> Maybe you should go back and re-read my original note .0. What we're
> talking about is Harlan Ellison's *unproduced* movie script for
> "I, Robot."
Maybe you should then title this note appropriately in order to
avoid further confusion. Maybe: "Harlan Ellison's Screenplay of
_I_Robot_
/
( ___
) ///
/
P.S. MOD NOTE/TITLE="string"
|
526.10 | | FENNEL::BALS | Nice girls don't explode | Tue Jun 07 1988 15:41 | 7 |
| RE .9:
Maybe I should, but I'm not. I think re-titling can be carried to
ridiculous extremes. You're of course free to solicit the moderators
to change it if you disagree.
Fred
|
526.11 | The sad story... | ISWSW::VILAINMI | the Cooking Lady is in... | Tue Jun 07 1988 19:48 | 24 |
| I recall at the 1978 World SF conventions in Pheonix (aka IGUANACON),
where Ellison read a bunch from the script, he also entreated the
audience (over 1000 people) to write Mr. Frank Wells of Warner Brothers
and suggest that the movie be made and that it be done the way it
was written (rather Machiavellian, I'd say).
A couple years later, Ellison was asked on a panel at Westercon
in Portland, what happened. He said that his idea to appeal to
fans was one of the worst things he could have done (besides accusing
Wells of having the intelligence of an artichoke). It seems fans
_did_ write and make these "suggestions" in typical faanish zeal.
Phrase like "Do it or we'll trash your life", "Hey garbage pail,
you should do this movie or we'll get Darth Vader to convince you..."
did not convince Wells any further that the project was viable.
Wells doesn't work for Warner Brothers any more. I don't know who
owns the rights to that script, weither it's still WB property or
comes back to Harlan. It would still be very expensive to produce
but based on what Harlan read, it would be worth it!
Please post the address of this place so I can try and get a copy
of the script.
/MeV/
|
526.12 | Definately worthwhile! | SNDCSL::SMITH | William P.N. (WOOKIE::) Smith | Wed Jun 08 1988 13:30 | 6 |
| > Please post the address of this place so I can try and get a copy
> of the script.
Look around for the November issue of IASFM, or read .0
Willie
|