T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
519.1 | Opinions | NUTMEG::BALS | Even the monkey needs a raincoat | Mon Aug 24 1987 09:47 | 24 |
| Read the book a couple of weeks back. It's not great Niven and
Pournelle, or even great Niven and Barnes (or even great Niven,
or Pournelle, or Barnes :-)), but I thought it a good, quick
entertaining read. A good book to pick up when its released in pb,
I think, but nothing I'd recommend getting in hardcover unless you're
a N/P/B freak with disposable income.
Plot-wise (no spoilers here), the book deals with a colony that
itself has to deal with an alien "monster." The theme deliberately,
and rather heavy-handedly I felt, parallels the "Beowulf" saga. There's
an interesting little plot-twist that you know is coming - as the
original monster is disposed of early in the book - but is still
a little surprising when you finally learn about it, especially
as the alien creature's uh, "habits" are apparently based on a real
Earth creature.
It's kinda like a literate "Aliens," if you can imagine such a
thing :-), with lots of side-commentary on the necessity of warriors
in human society (probably the Pournelle influence) and the sexuality
of colonies (probably the Barnes influence). For trivia buffs, there's
a continuing in-joke reference to Heinlein's "Tunnel in the Sky."
(probably the Niven influence).
Fred
|
519.2 | Thats Legacy of Heorot (I think) | MARX::TASCHEREAU | Whatever it takes | Tue Aug 25 1987 13:48 | 14 |
| Read this last week and have to agree with -.1. Its not classic
SF material but it is entertaining with just enough suspense(?)
to keep the reader's interest. The parallels to Beowulf are more
than obvious (the alien monsters are nicknamed grendels; obvious
enough?). The only things that I didn't really like about the book
were: 1) The way the format of the story changed; from monster and
human perspectives to a strictly human one, and 2) there were a
couple of loose ends that really weren't resolved, though not major
ones.
Anyway, the hardcover was an SFBC selection of the month a couple
of order forms back. I think it was about $5.95 (not bad).
-Steve
|
519.3 | Yup, Heorot | IND::BOWERS | Count Zero Interrupt | Tue Sep 01 1987 11:25 | 6 |
|
I'll add one more qualified positive - a good read, but not
particularly profound. I did think that the various
hibernation-related disabilities were an interesting idea. In most
early-colonization novels, whatever else may befall, the hibernation
mechanism either works perfectly or kills people outright.
|
519.4 | with bloodshot eyes | LOWLIF::SDAVIS | scott davis | Wed Dec 30 1987 16:07 | 6 |
| this is a late entry, but i just came on to the digital team.
i couldn't put the book down. i will admit that it won't bring
world peace or anything like that, but i thought it was written
extremely well.
scott
|
519.5 | Good Beach Book | MORGAN::SCOLARO | A keyboard, how quaint | Mon Aug 08 1988 12:47 | 9 |
| It is now out in pb.
I bought it on sat and am now about 1/3 done.
I think I have to agree with most previous responses. Not having read
Crichton's new book, but having listened to the discussion, I think
Legacy of Herot may make a better "beach book".
Tony
|
519.6 | Good Book, Period. | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | | Mon Aug 08 1988 17:05 | 11 |
| Another postive vote for Legacy of Heorot (see, not everything I've
read was "disappointing"). The "bad guys" even merit some sympathy;
they're just doing what they were "designed" ("selected" if you
prefer) for. Once into this, I couldn't put it down.
Still, one wonders how the writing chores were parceled out amongst
the three authors ("Uh, you come up with ideas, I'll write the first
draft, and he can wordsmith it"?).
len.
|
519.7 | | SKITZD::MESSENGER | An Index of Metals | Mon Aug 08 1988 17:23 | 5 |
| Another positive vote: I read it this weekend, and I liked it quite a bit.
I think the alien biology was good (I mean, the parts they didn't
steal from an African frog).
- HBM
|
519.8 | Quite good | HANZI::SIMONSZETO | Simon Szeto @HGO, Hongkong | Sat Aug 27 1988 06:57 | 3 |
| A lot better than _Sphere_, the other book I read on the plane between
NH and HK.
|
519.9 | Good work, destroy the eco-system | COFLUB::WRIGHT | The Audio Hammer | Mon Sep 12 1988 18:15 | 13 |
|
Well I am only a few weeks behind...
In general I liked it. My only problem was with them destroying
part of the eco-system, how are they going to handle that with the
sequel (which they left themselves open for).
And what is the grendels natural enemy? Or is it the top of the
food chain??
grins,
clark.
|
519.10 | Mommy got lost.... | SCOMAN::MULLAN | A one Trek mind... | Tue Sep 13 1988 09:06 | 10 |
|
My understading was that they weren't natural to that part of Herot.
The settlers thought that the mother came from the continent across
the sea. The last two questions you asked were presented by the
settlers, along with the worry of - If we had this much problem
with one, what are we going to do if we find more?
-mishel
|
519.11 | Some Notes on the Grendels | FORTSC::MESSENGER | Dreamer Fithp | Tue Sep 13 1988 14:16 | 25 |
| More information about the Grendels follows [potential spoilers]
The Grendels _themselves_ are a closed ecosystem. Adult Grendels eat
Samlon (proto-Grendels) if they can't find anything else. Therefore,
they hold their own population in check. This also explains why there
are no other native animals where you find Grendels.
The trick, of course, was not to kill them all. And when the Grendel
population exploded, some of them did survive afterward, so the
ecosystem restabilized itself.
The Grendels also are semi-intelligent (a little brighter than a
dog, maybe). But smart enough to understand what an adult Kzin told
his son in _The Ringworld Engineers_:
Cub: 'Is it good to eat?' [refering to Louis Wu]
Adult: 'No.'
Louis (thinking): 'You tell him, Daddy. It's safer to eat white
arsenic than human meat.'
The Grendels aren't likely to go after humans again.
Larry Niven seems to have a penchant for ugly biological systems:
witness the way Puppeteers reproduce...
- HBM
|
519.12 | | MINAR::BISHOP | | Tue Sep 13 1988 15:05 | 1 |
| Ok, I'll bite: how do Puppeteers reproduce?
|
519.13 | The Pupeteer Scoop! | MEMIT1::SCOLARO | A keyboard, how quaint | Tue Sep 13 1988 16:03 | 13 |
| Pupeteers have "3 sexes".
One is male, one is female the third can best be described as a host.
The male implants sperm, the female implants an egg in the host.
The hosts reproduce among themselves.
Niven was not specific about how the pupeteers young grow in the host, I
assume they didn't eat it! (pupeteers are vegetarians!), so some
symbosis is reasonable.
Tony
|
519.14 | How does this connect to Niven's penchant for ugly biology? | ATSE::WAJENBERG | Make each day a bit surreal. | Wed Sep 14 1988 12:10 | 5 |
| Re .11 & .13
That doesn't seem so terrible.
ESW
|
519.15 | | SPMFG1::CHARBONND | Mos Eisley, it ain't | Wed Sep 14 1988 16:32 | 4 |
| It would seem terrible if you were the third (host) sex puppetteer
:-)
re. 11 thanx for reminding me of my favorite SF scene ;-)
|