T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
426.1 | Asking the wrong questions | ANT::JANZEN | Tom LMO2/O23 296-5421 | Mon Jan 05 1987 08:37 | 4 |
| Jealousy is not an aspect of the partner being attracted to others; it is
an aspect of the personality of the jealous. Therefore, a love potion would
not affect it.
Tom
|
426.2 | Divorce Pills | PROSE::WAJENBERG | | Mon Jan 05 1987 11:56 | 25 |
| Well, it might alieviate the jealousy by giving the potentially
jealous partner the firm knowledge that the spouse CAN'T wander.
This monogamy pill sounds a lot like the good ol' love potion of
fantasy, at least in some of its versions, like the one in "Midsummer
Night's Dream." That one could be used more than once (as Puck
did to the human characters) or simply cancelled (as Oberon did
to Titania). A reusable or erasable "monogamy" pill might therefore
not result in permanent monogamy. There could be a corresponding
"divorce pill" that would erase the imprinting. I can see the TV
ad now:
"O God, she left me! I'm so miserable without her!"
"Try Foreign Legion (tm), the deprinting pill guaranteed to
make you forget that callous lover."
Slipping these pills into people's drinks would be a new kind of
crime, though I suppose it has some precedent in things like slipping
people LSD.
If the monogamy pill is NOT erasable, the whole situation becomes
much more serious and I would be inclined to ban them.
Earl Wajenberg
|
426.3 | Yech! | YODA::BARANSKI | Laugh when you feel like Crying! | Tue Jan 06 1987 15:07 | 4 |
| Somehow, at the present point of time, the idea of .0 strikes me as horribly
grotesque/disgesting/dehumanizing/*....
Jim.
|
426.4 | Marital Moksha (tm) | CGHUB::CONNELLY | Eye Dr3 - Regnad Kcin | Wed Jan 07 1987 22:24 | 6 |
| re: .3
>Somehow, at the present point of time, the idea of .0 strikes me as horribly
>grotesque/disgesting/dehumanizing/*....
...in short, worthy of Aldous Huxley's "Brave New World", right? ;-)
|
426.5 | Other potentials | VACCIN::ROUTLEY | | Thu Jan 08 1987 18:17 | 16 |
| from .0:
>So, as Theodore Sturgeon would say, ask the next question! If we now
>have drugs to control the (ahem) side-effects of sex, what about ones
>that control sexual desire itself? Enhance it? Suppress it?
>Redirect it?
...
>That's one possibility. Others? Ramifications?
I read a story somewhere ( I think I have in _the_Omnibus_of_Science_Fiction, or
something like that) where a big-league scientist came up with a substance. He
had intended to create a regular sexual cylce in women to prevent their use of
"sexual attractiveness" to control men. However, it backfired, producing a
regular sex cycle in _men_.
I'll see if I can find the title. Guesses, anyone?
kevin
|
426.6 | | RDGENG::LESLIE | Call me `{o}^{o}' | Sat Jan 10 1987 01:03 | 1 |
| Nit-picking, the pill is hormonal, not a drug as such.
|
426.7 | | INK::KALLIS | Support Hallowe'en | Tue Jan 13 1987 13:48 | 10 |
| Re .5:
It was Theodore Sturgeon's story: I read it as "Never Underestimate
..." which was a takeoff on the old _Ladies' Home Journal_ cartoon_ad-
vertisement, which had as its theme "Never underestimate the power
of a woman." Supposedly, he included his chemical secretly in a
thermonuclear test in the Pacific, which neatly dates the story.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
426.8 | Worse living through lawyers | LDP::GAY | | Tue Feb 03 1987 17:43 | 30 |
| Sometimes the real world is as interesting as fiction.
Reliable contraception gave women control over having children.
This caused all sorts of pressure for having casual sex, without
a corresponding info blitz on how to use contraception (so
birth control causes more births!!! particularly among teens who
are too embarassed to deal with the subject till too late).
It also caused an epidemic of VD and now is helping spread AIDS.
In the mean time, most of the major contraceptive methods turn out
to be less than perfect, and in this era of a lawer on each hip,
the drug companies (hormone companies?) start to drop the pill,
the IUD, spermacidal creams, ...
Research money for contraceptives is drying up in the U.S. No new
contraceptive methods are being produced in the U.S. (full steam
ahead in Europe tho - different legal procedures I guess).
In short, back to diaphragms and condoms (both of which are so
clumsy that they don't get used as much as they could).
So, it looks like the era of casual sex is soon to be over.
BUT WAIT. To combat the rise in teen pregnancy, high schools are
starting to provide contraceptives and/or info. Soon there will
be a whole new generation starting the cycle over. Well, I guess
I'll grab a book while I am waiting.
A detoxified SF junkie (but hand me a book and I'll fall off the wagon)
Erg
|
426.9 | low tech | ARMORY::CHARBONND | Shakin' the bush, boss | Fri Feb 06 1987 11:14 | 5 |
| >(CONTRACEPTION) is helping spread AIDS.
True, but the BIG culprit is K-Y jelly. :-)
---
2
|
426.10 | Institutional Aphrodisia | NY1MM::BOWERS | Dave Bowers | Mon Feb 09 1987 15:38 | 13 |
| The question of drugs to trigger or enhance sexual desire brought
back a memory of a really old SF story (I read it at least 25 years
ago).
The story was set in the context of a prolonged WW III where
inter-service rivalries were threatening to upset the entire war
effort. The remedy inter-service sex (the term used, I recall was
"dighting" or the verb "to dight", author's attemt to come up with
a non-Anglo-Saxan transitive verb). The members of the various
military services disliked each other so strongly that drugs were
required to permit them to "dight" successfully.
Anyone remember the story or the author?
|
426.11 | How Redightful! | ERASER::KALLIS | Hallowe'en should be legal holiday | Mon Feb 23 1987 11:12 | 9 |
| Re .10:
"Dight," FYI, is an old English word, popular in the Middle Ages,
for copulation. If the author's rationale was _not_ to find an
Anglo-Saxon word for the act, he or she received a self-inflicted
shot in the foot.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
426.12 | That's dightful! | BMT::BOWERS | Dave Bowers | Tue Mar 03 1987 17:19 | 5 |
| Re .10;
Thnks for the FYI, Steve. The author's rationale was mainly to
find a transitive verb that wouldn't immediately trigger the censor's
blue pencil.
|
426.13 | Trivia... | DROID::DAUGHAN | Redundant,a. See Redundant. | Tue Mar 03 1987 22:53 | 4 |
| Did you know Censor Blue is a new Crayola crayon? It came out
right after Urine Yellow.
The Iceman
|
426.14 | possible reference | SWORD::SHARP | Don Sharp, Digital Telecommunications | Fri Mar 13 1987 14:55 | 7 |
| I remember the story pretty well, considering I haven't read it in years. it
was told in the form of a psychiatric interview between a non-com who had an
assignation scheduled and a robot psychiatrist which was only
semi-functional. I beleive it was in Galaxy #5 or therabouts, and I think
the author was Theodore Sturgeon.
Don.
|
426.15 | I'll look... | IRT::BOWERS | Dave Bowers | Fri Mar 13 1987 16:34 | 3 |
| Thanks for the reference. I may even have a copy of Galaxy #5 around.
I'll take a look. Sturgeon is certainly a plausible possibility
for the author.
|