T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
263.1 | | TROLL::RUDMAN | | Wed Sep 11 1985 10:54 | 9 |
| Welcome to A & E!!
If history repeats itself, you'll get to see British versions of Holmes
(The hound, The carbuncle, etc.) AND a well done (I thought) "Day of the
Triffids". Not at all like the american DotT (seawater indeed!).
Read your listings carefully, they're easy to miss.
Don
|
263.2 | | AKOV68::BOYAJIAN | | Thu Sep 12 1985 02:06 | 7 |
| American DAY OF THE TRIFFIDS???
What American DAY OF THE TRIFFIDS???
--- jerry
(It was British.)
|
263.3 | | TROLL::RUDMAN | | Thu Sep 12 1985 17:57 | 5 |
| Excuse me. It was so bad I didn't wait for the credits. I blotted
everything out except seawater running down the steps. It must have
been a Hammer film....
Don
|
263.4 | | AKOV68::BOYAJIAN | | Sat Sep 14 1985 05:26 | 7 |
| Actually, no, it wasn't.
Certainly, sea water is not a particularly inspirational weapon, but then,
one assumes that it's the salt in the seawater that destroyed the triffids.
Not *completely* off the wall.
--- jerry
|
263.5 | | TROLL::RUDMAN | | Mon Sep 16 1985 13:49 | 14 |
| Howard Keel threw me off.
My info says Security Films, distributed by Allied Artists, 1963.
Close enough for Rock 'n' Roll.
Some did like it, so it is again a matter of taste. Just for glee, it might
be nice to hear a few reviews from people who see the A & E version. (The
Triffids looked so good I'd like a couple for my yard. What a watchdog!
Watchplant?)
Haven't seen the Invisible Man yet, but I will.
Don
|
263.6 | | BEING::POSTPISCHIL | | Mon Sep 16 1985 14:02 | 6 |
| Re .5:
> Haven't seen the Invisible Man yet, but I will.
-- edp
|
263.7 | | TROLL::RUDMAN | | Fri Sep 20 1985 12:26 | 14 |
| re .6"
I saw 'im! I saw 'im!
(Name's Griffin, an intense, standoff-ish chap.)
Too bad I missed the first installment. The special effects were kept to a
minimum and, I thought, done quite well. The show gives you a feel of the
period and how people react; folks are much more skeptical nowadays. I don't,
however, think it captured the flavour of how the book was written. (Not sure
how it could have, so it didn't detract from my enjoyment.) I won't miss part
III.
Don
|