T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
78.1 | | HARRY::OSBORNE | | Tue May 29 1984 13:25 | 22 |
| I'd like a discussion of John Varley, and this seems a good place to put it,
if no-one objects. Personally, I think he's an extrodinary writer, with a
fine talent for close examination of the human aspects of a specific tech-
nical subject. (e.g., "The Pusher", which I think won a Hugo, examines a
particular aspect of "time dialation from lightspeed travel" with a lot
more sensativity than I have read before.) On the other hand, he can write
startlingly coarse or nausiating descriptions with a sense of reality that
I find really gut-wrenching. (In fact, "Air Raid" was the first Varley I
read, and I didn't like it, nor the expanded version, "Millenium").
Many people seem to hate his stuff. I can see some reasons, but for pure
imagination he seems one of the best. I suspect many will disagree with
this.
Many more have never heard of him. This is interesting, because he's won
two Hugo's and a Nebula, and he hasn't been around very long.
Anyway, I'm looking forward to "Demon", also. Titan and its inhabitants
are really fun, and Varley has set up an "anything goes" locale for the
series...
John O.
|
78.2 | | VIKING::MCCARTHY_1 | | Tue May 29 1984 13:31 | 3 |
| I agree, I like his stuff too. I thouroughly enjoyed Millenium (I think
the off-beat humor added to it), and I await a paper back version of
"Demon" (I haven't found one yet. If anyone else has, let me know).
|
78.3 | | ALGOL::PARODI | | Tue May 29 1984 15:23 | 6 |
|
I think Varley is one of the best to come along in quite awhile. "Titan"
and "Wizard" were both very good -- I look forward to "Demon." But you
really should see his short stuff for an example of pyrotechnic imagination.
"The Persistence of Vision" and "The Barbie Murders" are both very good
anthologies of his short stories.
|
78.4 | | ROYAL::RAVAN | | Tue May 29 1984 17:50 | 5 |
| Re .2: The edition I saw was paperbound, but in the larger size; sells
for 6.95. It was at the Paperback Booksmith, or whatever that is,
up at the Mall of New Hampshire.
-b
|
78.5 | | AKOV68::BOYAJIAN | | Wed May 30 1984 00:47 | 9 |
| I also understand that there is a small print run of hardcover copies
of DEMON for libraries.
I am a bit of a Varley fanatic. I haven't read the Gaea series yet (I hate
reading trilogies a piece at a time), but I've liked almost everything else
I've read by him. I think he works better in the short story format than
the novel.
--- jerry
|
78.6 | | MANANA::DICKSON | | Tue Jun 12 1984 09:59 | 7 |
| The Paperback Booksmith has nothing by Varley other than Titan and
Wizard. Argh. I have just discovered this stuff, and want to
read lots more. The inhabitants and structure of Gaea are the
most sweeping creative effort I have ever come across - better
than Ringworld by far. And his characters have a lot of depth.
He really makes you care about them. (Just finished Wizard last
night at 1:30 am)
|
78.7 | | RAVEN1::HOLLABAUGH | | Tue Jun 12 1984 12:16 | 6 |
| Well, Paul if you come through Greenville, The Open Book in Loehmann's
Plaza has Demon in Trade paperback.
tee hee
in a helpful mood today,
tlh
|
78.8 | | HARRY::OSBORNE | | Wed Jun 20 1984 14:02 | 21 |
| I bought and finished "Demon" in three long nights of reading. It's a BIG
story! Yes, it pretty well concludes the trilogy, although there are certainly
openings for further stories. I can't say much about it without a lot of
**** spoiler **** warnings, so I won't.
Just this: it's as grand in sweep and scale, and as sensitive in its human
scale, as "Titan" and "Wizard" are. Maybe more so- it's been a while since
I finished "Wizard". Some 400+ pages of little type on big pages and every
word is a new bit of magic. Well, almost. Slam-bang ending, too. Varley's
recent exposure to the movie biz shows heavily, but he doesn't take it
seriously. One of the Sam Goldwyn quotes in the book describes the book
in pretty good metaphor:
"We want a story that starts with an earthquake
and then works up to a climax."
To which Varley might have simply said,
"Oh, I can do better than that...".
John O.
|
78.9 | | GUIDO::RAVAN | | Thu Aug 08 1985 10:33 | 32 |
| I just started reading "Millenium", and was immediately caught up in
it. Varley has a marvelous talent for talking about the weirdest
things in such a way as to make them comprehensible without actually
explaining anything. Well, not explaining MUCH. Part of the fun of
"Millenium" is that the first couple of chapters are blatant parallels
between the 20th-century rum-soaked air-accident investigator and the
45th-century "snatch team" leader, right down to the casual remarks
about the Mr. Coffee vs. the revitalizer.
(I will confess, too, that I enjoyed the twist that the story puts on
major catastrophes - and before you thing I'm getting even more ghoulish
than usual, read the book! No wonder they never found the wreckage of
the "Titanic"...)
There are plenty of holes in the story - anything dealing with time travel
tends to be that way. Varley has done a great job of rationalizing many of
the larger questions, and the rest are hand-waved very well; at least, I
found myself simply enjoying things and not worrying about how possible
it all was. (This might be a great candidate for the SF vs. F debate, too;
it's ostensibly SF, because of all the technical jargon from the futuristic
people, but if you look closely you'll find that most of their best stuff
is explained away as "Well, we don't know where it came from; some long-
lost civilization left it here millenia ago," which smacks of fantasy to
me. But it feels like SF, and that's what I'd call it.)
You Varley fans have probably read this long since, as it's been out since
'83, but those of you who haven't discovered him yet may want to take a
look. It's a fascinating time-travel story, combined with some good old
drama, and I'm enjoying it thoroughly.
-b
|
78.10 | | MTV::FOLEY | | Tue Aug 13 1985 20:41 | 6 |
|
As an aside... The wreckage of the Titanic is known and has been
dived on.. It's in about 385 feet of VERY cold water gently resting
on its port side if I remember correctly...
mike
|
78.11 | | SIVA::FEHSKENS | | Wed Aug 14 1985 12:27 | 4 |
| I'm another Varley fan. I strongly recommend _The Persistence of Vision_.
I really like Millenium, more so than Wizard, ehich I gave up on, though
I liked Titan. I'm surprised nobody's mentioned _The Ophiuchi Hotline_,
which I like best of all.
|
78.12 | | GUIDO::RAVAN | | Wed Aug 14 1985 13:42 | 21 |
| Re .10:
No, no, no - that's the "Andrea Doria". (Or is that the one resting in
90-odd feet of rather warm water...)
At any rate, as far as I've heard - and "Gory Details" Ravan tries her
best to follow the news about shipwrecks, believe me - there have been lots
of expeditions (well, two or three, anyway) trying to locate the "Titanic",
but with no definitive success. The most recent report I read on the matter
(published, I confess, about two years ago) is that they found a number of
possible sonar/metal-detector/whatever-they-were-using hits, none of which
was sufficiently clear to be positively identified as a ship at all, much
less the "Titanic" - and then they ran out of both money and time and had
to quit. Furthermore, all of the images they found indicated severe
fragmentation, so if they did point to sunken ships the ships involved were
broken up.
[If somebody DID find the "Titanic" and didn't tell ME about it, boy am
I going to be pissed!]
-b
|
78.13 | | AKOV68::BOYAJIAN | | Thu Aug 15 1985 01:39 | 31 |
| re:.10
I have to side with Beth. I don't recall hearing that the TITANIC was
found, and even so, it's a hell of a lot farther down than 300+ feet.
Which, apropos of nothing (at least, not of the subject of this note)
leads me to recommend the book RAISE THE TITANIC! by Clive Cussler.
Cussler is an underwater salvage expert (most of his novels deal with
salvage in one form or another), and the novel provides an interesting
view of the problems such an operation would entail. And it's science
fiction, so it's not even outside the scope of this notesfile!
But back to Varley...
re:.11
I liked THE OPHIUCHI HOTLINE except for the end, which I thought weak.
I also was upset by his giving an explanation for why the Invaders took
over Earth. It was certainly ingenious, but I felt that it was one of
those things that should remain a mystery.
The interesting thing about MILLENIUM --- actually, I blush to confess
that I haven't read the novel, but I have read a few times the short story,
"Air Raid" that it's expanded from --- is that the basic concept of using
a time gate to rescue people from doomed planes, ships, etc. is one that
I had in my head for a number of years, but I couldn't come up with a
story to use it in. Imagine my surprise when I read "Air Raid" by Herb
Boehm (a pseudonym Varley used for the story) in the first issue of ASIMOV'S
SF MAGAZINE and not only saw my idea turned into a story, but a well-done
story at that!
--- jerry
|
78.14 | | MTV::FOLEY | | Fri Aug 16 1985 20:59 | 8 |
|
Sorry about that one guys.. I was caught between two Cussler
novels and mixed up some depths... (embarrassed grin) I'm a
big fan of the Dirk Pitt novels... I'm re-reading Vixen 03 right
now.. (maybe that's where I got sidetracked...)
I stand corrected...
mike
|
78.15 | | AKOV68::BOYAJIAN | | Sat Aug 17 1985 01:48 | 6 |
| re:.-1
Yeah for Mike! Another Dirk Pitt fan. I haven't gotten around to reading
the latest one, DEEP SIX, yet, but I've loved all of Cussler's other novels.
--- jerry
|
78.16 | | MTV::FOLEY | | Mon Aug 19 1985 18:27 | 11 |
|
I read it last month.. Not bad from what I can remember... I'll look
at it again to re-fresh my memory.. :-) (Getting old.. :-) :-))
Do you really think this is sci-fi Jerry? Maybe Technology-Fiction?
Great books though!! I reccomend them!
I wonder who played Dirk in "Raised the Titanic" at the movies? I'll
have to check the video shop and see if they have that one..
mike
|
78.17 | | AKOV68::BOYAJIAN | | Tue Aug 20 1985 02:54 | 22 |
| Well, yes, RAISE THE TITANIC is science fiction. Remember, the reason the
government wanted to raise her was because they thought it contained the
only large amount of the radioactive element they needed to power a force
field device. Besides, it took place in 1989 (the book was published in 1977).
As for who played Pitt in the movie, it was Richard Jordan, who I've seen
only two other times that I can recall: he played the nephew in THE YAKUZA,
and Duncan Idaho in DUNE. The movie has been unmercifully castigated since
it first came out, but when I finally saw it a couple of years ago, I didn't
think it was all that bad. Certainly not the greatest piece of cinematic
achievement, but not dreck, either. And it had one of my favorite movie lines
(quoted not verbatim, unfortunately):
Pitt: "Where is the escort ship going?"
Navy Man: "We received a distress call. They have to help out."
Pitt: "*Distress* call? Here we are in the middle of the ocean, with a major
storm headed this way, and standing on a ship that never learned to
do anything but sink. *That's* distress!
--- jerry
|
78.18 | | AURORA::RAVAN | | Tue Aug 20 1985 09:49 | 14 |
| Maybe Cussler deserves a note of his own - then again, changing subjects
in mid-stream is a time-honored tradition.
I enjoyed "Raise the Titanic," both book and movie. The high point of
the film, of course, was the sequence in which the ship was actually
raised; I just *love* that kind of mighty-machinery stuff, and this
was relatively well done. There's something extremely powerful in the
image of the long-sunken ship wrenching itself off the bottom and
speeding ever faster towards the surface. It's things like that that
make me almost hope they never find the real ship, as it is very unlikely
that, even if it's still intact, it could really be raised in such a
spectacular and successful fashion.
-b
|
78.19 | | NACHO::CONLIFFE | | Tue Aug 20 1985 10:26 | 11 |
| re: Raise the Titanic.
Being raised in the nautical tradition, the touch of the book that I liked
the best was the reception of the Titanic in New York harbour... the salute
from the other ships because of the completion of the maiden voyage (albeit
an interrupted maiden voyage) was one of the few scenes in any book that
brought (cliche) "a lump to my throat".
I guess I'm an incurable romantic in some areas.
Nigel
|
78.20 | | MTV::FOLEY | | Tue Aug 20 1985 18:34 | 9 |
|
Hmmm.... I'm still not sure it's science fiction but I'll go
along with it for the sake of arguement.. :-) Does this mean I
can start a note on Cusslers novels in here? I'll try and we'll
see how far we get.. :-)
Nigel, I never thought of you as the incurable romantic type.. :-)
mike
|
78.21 | Overdrawn at the Memory Bank | CACHE::MARSHALL | | Mon Jun 23 1986 18:25 | 12 |
| back to Varley,
as i think we all know now, the TITANIC has been found and quietly
resting on the bottom of the Atlantic.
I don't think this diminishes the story line of MILLENIUM at all.
all you varley fans, did you know that "overdrawn at the memory
bank" was made into a PBS episode of AMERICAN PLAYHOUSE? It was
on last year on WGBH in Boston, and was pretty faithful to the story,
but the ending was a little different. Personally I liked the story
better, but the dramatization was very good.
sm
|
78.22 | | AKOV68::BOYAJIAN | Did I err? | Wed Jun 25 1986 02:18 | 7 |
| I wouldn't say it was very faithful to the story at all. The
very basic concept was still there, but that's about it. I
enjoyed the PBS "thing" more than most people did, but it was
still a bastardization of the original, which is my favorite
Varley story (well, maybe second favorite).
--- jerry
|
78.23 | Air Raid | ARGUS::COOK | Hackers Anonymous | Mon Sep 22 1986 05:29 | 6 |
|
Was his short story, "Air Raid" ever made into a movie? I read
that the film rights were sold.
PC
|
78.24 | | AKOV68::BOYAJIAN | Forever On Patrol | Mon Sep 22 1986 17:55 | 6 |
| No, it wasn't. Problems of one sort or another kept cropping up.
The novel MILLENIUM was intended to serve as a novelization of
the movie, and when the movie project died, Varley went ahead and
had the book published anyway.
--- jerry
|
78.25 | | NINJA::HEFFEL | Tracey Heffelfinger | Thu Sep 25 1986 14:09 | 12 |
| I heard Varley talk about this at the Atlanta Fantasy Fair
at the end os August this year.
There has been a revival of interest in the movie just recently.
He's not holding his breath but it might make it to the screen yet.
Interestingly ewnough, he said he was contacted to write a script
for "Have Spacesuit, Will Travel" (by Heinlein) for a movie. The
move fell through when the studio head changed but who knows!
tlh
|
78.26 | | AKOV11::BOYAJIAN | It's a dream I have | Thu Jul 07 1988 05:36 | 6 |
| The movie MILLENIUM is on again. It's now (or Real Soon Now) in
production in North Carolina. I heard this from a reliable
source. A friend of mine who does freelance assignments for
STARLOG is supposed to do an article on the MILLENIUM production.
--- jerry
|
78.27 | *Could* be a lot of fun! Any director named? | VAXWRK::INGRAM | Larry Ingram | Fri Jul 08 1988 17:38 | 0 |
78.28 | No, I haven't heard | AKOV11::BOYAJIAN | It's a dream I have | Fri Jul 08 1988 23:50 | 3 |
| re:.27
--- jerry
|
78.29 | Whither Varley? | NORMAL::MEAGHER | My brain is full. | Thu Mar 23 1989 08:36 | 5 |
| Anyone know what's happened to Mr. Varley? Has he gotten lost in Hollywood,
hit by a bus, or what? I'm getting tired of re-reading all of his old
stuff.
b
|
78.30 | | FOOZLE::BALS | No more jello for me, Mom | Thu Mar 23 1989 09:23 | 11 |
| Mr. Varley is alive and well in Eugene, OR. He's been very involved in
the production of MILLENIUM (a project which died in Hollywood and
was reborn with a Canadian production company and should be released
Real Soon Now). Varley reportedly likes to stay focused on one thing
at a time rather than juggling a number of projects at once, which
may explain why we haven't seen anything from him in recent years
except the BLUE CHAMPAGNE collection. He also reportedly was treated
terribly in Hollywood -- not an uncommon experience for a
writer -- and it's taken awhile for him to recover from the experience.
Fred
|
78.31 | You caught _my_ eye | POLAR::LACAILLE | We are the knights who say...NI! | Thu Mar 23 1989 16:57 | 5 |
|
MILLENIUM???? Please more detail.
Charlie
|
78.32 | | FOOZLE::BALS | No more jello for me, Mom | Fri Mar 24 1989 10:12 | 9 |
| Sorry I really don't have much more info than I mentioned in .30,
and what has already been said in this topic from replies .23 on.
I talked to Varley briefly at Nolacon, but our discussion of
the movie didn't go into much more detail than .30. I also know some
people who went over to Varley's house for a Christmas party las
year, and they said they had lots of fun playing with props from the
movie. :-)
Fred
|
78.33 | He's working - that's a relief! | NORMAL::MEAGHER | My brain is full. | Fri Mar 24 1989 11:22 | 13 |
| What puzzled me about Varley's whereabouts was that fact that he had several
years of high productivity (novels, short stories in everyone's "Best
Stories of 19xx" anthologies), but has been "inactive" for quite a while.
I recall reading some notes attached to one of his works which related
that he had been treated poorly by one of his publishers. It occurred to me
that he might have become so upset that he quit writing completely. That, to
me and probably a few other of his faithful fans, would be a tragedy.
Fred, thanks for confirming that he's at least still alive and working on
something. I look forward to the film version of "Millenium".
bob
|
78.34 | More on MILLENIUM | FOOZLE::BALS | No more jello for me, Mom | Mon Mar 27 1989 09:48 | 10 |
| As usually happens, when I say I don't have more info, more info
comes a-callin' the next day. This is from LOCUS (March 1989) ...
"Probably the most awaited picture of the season by real science fiction
buffs is MILLENIUM, starring Kris Kristofferson, Cheryl Ladd, and
Daniel J. Travanti (the "Captain" in TV's "Hill Street Blues").
John Varley adapted from his own book, while Michael Anderson ("Logan's
Run," "Around the World in 80 Days") directs. A possible heavy hitter."
Fred
|
78.35 | 2 out 3 ain't bad | SQM::MCCAFFERTY | | Tue Mar 28 1989 14:38 | 9 |
|
Questionable cast? Okay I think Travanti was good in Hillstreet and
he had good review for some other work but...
Kris Kristopherson - lousy singer , lousy actor
Cheryl Ladd - Charlie's Angels , need I say more.
- John
|
78.36 | Who plays 'you know who'? | ARTMIS::GOREI | | Wed Mar 29 1989 03:47 | 5 |
|
Kris Kristopherson will probably play the robot, so he should be
OK!
Ian G.
|
78.37 | | DWOVAX::YOUNG | Sharing is what Digital does best. | Thu Mar 30 1989 13:03 | 5 |
| Re .36:
Sorry, but I have seen some stills from the movie and it looks like
Kristopherson is playing the lead. Which, considering what I think
of the book, is about right.
|
78.38 | MILLENIUM opens Friday, August 25th | ELRIC::MARSHALL | hunting the snark | Tue Aug 15 1989 10:55 | 10 |
|
Saw (actually heard) an ad for Millenium on TV last night. All I heard
was a list of plane crashes, "... - no survivors." Opens Friday at a
theater near you.
/
( ___
) ///
/
|
78.39 | smashing | USMRM7::SPOPKES | | Tue Aug 15 1989 13:10 | 2 |
| I saw the preview for it the other night. It looks very exciting.
I don't know how it's going to play, though.
|
78.40 | Gone and Forgotten? | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | | Tue Oct 10 1989 12:54 | 5 |
| Did anybody actually see Millenium before it crashed? The reviews
were pretty abysmal.
len.
|
78.41 | Where's he hiding? | DOOLIN::HNELSON | | Mon Apr 30 1990 18:18 | 19 |
| I saw it and you didn't miss anything, Len. The book was probably TOO
faithful to the movie; the story's jumping from this time period to
that one to this one in between to... was probably much too confusing
for anyone who hadn't read the book. For example, Cheryl Ladd, the
woman from the future, smokes continuously because she's evolved to a
highly polluted envirnoment and can't breathe our air. There was no
explanation of this in the movie, so far as I can recall, just tons of
smoking.
Cheryl Ladd was fine, as was the Hill Street guy, but Kristopherson was
bad enough to kill the move. The view of the distant future was well done,
although not as horrible as in Varley's book. I liked the robot; he was
MUCH more human than Kris. The movie couldn't deliver the metaphysical
punchline in the book, though.
My REAL question is: Is there more Varley coming? I'm tired of finding
the V's and discovering nothing new.
- Hoyt
|
78.42 | Mixed (personal) review | NYDS01::MENDES | AI is better than no I at all | Thu Jun 28 1990 21:34 | 20 |
| A bit late to reply, but...
We rented the video. My wife and I are both SF fans, my 16 year old
daughter isn't. I had read the book.
The movie stuck pretty closely to the book in many ways, but left out
some key pieces, notably the message sent by the Cheryl Ladd character
to herself, and the final twist in the book where "all is revealed".
My daughter enjoyed some of it, but likes to kid me about stories of
the future where "blue paraplegics" are in charge of things, and people
have plastic faces. If I could find the book, maybe she'd understand
what was weak in the movie.
The ending was just too Hollywood. The time storm is ripping the place
to shreds, there are lots of sparks, and the aircraft passengers walk
into the time gate, or whatever it is called, like a bunch of zombies.
It really just dribbled off at the end.
- Richard
|
78.43 | any 1 read "Steel Beach"? | CGOOA::SEEMAN | | Tue Sep 28 1993 16:34 | 1 |
|
|
78.44 | yep - Good book. Who was Hildy Johnson, anyway??? | QUARRY::petert | rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty | Tue Sep 28 1993 17:05 | 18 |
| I finished it fairly recently. I think we discussed this in another
note, but right now I can't think of which one. My early impression
was that it was a good read, but it didn't seem to be going anyplace.
But soon after that it got to the can't put down stage and my overall
impression is to recommend it highly. It at first seemed to be
a series of interesting vignettes, but lacking in cohesion. Eventually
it did get tied together and I really enjoyed it. Perhaps it is my
style of reading these days (sneaking what time I can between work/kids/chores)
that colored my early impressions. If something doesn't appeal to me
quickly, I may not finish it. As an example, I've currently put aside
C.J. Cherryh's Downbelow Station (which I have in paperback) in favor of
David Brin's "Glory Season" (which was due last weekend at the library!).
I suspect I will pickup Downbelow again, but I've read a lot of Brin,
and little of Cherryh, and while I can see and appreciate the craft
of her writing, things are a little too dark and terse for that
must finish feeling.
PeterT
|
78.45 | Just Started | AIMT::PETERS | Be nice or be dog food | Tue Sep 28 1993 17:10 | 33 |
| I just started to read "Steel Beach".
The premise:
It is 200 years this humans lost the planet earth to aliens
protecting the dolphins and the whales. The humans on earth were
killed unless they left the planet and went to the moon.
The moon has reached a sophisticated cyberpunk society. Pure
humans do not exist. Every human has been modified to a varying
degree. Death by age or injury is unknown. Death by suicide is
the only form of death. Our hero is 100 years old and a reporter.
His boss wants him to write a column reporting the differences
between how things are now and how they used to be. He is assigned
a 17 year old assistent who only knows now and a 200+ year old
fighter/ex-reporter whow was born and raised on earth. They start
writing articles about how things were on earth 200 years ago compared
to now.
Little side notes: The 17 year old assitant is young, inocent child
of her time, slightly modified by choice and heavily modified by lack of
gravity. She is also hopelessly in love with our hero. The
fighter/ex-reporter is an expert on martial arts and a wise man in an
earth gruff way. Man has lost most interest in the ecology and wildlife.
People live in the most pecular ways just to add interest to life. The
search for pleasure and experience dominate people's lives. Sex plays a
big portion in this search but so does various form of self destruction.
One of our hero's favorite games is to commit suicide but not declare it
so he is revived.
I will tell you more After I have finished the book.
Jeff peters
|
78.46 | | NETRIX::thomas | The Code Warrior | Tue Sep 28 1993 18:01 | 2 |
| Ever the see the Front Page_ with Cary Grant, Rosalind Russell, and
Raplh Bellamy? Rosalind Russell played the character of Hildy Johnson.
|
78.47 | | NETRIX::thomas | The Code Warrior | Tue Sep 28 1993 18:03 | 2 |
| I think Steel Beach is my favorite Varley novel. I think he does short
stories better ...
|
78.48 | Readus Interruptus | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | len, Engineering Technical Office | Wed Sep 29 1993 11:11 | 16 |
|
I started it, got about halfway through and then stopped in favor of
Jack Vance's Ecce and Old Earth, which got interrupted in favor of
Asimov's final Foundation book (Forward the Foundation?), which I read
straight through. It sent me all the way back to The Currents of
Space, which I just finished. I can't find my copies of Pebble in the
Sky and Caves of Steel, or I'd be reading them now.
I generally like Varley, but even as far into Steel Beach as I am, it
still doesn't seem to be going anywhere. I'll probably finish the
Vance first, and then resume Steel Beach, but there's a new Gibson out
there (Virtual Light), and I believe the successor to Ecce and Old Earth
is now out (Throy).
len.
|
78.49 | Nah, go back to Steel Beach... | QUARRY::petert | rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty | Wed Sep 29 1993 12:55 | 10 |
| I found Steel Beach to be a quicker read than Ecce and Old Earth, which
I also enjoyed. Things really start to pick up during the bicentennial
clelbration of the invasion. That sort of gives a marker without revealing
anything. Of course that is 1/2 to 2/3rd's into the book, but it's
still enjoyable, if seemingly disconnected reading up till then.
Hmmm, Ecce and Old Earth seemed complete at the end, but I guess I could
still see some loose ends untied.
PeterT
|
78.50 | | DPDMAI::MILLERR | Barefoot on the Moon | Wed Sep 29 1993 15:33 | 9 |
| I finished Steel Beach a couple of months ago. I liked it.
Possible spoiler follows...
The most memorable scene is the dog, Winston, in his little space suit
trying to take a leak on the Lunar surface. I just about hurt myself
laughing so hard.
- Russ.
|
78.51 | | TLE::TOKLAS::FELDMAN | SDT Software Engineering Process Group | Wed Sep 29 1993 19:12 | 7 |
| re: .46
And it was remade (perhaps under a different title) with Jack Lemmon
and Walter Mathau. Of course, they left out the romantic aspects
(but consider if Varley had done the remake).
Gary
|
78.52 | Almost There | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | len, Engineering Technical Office | Thu Sep 30 1993 11:16 | 12 |
|
re .49 - I just got to the chapter were the bicentennial celebration
occurs. This is actually almost 3/4s of the way through the book. A
long time to wait (>300 pps) for things to pick up and sort out.
I don't know if Ecce and Old Earth needs a sequel (I'm nowhere near far
enough into it to make a judgement), but I'm pretty sure I've seen a
Vance hardcover titled Throy, which would place it in the Araminta
Station universe, along with Ecce and Old Earth.
len.
|
78.53 | | DWOVAX::EROS | Cardinals in '93 | Thu Sep 30 1993 16:00 | 12 |
| re: Steel Beach
** Spoiler **
I enjoyed the book up until the last 30 pages or so. When Hildy had the baby,
I knew I was looking at the Varley equivalent of a Star Trek 'red shirt' and
it really pissed me off. Killing off the kid (SIDS, no less) served no purpose
other than to bum out the reader.
-- Tony
|
78.54 | | AUSSIE::GARSON | achtentachtig kacheltjes | Tue Oct 18 1994 20:42 | 16 |
| Having just read "Steel Beach", the problem that I had with the book,
apart from those already noted regarding disjointedness and the time it
takes for the book to get focussed, is that the eponymous metaphor is
left completely unresolved i.e. man is left flapping on the beach with
barely a hint of how we metaphorically deal with this. I didn't expect a
riding off into the sunset ending but I wanted some kind of direction.
Is it that Varley plans a sequel?
A little more discussion follows FF.
The Heinleiners are raised as a plausible direction from which the next
step will come although they are working the problem in all directions
at once and may be decades from an answer. With the demise of the CC
and the rethinking that will occur as a result of the Big Glitch the rest
of the Lunar society doesn't look like contributing much for a while.
|