T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1398.1 | tank needs to fit need and resources | TAPE::SENEKER | Head banging causes brain mush | Wed Mar 05 1997 13:34 | 11 |
| I had entered a long detailed reply, but the notes editor doesn't
have a recovery log and the network connection went down so I lost
it. Here's the very short version.
What type of diving do you want to do?
What are your needs and resources?
Basic differences are gas volume, weight, cost, and compatibility
with other tanks.
Rob
|
1398.2 | Problems with fills and wear? | JAMIN::GOBLE | | Wed Mar 05 1997 16:16 | 11 |
| What type of diving do you want to do?
What are your needs and resources?
I want to do wreck diving.
I know the costs/gas volumes/etc. I have heard that with HP tanks you
frequently won't get a complete fill (since you can't overfill 10%), that
the higher 3500 pressure wears regulators significantly faster. On the
other hand, HP is smaller and lighter for the same gas volume.
Dave
|
1398.3 | getting 3500 psi fill may be a problem | TAPE::SENEKER | Head banging causes brain mush | Thu Mar 06 1997 09:52 | 21 |
|
>>> I want to do wreck diving.
Do you mean recreational wreck diving, i.e. no staged decompression
diving or extended range/tech wreck diving?
>>> complete fill... regulator wear...
It is true that many fill stations will not fill HP tanks to 3500
much less 10% over. If you have good equipment and have it annually
serviced the high pressure wear should not be a problem, partially
because it is only in the high pressure area for a few minutes until
you breath off some of the pressure.
I have been diving with pressures starting from 3400 to 3800 psi
for 3 years and I have not had any equipment problems.
Another concern may be the availability of a fill station that will
overfill LP tanks. Many tech-divers regularly get 50% overfills.
Rob
|
1398.4 | Cost is a consideration | JAMIN::GOBLE | | Thu Mar 06 1997 15:59 | 39 |
| <<< Note 1398.3 by TAPE::SENEKER "Head banging causes brain mush" >>>
-< getting 3500 psi fill may be a problem >-
> Do you mean recreational wreck diving, i.e. no staged decompression
> diving or extended range/tech wreck diving?
I am doing the former at the moment; will also do the latter if possible
at reasonable cost -- or I win the lottery (and I find others to get
involved with); Based on current info I would expect to get a closed
circuit rebreather if I were to be heavily involved with staged
decompression diving; I have a Zeagle Tech 50D reg /w cold water kit
(soon to have two) and going from single alu 80 to independent 80
doubles to single, then independant doubles/then probably manifold doubles
of whatever HP or LP tanks I get.
Also have a Beauchat (Cochrin) Maestro Pro EAN computer, which handles
switchover between two mixes, #1 EAN 21-50, and #2 up to 100%
Oxygen (21 to 100%), and a drysuit, and will probably want to get
Abyss deco software before I got much into deco stops.
> It is true that many fill stations will not fill HP tanks to 3500
> much less 10% over. If you have good equipment and have it annually
> serviced the high pressure wear should not be a problem, partially
> because it is only in the high pressure area for a few minutes until
> you breath off some of the pressure.
>
> I have been diving with pressures starting from 3400 to 3800 psi
> for 3 years and I have not had any equipment problems.
>
> Another concern may be the availability of a fill station that will
> overfill LP tanks. Many tech-divers regularly get 50% overfills.
So it sounds like you have a shop (or shops) that will give you a good
fill to 3500 or beyond on HP tanks. Are you implying that tech divers
are using their own compressors to overfill up to 50%?
|
1398.5 | must balance cost with safety margins | TAPE::SENEKER | Head banging causes brain mush | Fri Mar 07 1997 10:30 | 44 |
| > I am doing the former at the moment; will also do the latter if possible
> at reasonable cost -- or I win the lottery (and I find others to get
> involved with);
Tech diving is much more expensive than recreational diving. The
biggest reason for this is the cost of providing yourself with enough
equipment (and experience using it) so you have wider margins for
error while diving. Wider margins for error increase your chance of
returning from the dive in good health.
> Based on current info I would expect to get a closed circuit rebreather
> if I were to be heavily involved with staged decompression diving;
Yes, this would work but a fully redundant CCR is the most expense
means to currently go tech-diving.
> I have a Zeagle Tech 50D...
I am unfamilar with Zeagle regulators so I cannot make any comments.
I have gained my comfort level with my equipment via my time of use
with no problems and the time of use of others I dive with that have
had no problems. One of the hardest things about tech-diving is to
open your mind to new ideas, realize your personal limitation, and
start taking actions to improve yourself. Another big problem is
that you have to address the issue of dying while diving.
> on overfills...
Many tech divers are dive store owners. Also, due to the nature of
tech diving tech divers/tech dive store owners don't mind pushing
the envolope. So if the dive store owner overfills for themselves
usually the will overfill for you, once they know you are a tech-diver
(some may require that you are a regular customer).
I guess to answer your question ...using their own compressors....
the answer is: Yes, in the more serious tech divers.
Also, on your growth path for tanks, I recommend that you go with
alu 80's because they are inexpensive and if you really enjoy tech-
diving you can change them from your primary backmount tanks to stage
tanks, deco tanks, etc. Also, if you don't like tech-diving you will
have some good recreational diving tanks.
Rob
|
1398.6 | bottom line? | JAMIN::GOBLE | | Sat Mar 08 1997 13:33 | 7 |
|
Is it fair to say (on the original subject) that HP tanks are
preferable to LP if your shop can fill to 3500, you inspect
your reg regularly, and you don't have the 50% overfill
option?
Dave
|
1398.7 | sounds like a workable combination | TAPE::SENEKER | Head banging causes brain mush | Mon Mar 10 1997 11:39 | 3 |
| Yes, I would agree that is a good combination.
Rob
|