[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference noted::hackers_v1

Title:-={ H A C K E R S }=-
Notice:Write locked - see NOTED::HACKERS
Moderator:DIEHRD::MORRIS
Created:Thu Feb 20 1986
Last Modified:Mon Aug 03 1992
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:680
Total number of notes:5456

613.0. "Security Alarms" by DISSRV::NORRIS (What is it, Miss Pfeffernuss?) Mon Nov 30 1987 15:19

    Let's try this group. VMSNOTES and SECURITY_INFO have turned up
    nothing. Some security alarm questions:

    1. I have some files set up as follows:

$ dir/secure test.dir;

Directory DUA1:[000000]

TEST.DIR;1         [100,100]      (RW,RWE,RE,E)

Total of 1 file.

$ dir/secure [.test]this.dir;

Directory DUA1:[000000.TEST]

THIS.DIR;1         [100,100]      (,RWED,,)
          (DEFAULT_PROTECTION,SYSTEM:,OWNER:RWED,GROUP:,WORLD:)

$ dir/secure [test.this]file.txt;

Directory DUA1:[TEST.THIS]

FILE.TXT;1           [100,100]      (,RWED,,)


    If I issue the command; $ dir/secure dua1:[test.this]file.txt, 
    I receive a file protection message and a security alarm for
    a file access failure.

    If I issue the command; $ type dua1[test.this]file.txt, I
    receive a file protection message but I don't receive a
    security alarm. Why?

    2. If I set the security alarm for LOGFAILURE=ALL I don't receive 
    timeout failures on a system password. They do appear in the 
    accounting log as a LOGFAIL. Is this an oversight or was it 
    designed this way? 

    Ed
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
613.1NANUCK::SSMITHMinnesota Vikings' couching staffFri Dec 18 1987 11:2214
    1.  What is your process' UIC, and what privileges does your process
    currently have?
    
    2.  I don't believe the system password was intended as the primary
    security mechanism within VMS.  It is there to *impede* somebody trying
    to break in who has no right to be there.  As stated elsewhere, the
    *real* protection mechanism is a relatively obscure, (frequently)
    changed password. 
    
    BTW, I'd consider the lack of alarms on it an oversight.  QAR it.
    
    -- Shel Smith

    P.S. Have you set BREAKIN=ALL to see if it's checked there?
613.2DISSRV::NORRISWhat is it, Miss Pfeffernuss?Mon Dec 21 1987 13:537
    Re .1  The UIC is [200,200] or some such thing, it's not within
    MAXSYSGROUP and the privileges are TMPMBX and NETMBX.

    I have BREAKIN=ALL turned on, but that doesn't do it.    
    I think I will QAR the timeout on system passwords. 
    
    Ed
613.3Mis-read orig. note. QAR *both* issues.NANUCK::SSMITHMinnesota Vikings' couching staffWed Dec 23 1987 14:390