| Well, I'm an Infomaniac, so I bought it. After all, I am pelted with
so much information and misinformation from the magazines and notes that
I read, that I figured an extra book wouldn't hurt.
I'd be interested to know what was so drastically wrong, but then again,
if anyone else had written a book about a topic like this, there will always
be people who really saw something from a more inner and accurate perspective.
I just wish we could all write books. Perhaps notes is a better way to
express ourselves though....at least there is more immediate feedback,
among other reasons.
Perhaps it's too much to hope for that some of our notes files will someday
be printed, at least internally, so that people who's jobs relate to a
particular topic will have a copy. Or is the age of electronics so totally
upon us?
|
| I've finished Hackers and enjoyed it from start to finish.
While there were a bunch of errors (there was an editor called TICO),
it seemed to give a good picture of life in those early days.
Paul might be complaining since the Hacker's in the book came
out of the MIT-AI labs, which weren't too happy with CTSS/Project Mac.
If you check the book out, do read the Epilog "The Last True Hacker"
on Richard Stallman -- some comments in AI-Digest suggest that Levy
got that story down pretty accurately.
A book to give to mom?
I wonder what Alan Kotok (who is featured in the book) has to say
about it?
Martin.
|
| I have read HACKER's and am familiar with a lot of TMRC lore,
being a member myself.
Most of the problems with the book seem to stem from the author conducting
a lot of tape recorded interviews and not rechecking the material
with the originators. Some mistakes are in spelling (TECO is misspelled as
TICO regularly!) and he mixed up some second hand stories.
[At TMRC we have discussed hacking the author, by trying to find and
reporting on an error per page!]
All in all, I would recommend the book.
Dave Mitton.
|