T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
50.1 | | ROYCE::KENNEDY | | Thu Aug 23 1984 19:24 | 12 |
| I think that your problem is that the mailbox/terminal connection
isn't being broken. You could experiment by saying SET /NOBRDCSTMBX
to DCL. The assignment may be removed by a SETMODE QIO to the terminal
with TT2$M_BRDCSTMBX off (See chapter 9 in the I/O Users Guide Vol 1).
The mailbox should then be deletable.
The reason why WHAT was giving an error is that it uses a broadcast
mailbox and only one may exist per terminal at a time.
Good Luck
Hugh.
|
50.2 | | TURTLE::GILBERT | | Thu Aug 23 1984 16:28 | 15 |
| Is there any good reason why only one mailbox may be associated with a terminal
at a time? You could either put in a Y-valve to direct associated messages to
all the mailboxes, or a switch to direct them to the desired mailboxes, or a
combination of both (if this were handled by LIB$ASN_WTH_MBX, which is used by
(almost?) all the mentioned utilities, the problem would gracefully disappear.
- Gilbert
For what it's worth, I ran into this problem after trying:
$ SPAWN/NOWAIT SET HOST node
Which is a really neat hack that can be used like spawn/attach on a single node.
It should should suffice until someone hacks RTPAD to do this more cleanly.
You'll probably want to define some DCL symbols as "WAIT 00:02:00".
|
50.3 | | GLIVET::DIAMOND | | Thu Aug 23 1984 16:59 | 11 |
| When I try to remove the mailbox from the terminal, I also set brdcstmbx and
broadcast flags back the way they should be, off and on respectively. What I
don't understand is how to deassign the set. I'm just so confused...
.
.
.
.
.
Dave
|
50.4 | | HARE::STAN | | Thu Aug 23 1984 18:13 | 2 |
| What has this got to do with hacking? It sounds like a serious
problem. Use the VMSNOTES note file if you want a serious answer.
|
50.5 | | GLIVET::DIAMOND | | Thu Aug 23 1984 20:51 | 4 |
| I've got queries all over the place... What I'm looking for is not a certain
place to find certain answers, but certain people who might have my answers.
Dave
|
50.6 | | GLIVET::DIAMOND | | Thu Aug 23 1984 21:02 | 10 |
| Aha, he said!! What I failed to remember is that when you assign or deassign
anything, the device is given a special something to keep for the rest of its
life. And that something is a channel number. What idiot moi failed to
remember is that the deassign is based also on the channel number, so I have
to store the channel number used for the assign and use the same one for the
deassign. I can't believe it took me this long to figure it out after losing
so many hours of sleep, and thanks to those who listened to me babble about
it.
Dave
|
50.7 | | VANNOY::VANNOY | | Tue Sep 04 1984 17:44 | 6 |
| RE: .2
VMS has a one mailbox per terminal restriction. We thought we might
fix this in V4, but never got around to it. Maybe next time around...
jake
|