T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1560.1 | More Info Please | AIMHI::DANIELS | | Mon Nov 25 1991 09:39 | 5 |
| Can you give more details about what this is all about?
How does the carriage horse association fit into this?
Tina
|
1560.2 | ex | ABACUS::MATTHEWS | DEAth Star | Mon Nov 25 1991 10:33 | 3 |
| h*lL with that I wanna hear about this cease thing...
|
1560.3 | | SSVAX::DALEY | | Mon Nov 25 1991 10:40 | 13 |
| the thing with the Aquarium was probably about the dolphin being
sold (or not sold)to the Navy - altho I'm not sure about that.
Anyway, I cannot tell from the base note which part is from the
paper and which is the noter's comments.
About CEASE - I hope this note doesn't turn into a flame on; flame off
note. Also - from experience in another notes conference, any
comments made about a particular organization (CEASE) or about
an institution (the Aquarium) have legal implications. So please
exercise judgement about comments made.
Pat
|
1560.4 | | SSVAX::DALEY | | Mon Nov 25 1991 10:53 | 19 |
| Also about the carriage horse thing- it was about filing legislation
to allow carriage horse in Boston "X" number of hours off during the
hot summer days so they would not have to cart tourists around the
city all day- 7 days a week - in the hot sun without a rest.
I don't have the particulars, - just the basics.
And if it IS the dolphin thing- it was about the dolphin who was
raised in the Aquarium, was used to people, but was not particularly
friendly to other dolphins. So the Aquarium decided to sell him to the
Navy for research - not medical but some kind of demolition research.
It implied considerable danger towards the animal, and because this
particular creature was people-oriented, CEASE - and others- felt that
this one dolphin was not a suitable test case. So he was not sold to
the Navy.
Again, the base note didn't give any specific information - maybe the
Lowell paper didn't say much either.
|
1560.5 | someone help me! | ABACUS::MATTHEWS | DEAth Star | Mon Nov 25 1991 12:07 | 18 |
| re. while we are on the subject of animal rights.. do we have a
notesfile ... on animal rights stuff>>?????
The reason being I have a pet store that I dont agree with the
pratices, and there was a sick liitle dog, I convinced them he needed
a quiter place, becaseu of his brething/heartrate... he was under
stress and very very ill (eyes glazed,watery, hair matted ,etc)
they took him out back (where they proably ignored him ) I just
thought he need medical attention right then and there. someone told me
they take the sick animal out back and they die eventually.. isnt there
something we can do here ?? I need some direction, I'm sick of pet
stores that have water out for these bunnies (babies) and its so high
they couldnt reach it.. I came back three hours later and told her
they could reach thier water (she fixed it) i mean come ON, HOw
stupid!!
wendy o'
|
1560.6 | | SSVAX::DALEY | | Mon Nov 25 1991 12:22 | 18 |
| I don't think we have a conference like that - wish we did. But I think
the reason we don't is because Digital is opening itself for a lawsuit
from these various organizations and businesses. This was discussed in
great length in the Feline files.
The stongest recourse we have is through organizations like the MSPCA,
CEASE, town authorities, and the newspapers. Also, if you have a
complaint you can go directly to the manager or owner and threaten
to go to the newspaper. Too often nothing is done because people just
don't carry thru with their complaints.
Any ideas?
Pat
I believe that SOME businesses do practive what you have heard - but not
all busineses. Maybe someone here has suggestions to what can be
done - other than the above organizations, and working toward
legislation of these businesses.
|
1560.7 | Calling isn't heard,the written word gets results! | BOOVX1::MANDILE | Bad horse, bad horse | Mon Nov 25 1991 12:37 | 4 |
| Putting your complaint IN WRITING and sending it to the
MSPCA (Massachusetts Chapter) worked for me.
Lynne
|
1560.8 | gotta stick up for my alma mater | SMAUG::MORENZ | JoAnne Morenz IBM I/C DTN: 226-5870 | Mon Nov 25 1991 12:57 | 23 |
|
I worked as a volunteer for the Education Department for the New England
Aquarium for several years in the early 80s. The Aquarium is also the
site for the Marine Mammal Stranding Institute, responsible for rescuing and
rehabilitating hundreds of marine mammals every year.
It is an institution dedicated to education and conservation. Knowing the
folks their as I do, I know that they are all very committed to this end. I
really would find it hard to believe that their activities could legitimately
provoke animal rights groups (CEASE, MSPCA or others) to call them out on
the carpet.
I am a strong supporter or animal rights, but I would have to say that I'll
send in a donation to help the Aquarium.
-JoAnne_who_used_to_croon_over_the_baby_seals_in_the_rehab_tank_*8^)
p.s. does anyone know how the anti-cruelty laws work for horses, living
conditions, physical condition? i assume that there is some set of standards
that they must go by to legally determine what is considered *cruel*.
|
1560.9 | | BOOVX2::MANDILE | Bad horse, bad horse | Mon Nov 25 1991 13:26 | 5 |
| JoAnne-
The laws vary by State. You would have to check.....
Lynne
|
1560.10 | I guess it depends on which paper you read | CSCMA::SMITH | | Mon Nov 25 1991 13:59 | 12 |
| The pedlar had some articles in it fighting the carriage horse
legislation. The issue was not as cut and dry as was stated in the
earlier note. The legislation would have affected all driving of
horses, including any in your own backyard and shows, etc.
I get a little nervous about animal rights groups. Many animal rights
activists would like to ban all ownership and use of animals, even dogs
and cats. Maybe loving animals that much is over my head...
I guess it just depends on which newspaper you read.
Sharon
|
1560.11 | | CARTUN::MISTOVICH | | Mon Nov 25 1991 16:58 | 11 |
| I believe the problem with the New England Aquarium was about supplying
the Navy with one or more dolphins.
My understanding is that the Navy trains dolphins to locate underwater
mines with a harness strapped to their backs. They then use them to
locate real mines, with explosives attached to the harnesses. After the
dolphin is trained, it is released into areas where they are trying to
find mines. When the dolphin finds a mine, the dolphin and mine are
blown up. That is why animal rights activists protested.
Mary
|
1560.12 | Not only cruel, but STUPID! | DECWET::JDADDAMIO | Admire spirit in horses & women! | Mon Nov 25 1991 19:39 | 23 |
| Geez, I though that even the Navy would be smarter than that!
I doubt that anyone active in this notes conference could ignore
the animal rights issue completely but let's try for a minute.
It sounds pretty STUPID to spend time and the almighty military dollar to
train a dolphin for a kamikaze attack on 1 underwater mine! Wouldn't it
be more effective to give the dolphin time to swim out of harm's way
before detonating the mine? Or is my ignorance of naval mines showing?
I know that mines explode when they are hit by ships or triggered by
the magnetic field of a ship...Couldn't they make up some kind of
detonator that the dolphin could leave in the vicinity of the mine
which would explode after the dolphin swims away to "fight" again?
Anyway, back to the animal rights side of it. IMHO, if we are stupid
enough to want to kill each other in wars and other such conflicts,
it is pretty cruel of us to ask animals to risk their lives so we
can kill each other! That's why I was perfectly happy to see the US
Cavalry become obsolete with the advent of tanks! I just wish we could
get the dogs and dolphins out of the military's hands too! (Fat chance
though)
|
1560.13 | | CHOLLY::FARNHAM | | Mon Nov 25 1991 19:58 | 11 |
|
The rumor mill has it that animal rights fanatics (not everyone
concerned about animal rights is a fanatic) have started disrupting
dog shows. Friends of mine in Michigan claim that one group has
bee going to shows releasing dogs from crates (portable kennels, or
airline carriers) on the grounds that crating is cruel. There was
also a rumor that a similarly-minded crew was going to show up at the
4 days of shows in Boston a week ago.
Dunno if this is true, but it sure seems misguided to me...
|
1560.14 | | MPO::ROBINSON | but it matches my outfit! | Tue Nov 26 1991 08:43 | 16 |
|
Stu, they did show up at Boston, an acquaintance of mine
was there. I guess show stewards escorted people with dogs
back to their cars when they were leaving to prevent any
confrontations.
About the Navy, I find it truly hard to believe they would
blow the dolphin up, it takes MANY months if not over a year
to train a dolphin, esp when it is expected to go into open
ocean and return. When I first heard this story, the navy had
a dolphin they didn't feel fit their program and wanted to
TRADE him for `Rainbow' at the aquarium, (so why didn't they
just blow him up and get rid of him?).
Sherry
|
1560.15 | | CARTUN::MISTOVICH | | Tue Nov 26 1991 08:44 | 12 |
| re: last
That's so hard to believe that I'd believe it possible that anti-animal
rights people are doing it to make the animal rights people look bad.
I mean, if they want to prevent cruelty to animals I can think of a lot
better targets than dog shows! On the other hand, there are people
that are really ignorant about non-human animals...
I'm with you John. Just because we humans choose to go around killing
is no excuse to draft the poor animals into it!
Mary
|
1560.16 | from the trenches... | CARTUN::MISTOVICH | | Tue Nov 26 1991 08:51 | 12 |
| re: the dolphins
That's my understanding of how it works -- the dolphin detonates the
mine and goes with it. Remember, we're talking about a government
agency, so the money & time spent training them is irrelevent. Also,
we're talking about the government, so dolphins, like troops and other
pawns in their chess game, are expendable.
Re: why did they want to trade their dolphin for Rainbow? Maybe it
simply wasn't trainable?
Mary
|
1560.17 | | MPO::ROBINSON | but it matches my outfit! | Tue Nov 26 1991 08:56 | 15 |
|
Mary, I understand that and would not be surprised if it were
true. But I'd like to think it wasn't. The aquarium dolphin (I
don't know why I remember his name, but I know it was Rainbow)
was too aggressive - I did see him perform and he was bullying
another dolphin between shows and inattentive during the show.
The navy dolphin was supposedly not reliable enough to send out
into open ocean but he was trainable (ie to do all those cute
little tricks...), so it was deemed a mutually appropriate trade.
I wish I remembered more, it would help all of us if someone
had the whole story (?).
Sherry
|
1560.18 | original noter is back...great discussion. | KAHALA::HOLMES | | Tue Nov 26 1991 09:45 | 33 |
| The first paragraph was the only info the paper printed. Yes
I think the original issue was dolphins.
My point is that I would not put the MSPCA or the "original"
Humane Society in the same category with animal rights.
This is NOT a cruelty issue. Prevention of cruelty is not RIGHTS.
(this sentenance is my opinion, and I don't want to start a
notes war. Il'l stop.)
(There are TWO groups who call themselves the Humane Society.
One is the traditional one most all of us think of and the
other one is a true animal rights group. Their full names
are different. I'm really not that current on the subject.)
The discussion that followed worked out pretty well, thanks esp
to the past worker at the Aquarium. I can't imagine losing a
trained animal to a "regular" mine. In a real war there would
10's of thousands in use wouldn't there ? Maybe if the "target"
was a submarine or something.....
The dog show stuff is most relevant. My riding interest is
Dressage and I can't see these people attacking racing as
it is a billion dollar industry. If I was doing CT or
endurance riding I'd be real worried. It would not take
much go get a few short takes of spills over a fence, etc.
to get a campaign started.
The scary part is there are people who believe any animal is equal to
any human in all ways and as a previous noter said, they think humans
should never use an animal for anything as they are equals.
Bill
|
1560.19 | Yes! | BOSOX::KROY | | Tue Nov 26 1991 10:38 | 3 |
| I totally agree with the previous noters last paragraph.
Karen
|
1560.20 | cutting down fences | BRAT::FULTZ | | Tue Nov 26 1991 12:39 | 18 |
|
I like to put in my two cents..
I was as at our club meeting the other night (NETWA) and
we had discussed these animal right people.. Some of these
people have been cutting down fences and letting horse to roam
since they feel all horses are free animals.
They have been showing up at show an protesting.
I don't mind people who feel that the rights of the animal is
in jeporday but, if some one cuts down my fences my horses are
very close to route 3 so they would be dead horses no free ones.
I'm not going to continue since I know that it is only a few
people who have gone over the deep end and not the hole
organization.
|
1560.21 | | MPO::ROBINSON | but it matches my outfit! | Tue Nov 26 1991 13:39 | 11 |
|
I believe (if it hasn't been mentioned already) that CEASE
is agianst `animal suffering and exploitation'. Unlike the
humane society, they are not concerned with the care given
the animal, but with animals being used by man in a manner
that is not their natural destiny, ie horse pulling a cart,
dog being shown, dolphin jumping through hoops, etc. None
of these animals would normally do these things in the wild,
therefore why should they do them for man's benefit.
|
1560.22 | | KAHALA::FULTZ | ED FULTZ | Tue Nov 26 1991 15:59 | 14 |
| However, it is groups like this that give animal helpers the image of radicals
and criminals. Unless an animal is being treated cruelly or abused in some
manner, I don't believe these people have the right to try to rule what I
can or can't do. I know that the view of cruel is open to opinion.
I have not and probably never will, give money or support to any group purporting
to help animals. I, possibly unfairly, view them as radicals and the kind of
people who who sooner do a criminal act than work through honest means.
These are only my feelings and not meant to cause anyone any anger. So, please
do not take offense if you work for one of these organizations are not one
of the radicals to which I refer.
Ed..
|
1560.23 | First hand account of an encounter! | DECWET::JDADDAMIO | Admire spirit in horses & women! | Tue Nov 26 1991 17:46 | 46 |
| Like somebody said a ways back, preventing cruelty is different than
animal's rights.
Cutting down fences to allow horses to roam freely because roaming the
prairie is a horse's "rightful destiny" is CRUEL and STOOOOPID! The poor
critters thus "liberated" are likely to die horrible deaths in fairly
short order; hit by cars, starvation, dehydration...We are not living
in the Pleistocene(sp?) era anywmore folks. Horses, cattle and sheep
are domestic animals whose natural habitat when they were wild has long
since vanished.
Yes, cruelty is a subjective term. As those of you who are CANINE
cross-noters may know, Jan and I are also Cairn Terrier breeders and
work with a Seattle-based group that rescues abandoned/unwanted dogs.
Last spring, we invited a woman who was interested in adopting a Cairn
to visit our farm so she could see what a Cairn was.
She reported us to the county Sheriff for cruelty to animals because
we:
A) crate our house dogs when we are not home
B) have our kennel runs indoors (in the garage) and
C) stable our horses
She never asked any questions about the horses but she did ask about the
dogs while she was there. We explained that leaving unsupervised
terriers (especially bitches) loose could result in fatal fights and
that the house dogs got into mischief when left out alone. We also
explained that our kennel runs were indoors because there is a large
population of coyotes in the area and that the previous owners claimed
to have had two dogs killed by coyotes. We also told her that we took
the pack out hunting whenever we could.
Apparently she didn't accept that reasoning but she gave us no
impression that she thought we were doing anything wrong. However, she
called the Sheriff and spun such a convincing tale of horror that the
Sheriff had to formally investigate us, the rescue group had our kennel
practices inspected by a local Humane Society inspector....And all of
this was dropped on us one evening WITHOUT warning!!! Needless to say, it
ruined our day.... Of course, the unannounced inspections worked to our
ultimate benefit as they proved that this woman was a flake! The rescue
group tried to extract an apology(No hope!). The Sheriff and the Humane
Society inspector found our practices to be first rate and told her so.
She turned around and complained to the County about the Sheriff's
office!
Damn,telling that was good therapy...good thing too because the new
medical plans won't pay for trips to the shrink! :-)
|
1560.24 | | KAHALA::HOLMES | | Wed Nov 27 1991 11:34 | 22 |
| I'm glad I started this, and I could not have INVENTED having
a past Aquarium employee among us.
Two new thoughts,
1. My memory is returning, and I think I have seen shows on TV about
trained dolphins doing Navy recovery work, attaching a hook and
line to a 'lost' torpedo so it can be recovered. There are such
things as nuclear torpedo's, which should not be left lying around
down there !
2. I read that in one of the Scandinavian countries a law has been
passed that farm animals have the RIGHT to pasture. I believe
this resulted from an anti-"factory farm" campaign.
Now Dressage & CT (I think Oct '91) just quoted M Poulin and the
woman who won some big show in CA (sorry, can't remember her name)
that they never turn out their horses but ride them every day.
The couple of real-life examples entered are worth a 1000 philosophical
discussions. Thanks,
|
1560.25 | | CARTUN::MISTOVICH | | Mon Dec 02 1991 11:12 | 10 |
| There's always the danger of radicals spoiling any valid cause! ;-)
John, she complained because the horses had a barn!?! Sheesh!
Wonder how *she* would like staying out in freezing rain...
FYI, the Spanish Riding School Lippizaners don't get turned out either
(once they're off the breeding farm).
Mary
|
1560.26 | No turnout, no injuries.... | BOOVX1::MANDILE | Bad horse, bad horse | Mon Dec 02 1991 12:14 | 6 |
| I know of many horses that never get turned out, either.
They are at Dressage, Jumping, or Western show horse barns.
|
1560.27 | Not only the Spanish Riding School! | DECWET::JDADDAMIO | Admire spirit in horses & women! | Mon Dec 02 1991 14:48 | 21 |
| Mary,
She sure did complain because the horses were in a barn! Never asked
why they were in or how long we keep them in between turn-outs or even
whether or not they EVER got out...Although it's pretty obvious from
all the fenced pasture around the place that they DO get out!
It is a VERY common practice in Europe(more so on the continent than
the British Isles) for a horse to get no turn-out. This is especially true
of school horses, competition horses for dressage and show-jumping and
horses which are in/near urban areas...which includes lots of Europe! Why?
Land is too expensive and horses are not a food crop...but they are a CASH
crop...just ask anybody who has imported a European Warmblood :-)!
Anyway, it is very common for European riding horses to only get out of
their stalls when they are being ridden. A German friend once jokingly
said "Zey come from zee farm to zee riding hall never to see zee light
uvf day again!" Well, that's the best I can imitate her accent in a
note but you get the idea!
John
|
1560.28 | Dolphins at work | BSS::ZINN | | Tue Dec 17 1991 16:49 | 6 |
| I just wanted to set the story straight about the dolphins being
trained by the US Navy. They do not - repeat - DO NOT send them out to
be be blown up! The responsibility of the dolphin is to locate mines,
torpedoes, etc and either buoy-mark them or lead a diver to them. The
humans do the detonation or disarming work. Dolphins trained for this
type of work are extremely valuable and not easily replaced.
|
1560.29 | | CARTUN::MISTOVICH | | Thu Dec 19 1991 16:52 | 3 |
| Thank you *very* much for entering that!
Mary
|
1560.30 | | KAHALA::HOLMES | | Tue Jul 13 1993 10:03 | 21 |
|
>> I just wanted to set the story straight about the dolphins being
>> trained by the US Navy. They do not - repeat - DO NOT send them out to
>> be be blown up! The responsibility of the dolphin is to locate mines,
>> torpedoes, etc and either buoy-mark them or lead a diver to them. The
>> humans do the detonation or disarming work. Dolphins trained for this
>> type of work are extremely valuable and not easily replaced.
Tonight (Tuesday 13-Jul) on Boston public tv, Ch2 the New Explorers...
9 pm
The first look at the U.S. Navy's top secret Marine
Mammal Facilities includes footage of three decades
of behavorial research.
I guess it's a repeat but I didn't see the first run.
Now we can all see for ourselves.
|
1560.31 | security = weakness | KAHALA::HOLMES | | Wed Jul 14 1993 11:58 | 14 |
|
Military security signals weakness. The major weakness of the
Navy is being vunerable to a diver planting a bomb under a ship
which is in port.
The solution is to train dolphins to act like guard dogs
signaling when they find someone. No they do not attack or
kill as the military wants information from anyone captured.
I can't do the story justice in writing, youl'l have to
catch the show yourself next time.
Now some of this makes sense, the out-of-context linking
dolphins with bombs.
|