T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
779.1 | | PBA::KEIRAN | | Tue Nov 15 1988 10:52 | 10 |
| It would seem to me that $125 per month is a little steep to lease
a horse. I am leasing my mare to someone right now, and charging
her $35 per month, and she buys the shoes. It is actually a
convenience for me because I don't have time for all of my horses,
and this is a nice mare that enjoys being ridden. Where is this
horse located? Does the owner have other horses, and is the horse
being boarded at a large stable where the board is high? Also
remember that if you are responsible for the vet bills, and something
serious happens to the horse, you are talking big $$$ in bills.
Maybe some other notes have different input.
|
779.2 | | MEIS::SCRAGGS | | Tue Nov 15 1988 11:08 | 16 |
|
I agree with Linda in the sense that it depends on what the person
who owns the horse has to pay for board. I've leased horses in
the past anywhere from $40 t0 $150 per month, different arrangments
some included shoes and vet, others did not.... If it were a straight
lease where your daughter had sole responsibility of the horse,
you would be looking at full board which would be quite high with
shoes and vet ontop of that. I think if it's a half lease, then
half shoes and vet might be appropriate. Be careful about how the
terms are worded for coverage to the horse. In this case you may
want to be sure it states an exact figure and that only incase of
direct negligence.
Good luck.
Marianne
|
779.3 | It depends... | MEIS::BUSHMAN | Kate Bushman DTN 247-2497 | Tue Nov 15 1988 11:25 | 17 |
| I think that $125 may be either a good or a bad deal, depending
on what the circumstances are. Full board for a horse at a super
barn can be anywhere from $300-500 per month. $125 is about what
it would cost for grain, hay and shavings per month to keep the
horse in your own barn. If the price includes a good space to
ride, unlimited use of the horse, a well schooled horse, or lessons,
I think you should consider the option. (Although beware that you
are definitely going to pay about $40-50 for the farrier atleast
every other month, and a minimum $100 to the vet for shots and worming
over the year.)
You might ask around and see if another barn in your area has a
lease opportunity and what that costs/includes. A lease is a good
way to determine if your daughter really wants a horse, but what
if she gets attached to this one? You might also ask if the horse
would ever be for sale. Good luck!
|
779.4 | for comparision... | FRAGLE::PELUSO | | Tue Nov 15 1988 12:03 | 16 |
|
The guy who runs our stable leases horses out at the outside board
which is $145. I am not sure what he does about vet bills and shoes,
however I have known others in the past who have made it the leasers
responsibility for shoes (since she is the one riding it exclusively
and the horse would not have been shod if he was not being leased)
and anything above and beyond the normal vet things, say lameness
or other injuries which could occur due to the riders negligence.
It really depends on what you and the horse owner work out.
I know of a case where a girl thought she had and exclusive lease
on a horse, but someone else was riding the horse also. This went
on for quite awhile before anyone figured out what was going on.
It was not intentional, but a misunderstanding between all parties.
Make sure you get all the details in writing....
|
779.5 | DEPENDS ON THE SITUATION... | ASABET::NICKERSON | | Tue Nov 15 1988 14:08 | 26 |
| I personally have leased horses to people and from people.
It all depends on the situation...my lease agreement don't include
a monthly charge, however, you are responsible for the board of
the horse (usually at your own place) as well as normal vet and
farrier bills. If there is a major expense as far as the vet is
concerned (colic operation, etc.) it is my decision as to whether
or not I want to foot the bill. General injuries, however, are
carried by the leasee.
If we lease on the farm, it is unsually under the understanding
that you put shoes on the horse as this would not be a normal bill
that I would carry if the animal was not being ridden. Along with
this we do ask that when we need help we feel free to ask those
folks leasing horses from us.
It all depends on the situation (which is not that much help in
your case). We enjoy having the horses ridden and loved so to us
that is the biggest part of the lease as we don't have time to ride
all of them.
If you do decide to lease, have a vet check the animal out first.
This is an ounce of protection both for yourself as well as the
owner. Then be sure everything is written down or you might get
yourself into a very sticky situation.
By the way, where do you live? Are you in the Sterling area?
|
779.6 | price depends | ASD::WIMBERG | | Tue Nov 15 1988 16:41 | 13 |
|
Price has to depend on what the horse is being used for. Horsemenship
and children/jumior hunters are quite expensive. For the barn I'm
with leases are usually - a flat fee for the lease, then you take
over all expenses, including board, regular vet, shoeing, etc. Major
illness (such as colic) depend on the circumstances. If you are
new to competition leasing is a good alternative when the situation
is a rapidly improving rider who needs miles on a safe horse. This
way the rider gets the experience. When the rider surpasses the
horse in skill level, it is easier to move to a new (supposedly
better animal). The horse too benefits because it is not asked to
do more than it is capable of.
|
779.7 | Words of wisdom (or lunacy!) | BOEHM::SCHLENER | | Wed Nov 16 1988 16:52 | 45 |
| Leasing is definitely the way to go at the beginning. You can get a
feel for what type of horse you want why you're testing out a variety.
(Boy, that sounds familiar!)
Anyway, (it must be Wednesday) $125 is not that bad. Does the owner
plan on using the horse for any reason? Will your daughter have
exclusive rights to the horse? Answers to those questions will
determine what you should be responsible for.
If she has exclusive rights, then you will probably pay for shoeing and
most likely the board or a large portion of it. I would look into how
much the board costs.
Like anything else, whether leasing a car or a horse, in most cases
what you are saving is the cost of a horse or a downpayment on a car.
In some cases, you are not paying the full board, that depends on the
owner and how much they will kick in.
My big concern would be liability and vet bills. For instance, the
common vet bills are shots and wormings. Those are maintenance/fixed
bills and should be picked up fully/mostly by the leasee. It's the
other unexpected vet bills I would be concerned with. For instance if
the horse developed a condition which will cost $$$ to remedy, who's
going to pay? Who's to say this condition wasn't there prior to you
renting/leasing the horse.
I think you have to be VERY clear on the vet bills, what you are
and what the owner is responsible for. In most cases, all we have
suffered is an occasional visit due to some temporary lameness, ...
but that will still set you back $40 - $60.
Also make sure whose responsible for liability. Let's say your daughter
is out riding, she falls, and the horse runs into the road and gets hit
by a car. Most likely you are responsible (your house insurance usually
covers incidents like that) since your daughter was the one riding him.
However, if the horse was in the barn and some neighbors went over and
by mistake got kicked by the horse and sues - who's to blame? and who's
going to get sued. Ten years ago or more you wouldn't have had to worry
about the liability, but nowadays.....
Good luck. Even though you may not be satisfied with the leasing
requirements for this horse, alot of stables do lease horses including
mine.
It's better to lease a horse and find out that your daughter is tired
of horseback riding, then to have owned it.
Cindy
|
779.8 | | PBA::KEIRAN | | Fri Dec 30 1988 08:36 | 7 |
| On the subject of liability, is there some type of policy I could
take out in case someone got hurt riding my horse? I know the previous
reply stated it could come out of your homeowners policy, but that
wouldn't apply to me since I don't own a home. Has anyone ever
done this separate of their homeowners insurance?
|