T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
497.1 | | MEIS::SCRAGGS | | Fri Feb 05 1988 13:43 | 11 |
|
I would think that for the Stallion, if he will be shown also, you
would probably be asked to breed your mare in March or April at
the latest. I really don't know what a good age is at first, but
isn't three too young to breed? Physically I know they can be bred
and have a foal, but they're not even fully developed themselves
at that age?? Just a curious question.
Thanks
Marianne
|
497.2 | ok to breed | TPVAX5::JESSEMAN | | Fri Feb 05 1988 15:02 | 14 |
| 3 yrs. is fine to breed a healthy mare. You also should have no
problems showing the horse this season. The foal does not make serious
nutritional demands on the mare until months 8 thru 11. The major
caution is to not overwork the mare after breeding. I would define
overwork as extreme sweating, shaking due to muscle overexertion,
etc.. Recent studies have shown that a 2-yr. old mare, when receiving
proper nutrition, in sufficient quantities, can successfully breed
and birth without detrimental effects. However, since it is difficult
to always maintain optimum nutritional intake, most breeders recommend
waiting until the mare is 3 to breed. I show my pregnant mares in
halter and driving classes and have never had a problem. However,
I spend a lot of time studying equine nutrition and would recommend
anyone that breeds horses to increase their knowledge in this area.
Seek the advice of other successful breeders.
|
497.3 | mature enough??-reply | SEDJAR::NANCY | | Fri Feb 05 1988 15:21 | 16 |
|
Marianne,
I've been told that a horse can physically be bred at the age of
2 but that the Arab registry doesn't support breeding until 3 years
of age. My Vet told me that studies show..... when they are bred
at 3 - 4 years of age that their life-long fertility is better.
My filly is sensible and nothing bothers her, so I don't think that
breeding her will have any adverse effects. In fact, she is taking
a positive interest in the stallions this year. I asked the same
question before deciding to breed her, and learned the most important
thing is to make sure they are mentally ready, because physically
she won't mature until around 7 yrs.
Nancy
|
497.4 | | MEIS::SCRAGGS | | Fri Feb 05 1988 16:00 | 7 |
|
Hi Nancy, thanks for responding. Yes, I knew that Physically they
were able, but wasn't sure about whether it was a good thing to
do since they don't finish growing for such a long time. Thanks.
Marianne
|
497.5 | My two cents worth... | MURPHY::GCOOK | Murphy was right | Mon Feb 08 1988 12:22 | 21 |
| Here's my two cents worth:
The first time I bred my mare was when she was six. She was in
training at the time and was being shown. We had no problems.
The trainer did try to keep her fairly quiet, only working her
lightly, for about a month after they covered her. Her filly
showed up right on schedule the next spring...that was in 1985
so we'll probably see you in the AHANE Futurity.
The second time I bred her she came home after she was checked
in foal. I was riding her myself and doing some showing. Again,
her filly showed up right on time last spring.
I don't think I would have bred her as a three-year-old for the
same reasons other people have cited. I just don't think she was
mature and developed enough.
And, to take the discussion one step further, when she has a foal
at her side, that becomes her career. I do a little riding around
the fields but she doesn't go to shows until the baby is weaned.
|
497.6 | It won't physically hurt the mare, but... | PLANET::NICKERSON | Bob Nickerson DTN 282-1663 :^) | Wed Feb 10 1988 12:28 | 29 |
| It probable depends on what you want the mare to do after she has
been bred and has produced a foal. Arabs mature much later than
some other light breeds. Typically they don't completely stop growing
until they are about five. Physically you can begin breeding whenever
the mare begins to ovulate, which varies but is generally around
two years of age. By age three, only subtle growth changes will
take place and the ovulation process will have started. The question
you have to ask is if you intend to show in halter after the foal
arrives, if you lost a class by a small margin, was it because of
some small difference in size or muscle structure. If you met all
of the nutritional needs of the mare and foal maybe there wasn't
a difference, but thats a big `if'. There is also the issue of
the stress of a show circuit on the mare in carrying a foal to term.
If you show casually, there is little stress, but if you show out
of a show barn, there is high stress. I've bred mares that we have
shown with no ill effects, I've also had mares that have concieved
but not foaled (resorbed). It depends on the horse, the stress,
the diet, the phase of the moon, how many trucks passed the trailer,
and etc. The bottom line is figure out what is most important to
you and work to that goal. If you want to have a foal to play with
more than anything and don't think the mare will be a Regional or
National Halter champion, go for it. By the way if you want a foal
to make some extra money, forget the foal and put the money in a
secure investment. You'll come out way ahead.
Regards,
Bob
|
497.7 | Training before breeding? | SEDJAR::NANCY | | Wed Feb 10 1988 12:28 | 8 |
| I'm finding these replys interesting....I'm beginning to wonder
if I should reconsider breeding her. I'm wondering...would there
be any advantage to not breeding her as far as her training goes?
Would breeding disrupt her training very much? Would it be better
to have her just concentrate on her training since she is being
broke to ride this year? I really would like to hear some opinions
or ideas on the subject. Thanks, Nancy
|
497.8 | Why do you want to breed? | PLANET::NICKERSON | Bob Nickerson DTN 282-1663 :^) | Wed Feb 10 1988 13:18 | 30 |
| Lets start with a few questions:
Why do you want to breed?
Will you be breeding AI or natural?
Is the stallion close or far from you?
When will the stallion owner want the mare?
What are the conditions of the breeding contract?
(i.e. will the stallion owner want the mare to stay until the mare
is checked in foal or longer)
The reasons for these questions is to find out what the impact really
will be on the mare. For example, if you breed naturally, sometimes
stallions can be very rough with mares, especially inexperienced
ones. Maiden mares are sometimes hard to breed because of culture
problems, stress from being away from home, panic from seeing a
snorting stallion for the first time etc. Some stallion owners
like to have mares stick around until they know that the mare has
been checked in foal, and some would like the mare not to travel
until after sixty days. There is evidence that shipping before
that time contributes significantly to early aborting. I don't
want to paint a `scare picture' since many of these things are rare
(less than 5%) but you should understand the risk if you send your
mare away expecting to get her back in foal in a week.
Bob
|
497.9 | Train/Show First... | ASD::NAJJAR | | Wed Feb 10 1988 13:48 | 28 |
| re: .7 - I guess the biggest question is (like Bob said) why do
you want to breed the mare? For profit (better off putting your
money elsewhere), fun (it's fun to a point, then...), etc.
If it's not crucial that your mare has a foal now, then you may
be better off finishing your mare's training and start showing her
to see if it's even worth breeding her. It would be nice to know
that judges think your mare is a good enough representation of the
breed (or performs well under saddle) so that she has something
worth passing on to a foal.
My philosophy about breeding is that if you're planning to produce
a foal that you want to sell, then make sure you're going to produce
something that will improve the breed (or at least come close to the
standard). Those of us that are on the receiving end have too many
'poor quality' horses (that are for sale) to look at, and the owners
ask ridiculous prices for something just because it's registered (I've
seen plenty of grade horses that have better conformation and
temperment than some 'purebreds').
If you plan to keep the foal forever (and you know you can never
plan on something like this), then you really only have youself
to please (but it would be worth your while to put the same time
and care into selecting a stallion that really compliments your
mare as you would if you were producing something to sell).
It can only benefit you to not rush the breeding - enjoy showing
your mare while you decide what you really want to do.
|
497.10 | MY THOUGHTS!! | SCOMAN::ROCK | | Wed Feb 10 1988 21:32 | 29 |
| I MUST SAY THAT I AGREE WITH EVERYONES IDEAS....
BOB'S, THAT IF YOU ARE LOOKING TO MAKE $$$ ON THE FOAL, WELL PUT
YOUR MONEY IN A GOOD SOUND PLACE WHERE YOU KNOW YOU WILL GET A RETURN.
MY FEELING ON THIS IS THAT YOU SOUND LIKE YOU WOULD LIKE TO FINISH
HER TRAINING AND HAVE A GOOD TIME WITH HER. IF I WAS IN YOUR SHOES
(AND I HAVE BEEN) I WOULD FINISH HER TRAINING FOR NOW AND HAVE A
GOOD TIME SHOWING HER AND WHAT EVER FOR NOW.
IF YOU ARE BREEDING HER BECAUSE YOU WANT TO KEEP THE FOAL FOR YOUR-
SELF THEN GIVE YOUR SELF SOME TIME TO ENJOY HER RIGHT NOW. YOU CAN
BREED A HEALTHY HORSE UP TILL THE ARE 14 YEARS OR SO OLD FOR THE
FIRST TIME.
I TOO WANTED TO BREED MY MARES WHEN THEY WERE YOUNG. BUT I WAITED
TILL THEY WERE 13 YEARS OLD. THEY HAVE BOTH BEEN HAVING NICE HEALTHY
FOALS AND I HAD ALL THAT TIME TO ENJOY THEM AND NOT WORRY ABOUT
THE FOALS.
THE OTHER THING NOT ALL HORSES ARE THE SAME, AND OTHERS MAY BREED
THEIR HORSE AND CONTINUE TO SHOE OR WHAT EVER AND HAVE NOT PROBLEMS
BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN YOU WILL NOT. YOU WANT TO BE CAREFULL RIGHT
AFTER BREEDING THE MARE AND AGAIN AROUND 190 DAYS OR SO. THEY CAN
STILL SLIP THEIR FOALS UP TO 5 MONTHS OF PREGNANCY.
WELL GOOD LUCK AND WHAT EVER YOU DESIDED YOU WILL BE HAPPY.
TERRY
|
497.11 | Evaluating show potential?? | SEDJAR::NANCY | | Mon Feb 15 1988 11:13 | 30 |
| Thank you, Thank you, Thank you!!
I hear the note of experience coming through on selling foals for
$$$. Sounds like everyone knows someone that's experienced difficult
times...thinking they can make some money. I'm glad I asked this
question, because I feel I've recieved some really sound advice.
I now need to evaluate her "show potential". Can you help me with
this also? How do you determine halter potential? Consider the
following:
Pedigree
Her Sire: Regional Res Champion Stallion
Her Dam: Regional Champion Mare
Show record
Class A halter champion as a yearling.
won $350 in a sweepstakes as a yearling.
I purchased her as a 2 yr old and as part of the sales agreement
she was to be shown at the AHANE and Deerfield fair shows at no
cost to me. When she was being shown, she was not in show condition,
in fact she was kinda FAT and she was not being trained. However, I
think she did fairly well. She Placed 2nd at AHANE and 5th at the
Deerfield fair.
I just wonder what she could do if she was conditioned and trained
for showing. I think she has the potential to do well. Am I wrong???
Thanks, Nancy
|
497.12 | | PLANET::NICKERSON | Bob Nickerson DTN 282-1663 :^) | Mon Feb 15 1988 12:43 | 26 |
| It sounds like she may have some potential based on her current
show record. In halter classes, pedigree doesn't get you much,
it only gives you an indication that someone else in the family
did well. You probably should try to get a professional look at
the mare when she is fit to give you an opinion. By professional
I mean someone who shows and is well accepted as a top quality trainer
in halter. I assume that you are in the Northeast if your mare
showed at AHANE and Deerfield. Names that come to mind are Bill
Bohl, Rich Waller, Chip Cappobianco etc. Don't ask for an opinion
from someone who had anything to do with the sale, breeding, or
promotion of this horse or any of its pedigree.
You didn't mention whether you were planning to show the mare yourself.
Without knowing anything about you or your abilities in this area,
I can tell you that the chances of an Amatuer showing any halter
horse to the Regional level are very slim. Its a combination of
politics, showmanship, training abilities, and knowing the judges
to show under.
If you ask a trainer to evaluate your mare, also ask if they would
consider taking the horse in training. You don't have to commit
yourself to them (no one is committed until money passes hands)
but it is a good indicator of how much they really think about the
mare.
|
497.13 | Bob, How good are they? | GORT::NANCY | | Thu Feb 18 1988 13:09 | 13 |
|
Bob,
Thank you for your advice. The filly is fit to look at now and I
intend to take your advice. I am wondering...I have heard of all
the trainers you mentioned, are they in the same league as Ray
Lacroix? I realize that to be serious, I will have to play the
politics. Can I expect Regional and National wins from those you
mentioned. Can you tell me anything more about them? I would like
to have her trained in the Northeast if possible and any help
you can give me, would be deeply appreciated!
Thanks, Nancy
|
497.14 | | PLANET::NICKERSON | Bob Nickerson DTN 282-1663 :^) | Fri Feb 19 1988 15:39 | 16 |
| They are listed in order of their perceived success in the region
(by me). They have all had regional championship wins and I would
consider each of them to be National level trainers. Bill probably
has had the most experience in National competition. We use Rich
Waller exclusively for our `hot prospects'. For example look for
DW Miss Perk (*Perkal x Louisfield Mist) in open English Pleasure
and Informal Combination this year. She is our current prospect.
You may have some problems getting into their barns now since they
have pretty much already selected their 1988 show strings. You
probably can get an opinion from them though. I would personally
recommend any of them.
Regards,
Bob
|