T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
381.1 | Sad Situation | PARSEC::SCRAGGS | | Tue Aug 25 1987 10:02 | 25 |
| This topic file is probably going to become hot and heavy in the
future, but it's a good note to air some concerns and find out what
other people would do in a situation, and what might be considered
right/wrong.
The colt I listed in the for sale section is an absolute gorgeous
2 yr old standardbred. I myself and not a standardbred fancier,
but one look at him, I fell in love. Unfortunately I am not in the
position to take on another horse right now, but If I have to I
will take him until I can find a permanent home. The owner
uses his animals for harness racing. If they can't run he won't
leave them hanging around. Unfortunately he won't be bothered trying
to find a buyer, instead his method is sending a perfectly sound
beautiful animal to the rendering plant. He thinks I am totally
soft and out to save the world. I told him I'm not out to save the
WORLD, but, no way on earth I'd let him take something like that
to be destroyed. I don't fly off the handle or think he is the
most cruel person in the world, we are good friends, but I did tell
him I lost a great deal of respect for him. I think he is heartless.
What would others do in this situation. Would it be possible for
you to turn and walk away? I know that sometimes there is a need
to destroy an animal, but this one??
-Marianne-
|
381.3 | Rotten Situation\ | MILVAX::HUDSON | | Tue Aug 25 1987 15:25 | 10 |
| Marianne,
To bad about what that guy does to those horses that don't run
or aren't fast enough to make it. Did he ever think of even
trying to give them away. It's better than having to destroy
them. A friend of mines boyfriend trains harness horses, and
she told me thats what they try to do instead of destroying
them.
Just thought I'd ask
|
381.4 | | PARSEC::SCRAGGS | | Wed Aug 26 1987 11:10 | 9 |
|
.3 He feels he can recoop a couple hundred dollars for his
losses, I guess it just doesn't bother him, he doesn't really
realize or care what he is doing. I will be taking him myself
if I cannot find a home for him by Friday. I'll just hold onto
him until I can place him.
-M-
|
381.5 | race+heat = death | IMAGIN::KOLBE | She's back - watch out world | Thu Aug 27 1987 13:59 | 17 |
|
I know it's tacky to reply to your own note but the current issue of EQUUS
has a story that breaks my heart and concerns abuse.
There was a competative trail ride in (I think) Tennessee (sp) where the
sponser decided not to have vet checks on the 15 and 25 mile rides. The
trail ride assc. pulled their sponsership but the promoter went ahead
anyway. It was an exteremely hot day and they offered cash jackpots for the
winners. The long and short of it is that some 13 horses died that day, most
of them belonging to kids.
The part that really got to me - the winner of the 25 miler was a young
teenage girl who's parents and family cheered and urged her on to gallop to
the finish line even though the closest 2nd was way behind. Her horse died
after the race. As you might expect in this situation everybody is now sueing
everybody else. The promoter is even trying to sue the trail ride assc. for
pulling their sponsership!!!! I hope they hang him. liesl
|
381.6 | is this a mild form of abuse? | TOPDOC::NAJJAR | | Thu Sep 17 1987 14:32 | 34 |
| I know there are varying degrees of abuse, but wouldn't something
like this constitute a mild form of it?:
I know someone who has 2 horses that she events. One was bought
last year specifically for doing training & prelim, the other one
is a 6yo that in now doing training level. The owner decided as
of last year that the 6yo should stay in his stall all day so that
he doesn't get hurt in the paddock, or tire himself out before she
rides him. The only time he is out is if she comes up to ride (and
that is not always every day). The other one now stays in 1/2 days
for no apparant reason and is ridden even less.
The 6 yo is sometimes a little timid about jumping (I think he was
overfaced as a youngster) and always gets a little 'assistance' in
the form of spurs and whip when he so much as cocks an ear backward
when approaching a jump. The owner has started riding with a 'top'
trainer who tells her that she should beat the s--- out of the horse
if he hesitates or seems to not want to jump. (instead of going
back to small fences and ground poles to help the horse build up
confidence before moving on to the bigger ones).
He was even so kind as to demonstrate what he wanted her to do (on
her horse). Now when she schools the horse, for example, the other
night, she rode for about 45 min. on flat work and set up a small
cross rail and proceeded to jump the horse over it back and forth no
less than 30 - 35 times.
The horse was plainly tired & bored, and started to get lazy with
the front feet (tapped the poles) so of course he got punished for
that. Then, when the owner finished riding, the horse was walked
around for a couple of minutes, a sheet was put on him and he was
put back in his stall. When you see things like that it makes
you feel sorry for the horse, at 6 yrs old, he's got a lot more years to
face the same routine.
|
381.7 | sounds more than just mild | MILVAX::HUDSON | | Fri Sep 18 1987 09:33 | 4 |
| This is inresponse to .6
Someone should train her the same way and if she doesn't respond
to those comands than she should have the S*** beat out of her.
The same goes for the instructor.
|
381.8 | Yes. It's abuse. | SSDEVO::KOLLER | | Fri Sep 18 1987 11:55 | 25 |
| RE:.6
Yes. I believe it is abuse. As usual, abuse occurs due to ignorance
or insensitivity to the needs of the horse.
I do not believe for a minute that horses "just love" to show,
event, go for 25/50/100 mile endurance rides, or whatever. The fact
is they would prefer to just be horses and romp in the fields with
their fellow horses. We humans have ensleved them for our purposes.
In previous centuries our excuse was that we needed them for
transportation, survival, food , etc. Now that we use them mainly
for pleaure and sport we owe to treat them with dignity and let
them be horses as much as possible. To me that means providing an
environment that as as natural as possible, and to show appreciation
of what they do for us.
keeping a horse in a stall for hours on end with a one to two hour
turnout is not my idea of natural and human treatment of a horse.
Boring a horse with repetitive schooling and beating up on a horse
is also to my mind not very horsemanlike. Horses are not machines.
Enough said. Had to get it out.
bobk
|
381.9 | Yes, another case of abuse | SQM::MURPHY | Is it Friday yet? | Fri Sep 18 1987 15:41 | 7 |
| A definite sign of abuse. Maybe we should have a file in here for
"Bad Riding Instructors/Trainers" similar to "Bad Veterinarians"
in one of the other note files? It might save someone from getting
themself or their horse in the wrong hands for lessons if warned
in time.
|
381.10 | the battle begins | IMAGIN::KOLBE | Stuck in the middle again | Fri Sep 18 1987 16:41 | 14 |
|
A followup on my note in .5 - the jackpot endurance ride in Tulsa.
Bill McAnally, the organizer, and several competitors are being
charged with cruelty to animals which is a felony in Oklahoma.
This is a possible 5 year prison sentence. There are also several
persons connected to the ride that are being charged with illegal
gambling for organizing a 'Calcutta' (I don't know what that is)
on the race.
In retrun McAnally has charged the editor of EQUUS with defamation
and the AERC with breach of contract for pulling their sanction of
the race. Seven horses died during the ride and several more died
later. liesl
|
381.11 | Slanderous? | BUGCHK::DINGEE | Julie Dingee, VAX Forms Development | Sat Sep 19 1987 11:45 | 19 |
|
I don't know which file has info on "bad vets", but do you
really think that's a good idea? I have some reservations
about really going into detail here. Even if they're the
worst instructor (or vet) in the world, maybe we should
ask for recommendations, instead, then get in touch with
whomever said "I don't recommend that person" to find out
details.
I'm not sure that really going after someone in a notes file
is the best way to do things. It seems that if the person
"maligned", whether the info is true or not, were to find
out, DEC could get into a great deal of trouble and so could
the person who wrote down the information for all to see.
Anyone know more about this? Moderators?
-julie
|