T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
229.1 | 4 speed, not 2! | ZEPPO::FOX | | Thu Mar 19 1987 13:08 | 5 |
| Whoops, I meant to say that my mom's truck is a 4 speed manual!
I don't even think they make 2 speed manuals any more!
Oops!
|
229.2 | Make it the RIGHT ONE!! | DONNER::PAYNES | Payne Weber | Thu Mar 19 1987 23:19 | 14 |
| RE: .0
Make sure it's a V8, has the right rear-end gear ratio(3:56,3:73,3:90,
etc.), you need to be sure that the torque range of the engine is
high enough to pull the load, especially up hills, stop & go traffic,
etc. . This will be ecspecially true if you later put a camper on.
That's the trouble i have, not the right gear ratio, it's to high
(3:08's, YUK!!), I'm always using 3rd gear on hills, etc. .
Be chosey(sp), there's alot of trucks out there.
Steve
|
229.3 | used Ford | PIXEL::DANI | | Fri Mar 20 1987 09:26 | 22 |
|
I still have my original rig, and I like it a lot. I'm hauling
a 19 ft Hartman, TB size with a 4 ft dressing room. It's a tag
along with a GVW of 5400 lbs. I put my money there and bought
a used truck.
I have a 1978 Ford 351, manual 4 spd (1st is granny gear). I have
a weight distributing hitch but probably don't need it due to
the long wheel base of the truck (it's a camper special, 2 wheel
drive). I lose speed on the hills some but rarely have to shift.
Definitely an 8 cylinder for hauling a horse trailer! A 6 will
have to work harder and probably not last as long. I am biased
towards Ford trucks for hauling. They seem to do better than
the Chevy's in the power department.
I have had great luck with my used truck!
Danielle
|
229.4 | truck hunting | CSC32::M_HOEPNER | | Fri Mar 20 1987 10:25 | 16 |
| I really have to agree with everyone so far. You can get yourself into
a bind with "not enough" truck. I know several people who decided to
go with a "small" engine (for fuel economy, etc). Their poor trucks
have to work so hard they get poorer mileage and more repairs (like
tearing out the transmission, or the rear end) than my heavy 3/4 ton
with 400 cu engine.
My truck is extra heavy duty everywhere, extra large radiator,
transmission cooler... and I have towed trailers over 100,000 miles
with it. I did have transmission work done at 125,000. Mine
happens to be a Dodge--I swear by it. By the way, with this big
engine, I get 13 to 15 miles per gallon towing a trailer.
Good luck truck hunting.
Mary Jo
|
229.5 | towing vehicles - which one??? | NRADM2::CIAMPAGLIA | | Fri Mar 20 1987 11:18 | 25 |
| Hi Linda!
Presently I tow my 2-horse, TB size, Hartman with a 1984, full-size,
Ford Bronco. It is an 8-cyl, manual, 4WD, 302 engine. Does a great
job. BUT, it is a short wheel base and therefore can have some
problems loosing power when fully loaded on hills (especially those
Vermont ones!). I have read that ideally that vehicle you tow with
should be longer than the vehicle you tow.
My last truck was a Ford F250, manual, 4WD, 3/4 ton pick-up. It
had a longer wheel base than my Bronco and did a super job hauling
but it was only a 6-cyl and therefore lost power easily. I would
have kept it if it were an 8-cyl.
My husband and I are currently thinking of selling the Bronco and buying
a Suburban. They are know to be great for hauling, especially if
you have the tow package installed. They have a long wheel base,
haul easily and are comfortable, but they are expensive and don't
have too great of gas mileage...sooo...you have to make a big decision
when purchasing a towing vehicle.
Good luck, and keep us posted on what you end up buying...
Jenny
|
229.6 | FORD F-150 "AOKAY FOR ME" | USWAV1::GREYNOLDS | PAINTS-sports model of horses | Fri Mar 20 1987 11:22 | 9 |
| Linda,I currently have a 1985 Ford F-150 4X4 with a 351 HO engine
the truck is a shortbed (that is 6 1/2 ft.bed)and it drive fine
hauling a Gore 2-horse trailer.I also use a Reese hitch as opposed
to a bumper setup.Weight distribution is okay and all.I've always
liked my trucks bigger than the trailer in case one horse comences
to sway or scramble,you have vehicle stability to compensate.
Hope this helps.
P.S. It's also a good thing I work field service so I get a company
car cause the gas mileage ain't too good w/truck
|
229.7 | Lousy gas mileage? - carry more gas | NOWIMP::DADDAMIO | Nothing artificial added | Fri Mar 20 1987 12:04 | 11 |
| We have a GMC 3/4 ton 4X4 with automatic transmission and 350 V8
engine. You definitely need the power, but the gas mileage is rotten.
One thing we did about gas mileage is to get two 20 gal. gas tanks
on the truck. There is a switch in the cab to let you switch from
one tank to the other. At least it keeps you from having to stop
at every other gas station! We can usually do long distance hauls
(for us that's about 3 hours one way) without using up all the gas
in both tanks. I don't think I'd get another truck without 2 tanks.
Jan
|
229.8 | Bigger is better | PLANET::NICKERSON | Bob Nickerson DTN 282-1663 :^) | Fri Mar 20 1987 12:25 | 29 |
| In my opinion you are better off with too much truck than with too
little. The gas mileage won't make that much difference (note that
underpowered engines pulling heavy loads use "MORE" gas than larger
engines suited for the task). You should ask for heavy duty everything
especially now that light trucks are in vogue and are often not
like they used to be. I have a Chevy 3/4 ton which I've modified
to a one ton except for the front axle (added doolies, suspension
etc). It has a 350 engine which pulled our old Miley two horse
with no problems. Now we have a four horse tracer with living
quarters, and it is grossly underpowered (needless to say I'm in
the market for a truck). I would think about what you plan to do
in the next five years and let that dictate what you will need in
a truck but generally I'd get no less than a 3/4 ton set up with
a camper/tow package (eg Camper Special). For tag-along's you want
a long wheel base, but for goosenecks you would rather have a short
wheel base. By the way the longer the wheelbase, the harder it
is for most people to back so you may want to try a friends truck
for backing first. Any of the big three US truck makers should
fit your needs, but I'd be careful of the imported versions because
even if they are rated for the same load capacity, they just aren't
big enough. My preferance is Chevy or GMC but its based on my
subjective feelings, not an objective advantage. All in all I don't
think any American manufacturer has it over any other in this
department.
Regards,
Bob
|
229.9 | Truck Reliability. | SMAUG::GUNN | | Sun Mar 22 1987 09:44 | 21 |
| The April issue of Consumer Reports has just come out - it's their
1987 Car Issue. The reliability ratings include pick up trucks.
These ratings are based on the reported experiences of Counsumers
Union memebers, although Consumer Reports doesn't test trucks. All
the three domestic manufacturers get "much worse than average"
reliability ratings on their full size pick up trucks except for
Ford which is "worse than average" for its 2WD V8.
The "anecdotal evidence" I have heard suggests that the manufacturers
are about equal but are probably average overall in reliability.
Each brand has some problems, but the only universal criticism I
have heard is of the Jeep Cherokee (bring your own mechanic). Any
body care to add their comments?
It is extremely important to properly maintain your truck if you
are using it to haul horses (or anything else that heavy). A fully
loaded two horse trailer weighs in between two and a half and three
tons, depending on the brand of trailer and horse. Brakes, suspension
and transmission are put under high stress when hauling. I agree
with the previous reply that a V8 heavy duty everything is the way
to go.
|
229.10 | Bigger is Best | TRNING::PJOHNSON | | Wed Mar 25 1987 09:14 | 3 |
| I have a C-10 longbed, with small V8, transmission cooler, etc.
It is ok for a 2-horse trailor. But, in agreement with others,
I WISH I HAD GOTTEN A LARGER V8.
|
229.11 | YUP BIGGER IS BEST! | LAUREL::REMILLARD | | Wed Mar 25 1987 09:59 | 30 |
| Yup... Bigger is better in this case. I have a Ford F-100
(V6) and had a transmission cooler installed. The only thing
that this truck had going for it was - it was all I could afford,
the engine was sound and it wasn't a rust bucket. This truck
slows on hills just by itself.... I am buying a trailer and
have not hauled with it - yet. I know that it will be slow
hauling the trailer but I look at it this way... I'll git there!!
But I know that with a smaller engine - it will work harder
you do go through (my opinon) more gas. So it does require
that you take the best care of it that you can... I am by myself
most of the time and I have had my brakes lock up on me a couple
of times, ran out of oil (garage din't tighten down something)
and have had BOTH tires of a trailer go flat on the same side
with two horses loaded. So, it doesn't pay to not take the
best care of of them that you can. I have a honest garage the I can
count on - he knows I don't know much about how a engine runs
and takes care of my truck for me. I tell him to do what he
has to and if I get stuck I will pull his lips over his face
and punch holes in it.... We get along fine.
Bottom line is - that I do bring the truck in a couple of times
a year and if I am going on a particularly long trip, I will
bring it in before I go. I have found that this has saved me
money in the long run. It is very hard to run around and find
someone to fix your truck when you have a nag in the trailer.
I know - I spent a nite in a garage parking lot with two of
them because there wasn't one open.
|
229.12 | And more - an update | ZEPPO::FOX | | Wed Mar 25 1987 11:27 | 25 |
| Well, to keep anyone updated, at this point with the amount of plain
commuting miles I do a year (about 20,000 or so) and the fact that
only about 1/5 of that is hauling, I think I am going to try to
go with either an F-150 with a small V8 (EFI 302) or a R10 (Chevy)
with the 305 EFI small V8. I have no preference between Ford or
Chevy but I am going to get the super engine cooling package on
either, heavy-duty suspension on either, front and rear stabilizer
bars and either the 3.42 axle if its a Chevy or the 3.55 axle if
its a Ford. I'd LOVE to be able to get a 3/4 ton with a big V8 however
the gas would eat me alive in the long run (which is what I had
before! heavy sigh!)
Thanks for all the advice and please, I'd still welcome suggestions,
advice, etc!
Thanks,
Linda
P.S. In reference to .11, I am currently using a 6 cylinder and
with 1 medium size horse (15.3 hand Appaloosa), I have just barely
gotten there! I can remember a few occassions of going up hills
and being in first gear on a manual transmission hoping and praying
that I wouldn't have to shift into "granny-low"!
|
229.13 | When it's all over... | ZEPPO::FOX | | Wed Apr 08 1987 10:21 | 14 |
| Well, thanks everyone for the advice! I finally bought a truck!
I decided upon a 1/2 ton Chevy with HD everything including springs,
shocks, radiator, battery, brakes, aux. transmission cooler, etc.
with an automatic transmission and a 350 fuel-injected engine. Now
all that is left is to put 500 miles and a hitch before I attempt
hauling!
Again, thanks for all of the advice and suggestions!
Linda
P.S. Oh yeah, it also has a 3.42 rear axle and a rear axle locking
differential (which hopefully might come in handy in wet fields!)
|
229.14 | Weight distribution kit really needed? | CSLALL::LCOBURN | Plan B Farm | Mon May 23 1994 11:24 | 21 |
| Another question about equine transportation, this regarding my
towing set up. Fate has kindly befallen me an awfully nice truck...a
91 Ford Lariat XLT, 4WD, low mileage, V8 5.0 liter engine, at a price
I cannot refuse...free! (a gift from my father, the dear man!). All
that remains for me to do is have the hitch installed. I have called
several places and found U-Haul to have the best price around. This
is the same place that put the hitch on my last one (which is now
for sale if anyone needs an inexpensive conversion van with towing
package), and I was very happy with their work. So, Im on the right
track...my question is the neccessity of the weight distribution bars.
I have never had them on my van and have had no troubles, but Im
wondering if they really make a diffence and if it is something I
*should* invest in to extend the life of my new truck? The prices
I've been quoted for this 'kit' have made me gag! Just this alone
is equal to the total price of everything else put together...hitch,
wiring harness *and* electric brakes set up! My truck is huge, 4WD,
with a very large wheelbase. I guess what Im looking for is opinions
from someone other than the guys who are trying to sell me the weight
distribution kits. FWIW, I know a lot of other people who tow just
fine without it...opinions?
|
229.15 | Maybe(and that's definite!) | DECWET::JDADDAMIO | Seattle Rain Festival: 1/1-12/31 | Mon May 23 1994 14:46 | 19 |
| Linda,
Never look a gift truck in the mouth! ;-)
A weight distributiing hitch may be necessary or not. It depends on
what you're going to tow with the truck. If you're going to tow a
trailer which has a loaded weight of 5,000 pounds or more, I'd
recommend one. At 6,000 pounds a WD hitch is kind of a necessity. (My
opinions only)
So, if you're towing an aluminum or fiberglass 2 horse trailer w/o a
dressing room, you're probably OK w/o a WD hitch. If you've got a
dressing room, a 3 horse trailer or an all steel model like the old
Kingstons(which weighed over 4,000 empty!), a WD hitch is indicated.
There was a recent article in EQUUS(2 months ago?) on trucks and
hitches which might be useful reading.
John
|
229.16 | | CSLALL::LCOBURN | Plan B Farm | Mon May 23 1994 15:12 | 17 |
| Thanks for the tip, John! I have a friend who keeps her back copies
of Equus, I'll ask her if she remembers the article!
My trailer is an old Miley, the spec sheet (which surprisingly still
remains on one of the escape doors), say's it's 3000 lbs empty. I
usually only haul one horse, approx. 800 lbs. Sounds like, from
your input, I would be okay unless I started hauling 2 larger horses
frequently (which is not likely). My dad tells me he would expect
this truck to haul just fine, that the (gear?) ratio is very low and
the 4WD will help out in a pinch. Still, I want it to last a quite
a few years, it's a third car only and won't be used for commuting or
much else except towing and moving hay/shavings, etc, so I should be
able to keep the wear/tear it takes to a minimum....I'll never be able
to buy something this for myself, so this freebie has to last! :-)
Thanks for the input!
|
229.17 | What EQUUS says | DECWET::JDADDAMIO | Seattle Rain Festival: 1/1-12/31 | Fri Jun 03 1994 17:21 | 11 |
| If you haven't dug up that EQUUS article yet, it was in the April 1994
issue(EQUUS 198). I came across it while cleaning up some magazines
yesterday.
I looked for what they had to say about weight distributiing hitches.
They say that WD hitches should be used on a full size truck when
towing 5,000 pounds(trailer + horses + "stuff") or more. For compact
trucks and Bronco-type vehicles, they recommend WD hitches for towing
3,500 pounds or more.
John
|
229.18 | | CSLALL::LCOBURN | Plan B Farm | Mon Jun 06 1994 09:40 | 10 |
| I did find the article. Actually, I have since found a few more
articles about towing as well that were more useful. The Equus one
was rather vague to me.
I HAVE decided to go with the weight distribution set up, though. My
truck is full sized, my trailer weighs 2640 empty and my one horse is
small (about 800 lbs), but I'd rather be safe than sorry and I do want
my truck to last as long as possible. Got the truck this weekend, it
goes in for the hitch installation at the end of the week.
|
229.19 | Sorry, I was getting off topic | DECWET::JDADDAMIO | Seattle Rain Festival: 1/1-12/31 | Mon Jun 06 1994 15:02 | 8 |
| >The Equus one was rather vague to me.
You have just said out loud my biggest complaint about EQUUS in recent
years. They go to such extremes to be "fair" and not offend *anyone*
that they frequently come off as vague and/or wishy-washy.
That's another subject though and, if there's any more comment, let's
take it up under the magazine topic....
|