T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
199.1 | i'm so broke i can't even pay attention! | PHILEM::MATTHEWS | | Wed Jan 07 1987 13:41 | 13 |
|
re .0 thanks for the name i couldnt think of it at the time.
I have started to investigate that if i use my horse as a broodmare,
how can i show her and breed her, and still write some things off.
as with any bussiness you have to keep strict records, and as
re 0 explained... you must show an intent to make a profit, now
the laws says that you have 7 years to show that.
will let you know what i find out for 87.
wendy.
|
199.2 | I forgot the AHC book! | PLANET::NICKERSON | Bob Nickerson DTN 282-1663 :^) | Wed Jan 07 1987 17:28 | 23 |
| I didn't think to mention that the American Horse Council publishes
a book every year which details some of the finer points of the
tax law as it applies to horse businesses. I can't remember the
name of it but I went to a seminar in November where one of the
authors gave a talk on the new tax reform. Even if you read this
you still need to at least consult with an EQUINE TAX EXPERT. Most
General CPA's are not well versed in the old law never mind the
new. For instance, if you use a non-straight line depreciation
schedule, you must keep a record of all pre-production expenses
of assets which are put in service after two years. This means
that if you breed a mare which you are depreciating (non-straight
line) you must keep a record of all expenses incurred from the instant
of inception of the foal. Things get curiouser and curiouser...
In addition you must apportion all capital costs used to produce
that foal as part of the cost basis. This means that foals portion
of the depreciation expense of your fences, trucks, barn, etc.
If you are confused at this point, you're beginning to get the message.
The IRS has a notoriously bad sense of humor which could cost you
some money in five to ten years. Be smart and read as much as you
can but when you are done reading, GET SOME PROFESSIONAL ADVICE.
Bob_living_in_the_shadow_of_the_IRS
|
199.3 | HORSE ATTORNEY | PMRV70::MACONE | | Thu Jan 08 1987 13:08 | 10 |
| I didn't realize this file had been created before I dumped my response
in 10. I agree that very few accountants are knowledgeable enough
to handle horse businesses....If anyone is looking for a very good
attorney who handles a lot of horse people/problems/business call
Sherry Gould at Gould Law Offices in Littleton, MA. Sherry is not
a bonafide "horse person" but she is now handling so many horse
people she is becoming somewhat of an expert in the area. All the
horse people I know that deal with her find her to be excellent.
Jeannie
|
199.4 | A REAL horseperson/tax expert | NEWVAX::AIKEN | I love Crabbet Arabians! 301-867-1584 | Fri Jan 09 1987 17:35 | 8 |
| I have a friend, Margaret Berger, who is a CPA with a Master's in
business. She is a bona fide horseperson -- her Arabian stallion
is Atabi Moonfyre, of Colorado fame -- and has saved me BUCKS in
taxes. If anyone would like to reach her, send me a DECmail at
Merrie Aiken @DCO or mail to NEWVAX::AIKEN.
Regards,
Merrie
|
199.5 | Info on tax laws? | DANUBE::PORTER | | Wed Jul 13 1988 08:47 | 5 |
| Bob mentioned there is an American Horse Council book on tax laws.
Can anyone tell me how to get hold of this book or any other related
material.
Karen DTN-241-3102
|
199.6 | Contact AHC | PBA::NICKERSON | Bob Nickerson DTN 282-1663 :^) | Tue Aug 09 1988 13:19 | 7 |
| I don't have the address with me but I'll see if I can find it.
I would contact AHC directly and ask them where you can get it along
with similar information. The address for AHC is usually published
in an ad in Equuis etc.
Bob
|
199.7 | Four-footed Deductions? | VMSSPT::PAANANEN | | Tue Dec 05 1989 12:40 | 29 |
| ================================================================================
Original Note by:
GENRAL::LEECH "Pat Leech CX01/02 DTN 522-6044" 24 lines 5-DEC-1989 10:50
-< Tax deductions >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To realize tax benefits such as deduction of expenses, a Thoroughbred
owner must operate in a businesslike manner with a for-profit
objective. An unusual case decided recently by the U.S. Tax Court
gives insight into how the government determines whether a business is
a profit-seeking activity or a non-deductable hobby.
Charles O. Givens of Mount Vernon, Ind., is an investment broker. He
bred Tennessee Walking Horses for six years, raised cattle for four
years, and never ralized a profit from either venture. Givens claimed
losses of $42,455, but the Internal Revenue Service denied the
deductions.
The Tax Court, however, ruled that Givens managed his horse operation
in a businesslike manner by maintaining detailed accounts, consulting
experts, devoting several hours daily to the activity, etc. The court,
though, concluded that Givens did not devote similar attention to the
cattle operation. The special judge in the case ruled that Givens can
deduct $30,180 of losses from the horse operation, but cannot claim
deductions of $12,275 from the cattle enterprise.
From The Blood Horse dated Dec. 2, 1989.
|