T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
159.1 | | BAUCIS::MATTHEWS | | Thu Nov 06 1986 08:47 | 13 |
|
oh boy, you came up with a great one.....
but the way I see it is plain and simple! no drugs.. period.
if horse your horse is sick or hurt, he should stay at home.
I feel if any drugs are used people try and push it no matter what.
what happens when you see a nice filly on the rail, that you saw
in the sale program. you decide to buy her the following day at
the sale. you get her home... and taaaa ddaaaaa....the mares
lame as hell?? now what? sell her.... ????? not to me you won't
;^)
wendy
|
159.2 | Bute is a drug | TYCHO::FROST | | Thu Nov 06 1986 09:36 | 12 |
| The use of Bute in horses during competition has been a hot topic
in New Hampshire the last couple of years. I've discussed this subject at
hearings before the State Legislator, the New Hampshire Horse Council,
and the New England Draft Horse Association. After listening to all the
arguments, it appears to me to break out with the race horse crowd strongly
favoring the legal user of Bute, the show horse people opposed to declaring
the use of Bute illegal, and the horse pullers favoring a total ban on the
use of Bute in competition.
Personally, I agree with Wendy. No drugs means no drugs. I don't
believe a sound horse needs Bute and only sound horses should be in
competition.
|
159.3 | | CTOAVX::IZZO | | Thu Nov 06 1986 09:37 | 25 |
| I have to agree totally about _not_ allowing Bute. I'll relay a
story that may help to clarify why position on Bute in the show
ring.
I judged a show where a spiffy kid was showing a spiffy quarter
horse. The horse was lame, so I could only use her in the equitation
and showmanship classes. Halfway through the day, the kid's father
approached me and wanted to know why I had used the kid so
inconsistantly. I explained that the horse was lame and that it
couldn't be used against her in eq and showmanship, but that there
were too many other good horses that were going sound for me to
use her in pleasure, etc.
The guy went wild. He said that it wasn't fair for me to judge
that way. That the horse had arthritis, that he'd just administered
Bute, and that if I'd be patient he'd prove her sound. It is at
that point I had to walk away. Bute does not make an unsound horse
sound. Period. It only gives the horse comfort. It is my opinion
that allowing people to show a drugged horse (any drug) borders
on abuse. Showing is stressful enough on an animal mentally, why
should be allow further stress on them physically.
My $.02.
Ann
|
159.4 | | PHILEM::MATTHEWS | | Thu Nov 06 1986 10:13 | 12 |
|
hi ann, I have been interested in judging since my 4h
days, used to be on the judging team. How as an adult can i become
a judge???
second, if you knew that the horse was lame,
why?? didnt you just excuse the horse from the ring??? If my
horses pick up a stone before a class, and they are off , i'll excuse
myself before the judge gives me the gate.
wendy
|
159.5 | NEVER to BUTE? | GENRAL::KOLLER | | Thu Nov 06 1986 11:50 | 10 |
| It's all either black or white right? Last year my daughter and
I travelled to Oklahoma City from Colorado Springs so she and our
Morgan could participate in their first Grand National. The trip
was expensive. Anyway, once there for the very first time the horse
got girth galls. What to do? I went to the show vet who told us
that besides putting on a fleece covering, to give him some bute
which he gave to us. We did that, the horse was comfortable, and
we were able to finish the show. Was it wrong? Under the circumstances
I think not. Any thoughts on this?
|
159.6 | Not in the show ring | CTOAVX::IZZO | | Thu Nov 06 1986 12:56 | 43 |
| Re .4
Wendy, there's a lot to tell about becoming a judge (carded). It's
rather extensive, but if you'd like to contact me off line I'll
be happy to talk/write to you about it. CTOAVX::IZZO or DTN:
255-5377.
The reason I didn't give the kid the gate was because the rules
governing the show said that _in equitation and in showmanship_
the horse had to be "reasonably sound". Technically, she was
"reasonably sound". She just didn't move correctly and seemed
a bit ouchy in the hips.
Re .5
I think it almost has to be a black or white issue for a couple
of reasons. I do not mean to say that what you did was wrong (under
the current rulings), but things happen and if the rules said you
couldn't have shown, I'm sure you wouldn't have. Your daughter
would have had a broken heart and you would have had a broken bank
account, and you would have gone home.
I have a friend who's Appy filly was invited to the world's. They
trucked the filly from Connecticut to Oklahoma City with no trouble,
but once there, she developed what the vet told her a minor cold.
They didn't show her. They took their lumps and came home. (BTW,
the filly did not have a cold, she had pluresy (sp?) and died a
couple of days later at Tufts.)
I know a girl who has a horse with navicular. The horse lived on
Bute every day of his life. Her students pin well on him (when
he goes good) but should he be out there at all? The horse was
ultimately nerved...he's still shown all the time, even over fences.
I'm not saying it very well, but my point is that it's not only
the slimey people trying to cheat a judge that this ruling affects.
Because Bute makes a horse more comfortable, a small problem can
develop into a more complicated problem without anyone noticing
it in time. This is one of those rulings that will make a lot of
exhibitors mad (similar to the AHSA hard hat ruling) but is put
in place for physical protection.
Ann
|
159.7 | cudos to ann | PHILEM::MATTHEWS | | Thu Nov 06 1986 13:37 | 5 |
|
SLIMEY PEOPLE????? THANKS FOR SAYING THAT FOR ME!
I just didnt know how to say it, but you said nicely.
wendy
|
159.8 | More 2 cents worth | ZEPPO::FOX | | Thu Nov 06 1986 13:42 | 22 |
| I would like to thank everyone who has responded to this topic so
quickly (and those who will respond!) The reason that this came
up is because of a local though large county 4-H Fair in which I
saw a few kids with older, athritic horses who were giving them
Bute because of the athritis. I understand that the kids want to
show at just this one show, etc but my feelings are (and what I
think 4-H kids should learn as a practice) that no drugs should
be allowed also, including Bute for the same reasons as mentioned
before, masks other problems etc. I am on a show committee for local
4-H shows and requested that the growing drug problem at least be
addressed by putting something in the premium/entry list that states
that no drugs be allowed. I met with opposition from fellow committee
members who felt that "Bute is like aspirin and you (meaning me)
take aspirin, don't you?" I know that Bute is nonthing more than
an antiinflammatory however if there is a reason to need it at all,
than at least at the 4-H level, my feelings are that there is also
a reason for the horse to stay home.
Again, thanks and please keep the replies coming on this topic!!!!
Linda
|
159.9 | | PHILEM::MATTHEWS | | Thu Nov 06 1986 15:03 | 17 |
|
you stating it that way, makes me really feel for some
of those kids. I know whats its let to have an older horse. my father
bought me a horse for my 11th xmas. he knew nothing about horses,
the horse was sold as a six year old, turns out, thank God she was
sound, just some minor wind puffs, she was a retired 23yr old
GRA barrel horse. we found this out 2 years after we moved her
out of the show barn. for all you people in denver.... that
was Don Wyatt, remember him???? anyway she taught me alot, and
i had her til she was 25, then i sold her. anyway...
enough rambiling. as for bute.. well... you said 4h kids?? right??
well... this might be going over board a bit *BUT* are you teaching
kids at an early age that drugs are ok for horses, and kids????
think about it... and when they get older, winning means everything,
even put a sick or ouchy horse to work. oh well. I better get outa
here before I get beat up.... ;^)
|
159.10 | More drugs | TYCHO::FROST | | Thu Nov 06 1986 16:06 | 23 |
| re: .5
As far as I'm concerned the issue is black and white. I do not believe
your use of Bute was wrong. Under the same circumstances I may have done
the same thing. The problem is that one cannot limit the use of Bute or
any other drug. It's allowed or it isn't allowed.
I know, and I'm sure Ann knows, horses that have been injured pulling
while on Bute. The argument used sounds much like yours. "I've sent alot
of money on this horse, I've sent time and money getting him ready and I've
trucked him a long way." How about the owner who insists that his horse
is only a little sore up front because he was trimmed too close. At least
one horseman has a horse "a little sore up front" the last two years and
he's still using Bute and he will until the horse is a cripple or he's stopped.
I'm not opposed to the general use of Bute. I'm against the use
of Bute or any other drug in horses during competition.
This is somewhat unrelated but this past summer at a large fair
I saw a lady blowing Coke into her horse just before going into the show
ring. There were several competitors watching and no one objected or filed
a complaint.
|
159.11 | More on Bute | ZEPPO::FOX | | Thu Nov 06 1986 16:09 | 22 |
| All I am saying is that this was an issue that came up at a show
committee meeting of which I was attending. The show in question
is a 4-H show. My own feelings are that if a kid has to give a
horse Bute to be able to show them then maybe the horse is better
off being left at home. I, fortunately, have never had a need to
use Bute and would not compete any horse of mine if they were on
Bute, however I do understand that it is done for whatever reason.
I have mixed feelings about allowing Bute at a 4-H show. On the
one hand, I would love to see every kid who can only afford to ride
a 23 year old, sweet, arthritic gelding be able to show it and enjoy
the horse in every possible way. On the other hand I feel that
if there is a need to give the horse Bute, then that is probably
a good reason for the horse to stay home. I personnally left the
decision up to the other members of the committee but I felt that
it might be an interesting topic for EQUITATION so I mentioned it
here. The final outcome (decided by the other members on the
committee, I abstained) was to mention in the premium list that
all drugs (including Bute) were disallowed.
Linda
|
159.12 | And more... | ZEPPO::FOX | | Thu Nov 06 1986 16:13 | 13 |
| In reference to -.9, that was exactly my point - I feel that we
should be teaching the kids that drugs are NOT okay for horses in
competition (as T. Frost mentioned) however other show committee
members felt that Bute was not really a drug but instead wsa just
like aspirin and was therefore alright to use. Don't worry about
getting beat up! I am just trying to get others feelings about
a topic which has been thrown around by AHSA, AQHA, ApHC, etc for
a few years now and has just recently reached the 4-H level.
Thanks for the comments! Please keep them coming!
Linda
|
159.13 | COKED OUT HORSE?? | NRADM2::CIAMPAGLIA | | Thu Nov 06 1986 16:22 | 11 |
|
regarding 158.10: you saw a lady blowing Coke into her horse before
going into the show ring????
THAT'S GROSS!!
The poor horse...people like that should be shot!
|
159.14 | CLASSIC COKE????? | PHILEM::MATTHEWS | | Thu Nov 06 1986 16:47 | 9 |
|
well.... we might be just a bad as the people who are
doing things (coke) to their horses. I would have reported it the
police(prosession) and humane society. If we stand by and watch
we are just as guilty.
wendy WHO_SOME_PEOPLE_HATE_IS_ALSO_VERY_RESPECTED_
WITH_THE_MAJORITY_OF_THE_SHOW_CIRCUIT
|
159.15 | Horse Aspirin? | GENRAL::KOLLER | | Thu Nov 06 1986 17:06 | 11 |
| I would like to sidestep (for a note or two) the issue of whether
bute should be a permitted drug at horseshows and events. Instead
I would like to understand a little more about the drug itself.
From previous notes I get the impression that some horse people
think of bute as "horse aspirin". The pracctice of allowing its
use by AHSA may have encouraged that attitude. My question: "Is
bute really the equivalent of horse aspirin? If it is no wonder
that there is so much controversy! Some people will take aspirin
at the first symptoms of discomfort, others have to in severe pain
before they'll take anything! What is bute?
|
159.16 | My vote is Ban the Drugs | PLANET::NICKERSON | Bob Nickerson DTN 282-1663 :^) | Thu Nov 06 1986 17:22 | 25 |
| Sometimes when you read a topic like this one you just know there's
going to be a controversy. If anyone is interested, this month's
Equus magazine did a feature article on equine drug use in general.
It has changed some of my ideas about drug use (abuse) but not all.
Its easy to see the abuse spectrum because it usually ends up with
a horse or rider getting hurt or its just plain illegal (like blowing
coke on a horses nose). It's also pretty easy to justify some drug
use on the benificial side (like wormers or the theraputic use of
a drug like banamine). Its the gray area in the middle that causes
the controversy. I personally think that we have made this drugged
society and we now own the obligation to correct it. I'm therefore
opposed to drug use in the show ring for any reason. The first
place to start is with our future (all those little persons that
we put all the pressure on) riders. We should enforce the idea
that drugs shouldn't be a way of life even if it costs us financially.
my $.02
Bob
BTW how would you propose to enforce drug use rules? Drug testing
can get pretty expensive for a 4H show.
|
159.17 | Bute belongs in the vet's kit, not the showring. | A1VAX::GUNN | | Thu Nov 06 1986 17:31 | 19 |
| Neither Bute nor Aspirin, for that matter, cure the underlying condition
that causes a horse (or a person) pain. They merely mask the symptoms.
In most instances, showing involves a higher level of stress on
a horse than its normal routine does. Therefore showing an unsound horse
on Bute is doing the horse no good whatsoever and can aggravate
whatever injury causes the unsoundness. I don't have any reservations
about absolutely prohibiting the use of Bute along with all the
other drugs in any kind of show. Bute has its place in the treatment
of injuries but not in the showring.
On the few occassions my horse has shown some lameness, I stopped
riding him completely until he recovered. In one instance that meant
dropping out of one of the only novice event in the area on the
suspicion of a problem.
Another related issue is keeping the older arthritic horse going
on a continuous diet of Bute, whether it's competing or not. I do have
reservations about doing this no matter what the emotional attachment
to the horse. I have yet to face this dilema myself.
|
159.18 | Equus has a feature on drug use! | PLANET::NICKERSON | Bob Nickerson DTN 282-1663 :^) | Thu Nov 06 1986 17:34 | 12 |
| As mentioned before, this month's Equus is a worthwhile buy since
it covers many of the popular drugs being used on horses today.
It describes Bute (phenolbutozolidin sp?) as having its roots in
the same chemicals that are contained in "good ole asprin". Note
that it has some of the same side effects like burning a hole through
the lining of the stomach. It's only one of many drugs used to
make a horse feel better. A drug gaining in popularity on the show
circuit is Banamine (tm), especially for horses with a propensity
for sore backs.
Bob
|
159.19 | More of the same | RDGE43::HARWOOD | | Fri Nov 07 1986 04:46 | 42 |
|
What a question. Needless to say the discusions that have gone
on in this notes file, happen here on this side of the water too.
If I may put in my two penneth -
Bute, like many drugs is used to ease pain and discomfort making
life more comfortable during the treatment and the recuperation
process. It is a symptom inhibitor and as such should surely be
used with caution. As pointed out in a previous reply a multitude
of other problems can be masked by using such drugs.
The controversy arises from the 'true reason' for employing the
drug. I think most people would have sympathy with using available
drugs to ease suffering and premote recovery. If,however, such drugs are
used as an attempt to 'cover up' or defraud then few would condone
such action.
Surely the problem is why are the drugs being used, and to what
end. Is it really to make life more bearable for the horse until
recovery is complete, or is it to allow us to continue doing the
things we enjoy ?
As to the question of drugs being used on competition horses ?
Apart from the moral issues, I find it difficult to accept an
animal that is under any treatment as being a suitable candidate
for being placed in the top positions over 'sound' animals.
As you may have gathered, I have not been placed in the position
of having to make such decisions. Should that time come, I will
obviously have to make up my own mind - as easy or difficult as that
may be ?
Thanks for listening. Keep the good words rolling as your help,
advise and opinions are greatly appreciated.
Judy
|
159.20 | read the Equus articles! | CADZOO::NAJJAR | | Fri Nov 07 1986 10:28 | 29 |
| To reinforce Bob's reply about the Equus article, if anyone is
interested in this topic, I strongly suggest you get that issue
and read the articles word for word. The drug topic was a special
feature for that issue and they put a lot of research into it.
They talk about drug use in the various industries from TB racing
to the QH congress to Eventing and showing.
I know that the AHSA has been adding a $4.00 charge to cover drug
testing at some of the Dressage shows and Events I went to this year.
In one of the Equus articles, it mentioned that the AQHA has started to
do its own testing at recognized shows, and they arrive unannounced at
various shows during the year. They noted that some entries scratch
from classes when they hear that the drug testers are at the show,
but maybe this will help control the problem, because when you've
paid a lot of money to enter classes, then have to scratch because
you've drugged your horse, it's going to cost a lot in the long
run, so you might as well not bring the horse unless he's sound.
As far as 4-H is concerned, I agree that is important to teach the
kids the proper treatment of a lame or sore horse, and not to give
them the idea that there is a pill for every illness. Teach them
how to apply heat during the first few hours of an injury then to
hose the leg with cold water over the next few days to reduct the
swelling. Teach them the proper bandaging methods, furacin sweats,
how to use protective boots etc, and let them know that the vet
is responsible for prescribing medication when necessary. Stress
the fact that if they let the horse recover on his own, that he
is less likely to reinjure himself than if he was worked while on
bute, therefore masking the fact that he is in pain.
|
159.21 | to Bute or not to Bute... | VOLGA::BENNETT | I'd rather be riding... | Fri Nov 07 1986 13:00 | 27 |
|
If I may add my 2 cents also...
I just wish people could stop treating their horses like they were
machines. Owning a horse is much more complex than a motorcycle or car. We
have to take on the responsibility of caring for their every need. In return
they give us their all... How can people be so insensitive to this living,
breathing, simple minded creature? How can earning points or ribbons be more
important than their comfort and happiness? When a horse breaks down we owe
them the decency of caring for them until they are well. When you purchase a
horse you take the risk of losing your investment if something should happen.
(Unless, of course, you buy insurance).
And another point - I was a 4H'er as a kid - and I really enjoyed having
horses. I spent alot of time learning about nutrition, care, health, etc.
Hopefully, what I gained was knowledge to become a good horseman, becoming a
good rider is another category in itself - this is where the shows come in.
I've only had the experience of using Bute once. This was when my mare
turned up lame 2 days after purchasing her. I can't be sure she had been given
Bute the day I bought her - anything could have happened - she could have hurt
herself in the trailer, etc. So I called the vet in. He took x-rays and
assured me that she had only a minor injury. He prescribed a few weeks of
rest, walking her when she seemed better and Bute to ease the pain (which I
did give her). In two weeks she was fine.
-Janice
|
159.22 | Phenylbutazone = horse aspirin ?? | CSC32::LIVERMAN | They all must be crazy out there | Fri Nov 07 1986 16:28 | 57 |
| RE: .15
> ...My question: "Is
> bute really the equivalent of horse aspirin? If it is no wonder
> that there is so much controversy! Some people will take aspirin
> at the first symptoms of discomfort, others have to in severe pain
> before they'll take anything! What is bute?
Bute = Phenylbutazone = 4-Butyl-1,2-diphenyl-3,5-pryazolidinedione
One common brand name is Butazolidin from Geigy.
According to my 1980 Physician's Desk Reference, phenylbutazone is
"...a nonsalicylate, nonsteroidal, anti-imflammatory drug. It has
anti-inflammatory, antipyretic, analgesic and mild uricosuric properties
that produce symptomatic relief but do not alter the disease process."
It is similar to ibuprofen = (�)-2-(p-isobutylphenel) propionic acid, which
is sold under the brand names of Motrin (prescription only, Upjohn), Advil
and Nuprin (I apologize, but I don't have info at hand on who owns the last
two tradenames). According to the PDR, ibuprofen is described as a
"...non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent that possesses analgesic and
anti-pyretic activities."
I'm sure everyone recognizes Nuprin and Advil as analgesics currently being
heavily marketed as replacements for acetominophin or aspirin. Thier
presence on the market and widespread acceptance (to mention nothing of the
clinical studies drug companies do) indicate that an anti-inflammatory
agent can act as an effective general analgesic in low doseages.
Ibuprofen is a replacement for aspirin. Phenylbutazone is an
anti-inflammatory agent like ibuprofen, one which is more widely prescribed
for horses. It is essentially "aspirin for horses" and more literally
"Advil/Nuprin/Mortin for horses". Note, however, that in larger doses,
phenylbutazone in horses, like ibuprofin (and phenybutazone) in people,
becomes a potent drug rather than an over-the-counter analgesic. The vet
supply houses that I deal with require a vet's prescription before shipping
bute, also.
I'm not advocating using drugged horses in shows. I wouldn't want to ride
dressage, barrels, rope, cut, jump, etc. on a horse that was on bute. I
owe that to the horse and myself not to get us killed or hurt if I can
avoid it.
I keep bute around the house to give to one of mine should they turn up
with a pulled muscle from running around chasing each other (you should see
the two young geldings!) or slipping on the snow (while running around
chasing each other...) or whatever. But I don't work 'em while they're on
bute - just a little exercise to keep 'em from getting stiff. I have only
really used the stuff on an old gelding we had while he was recuperating
from a serious wire cut on his front leg. I don't ever want to use it
again at all...
Greg
|
159.23 | Thanks for BUTE description | GENRAL::KOLLER | | Fri Nov 07 1986 16:36 | 8 |
| re: .22
Greg, thank you. You have done a pretty adequate job of describing
what bute is. I have also gone out and bought the current issue
of Equus. I've been meaning to subscribe to that mag anyway. Again,
Thanks.
bobk
|
159.24 | more bute | DYO780::AXTELL | Dragon Lady | Mon Nov 10 1986 11:36 | 31 |
| I too keep bute around to treat certain types of lameness. One almost
has to be versed in the use of drugs like this if you keep performance
horses and can't afford a lot of unnecessary vet bills. I only
use it when a horse is recuperating from an injury and I certainly
wouldn't want to be woking a horse that's on bute (for my sake and
his/hers). I do combine bute with a variety of forms of physical
therapy, normally I don't use it alone.
Bute is a useful drug, but it's not one that should be used lightly
or without education. Long term use of bute can leach calcium from
bones (the orthopedic vets at Ohio State use it only sparingly for
long term recovery patients - like broken legs). It also can lead
to gastrointestinal problems when used in high doses or over a long
period of time. And finally, it's not a drug that should be combined
with any other (excepting antibiodics), especially tranquilizers
and muscle relaxants. They can amplify the effect of each other
and are particularly prone to masking of problems.
One more bute note... About five years ago, I broke my back in a
fall. Since then I've used bute myself to keep mobile. For me
it seems to work well and without a lot of complications. It's
important to remember that people bute is different from horse bute.
The active chemical is the same but the base for horses is not healthy
for people.
|
159.25 | I vote yes | TRNING::PJOHNSON | | Mon Nov 24 1986 13:43 | 31 |
| This discussion concerning the use of Bute is most interesting.
We have shown saddlebred horses for several years. My general
observation is that the majority of saddlebred horses in training
suffer from some sort of injury that requires Bute in order to
work sufficiently hard to be ready for the ring. In most cases,
the owners have invested a substantial amount of money in their
horse(s) and it is not practical, from an economic point of view,
to simply put them up. Like human athletes, horses quickly lose
their condition when not worked on a consistent basis. And I would
point out that human athletes often use legal drugs which permit
them to continue training when injured. Judicious use of Bute,
in particular, permits the equine athlete to continue in competition.
As regards the 4-H world, my daughter was involved with 4-H here
in Georgia for many years. Bute is used routinely, when needed,
at the area, state, and regional contests. I agree with others
in this conference who feel that this is appropriate so that the
youngsters can compete. In particular, it allows the child with
an older, somewhat arthritic animal to show. Remember, 4-H
requires that the kids OWN their horses in order to show them.
Can't be leased or borrowed. 4-H horse shows are great experience
for children. They are very much oriented to the child, not the
adult.
Children should learn that drugs are another tool to assist in
equine management. If we want horses to be "natural", then we
should not ride them. Once, however, a person climbs on the back
of a horse, he/she should be prepared to deal with the injuries
that will inevitability occur over time.
=paul=
|
159.26 | No Bute | ATLAST::WAYER | | Mon Nov 24 1986 15:34 | 10 |
| I really don't agree with you at all. It is different for an
athlete to take a pain killer he knows what he is doing he
is not being forced to take the pill. An athlete can decide
when it is to dangerous to mask the pain. When you give a horse
bute you are forcing an injured animal to perform and since
the horse can't talk you may be adding to the injury.
What is more important the horse or the investment in the animal?
If the investment is the most important forget about horses and
invest in cars.
|
159.27 | Bute is necessary | TRNING::PJOHNSON | | Mon Nov 24 1986 21:13 | 23 |
| I have a Saddlebred which I show Country Pleaure. When I bought
her 7 years ago, she was two and a half and had been broken as a
5-gaiter. I chose not to show her as such seeing as how I was 10
at the time. Three years ago she colicked and had to undergo major
surgery. She had a very high fever for several weeks. This caused
her to get laminitis last year. She is a very successful show horse
and this outbreak caused us to lose a state championship. Since
then, she has been lame on and off. I have missed several very
important shows as a result.
Obviously, her condition is going to remain uncertain for quite
some time. I have cut no corners in her care; she is shod at the
University of Ga. vet school every month. Still, nothing more,
except using bute, can be done.
Another point I'd like to make is that several of the best show
horses in this country have permanent or recurring ailments. These
require the use of bute to keep it showing sometimes. This is not
bad- it is necessary. The use of bute in such cases does not hurt
the horses any more than they already are. It just allows them
to be the fabulous show horses that they are.
Julie
|
159.28 | Ownership NOT required (at least in New England) | ZEPPO::FOX | | Tue Nov 25 1986 13:38 | 3 |
| Just as a reply to one of the previous replies, 4-H does NOT require
the kid to own the horse. The horse may be leased, borrowed or
owned as long as the 4-H member provides at least 75% of the care.
|
159.29 | 4-H in Dixie | TRNING::PJOHNSON | | Tue Nov 25 1986 16:15 | 2 |
| 4-H was founded in the state of Georgia and ownership is required
here. It would not surprise me if Yankees did things differently.
|
159.30 | the night they drove old dixie down | PHILEM::MATTHEWS | i mite b blonde but i'm not stupid | Wed Nov 26 1986 08:58 | 21 |
|
Now hold on now, my family are all rebels.;^)
well paul, you might have to own in georgia,HOWEVER...in
DENVER you do not. and we also DONT allow any type of drug
administered to the horse. I have seen the way saddlebreds have
to be worked and i can see why they would on occasion need bute,
thats why i would never own one. because of the special care
they require(sometimes).
lets look at it this way, say i had a fancy stallion and
the horse was lame or ouchy,for whatever reasons and i show the horse
with bute in him. and i have a couple of mares bred to him, and
people see him in the ring and they also want to bred to him.
arent you just passing bad genes along the bloodlines?
if i had a horse that needed bute to go good in the ring... i wouldn't
show plain and simple. and if i bred my mare to that same horse
and later found out he was lame i would be pis*ed, and thats putting
it mildly. please correct me if i'm seeing things the wrong way.
wendy.
|
159.31 | This isn't New England vs. Georgia! | ZEPPO::FOX | | Wed Nov 26 1986 10:02 | 18 |
| re: .29
I think the reason that kids aren't required to own the horse in
New England is because at this point there is so much industry and
such moving into the area, there are fewer and fewer places for
kids to keep horses without having to pay an arm and a leg to board
them out so if the kids can get ahold of a horse, then it is felt
that as long as they provide at least 75% of the care (feeding,
riding, grooming, etc.) then it is fine for them to be in 4-H.
I don't think there is any reason for you to attack Yankees just
because things are done a little different up here than in Georgia.
If I am misunderstanding your reply in .29, then I apologize.
Happy Thanksgiving all!
Linda
|
159.32 | | USSCSL::IZZO | Ann Izzo...DTN: 255-5377 | Wed Nov 26 1986 10:59 | 41 |
| Let me say first, that I do not enter the following comments to
intentionally antagonize anyone. I enter them in the interest of
clarity of position.
>.25
>We have shown saddlebred horses for several years. My general
>observation is that the majority of saddlebred horses in training
>suffer from some sort of injury that requires Bute in order to
>work sufficiently hard to be ready for the ring. . . . .
I find it interesting that you specifically reference saddlebreds.
It has been _my_ general observation that of all the breeds,
saddlebreds are more often pushed beyond their physical limitations.
How many times saddlebreds are left in their stalls 24 hours a day,
less the 15-20 minutes they're worked. They're brought out of a
stall all hot and bothered and rushed through a complete workout
in the time most breeds take to warm up.
To further complicate the matter, these horses are asked to perform
on extremely long feet. This just adds to the physical stress they're
subjected to. There are lots of saddlebreds in the world who do
not have the conformation to support working in long feet....just as
there are lots of thoroughbreds who do not have the conformation to
support the stresses of jumping activities. Quite honestly, I'm
amazed that there aren't more bowed tendons and pulled suspensory
ligaments in saddlebreds.
I am not niave enough to believe that _all_ saddlebreds are handled
in this manner, but I've been in enough "saddlebred barns" to know
that it's not out of the ordinary either. Don't you believe in
retiring your horses? No one, that I've noticed, in this conference
has suggested that Bute be outlawed all together, but as use it
as a medical tool, not a tool to allow inconsiderate or uneducated
owners to _show_ injured animals for the gain of the all mighty
dollar.
Ann
P.S. I did a majority of my growing up in North Carolina...4-H'ers
were not required to "own" there either. They were, however, expected
to provide X% of the animal's care.
|
159.33 | On Saddlebreds | ARGUS::CURTIS | Dick 'Aristotle' Curtis | Wed Nov 26 1986 21:25 | 20 |
| As the owner of two non-showing saddlebreds I would like two put
in a good word for this breed. My mare has been a very sound
intelligent trail horse. I have owned a thoroughbred, a quarter
horse, an arab/appy cross, a walker, a passo fino/quarter cross,
but my last three have been saddlebreds. Since I ride huntseat
or dressage and use to show huntseat, I think I can be considered
a fairly impartial judge of the breed. This breed has been
very der rated by those who do not ride saddleseat. I have also
found that the saddleseat riders of my aquaintaince do not use their
horses half as hard as the hunterjumper people. The "long
toe" of the park horse is offset by an equally long heel, this keeps
the angle of the hoof correct. It is the ANGLE not the hoof length
that will make a horse lame. Seven years at saddleseat stables
has managed to clear up some of the misconceptions I had from spending
fifteen years at hunter/jumper/dressage stables. I have found good
and bad horsemanship is dependent on the person not the breed or
style of riding.
Cher
|
159.34 | | USSCSL::IZZO | Ann Izzo...DTN: 255-5377 | Mon Dec 01 1986 09:47 | 14 |
| re .33
Cher - I'm sorry if I left you with the impression that I was picking
on saddlebreds as a breed. That was not my intention, and I tried
to indicate that in my original note. I enjoy a nice saddlebred
as much as the next guy, and have played around with some gaited
horses in my day.
My intent was to point out to .25 that perhaps he was using a
justification for the use of bute based upon his specific experience
in _his saddlebred show barn_ rather than looking at the how the
drug can be mis-used as well.
Ann _who_doesn't_always_express_herself_very_well
|
159.35 | Hunters Also Need Bute | TRNING::PJOHNSON | | Mon Dec 01 1986 17:23 | 14 |
| Thank you for your observations, Wendy. I can't say that I agree
with the way 4-H is run in Georgia. This very topic of horse ownership
is a continuing controversy. As you can well imagine, it comes
up every year. There are other unwise aspects to the pony club
side of 4-H in Georgia . . .
Anyway, Saddlebreds do seem to have considerable leg problems; no
doubt because of the way they are worked. But probably also because
of some of the breeding.
At the same time, most of the horses at our current barn are hunters.
The ones that show (and jump) likewise have frequent problems,
especially with their feet (navicular). Bute is administered in
order to keep them showing, so it isn't just the saddleseat folks.
|
159.36 | Boarding Horses | TRNING::PJOHNSON | | Mon Dec 01 1986 17:29 | 13 |
| Well, Linda, I guess maybe I was a little sharp with my remark about
Yankees. Actually, I was raised in Mississippi, where it never
has really been accepted that the War of Northern Aggression ended
in 1865.
Your point about the shortage of places to board up North makes
a lot of sense to me! Since I will probably be moving up the the
GMA one of these days . . . what is the boarding situation like?
There are PLENTY of good stables in the Atlanta area, with a wide
range of boarding arrangements. Is it difficult to find a place
up there?
=paul=
|
159.37 | Bute and Showing | TRNING::PJOHNSON | | Mon Dec 01 1986 17:36 | 9 |
| Ann, I very much agree with your observations concerning the saddlebred
world. As for retiring the horses, it is not all that uncommon
for them to be shown into their early twenties.
I might also comment that it is easy to get caught up in the
competitive side of showing, which is not always best for the animals.
Nevertheless, this happens and will continue to be common, especially
in professional saddlebred barns, as long as there is money to be
made. Perhaps the new IRS code will make some difference.
|
159.38 | Boarding | ZEPPO::FOX | | Tue Dec 02 1986 09:50 | 23 |
| Paul, I live in Massachusetts (about 205 miles away from Boston)
and have had to (unfortunately) rely on boarding my horse at stables
in the area. The number of stables has been drastically reduced
because of urbanization, etc. The stables that remain are mainly
large training/boarding/showing stables where the board runs fairly
high and you pay for everything. I currently pay around $225 per
month to have my horse fed 3 times a day, turned out daily in a
field, stall cleaned, indoor arena, worming and excellent care however
I think that is extremely low for this area. I have to drive
25 miles to get to the barn but it is worth it!
I would say that people in this area generally pay $275-??? for
decent care (feeding, stalls cleaned, turnout) which doesn't
necessarily include an indoor riding area for winter riding (too
dark to ride outside)!
I have only been to Georgia twice, once to Atlanta for an overnight
trip and once to Savannah for a vacation, but what I saw, I really
liked. If you come north with your critters, don't forget your
blankets for the winter!!!
Linda
|
159.39 | Mass is a small state! | ZEPPO::FOX | | Tue Dec 02 1986 09:51 | 5 |
| re: .38
That's supposed to be 25 miles, not 205 miles out of Boston! Oh
well!
|
159.40 | More on Boarding | PARSEC::SCRAGGS | | Tue Dec 02 1986 10:31 | 11 |
| This probably should be a separate note, but Linda is right
in saying that $225.00 is very reasonable. There aren't very
many barns in the area that you can really trust. Prices
range from $150 and up, but finding a truly nice barn with
adequate facilities is like finding a needle in a haystack!
I have two of my horses boarded out for the winter for
convenience, but am fortunate enough to have my own barn. I
know I wouldn't have more than 1 if I had to permanently board.
Marianne
|
159.41 | REFORMED YANKEE | USWAV1::GREYNOLDS | | Fri Dec 05 1986 09:55 | 18 |
| HAVING JUST MOVED BACK TO NEW ENGLAND FROM VIRGINIA I"VE BEEN AMAZED
BY PRICES AN SO FORTH ALSO FOR BOARD,I'M LUCKY I GUESS I WAS ABLE
TO BOARD MY FOUR MARES AT MY BROTHER-IN-LAWS PLACE..THE REAL QUESTION
THOUGH-----BUTE----BEING A SHOWPERSON OF MARES AND A STALLION IN
THE PAINT/PINTO WORLD BOTH HERE AND DOWN SOUTH I'VE SEEN QUITE A
BIT OF "STABLE GOINGS ON"NOT JUST W/BUTE.CURRENTLY FROM WHAT I'VE
BEEN ABLE TO FIND OUT FROM THE APHA(AMERICAN PAINT HORSE ASSOC.)IS
THEY HAVE ONLY ALLOCATED $2500.00 NATIONWIDE FOR RANDOM DRUG TESTING
OF SHOWS,SO WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? SELF-POLICEING BY THE MEMBERS THEM-
SELVES. I CAN GUARANTEE IF I SEE A PERSON DRUGGING A HORSE AT ANY
TYPE SHOW-THEY WILL BE REPORTED.I TOO HAVE AN INVESTMENT IN MY HORSES
ESPECIALLY IN MY STUD,AND IF HE NEEDED ANY TYPE OF DRUG TO PERFORM
THEN IT'S STAY HOME TIME.IT IS THAT BLACK AND WHITE-WE OWE IT TO
ALL THE YOUNG PEOPLE NOT JUST THOSE ON HORSEBACK,THEY ARE INDEED
OUR FUTURE- WELL I GUESS I'VE PREACHED ENOUGH
THANKS FOR LISTENING,AND KEEP THE REPLIES COMING
GARY
|
159.42 | A "NO" VOTE | LAUREL::REMILLARD | | Fri Dec 05 1986 11:15 | 52 |
|
YEAH Gary!
I saw lots of NASTY things going on in the "professional" world
of showing and after seeing this for awhile I walked away and
I haven't seen a show for over five years. Mind you, most of
the time I was just there to watch and enjoy these beautiful
cridders.
I am not saying things go on at every show but I did see my
share.
All I know that _sometimes_ when horses are your business, you
are sometimes pushed too far. A good show barn - means winning
only to _some_. The horses stop being living, breathing creatures
and become "things" to use as you need them - like a car...
You do "what you have to" to make sure you get the end result
and your money's worth. "If he/she breaks - I'll buy another
one."
It all comes down to what each of us think is important. I
still have my very first horse, we grew up together, he saved
my life twice, and we have traveled countless miles together
and through it all - he is sound. I am not saying he hasn't
had his share of bumps and bruises... But, with all the miles
we have traveled - not ONE time have I ever pushed him too far
brought him home lame. I would hope not to ever want something
bad enough that I would not consider him first.
He is now retired - he will be 31 this February and I am only
now considering using Bute on him because his hips seem to be
starting to pain him.
Bute does have it's place - as with all drugs. But it should
be used for helping and not for covering up problems. If a
horse is pushed so far that they are not sound - doesn't that
ring a bell that there is SOMETHING wrong in the way the horse
is being handled??????????????????????
As far as 4-H... Well, when I was a kid, I couldn't join because
I was told that I had to OWN. That was really too bad, because
I really could of still learned so much from 4-H. I hope they
do away with that rule. My parents couldn't afford to buy me
one... so I had to save and buy my own. It took 9 years, but I
did it.
I am not trying to toot my own horn - but I don't believe that
drugs = soundness.
My 2 cents worth.... I hope I haven't offended anyone.
Susan
|
159.43 | FOR MEDICAL USE ONLY | SWAM2::MASSEY_VI | | Fri Jul 17 1992 18:52 | 26 |
|
WOW!!!
Was that a hot one or what??? I had to read all the replies in
this topic. I myself have used bute but NEVER at shows. I have always
been told if you use bute on a horse they will most likely make the
problem worse.
I had a Peruvian Paso who was a bit accident prone, ok I'm lying,
he was and accident looking to happen. One of his worse mishaps was
getting his head stuck between the barn and the padock post. The post
was almost flush to the building. we belive he was rubbing his neck
and somehow sliped and fell into the crack.
when he was found he had been doing some strugeling and had crushed
his temporal bones. The vet and I were pulling bone fragments out of
his head for 2 hours. In the end, he was stiched up.
by morning, his face was so swelled up he couldn't see. I couldnt
even find his eyes. Anyhoo, the vet said to give him bute if he
started shaking his head around. I wasn't sure why he said this untill
about an hour latter when he acted like a crazy man. The poor thing
had a raging head ach. He was on bute for 2 weeks and it kept him from
bashing his head again.
virginia
|