T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
356.1 | | NRADM2::CIAMPAGLIA | | Mon Oct 06 1986 12:57 | 19 |
| Oh Ann, a sad story that I too have seen (not to such degree) too
often. I have been showing all my life and fortunately had a "horsey"
mother that understood the show world and never ever pushed me to
win but to always have fun. I always remember seeing my mom on
the rail - and everytime I would pass by she would say "smile, have
fun, you look great!"...those words do so much more for a kid then
"sit up, look ahead, use your legs" etc...
I only feel bad for the little kid, certainly not the mom, the poor
kid will soon learn to resent riding and always associate showing
with a no-fun, all work attitude, and that the sole purpose is to
come home with ribbons.
I really have nothing else to say except that you and the paramedics
reacted very well, we can only hope that the mother will learn from
this experience...but who knows...
- jenny -
|
356.2 | Liitle League parents are in every sport. | A1VAX::GUNN | | Mon Oct 06 1986 13:01 | 12 |
| Some parents have to "achieve" through their children. These kind
of stories crop up in every sport in which kids participate. "Little
League Parents" is the term I have heard most often, which may be
unfairly criticising Little League. Both mothers and fathers are
guilty of this behaviour, which fortunately is not too common. Their
behaviour practically guarentees that their kids will have nothing
to do with the sports into which they have been pushed when they
become independent.
I don't know why parents do it. I leave the explanation to those
in the mental health field.
|
356.3 | THANK YOU!!!! | TIGEMS::SCHELBERG | | Mon Oct 06 1986 13:23 | 14 |
| THANK YOU!!!!!! For telling that child not to MOVE anything! All
to often after a fall like that someone will try to get up.....if
it was a cervical spine injury and she moved she would of been
paralyzed for life.......
As for the mother.....she has problems. No one should let a child
ride an animal that scares her/him. Riding is for fun. As a parent
I can't understand that woman at all. My child comes first and
after a fall like that girl took she should have been worried about
her.....not the competition.
But again, your quick thinking did wonders!
bs
|
356.4 | Show Mother=Little League Parents | COMET::PEACOCK | | Mon Oct 06 1986 13:43 | 30 |
|
RE: 0
The incident that you describe sadly is not that uncommon in any
type of competition that children are involved in. The 'Little
League' parent exists no matter what the sport is.
Those of us that have any responsiblity for shows that children
participate in need to be aware of this and not hesitate to give
these competitors the gate or refuse them the gate. You will not
make friends this way but at least will insure the saftey of all
concerned.
Here in Colorado the putting kids on a 'over-horsepowered' horse
is unusual in the horse shows, but is frequently seen in the speed
events(barrels, poles, etc). It reached the point where the rules
of some of the riding clubs were changed so that the competitor
had to enter and leave the arena at a walk.
Back to your incident, it sounds like the mother involved was fairly
new to horsey shows. I think that we all need to take this type
and convince them of the saftey required.
To sum this up and get off my soap box. I've seen a lot of talented
kids get so burned out by this that they just quit. So I hope that
if sombody notices me being a 'little league' parent they will tell
me.
-John-
|
356.5 | Why do people do that?? | STAR::NAMOGLU | | Mon Oct 06 1986 14:10 | 29 |
|
This also sounds like a typical case of 10% of information being
worse than 0% information. She (the mother) must have just picked
up some "horse talk" from hanging around the barn and watching the
daughters lessons - and then considered herself an expert (or at
least extremely knowledgable). I second (or is it third??) the
comments above in regards to the "little league parents". There
are usually two kinds, both of which can be obnoxious. 1) the kind
that is 100% behind the kid, who sits in the stands and yells at
the other team and the ump's or the other parents. They don't mean
harm, and want the kid to have fun, but they don't realize how what
they say affects the kids actually playing the game. Especially
if they are yelling instructions to their kid. The poor kid can
get so confused and frustrated that they don't ever want to play
again. 2) the kind that wants their kids to win no matter what
happens. This kind was described in an earlier reply.
Unfortunately, most parents don't have the time to spend to learn
how to ride - and probably don't have the least bit of interest
in doing so. Showmanship?? Well, I would think that any reasonable
person could pick up the basics by paying attention to other
competitors at show that she/he attended.
Don't the judges have the right to tell someone who is disturbing
the class (someone outside of the ring) to keep it down?? Or to
leave the area??
|
356.6 | Show Mothers & Show Families | BLISS::NAJJAR | | Mon Oct 06 1986 14:11 | 31 |
|
Ever since I got my horse and started showing, my parents would
attend a few shows to take pictures and see what it was all about,
but they (thank goodness!) didn't know enough about the sport to
'coach' or pressure me.
Many shows I attended had entire Show Families. Not only was the
mother on the rail yelling at the kid, but the father, sisters,
brothers and even the instructor or trainer. They would tell the
kid everything as he or she passed them (ie. head up, heels down,
wrong diagonal, etc.) Also, they would be strategically placed
around the ring to make sure the kid didn't mess up. This used
to really aggrivate me, because I had to school my horse myself,
try to take lessons once a week, get a ride to a show with someone
else, and once at the show, I was on my own. If no relatives came
to watch, it was just me and my horse, and often times these other
kids would place because they had people watching them at all times
and correcting their position etc. (little did the judge know).
But I always got my revenge in the jumping classes, because my horse
loved to jump, and most of those kids had horses that refused or
ran out and their 'coaches' couldn't help much with that.
Because of that type of show atmosphere, I got so disgusted with
it that I stopped going to shows for a couple of years. The only
kind of competition I'll enter now is eventing or dressage shows
where you don't run into 'show families' like you find at regular
shows. It would be nice if there was a rule saying that any competitor
found receiving help or assistance of any kind during a class will
be eliminated from that class. In eventing, if a rider falls or
loses a crop or hat, the spectators are not allowed to assist them
because the competitor will be eliminated.
|
356.7 | more | CTOAVX::IZZO | | Mon Oct 06 1986 15:42 | 29 |
| Thank you everyone for all your support. I really didn't write
this to "pick" on this particular woman (although she annoyed me),
it's just that the situation haunted me all weekend.
Would it help if clubs (i.e. American, NEHC, etc) publicized the
"family/instructor" etiquette as much as they do exhibitor etiquette?
I'm in a position where it's possible for me to make a push for
that to happen if it would help.
Also....regarding .6
>kids would place because they had people watching them at all times
>and correcting their position etc. (little did the judge know).
Don't kid yourself! It's not that hard to pick out the kids that
have been propped up on their wind-up ponies from the kids that
are really *RIDING* their ponies. It's just that a judge can't
always tell which kid it is getting the instructions and you don't
want to penalize the wrong kid. You should see the horror on the
face of some kids when their asked to do individual workouts, or
if they did their own braids (I'm just nosey and like to know, doesn't
really mean anything to me). Suddenly a voice on the rail can't
help!
Another thing that's come to my attention lately is the use of wireless
walkie-talkie type things in the ring. I've seen kids wearing them
during a class (so that they can listen to an instructor on the
the rail) and get used! Are they pulling that stunt where you are?
Ann
|
356.8 | Help from the sidelines? | GENRAL::KOLLER | | Mon Oct 06 1986 16:13 | 12 |
| I thought that there were strict AHSA rules concerning coachingfrom
the sidelines! I would think that the use of walkie talkies in the
show ring would be automatic grounds for disqualification!
On the other hand, being hard of hearing I think walkie talkies
would be a neat thing to use during riding lessons!
As far as the coaching from sidelines... I thought that it was illegal.
Whnever my daughter's trainer would coach during an equitation class
it was at a far corner of the ring and out of earshot from any show
official ( in other words, discreetly!)
|
356.9 | Time to excuse a few! | PLANET::NICKERSON | Bob Nickerson DTN 282-1663 :^) | Mon Oct 06 1986 18:24 | 21 |
| It seems like there are two issues here, one of show parents and
one of sideline coaching. The sideline coaching from my own experience
is more of a distraction than a help. You end up spending most
of your ride getting in position to hear your coach and as a result
don't pay attention to where you are in the class. A remote mike
is a novel idea but I haven't seen it used in New England yet.
The bigger problem is the show parent who pushes their children
(who usually want to please) to the brink and add to that an animal
not suited to the rider and you have a potentially hazardous situation.
In our litigation happy society, I shudder to think of the libilities
to the show which ends up with this situation. Its probably time
for AHSA to provide some protection for these kids in spite of their
parents. One way would be to give judges the responsibility to
excuse an unruly horse sooner than they currently do. The key here
is to pick out the bad horse/rider combinations rather than to give
a competant rider who is just having a bad ride the gate. Today
such a decision by a judge would be very unpopular, but maybe if
the governing body (AHSA) where pushing it, there would be less
of a scene.
|
356.10 | Who's Competing? | APTECH::WILLIAMS | | Tue Oct 07 1986 11:16 | 21 |
| My daughter began riding this last spring. She has since fallen
once from the horse she was riding and, fortunately, was able to
recover quickly. I guess that its every parents wish to see that
their child is not hurt in any way but riding horses has its possible
disasters as does any other sport. I have taken riding lessons
and have had my own spills and can appreciate what a youngster is
going through when they fall for their first time. I firmly believe
that a parent should be required to get up on the horse and try
it for themselves as a prerequisite to allowing their children to
do so.
I do also believe that some parents are motivated by social pressures
rather than new, holesome experiences for their children. They
are, I believe, more concerned about their embarassement rather
than safety of the child. You know what I mean, "My child rides
in Horse Shows, I bet your child can't do that! Isn't she wonderfull?"
The children aren't learning to ride but are learning to hate their
parents. I've said my piece. I sure hope the kid was all right.
Denny
|
356.11 | Status report | CTOAVX::IZZO | | Wed Oct 08 1986 10:00 | 17 |
| I received a call from the kid's mother yesterday (I had asked her
to call and let me know how she made out). It seems the paramedic
was premature in his diagnosis (I thought he had accompanied the
child to the hospital). Stephanie ended up with a bruised hip and
knee, a couple of messed up ligaments, but no broken bones.
Emotionally she is fine (according to the mother). Ah, relief.
As for the AHSA ruling on coaching, I agree that there needs to
be more specific rules established to address the issue. My personal
opinion is that coaching should not be allowed - period. (I do,
however, appreciate that there are times that should be excused.
i.e. situations that could become hazardous without the aide of
a more experienced person). I really went wild over the
"walkie-talkie" concept...but currently there is no _specific_ ruling
on it, therefore, I think a steward would tell you it must be allowed.
Ann
|