| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 601.1 | | MGB::GILLOTT | Mark Gillott, CBN, 831-3172 (RKG) | Thu Mar 12 1992 08:13 | 6 |
| 601.2 | Why 33.... | 28888::B_GOODWIN | Time is an illusion... | Thu Mar 12 1992 09:30 | 13 |
| 601.3 | ncl set osi transport nsap selector = 99 | TOOK::MICHAUD | Jeff Michaud, DECnet-ULTRIX | Thu Mar 12 1992 23:57 | 10 |
| 601.4 | I would still like to know why I can't use "01" | 28888::B_GOODWIN | Time is an illusion... | Fri Mar 13 1992 09:23 | 8 |
| 601.5 | 01 reserved for future expansion! | OSI::SHAND | Mike Shand | Mon Mar 16 1992 09:53 | 29 |
| 601.6 | | 28888::B_GOODWIN | Time is an illusion... | Mon Mar 16 1992 10:13 | 3 |
| 601.7 | Value of 1 has special meaning to DNA OSI TP management code | TOOK::MICHAUD | Jeff Michaud, DECnet-ULTRIX | Tue Mar 17 1992 17:56 | 7 |
| 601.8 | Clarification? | OSI::SHAND | Mike Shand | Mon Mar 30 1992 05:56 | 3 |
| 601.9 | Are NSEL's standardized?? | STKHLM::WEBJORN | Gullik Webj�rn Product & Technology Group | Fri Apr 03 1992 04:53 | 16 |
| 601.10 | Only 0 is standardized in ISO 10589 | OSI::SHAND | Mike Shand | Fri Apr 03 1992 09:00 | 11 |
| 601.11 | NSEL Setting Restriction for 01 Should Be Removed! | EICMFG::ELLAM | | Thu Aug 27 1992 04:58 | 47 |
| 601.12 | As far as I'm concerned it can go. | MARVIN::SHAND | Mike Shand | Fri Aug 28 1992 13:51 | 6
|