T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3211.1 | | TLE::LUCIA | http://asaab.zko.dec.com/~lucia/biography.html | Mon May 19 1997 12:09 | 15 |
| Make ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN you tell ANYONE who is riding on the wrong side of the
road to get on the correct side. And tell them why. Remember that girl in
Westford by Long Sought for Pond? The one we almost creamed coming around a
corner?
Any time I see two kids, where one has a helmet and the other does not, I make
sure to say "nice helmet" to the kid with the helmet.
Scot Benton, a Boston racing semi-icon, aspiring coach and team captain was
seriously injured when he swerved into traffic to avoid a kid on a bmx bike
going the wrong way on the road.
Tim
|
3211.2 | Great PR for us... | WMOIS::GIROUARD_C | | Mon May 19 1997 12:45 | 18 |
| The problem was the obvious presence of alcohol. Riding on sidewalks is
controlled by town ordinances. Many of these ordinances are very old,
but still on the books. These were established when car traffic wasn't
nearly so copious. I'm sure a lot of the ordinances were enacted to
make sure kids weren't in the roads very much, as well.
I know in my city you can (or you used to be able) to ride on the
sidewalks.
I believe that sidewalks can be used by kids safely and responsibly
side by side with pedestrains.
I don't believe guys like us or teenagers in a hurry should be using
them. Certainly, a drunk individual shouldn't be using a bicycle let
alone be on the sidewalk. It will interesting to see why this
individual was on a bicycle in the first place (no license - DUI?).
Chip
|
3211.3 | | DELNI::LBASSETT | Design | Tue May 20 1997 14:24 | 6 |
| This guy is going to be cited in the same way as if he was behind the
wheel of a car? NO WAY...! What are they going do? Pull his drivers
licence for riding a bike? I don't think so............. Maybe he
would cited for disorderly but DUI? It would never hold up in court!
|
3211.4 | | WMOIS::GIROUARD_C | | Tue May 20 1997 14:57 | 9 |
| -1 It probably will hold up in court since a bicycle is subject to the
same rules as a motor vehicle. My guess would be that it won't make a
lot of difference simply because the vehicle was motorless.
I could be wrong. I would think a lot of the direction on this one
would be geared against how his lawyer attacks this case.
As far as the punishment (if found guilty)... that's up to the judge.
|
3211.5 | | MRPTH1::16.34.80.132::slab | [email protected] | Tue May 20 1997 15:15 | 9 |
|
Change DUI to OUI ["operating"] if it makes you feel better.
I believe the charge WILL hold up in court if it is pursued.
A cyclist is considered a vehicle operator if [s]he is actually
riding the bike, but is a pedestrian if [s]he is walking alongside
the bike.
|
3211.6 | | PCBUOA::KRATZ | | Tue May 20 1997 17:29 | 4 |
| When my bike breaks a chain and transforms itself into a
[actually the world's most expensive] push-beside scooter,
am I a cyclist or a pedestrian?
K
|
3211.7 | | MRPTH1::16.34.80.132::slab | [email protected] | Tue May 20 1997 17:36 | 3 |
|
Pedestrian.
|
3211.8 | Yup... | WMOIS::GIROUARD_C | | Wed May 21 1997 06:45 | 3 |
| Thanks for the precision, Shawn.
-2 Actually, you're a p.o.'d pedestrain :-).
|
3211.9 | It's murder on the lower back tho | PCBUOA::KRATZ | | Wed May 21 1997 12:19 | 4 |
| The amazing part... I averaged over 12mph for 12 miles as a
scooter when the last chain broke. You'd think I'd learn to
carry a chain tool. Pretty fast for a pedestrian, huh?
K
|
3211.10 | | MRPTH1::16.34.80.132::slab | [email protected] | Wed May 21 1997 13:51 | 9 |
|
RE: .6
When you say "scooter", do you mean that you were, for example,
"leaning" on the left pedal with your right foot and propelling
yourself along with your left foot?
If so, I'd say you were a rider/operator at that time.
|
3211.11 | | PCBUOA::KRATZ | | Wed May 21 1997 14:20 | 6 |
| Yes, or variations on that theme. It's kind of a cross between
walking beside the bike and "riding" in a half-dismounted position
while standing on one pedal. Useful for chain breaks and when mtn
bikes decide to consume their rear deralleiur on a stick; either one
is a pissed (pedestrian|rider)!
K
|
3211.12 | | DELNI::LBASSETT | Design | Thu May 22 1997 17:50 | 8 |
| re: .4 subject to the same rules as a motor vechicle.
yeah, except that you don't need a licence and you can DRIVE when
you're 3 years old.....
I'm interested to hear how this case ends up....
:)
|
3211.13 | | MRPTH1::16.34.80.132::slab | [email protected] | Thu May 22 1997 18:15 | 5 |
|
If he's still around, ask Mr. Shaw what happens when one decides to
ride a bicycle the wrong way down a one-way street and gets walloped
by a pickup truck.
|
3211.14 | It appears that he "won", but he easily could have lost | MRPTH1::16.34.80.132::slab | [email protected] | Thu May 22 1997 18:22 | 3 |
|
Note 1645
|
3211.15 | | CONSLT::MCBRIDE | Idleness, the holiday of fools | Fri May 23 1997 11:32 | 2 |
| It's amazing what you can lose your license over. Boating laws apply
to driver's priveleges also.
|
3211.16 | | DELNI::LBASSETT | Design | Wed May 28 1997 14:20 | 1 |
| Cars and Boats are machines that use fuel. BIG DIFFERENCE.
|