T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3057.1 | inseam? | SOLVIT::MEREDITH | another hill? ugh | Tue Mar 26 1996 14:38 | 6 |
| what is her inseam?
The rule of thumb for a mountain bike is for the top tube to be
3-4 inches lower than her inseam.
Paul
|
3057.2 | | BIRDIE::POWIS | | Tue Mar 26 1996 15:57 | 7 |
| What I think Paul meant to say is that there should be 3-4 inches
of clearance between the top tube and the rider's crotch when the
rider is standing astride the bike. Actually, for mostly trail
riding, the clearance should probably be a little more...
For a reference point, my wife is about that height (5'4") and
her MTB has a 16" frame.
|
3057.3 | | ANGST::BURTON | Jim Burton, DTN 381-0272 | Tue Mar 26 1996 16:13 | 4 |
| Thanks for the input. She is seriously considering the 16 inch over the
14.
Jim
|
3057.4 | 16"....to big? | FABSIX::JO_BARTER | | Tue Mar 26 1996 22:33 | 15 |
| Jim,
Most reliable bike shops should have a defined criteria on the sizing
of the bikes that they carry.If not,you realy should try another shop.
My personal thought is that the 16" would be to big for someone 5'4"
tall.There are a few very good womans models of Mt.bikes out there.
Not to say that they're lesser models,but that they are designed with
the ergonomics of a woman in mind. If she is going to ride in the woods
the smaller the frame the better.That is true with men and woman.You
can always adjust sizing with stem and seat post height.I am 5'10"
and I ride a 18" C'dale,just for comparison.
See ya in the woods
Jack B.
|
3057.5 | | WMOIS::GIROUARD_C | | Wed Mar 27 1996 06:16 | 3 |
| I'm 5'6 1/2" and ride a 16" frame. you may want to reconsider the size.
Chip
|
3057.6 | between sizes | ANGST::BURTON | Jim Burton, DTN 381-0272 | Wed Mar 27 1996 07:20 | 5 |
| We have been to two bike shops and one said the 16 inch is perfect. The other
said the 14 inch is perfect. I believe both of us will go down this weekend
and make our own decision.
Jim
|
3057.7 | CONCERN YOURSELF WITH TOP TUBE FIT | STOWOA::SWFULLER | | Wed Mar 27 1996 08:38 | 8 |
| There is a difference in frame sizes depending upon the brand. Those
with higher bottom brackets, ie: Fisher, you would need a smaller
frame. Most important is the reach. Many mountain bikes tend to have
a long top tube, too much so for some women, resulting in the need for
a smaller frame. My wife (5'2") used to ride a 16 (one that happen to
have a short top tube) but now rides a 12.5" Fisher and loves it.
steve
|
3057.8 | Short | BOOKIE::J_CROCKER | | Wed Mar 27 1996 16:18 | 10 |
| On these borderline cases, going with the the shorter frame gives
you more options than the larger. You can get a longer stem, for
example, if you want more forward extenstion, and you can raise
you seatpost if you want more upward extension, but you can't chop
down a frame that you later decide is too big.
Also, usually a woman's legs are longer than a man's of the same
height, for what that's worth.
Justin
|
3057.9 | check out the Colorado Cyclist catalog | COOKIE::MUNNS | dave | Wed Mar 27 1996 16:40 | 4 |
| The most recent Colorado Cyclist catalog starts with a few pages
describing proper fit. It seems to have enough detail to help you
select a frame and to adjust stem and seatpost. All the local shops
did just one measurement - check my clearance over the top tube.
|
3057.10 | | STRATA::HUI | | Wed Mar 27 1996 16:49 | 19 |
|
If you are looking at a mountain Bike at around $400, the stem would be less
aggressive then bikes at the $550 range. Therefore the a $400 range 16"
bike will fit differently then a 16" bike at the $550 range even though they
are the same brand. Like the previous noters indicated, different brand of
bike will measure differently (from the ground to the top tube) even if
they both say 16" (especially Gary Fischers).
Measured your wife inseam and then measure the bikes she will be test
riding base on the 4-5 inch clearence recommendation.
Have fun,
Dave
|
3057.11 | | WMOIS::GIROUARD_C | | Thu Mar 28 1996 05:52 | 3 |
| One other thing not mentioned. Some shops will also lean toward moving
slow moving or last year's models first, if they can. Particularly now
with their floors chuck full of new models.
|
3057.12 | | CONSLT::MCBRIDE | Keep hands & feet inside ride at all times | Thu Mar 28 1996 09:45 | 15 |
| Just to echo the rest of the advice in here, we recently went through
the same thing. The 15.5 Giant 875 fit fine while the 15.5 Fisher
Hookooekoo did not. The 14" Montare was a good fit though the seat had
to come all the way forward. My girlfriend is 5'3" + a tad. She tried
several brands and needed one with a shorter top tube. Stand over height
was not a problem. A few companies make woman specific frames, like
Giant. She balked when sales folks started talking about higher rise
stems etc. She wanted one that fit, out of the box so to speak. I on
the other hand am about the same height as Chip (maybe a hair taller :-) )
and I ride a 16" GT. I was comfortable on frames from 15 to 18"
depending upon the brand. The bike that is right is the one that fits
regardless of what they claim the frame size to be. Good luck and happy
trails!
Brian
|
3057.13 | Hard to be Perfect, Outta the Box | BOOKIE::J_CROCKER | | Thu Mar 28 1996 14:13 | 5 |
| Stem size is only what accomodates a particular company's idea of what
the "average" rider for that frame size amounts to. Quite often,
company's base this on your typical man, not your typical woman.
Justin
|
3057.14 | Question re. "frame size" terminology | BIGQ::WATSON | | Wed Apr 17 1996 09:33 | 24 |
| I'm interested in buying a bicycle this Spring and hope to spend
somewhere in the neighborhood of $150. I'm 5'4" and the last time I
rode a bike was over 20 years ago! It was the same bike I had since
kindergarten...coaster brakes, high handlebars, etc.
This weekend I went to a sports shop in Worcester to get an idea of
what size I'd feel comfortable with. The 26" wheels were too high for
me but the length between the seat and handlebars felt cramped. The
frame was 18". I don't understand what that means...is it the length
between the seat and the handlebars? Upon returning home, I measured
my husband's bike. 26" high and the bar is 21" which felt right to me
except the seat was too high.
After reading through several notes in this notesfile from petite
women, I'm seeing recommendations for incredibly small frame sizes.
Can someone please explain to me what the frame size is?
I plan to visit a real bike shop within the next few weeks and would
like to go with a little information.
Thanks very much for any advice! I'm looking forward to riding with my
daughter around an asphalt track...flat.
Robin bigq::watson (preferred)
|
3057.15 | | STOWOA::SWFULLER | | Wed Apr 17 1996 10:10 | 6 |
| You probably need about a 14 to 16 inch mountain bike. There are a
number in the $230 range that would work for you, being better than
the dept store type. You may inquire about last year's leftovers,
however that size is probably gone.
steve
|
3057.16 | 16"???? | SALEM::DACUNHA | | Wed Apr 17 1996 11:04 | 13 |
|
The frame size is usually measured from the center of the bottom
bracket (that roundish thingy on the bottom where the pedals go
through) to the top of the top tube (the one you straddle when off
the seat) It really depends on how long your legs are and what
kind of riding you want to do. I would guess, at 5'4" you would
not want anything bigger than 18", probably closer to 15".
To be comfortable you would want 2 or more inches of clearance
between you and the top tube, when you are straddling it.
Glad to help
|
3057.17 | | BUSY::SLABOUNTY | Duster :== idiot driver magnet | Wed Apr 17 1996 12:10 | 3 |
|
They recommend about 4" of clearance on a mountain bike.
|
3057.18 | | SOLVIT::ALLEN_R | on the point | Wed Apr 17 1996 13:40 | 7 |
| My wife just bought a bike from SAM'S for $160. While it is not as
nice as my C-Dale I think it has good parts for the money and I think
she will ride it (even if it isn't purple). Flat is the way she wants to
ride too. So she doesn't need shocks, etc., stuff that just adds to
the price.
The thing that I really like about it is that it has grip shifters. First
time I ever tried them and I want some now.
|
3057.19 | Thank you! | BIGQ::WATSON | | Wed Apr 17 1996 14:07 | 14 |
| Thanks very much for your responses! I also heard back from
Cannondale. They too explained what "frame size" means. Since it is a
vertical measurement, I agree, I need a small frame. I was mistaken
thinking it was the length from the seat to the handlebars...or the
length of the bar on a man's bike. I'd like that distance to be 21"
or so. For future reference, Cannondale recommended that I try a
18" size Hybrid like the H200 or H300 or a 16" size.
I'm looking forward to riding again to get some exercise. I had no
idea how far the technology had advanced since my days of a basic
bicycle.
Robin
|
3057.20 | | BUSY::SLABOUNTY | Erotic Nightmares | Wed Apr 17 1996 15:49 | 5 |
|
Hopefully they told you that you won't be able to buy an H200
for $150. When I bought my H400 for $530 the H200 was going
for about $400 [Landry's in Westboro].
|
3057.21 | | ANGST::BURTON | Jim Burton, DTN 381-0272 | Wed Apr 17 1996 21:00 | 21 |
| I'm the one who started this note for my wife who is also 5'4". We shopped for
months and finally chose a 14 inch frame Cannondale M200SE for my wife, Paula.
Unless you have very long or short legs, you should't be looking at anything
other than the 14 and 16" frames in the Cannondale. Other brands may have
different ways of measuring frame size, so I'm not sure how the Cannondale
info would convert to other brands.
On a mountain bike what you want to be concerned about is stopping with one
tire elevated on a rock . Will you have enough room to drop a foot to the
ground without having the top tube injure yourself? If you ride a road bike,
you don't have to worry too much about that scenario, but a mountain bike
off-road is a different story. That's why people buy a smaller mountain bike
frame than road frame. I'm 6'3" and I have a 25 inch road frame and 20 inch
mountain frame. On a mountain bike, you can always raise and lower the seat,
plus shift the seat forwards and backwards to some extent once you have
identified the correct frame size. You can also raise and lower the
handlebars, and/or purchase a new stem to push the handlebars out or bring them
closer towards the seat. The best thing you can do is to ride as many sizes of
bikes as possible until you find what's right for you.
Jim
|
3057.22 | re. .20 | BIGQ::WATSON | | Thu Apr 18 1996 09:30 | 10 |
| re. .20 Cannondale didn't mention a price range, but I assumed it was
way beyond what I want to spend. I only plan to ride around a paved
track and maybe up and down our flat street. Of course, if I can't
find anything in the $150 range that fits me, I will spend more.
Thanks for warning me what Cannondales sell for. Their web page
doesn't mention price.
Robin
|
3057.23 | around $89 each! | ANGST::BURTON | Jim Burton, DTN 381-0272 | Thu Apr 18 1996 10:04 | 9 |
| >> way beyond what I want to spend. I only plan to ride around a paved
>> track and maybe up and down our flat street. Of course, if I can't
>> find anything in the $150 range that fits me, I will spend more.
Lechemere has some mountain bikes for under $100. They are very heavy
compared to my Cannondale, but they should do fine for what you want to do
with them. You may also want to look at used bikes.
Jim
|
3057.24 | Bought a Bianchi Strada | BIGQ::WATSON | | Mon Jun 03 1996 10:36 | 11 |
| Well, it took a few months, but I finally bought a bike this past
weekend! I don't have the details with me, but it's a Bianchi Strada
model. I tested one in the parking lot and was very comfortable on it.
$300 at the Bicycle Barn in Westboro, MA. I'll pick it up tomorrow.
Looking forward to riding and getting some exercise again.
Thanks again to all of you who were kind enough to offer suggestions on
what to look for and for answering my questions!
Robin
|