T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2879.1 | my 3 francs | HERON::codger.vbo.dec.com::HEMMINGS | Lanterne Rouge | Mon Nov 21 1994 02:43 | 7 |
| Like I said Piers, you have 3 choices -
1. Put up with a whippy frame
2. Pay the money for a special design (Tried Giant? - ho! ho! ho!)
3. Take up Basketball
Happy to help ....
|
2879.2 | Being tall ain't all it's cracked up to be. | LASSIE::ZIELONKO | | Mon Nov 21 1994 13:00 | 21 |
| Hi Piers,
If your bike hunt is anything like mine two years ago you could be in for a bit
of a rough time given your size. I'm 6'3" and my size was the single biggest
barrier to finding a bike. Most bikes just don't come big enough so the choices
were severly limited. Many steel bikes stop at 62 cm and the hi-tech bikes
(carbon and Ti) generally run even smaller maximum sizes.
FWIW. My inseam when measured in the way advocated by Hinault and Lemond for
their frame sizing formulas comes to 38 inches. I get by on a Serotta 63 cm
(ctr-to-ctr) steel (oversized Nivacrom) with a 60 cm top tube. I have no
problems with lack of stiffness. If anything this bike is *too* stiff. However
it bears mentioning that my weight ranges from 155 to 165 - very light for 6'3".
I don't recall ever seeing a stock carbon fiber that would fit someone our size.
If you were to consider Ti, Serotta does make a stock Ti big enough for you.
Beware of someone trying to sell you a bike that's too small and telling you to
just get an extra-long seat post and stem to make up for it. A long seat tube
and stem can only make up for so much.
Karol
|
2879.3 | I agree | NWD002::REID_PA | SI - Lookin' for a bigger hammer | Mon Nov 21 1994 22:45 | 30 |
|
RE: .last few
I too am doing the new bike search with some of the same constraints. I'm
6'6"/230lbs/38" pant inseam and average 100 miles/week over rough hilly roads.
I'm tired of hauling my 27" c-to-t, 30+lb steel road bike over this terrain
and would like to lighten up a bit ... of course it'd be easier and cheaper
to just loose 15lbs off of me ... but not as much fun ;^).
Lately I'm been checking out the places that will custom build a frame. Most
will build either steel or Ti, however I did find on that will build carbon.
I've even talked to Alexi Grewal @ Green Gear Cycling who make the Pocket
Rocket folding cycle. Alexi claims that they can build a sub-20lb bike with
Dura Ace components for about $2700. My concern here is frame flex and
long term durability (and the small wheels).
I've also talked to Ti Cycles here in Seattle. They'll build a Ti frame
~$2000 or a choice-of-steel frame ~$900 customized to your riding needs and
fit. (If anyone has worked with these guys, I'd like to hear what you think).
Of course I'm still looking for a good comparison study describing the
different frame materials (i.e. Ti .vs. Steel .vs. Aluminum .vs. Carbon .vs.
... etc.) their benefits, problems, durability, comfort, etc.
I guess what I'm really rambling about is that I haven't been able to find
a stock bike, that uses modern frame technology, that would fit and meet my
need. Therefore, I'm concentrating on the companies that will build me a
custom frame.
Paul
|
2879.4 | | WMOIS::GIROUARD_C | | Tue Nov 22 1994 06:22 | 32 |
| Paul do a DIR/TItle=Ti (or) Frames, etc... There's a lot of dialog
in this note about preferrences, material's +'s and -'s... There
have been many articles in all of the major cycling rags as well.
I'd tell you to go Ti, but others might tell you I'm a bit biased.
Okay, addicted!
I'll fill in a little info here for you to think about...
Titanium Steel Aluminum Composites
___________________________________________________________________________
* Tensile Strgth. Excellent Very good Good Very Good
* Ride Excellent Very Good Hard Excellent
* Frame Maint'ce Very Easy **** Paint requires attention ***
Life Heirloom Rust Fatigue Unknown
* Repairability Easy Easy Uh-Uh Difficult
* Whippy-ness Some Better None Some
* Cost A lot Reasonable Good Value A lot
If you are serious about laying down some "healthy" money, go to a very
reputable dealer. They'll be more than happy to answer questions and
provide advice...
Good luck!
|
2879.5 | Cannondale makes a 66cm frame | ZEKE::SZCZ | | Tue Nov 22 1994 15:03 | 7 |
| I have similar dimensions to challenge bike manufacturers, I'm 6'9" and
weigh about 250 lbs. I've been looking around and found that
Cannondale makes a 66cm frame in their 2.8 and 3.0 series road bikes.
This is the only stock 66cm frame I've found to date, though I haven't
looked all that much this year as this year was mountain bike purchase
time. Maybe next year....
|
2879.6 | | STOWOA::SWFULLER | | Tue Nov 22 1994 15:52 | 7 |
| I saw a beautiful CARBONFIBER frame, the one Lemond used to use at
O'neils in Worcester MA. It was 62cm.
Another option, although may be custom is a beam bike. Serotta and
others make them, they should be able to get pretty big.
steve
|
2879.7 | | JURA::LETCHER | If not for good; if not for better | Wed Nov 23 1994 03:04 | 5 |
| The Randonneur I have is an off the shelf bike from Raleigh in the UK,
and has a 26�"/66�cm frame. That's one of the reasons I like it so
much...
Piers
|
2879.8 | | ODIXIE::CIAROCHI | One Less Dog | Wed Nov 23 1994 12:20 | 3 |
| I enjoy reading things like this. I'm 5'6".
Thanks, guys. I feel much better now... ;^)
|
2879.9 | | WMOIS::GIROUARD_C | | Wed Nov 23 1994 12:48 | 3 |
| <- Me too! It must stink being deformed like that! :-)
Chip
|
2879.10 | | PAKORA::GGOODMAN | Loonatic | Sat Nov 26 1994 02:46 | 13 |
|
Piers,
Have you thought about trying a frame like Van Hooydoncks? Essentially
it is a smaller frame size, but both the head and seat tube extend
beyond the top tube so that you don't have a seat post the size of the
Eiffel tower sticking out. Not sure who makes them, although I'd guess
that a lot of the UK frame manufacturers could. Certainly, Van
Hooydonck has ridden Colnago for the last few years so I'd say that
they will almost certainly sell you one if you are willing to go to
that price level.
Graham.
|
2879.11 | | BIS5::RUTTENS | | Tue Nov 29 1994 02:29 | 14 |
| This is exactly what I've done.
I didn't go for Colonago (Various reasons) but I choose a 62cm
Chesini-frame with extended seat-post and a spacer on the head set.
The frame is made of Columbus oversized THRON tubes.
I'm very pleased with the result.
Here in Belgium (Geraardsbergen - Where you find the famous "Muur" of
the "Tour of Flandres") we have a maufacturer (Giacomelli) who makes
bike up to 68cm In all kind of Columbus tubes in whatever form you
want. I know Giacomelli sounds very Italian-like but it is not.
If you are interested in some doc. about this let me know.
Peter
|
2879.12 | | BOOKIE::J_CROCKER | | Tue Nov 29 1994 14:36 | 16 |
| Leonard Zinn is a custom framebuilder out in Colorado who specializes
in frames for tall people (he's well over 6' himself). He advertises
in VELONEWS (and also writes a column for them).
Karol makes a good point that's important to remember: the length of
your top tube is almost important as the length of your seat tube.
Cannondale tends toward a shorter top, so while 66 might accomodate
the inseam of someone who's 6'9", that person might also need a 14 or
15cm stem to get proper forward extension.
Serotta has a very good understanding of proper geometry for "stock"
frames, but custom is worth exploring.
Justin
|
2879.13 | | JURA::LETCHER | If not for good; if not for better | Wed Nov 30 1994 11:30 | 11 |
| Thanks all.
I think what all this has shown me more than anything is that my next
visit will be to a couple of builders in and around London at Christmas
and let them do some measurements. There's one in Bexley who's using
the new Vitus steel tubing that looks pretty nifty. Finally I thought
that it's all very well looking at the Colnagos and Bianchis in the
catalogue, but unless you have a big big budget they're going to be off
the shelf frames, albeit nice ones, and what I want is a frame for me.
Piers
|