T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2791.1 | BAD NEWS? | WMOIS::GIROUARD_C | | Mon Jun 13 1994 13:24 | 9 |
| Was the original set-up indexed?
Is the Ultegra derailleur indexed?
How old are these derailleurs? Pre-7spd? Pre-8spd?
Compatability issues? Shimano? You can bet on it!
Chip
|
2791.2 | Good chance of it working. | STARCH::WHALEN | Rich Whalen | Mon Jun 13 1994 13:41 | 15 |
| Though they tell you otherwise, most Shimano equipment is compatible, EXCEPT FOR
DURA-ACE. Since thin indexing is in the shift levers derailleurs will be
compatible as long as they respond with the same amount of movement for a given
amount of cable movement. If the Ultegra derailleur is only 1 or 2 years old,
then it will most likely work.
The most time consuming part of changing a derailleur is adjusting it after
you've put it on the bike. You'll have to adjust the limit screws so that it
covers the necessary range. The barrel adjuster is used to fine tune the
position.
Rich
I have a 2 year old bike with RX100 derailleurs and Ultegra STI shifters
(upgrade done last year), it works fine.
|
2791.3 | | WMOIS::GIROUARD_C | | Mon Jun 13 1994 13:52 | 4 |
| I love this! It'll be compatable if there isn't a lot of time
between manufacturing... Of course, working fine is a relative
term :-) The again, Shimano has that "friction" option just
in case things don't work out -- Bwawawawawaaaaaaaaaaaaa :-)
|
2791.4 | Rich is right | LUDWIG::ASMITH | | Mon Jun 13 1994 14:07 | 6 |
| I agree with Rich (splaaaaaaa!, Chip). You can mix and match
105 and Ultegra pretty much as you desire. Shimano components ALWAYS
require some adjustment before you hit the sweet zone, but once there
you hardly ever have to adjust again.
Abe;
|
2791.5 | all Shimano's are '93 | MILKWY::DIVITA | | Mon Jun 13 1994 14:08 | 14 |
| Chip,
The old bike is about 7 years and does not have index shifting. It's
the old shift till you get it in the right gear! The Ultgra derailleur
was put on last December so it's never seen road miles, just trainer
miles. The new Cannondale is actually a left over '93 so with that in
mind, hopefully all the Shimano components are factory '93's.
I was hoping to see a couple replies like .2 saying it's a fairly
simple swap mechanically. The only hassle being getting the adjustment
screws set up right. What do you think?
Mike
|
2791.6 | | WMOIS::GIROUARD_C | | Mon Jun 13 1994 14:40 | 15 |
| Sounds like it shouldn't be a problem. Getting the indexing
adjusted is the worst (or hardest part).
Somewhere in here is a step by step set of instructions. It really
isn't bad to do. Just make sure you "neutralize" your adjusting
screws and barrels so that you can go either way with them.
Start tuning in the gears with the chain on the big cog (small chain-
ring).
Starting off requires patience. Once you've done it, there's no magic.
Good luck, and to the other guys... :-pppppppppppppppppppppppppp's
Chip
|
2791.7 | Install Levers to match the Derailleur | LUDWIG::ASMITH | | Mon Jun 13 1994 16:26 | 6 |
| If you have a new derailleur that is indexed just install a set
of indexed shift levers, this and some adjustments will solve your
problems. Indexing at the lever comes from the internals of the lever
not from any fixture of the bike frame.
Abe;
|
2791.8 | Cosmetic Upgrade | BOOKIE::J_CROCKER | | Wed Jun 15 1994 15:25 | 12 |
| The main difference between 105 and Ultegra is finish: Ultegra is
anodized, 105 is painted. The performance is the same, so there's another
stunt Shimano pulls: Ultegra is mainly a cosmetic upgrade. It does not
improve performance. It may enhance durability a little, since Ultegra
sometimes uses metal where 105 uses plastic.
Unless you have a photographic memory, keep the directions that come
with the derailleur. After 20 years of doing my own work, I still
find installation goes quicker when I'm reading than it does when I'm
remembering.
Justin
|
2791.9 | | JURA::MACFADYEN | smile and mean it | Thu Jun 16 1994 03:40 | 4 |
| If the 105 stuff works, why bother making the change?
Rod
|
2791.10 | To switch or not? | MILKWY::DIVITA | | Thu Jun 16 1994 10:11 | 13 |
| At this point, I'm asking myself the same question. Is it really worth
the time and effort to switch over? If there really is no difference
between the two other than cosmetics, it doesn't make sense. I've never
seen a side by side comparison of the two which showed differences or
advantages of the Ultegra. Have to admit, the Ultegra does look much
nicer.
What do you all think, is it worth doing?
BTW, thanks for all the inputs so far!
Mike
|
2791.11 | My $.02 | NEMAIL::BUXTON | | Thu Jun 16 1994 12:13 | 8 |
| I had all Ultegra components on my road bike until last year when my
front derailleur blew 2 days before a race.
Bike Alley threw on a new 105 and it's worked great ever since. I
believe I have a couple of 105 cogs in the back, too. IMHO, it's not
worth it to change over.
rb
|
2791.12 | $$$ ??? | HYLNDR::OUELLETTE | Buddy Ouellette | Thu Jun 16 1994 12:25 | 20 |
| This bring up another interesting question. If the biggest difference
between Ultegra and 105 is the finish, then what's the difference between
105 and RX100?
Back 3 years ago when I bought my Schwinn Paramount Series 3, I had the choice
of RX100 or buying the Series 5 Paramount which used 105. Back then, they were
both 7 speed index shifting on the down tube. I was told the only difference
between the shimano components was the finish. If this is the case, then
it's possible that the RX100 is functionaly equivalent to the Ultegra, although
the RX100 group does lag behind the technology a little bit. For example,
I think STI shifters are new to RX100 for this model year.
It makes you wonder, is it really worth the price difference between RX100,
105, and Ultegra 600?
Sounds like the answer is no, if they all are functionaly equivalent.
Opinions?
-Buddy
|
2791.13 | | STRATA::HUI | | Thu Jun 16 1994 13:16 | 18 |
|
The finish is one of the main difference between the upgrades. But the
tolerances of the moving parts are also tighter (IE: cones, racers, bearing
etc..) in the more expensive components. This is effect make the units a
little smoother in shifting, rolling etc... Also the seals are improve as you
move up the line. If you take apart the BB, hubs etc.. between a 105 and
a 600, you will notices the seals are designed differently between them.
There are several other mechanical design, cosmetic and component processing
differences between them. But in the end, if you can feel the difference, then
you might buy the more expensive components. If you don't, then why waste your
money.
Kind of like Stereo Equipment to me. I can't hear the difference between a
$1000 CD player verse a $250 one.
Dave
|
2791.14 | Before trying to save $$, ask questions | LUDWIG::ASMITH | | Thu Jun 16 1994 13:35 | 23 |
| Buddy,
I read something in Bicycling Magazine once that stated that the
RX100 gruppo was the beneficiary of proven technology upgrades from the
105/Ultegra gruppos. If this is correct, then there are periods where the
RX100 gruppo will be inferior to 105 ( assuming the upgrades are positive,
overall I think that Shimano has a good track record in this regard ).
If a person pays attention and ask the right questions then he or
she can save money by buying RX100 instead of Ultegra. I don't
understand how the pricing discrepancy comes about in a case when
RX100 and 105 are equivalent but it is possible that it is not all
Shimano's fault. Justin made a point on the materials differences
between Ultegra and 105, in this case a price difference can be
explained.
In the 8 years that I have actively ridden bicycles, I have found
that the price/carefree operation/overall performance advantage of my
Ultegra gruppos is so great that I don't quibble about paying a few
bucks more than I would pay for 105 ( I tried one of another
manufacturer's gruppos once and ended up loosing hundreds of dollars
when I got sick of it and stripped it all off in favor of Ultegra ).
Abe;
|
2791.15 | | MSBCS::BROWN_L | | Fri Jun 17 1994 13:23 | 3 |
| ...and FWIW, there was a pretty big change between last year's 105
rear derailluer and this year's. Best place I've seen for a rear
is $29.95 at Nashbar. kb
|
2791.16 | Does the new derailleur span 8-speed well? | LUDWIG::ASMITH | | Fri Jun 17 1994 13:55 | 8 |
| Re .15,
Is the "throw" better on this year's model? One problem with the
old derailleur was if you used 8-speed it was hard to reach the biggest
freewheel easily ( after a lot of adjustment, sweat and #$%&*+=, I
could setup a useable reach.
Abe;
|
2791.17 | dunno | MSBCS::BROWN_L | | Fri Jun 17 1994 14:25 | 2 |
| The new one has 8sp stamped on it, but (I hate to admit this)
I'm using it on a pre-hyperglide 6sp setup. kb
|
2791.18 | 105 bar end to STI? | AIMHI::RAYMOND | | Mon Jun 20 1994 10:23 | 10 |
|
Just to add more questions here. I have a Shimano 105 setup with bar
end shifters. How complicated and pricey would it be to switch to STI?
Im not sure if I would do it this year or look at an upgrade for next
year.
Thanks
MikeR
|
2791.19 | Not right now... | MILKWY::DIVITA | | Fri Jun 24 1994 09:24 | 7 |
| Just wanted to drop one last note in here and say thanks to everyone
for their inputs. I've decided not to do the swap to the Ultegra
right now. Everything works great as is, so I don't want to mess with
it. If I still have the old bike around in the winter, I'll do the
change over then.
Mike
|