T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2667.1 | Call around and ask! | KIDVAX::OPR_BROGDEN | | Thu Sep 02 1993 01:08 | 21 |
| Nancy,
First if you had a Fit Kit done, meaning they used all the measurements
they took from you, some places only use the upper body measurements,
arm measurements etc. It just depends on whether they used all the info
or maybe just some of it!! I would advise you to get another stem too!!
As for the tune up, it depends on what they are actually doing to the
bike. If they are replacing all cables for brakes and deraillieurs and
the bike has indexed shifting, these cables will be a little more then
the older friction type cables. If they are regreasing the hub, bottom
bracket, head set, etc then these are a fairly time consuming jobs.
Also if your wheels need to be trued this will add to it. Basically if
your bike is only 2 years old then I would tend to believe that $100.00
is too much, but maybe this person is including the stem in the
$100.00, then that might be a decent deal. If I where you, I'd call
around to some other bike shops. I know Bicycle Alley in Worc. offers
3 different tune ups, depending on what the bike needs, I think they
start out at around $40.00.
Good luck-
Tim
|
2667.2 | FUNNY PROBLEM... | WMOIS::GIROUARD_C | | Thu Sep 02 1993 07:44 | 22 |
| Hi Nancy... A $100.00 is about right for a full-blown tune-up. This
means all brearings repacked (BB - H/S - Hubs), everyhting gets a bath
including the frame. All necessary adjustments to everything that does
requiring adjusting. In other words, when you jump on the bike it's
practically worry-free for the season. Unless stated, the cost of
anything needing replacing is usually extra.
Now, the stem. Unless you go with a "specialty stem" or a headset
extension, most stem shafts are standard length. Where the sizes
come into play are the reach. I can't see a stem shaft being too
short if the frame and all other adjustments are correct (including
the stem reach) unless there is an unusual body type involved here.
If you bought the bike there and you got the FIT KIT done there, and
you do need a different stem, on the surface, it sounds like
they screwed. Not knowing whether you just have a special requirement,
however, I'll pass on the judgement. Chelmsford has always carried
a good rep in these parts.
Good Luck,
Chip
|
2667.3 | | LHOTSE::DAHL | Customers do not buy architectures | Thu Sep 02 1993 11:11 | 24 |
| RE: <<< Note 2667.0 by ALFA1::PEASLEE >>>
> ...there is approximately a 4 - 6
> inch difference in the height that was fitted and the height I am
> comfortable with.
WOW! Four to six inches? Good golly, that's a huge change. Where is the top of
the stem, with respect to the top of the saddle? E.g., about the same height as
the saddle, an inch lower, etc. What was the old value of this measurement? I
really have a hard time believing that the change could be that huge. A typical
adult palm is about four inches across (not counding thumb), for example.
Some racers like really low stems (three or four inches below the seat), while
many recreational riders like the stem about the height of the seat. So there
is a very large range here, able to cover your 4-6 inch figure, but I'd think
that the bike wouldn't have been set up with such a low stem (unless maybe you
have a very long inseam, requiring a very high seat).
Stems do have varying length stafts which fit into the steerer tube. I bought a
longer (reach) stem some time ago, and it's steerer-tube shaft must be three
inches longer than the shaft of the old one. In fact I wasn't able to get the
stem quite as low as I wanted, because it runs up against the brake bolt or
something near the bottom of the steerer.
-- Tom
|
2667.4 | | ODIXIE::RRODRIGUEZ | Sign Here X__________ | Thu Sep 02 1993 11:46 | 7 |
| Ditto Tom's remarks-
Also, new cyclists often find the "fit kit" height for a stem to be
restrictive to their breathing. Many are accustomed to the very erect
position offered by the old "banana-seat" racer.
r�
|
2667.5 | Women's frame size | PHONE::MURRAY | Tom Murray, Telecom &Nets EIC, Merrimack, 264-3339 | Thu Sep 02 1993 12:34 | 34 |
| This is a common complaint among women. Frames are designed
for men (except at least Georgina Terry's bikes), and women
tend to be proportionally shorter in the body and longer in
the legs. Thus a standard frame and gooseneck length (not
height) can be too long.
I presume you're going to a shorter stem. This has a good chance
of solving the problem. Raising the stem height doesn't really
change the reach, so use the recommended height. (After, maybe,
some remedial exercises for your back muscles.) Saddle discomfort
complaints (affecting areas one shouldn't sit on) are also
associated with this long reach problem.
If the problem persists, look into getting a Terry. There is
a model available with a triple as the 1420 has, but the
middle chainring size is kinda weird (or at least it was
3 years ago). I recommend matching the ratios on your TREK.
(I have a TREK 1100, a cheaper version of the 1420; and my wife
has a Terry Symmetry with the weird triple ratios. The Terry
worked for her cause she's only 5' tall and needed the 15"
frame. Her build is the opposite of what's typical for women -
her very short legs needed this tiny frame. Smaller Terrys have 24"
front wheels to get the frame short enough, and 165mm cranks,
at least on the 15" model. Terry makes special women's seats
too. No, I don't get a commission on Terrys; they're just a
good idea. I think Klein makes a small frame with triple
combination too, but I don't know about the proportions.)
Happy trails, Tom
|
2667.6 | EXSQUEEZE ME... | WMOIS::GIROUARD_C | | Thu Sep 02 1993 12:45 | 6 |
| This statement is based partly on my experience... The stem height
is purely a personal matter. The FIT KIT I had done did not - I repeat
did not recommend stem height or even provide a range. That was left
up to me. The only stem measurement was reach.
Chip
|
2667.7 | | STARCH::WHALEN | Rich Whalen | Thu Sep 02 1993 13:40 | 6 |
| Another thing to look at is the angle of your handlebars at the point where you
usually hold them. If the handlebars are rotated too much away from the body
(at the point where you usually hold the bars), then you've effectively added
reach to your stem. Rotating them closer to the body will remove some reach.
Rich
|
2667.8 | Bathing the Frame | KAOFS::M_COTE | I'm a mod, not a rocker | Thu Sep 02 1993 15:52 | 11 |
|
Chip,
Could you elaborate on giving you frame a bath? This might be
covered in another note, I have note checked. The bearings, sure I
have bathed them, but the frame?
Thanks
mike
|
2667.9 | I just went thru this... | MSBCS::BROWN_L | | Thu Sep 02 1993 17:38 | 15 |
| The first thing I do is strip everything down to the bearings and
put the components in a (clean!) kitty litter tray. I bring the frame
and the kitty litter tray outside and wash off the major grease globs
with gas and a toothbrush. Then I wipe things off and bring them
inside the bathtub/shower and wash things again with a 3M sponge and
Dawn dishwashing detergent. The detergent is needed to get rid of
the gas residue, which attracts dirt like mad. The gas is needed (at
least for me) to quickly get all the grease off, although if the grease
isn't too bad, you can probably make it a one-step process. I used
to worry about getting water in the frame tubes, but they drain/dry
pretty quickly.
Using gas is debateable... I like it because it makes short order of
grease and handlebar tape goo, it's cheap, convenient, and I have a
large open area outside to use it. KB
|
2667.10 | CALGON TAKE ME AWAY... | WMOIS::GIROUARD_C | | Fri Sep 03 1993 06:55 | 16 |
| If you want to eliminate a step use thinner or lacquer thinner.
It's actually a quicker "cutter" than gasoline and no residue.
In fact, it's evaporated in 10 minutes - nice.
Frame baths? Okay, a little epsome salts, bitters,... :-)
What I meant is that they'll clean the entire frame, e.g. get all
the grease off, Pledge it, etc... IMHO a full tune-up should leave
your bike looking and riding showroom new (barring any negotiations
on not replacing worn stuff) when you leave. If it's not you have two
options, make 'em do it right or go somewhere else.
The most important thing is ask what they'll do prior to handing your
beloved steed over.
Chip
|
2667.11 | I'd hate to have a rep like that... | BARTAB::CAMPBELL | | Fri Sep 03 1993 10:08 | 12 |
|
For what it's worth. I wouldn't actually say that CC has "a good rep".
I've had work done there that was questionable, and seen quite a bit
of work done for friends that was (more than) questionable. Also
Martin doesn tend to be rude sometimes.
Just having a FIT KIT does not ensure a good fit! A competent
person has to take the measurements, use the table's properly,
and then translate that into a bike for you. Then they have to
look at you on the bike and decide the measurements are correct.
Stew
|
2667.12 | OKAY... | WMOIS::GIROUARD_C | | Fri Sep 03 1993 11:35 | 5 |
| MO, that's all... I never had a crummy experience. I agree with you
on the FIT KIT. There is formal training attached to doing FIT KITS.
Aside from being competent the person should be sober, of sound mind,
etc... :-)
|
2667.13 | Watch those solvents! | PHONE::MURRAY | Tom Murray, Telecom &Nets EIC, Merrimack, 264-3339 | Tue Sep 07 1993 12:05 | 16 |
| Regarding use of lacquer thinner: This stuff, and acetone and
other strong solvents used around paint shops
are guaranteed to dissolve paint, epoxy, skin, etc. And it
can make rubber seals swell to uselessness. I assume .10 was
saying, use this as a parts cleaner; I just didn't want the
unwary do get this near anything that it can attack.
Gas and paint thinner can stain some finishes too, though most
paints these days resist this. Gas can swell some rubber seals.
I think it's better we get away from these hydrocarbon solvents.
I use Simple Green. Yes, there will be an oily residue, but
the parts get clean and you have the added advantage of a water
rinse to blast dirt out. Performance bike sells an "organic"
cleaner too, but it sure did a number on my bare hands.
|
2667.14 | INTERNAL APPLICATIONS ONLY | WMOIS::GIROUARD_C | | Tue Sep 07 1993 13:00 | 5 |
| I agree... Those hydro... things should be ingested only!
:-)
Chip
|
2667.15 | Not a pretty sight | ALFA2::PEASLEE | | Mon Sep 13 1993 10:14 | 18 |
| I picked up my bicycle from Chelmsford Cyclery and was told that
the complete ($100) overhaul included:
Repacking bearings in the hub, crank and head,
Tune up of brakes and gears
The wheels were trued
The bicycle was filthy and the tires needed air. When I got home I rode
around quite and noticed that I need to apply quite abit more pressure
to one of the brake levers when I apply the brakes.
It looks like I will be going back to complain. I had brought my bicycle
there for repair because that is where I purchased the bicycle and I had
been quite satisfied at the time of purchase.
When I bring it back to get the brakes adjusted, Martin will get an earful.
nmp
|