T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2558.1 | U-brakes on a MTB-ouch! | DNEAST::FIKE_MIKE | | Tue May 11 1993 08:34 | 6 |
| The 6 speed, Biopace Rings and especially the U-brake are going to
negatively impact the resale value significantly. Don't know how
much...depends on the general bike condition, but if it was in good
condition, I'd expect the you may get a third of the original cost.
Mike
|
2558.2 | Frame might be good but.. | SALEM::SHAW | | Tue May 11 1993 11:17 | 10 |
|
If its a freind you are selling is to, then in my opinion it is only
worth the value of the frame. Biopace and U brake and six speed
is not what a serious mountain biker needs. If the frame is in good
condition, it might be worth upgrading the components.
There is a good articel in Mountain Biking (this months) titled
From old to new. That will give you or your intereseted friend an
idea of what could be replaced with what.
Shaw
|
2558.3 | | MIMS::HOOD_R | | Tue May 11 1993 14:56 | 22 |
|
The only technology change here that you can't get by is the
U break. Assuming this is not an aluminum bike , everything else
is upgradeable. The cost to upgrade to 7 speeds will run about $100 and
the cost to change chainrings will run about $45. I lived with a
circa 1987 Stumpjumper for 5 years with the same componentry as your
Mt. Tam and it was "serious" enough to blow the doors off a lot of
posers with round chainrings/cantilever breaks/7speed rapidfire
shifting. I would say that "serious mountain bikers" need more riding
time and practice than the latest in mountain bike technology. In 1988,
the Mt. Tam was a bike to lust after. Assuming that all the bearings are
good, and realizing that getting rid of those Biopace chainrings is a
must, $400 should be fair.
doug
BTW, U brakes were NEVER as bad as they were made out to be.
|
2558.4 | FEW MORE COMMENTS | AKOCOA::FULLER | | Tue May 11 1993 15:16 | 18 |
| I could bring the bike up to date doing the following:
- round chainrings
- 7 speed shifters
- new freehub and cogs
- new rear derailleur
- send out frame for rear brake mounts to be brazed
- suspension fork
I am thinking of the above. In terms of frame geometry, how
well do people like the newer agressive geometries? The Mt Tam
was unique, for being more laid back geometry, a real cruiser.
I am not sure how well the bike would handle with a shock.
Also, how well are the newer 32 and 28 spoke wheels holding
up? Mine are 36 and with the RM40 rims, never need truiing.
steve
|