T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2501.1 | :-) | NOVA::FISHER | DEC Rdb/Dinosaur | Wed Feb 24 1993 17:41 | 11 |
| for $120, these must be just aero rims with ordinary spoking, right?
I think aero rims are a little stronger than non-aero and usually
just a little bit heavier.
as for individual performance, if you can do 25 mph, you will
save something like 20 seconds on the hour.
But you will look cool.
ed
|
2501.2 | CHOICE | WMOIS::GIROUARD_C | | Thu Feb 25 1993 07:12 | 6 |
| Ditto on Ed's observations. They do tend to be stronger, but usually
weigh more. Are you speaking of their Ypsilon?
Don't forget the bladed spokes...
Chip
|
2501.3 | | STRATA::HUI | | Thu Feb 25 1993 10:58 | 9 |
| The only thing I hate about areo rims is that the presta valve from the
tube come ups a little short sometimes. It makes it a two person job to pump up
your tire because one person has to hold the hose on the valve. So in general,
try to find a tube with a long valve or go with a Mavic Open 4 CD aero rim
since they don't come to a point.
Dave
|
2501.4 | aero wheels | SALEM::RYAN_J | | Thu Feb 25 1993 11:31 | 16 |
|
The model in the catalog is the Omega. Yes, is a little heavier by
24 grams. I haven't spoken to the Nashbar folks yet so I don't know
about the spoking.
I think I gave up 'looking cool' a long time ago but I might be at
that dangerous age when looking cool would help.
The add says that the non-aero has a "patented double-position eyelet"
while the aero has a "eyeletless design". Significance?
Thanks again
Jim
|
2501.5 | aero wheels | SALEM::RYAN_J | | Thu Feb 25 1993 11:33 | 6 |
|
Correction: The Omega Clincher is actually 26 grams heavier than the
aero clincher. The Omerga 19 Clincher is lighter than the aero.
Jim
|
2501.6 | A semi answer | ODIXIE::RRODRIGUEZ | Shake that grits tree! | Thu Feb 25 1993 12:44 | 7 |
| A double eyelet is when you have the "spoke nipple hole" in the
rim reinforced by a little metal collar. It looks like the same
rings that are in the eyelets of canvas tennis shoes.
That is as far as my rim terminology goes...
r�
|
2501.7 | Wheels? | CARTUN::VINCENT | | Wed Mar 10 1993 13:42 | 10 |
| I thinking about building some wheels using the latest and greatest
in trick parts (yes Chip, it might include some Ti...). I'm looking
for something lightweight, aero, strong, and cool looking.
The only restrictions are:
Legal for USCF events
They have to be clinchers.
Any ideas?
|
2501.8 | GOOD LUCK... | WMOIS::GIROUARD_C | | Wed Mar 10 1993 14:02 | 4 |
| That's very open ended and the combinations of things are umlimited.
Which shifting system will you use?
Chip
|
2501.9 | ....and money is no object ;^) | CARTUN::VINCENT | | Wed Mar 10 1993 16:36 | 3 |
| Re 2501.7 Shifting system is Shimano Dura Ace STI 8 speed.
|
2501.10 | Why not Sew-ups | VMSNET::65134::LYNCH_T | Tom Lynch | Wed Mar 10 1993 16:45 | 13 |
| RE .7
Why must the wheels be clinchers?!?
I don't have sew-ups but my next set of wheels will be
and everyone I have ever talked to that has ridden sew-ups
raves them.
Also since money is no object what about some carbon-fiber
spoked wheels? According to the write up in VeloNews
Andy Hampsten will be using a Specialized Tri-Spoke in all
but the mountain stages this year.
|
2501.11 | | KRAKAR::WARWICK | Can't you just... ? | Wed Mar 10 1993 20:09 | 10 |
|
> Andy Hampsten will be using a Specialized Tri-Spoke in all
> but the mountain stages this year.
Isn't (or wasn't) there some (UCI?) regulation that forbade tri-spokes
or similar wheels in road races ? I thought this was something to do
with the amputating potential of one of these things in a crash.
I freely admit that I might have imagined it though.
Trevor
|
2501.12 | Good Wheels = Flying | KAOFS::W_VIERHOUT | Canadian CSC TBU | Wed Mar 10 1993 20:54 | 20 |
|
You can get an all Ti hubset that supports the Dura Ace setup. I'm
not sure of who makes them because I would'nt afford it anyway.
I think the lightest durable clincher rim around these days is the
Mavic open 4 CD. Its also aero.
For spokes there is the new carbon fier type spokes mentioned some-
where in a previous Bicycling Mag. Also you can now get spokes with an
oval crossection shape as well as of course double butted. Spoke
nipples are available in super light alloy to save a few onces.
Dont forget to buy nice light tires for your wheels. Richy Road K
Force tires are sticky and have about the same weight as a premium
racing tubular. Top it off with the Specialized extra light model of
tubes and you'll ne flying.
In my parts (Southern Ontario) I think the move is going away from
sew-ups. I think its because there are now many light clincher rims and
tires to choose from.
|
2501.13 | | PAKORA::GGOODMAN | | Thu Mar 11 1993 02:56 | 16 |
|
Re. Tri Spoke
Don't think they're banned from RRs. I've seen Rooks ride them in
the Worlds.
Re. Sew ups v clinchers
Most folk do seem to be switching from tubs to wired ons. There is
no longer any real difference in ride quality if you buy a good quality
wired ons. The main difference is in a race a tub is quicker (but more
expensive) to change. But buy then you've probably lost anyway...
Graham.
|
2501.14 | | NOVA::FISHER | DEC Rdb/Dinosaur | Thu Mar 11 1993 07:53 | 15 |
| Nuke proof makes some Dura Ace compatible hubs.
If I were having some trick wheels made here's what I'd
do: Nuke Proof D/A Titanium hubs, 28 spokes, 14/15 3X
DT spokes in the rear, 15/16 2X DT in the front, Matric
ISO C-II clinchers. 700-23 something tires.
In fact I already did. :-)
As for trick stuff for road racing: Have you ever wondered why the
pro's only use the trick stuff for time trials? and not raod races?
But it depends on whether win, place or show is your goal.
ed
|
2501.15 | A LITTLE MORE... | WMOIS::GIROUARD_C | | Thu Mar 11 1993 08:06 | 30 |
| You've gotten some good direction here. Trick stuff (wheels) are now
legal in international racing.
One point, there is a lot of "trick" stuff being used by the pros
these days. A lot of it is not obvious. There are tons of Ti nuts and
bolts on the top riders bicycles these days.
If you like chewing up freewheels, you can pay for alloy cogs or (be
really stupid like me and get the Ti cog set from Boone). I'm not sure
if the composite spokes have hit the market yet, but there are Ti
spokes out there (costly Apptox. $1.50@) and I hear they give a very
spongy ride.
There are pluses and minuses (and raging debate potential) to
clinchers and sew-ups. Sew-ups give a better (but not that much
anymore). They are easier to change on the road (but the good ones
are expensive and are difficult to repair). Sew-ups are lighter, but
not that much anymore. Clincher rims and tires have made incredible
leaps in improvement over the years and continue to do so.
Other things to consider... Sew-ups can roll off - Clinchers won't
unless they are improperly seated. A lot of braking can melt glue and
also bring the roll off factor into play.
They are a little messy to put on too. I do for my disk wheel and
don't enjoy it much.
The bottom line... It's what you want.
Chip
|
2501.16 | Where to draw the line... | NOVA::FISHER | DEC Rdb/Dinosaur | Thu Mar 11 1993 08:44 | 16 |
| Ok, what would I avoid? 280 gm rims with 200 gm tires for road racing
and certainly for training. The first pothole and they're gone.
Save them for the time trials and maybe the hill climbs.
Where else do I think one can be foolish? There was a guy on BMB last
year who had a nine speed freewheel and a lot of Ti stuff on his bike
including Ti crank bolts. He pulled into a support stop and asked the
mechanic to tighten his cranks. Didn't mention he had Ti bolts. A
little too much torque and they were gonzo. Actually they didn't break
when they were torqued but a hunnerd miles down the road they were gone
and the crank came off. Where's the mistake? I woulndn't blame the
mechanic. I think the rider should have either told the mechanic or
not asked for help. Of course with 500 miles behind him in 2 days he
probably forgot, until his crank came off.
ed
|
2501.17 | what's another $2000 | AKOCOA::FULLER | | Thu Mar 11 1993 09:38 | 5 |
| If you want to save substantial weight, uncluding your wallet,
investigate Magic Motorcycle. They claim 3 lb saving to standard set
of wheels and cranks.
steve
|
2501.18 | | NOVA::FISHER | DEC Rdb/Dinosaur | Thu Mar 11 1993 10:52 | 11 |
| FOR THE ULTIMATE IN WEIGHT SAVING!!!
Take up running.
Gag.
Ok, I'll go back to my corner.
Ok, how about "Don't forget the aero seatpost!"
ed
|
2501.19 | | PAKORA::GGOODMAN | | Thu Mar 11 1993 11:06 | 5 |
|
Thank you, Mr.Fisher. Don't call us, we'll call you... :*)
Graham.
|
2501.20 | Wheels | CARTUN::VINCENT | | Thu Mar 11 1993 13:40 | 19 |
| Thanks for all the advise.
All my reasons for wanting clinchers were listed in the various responses.
I have considered the Trispokes from Specialized - I had a pair of last
years model and they were really heavy (new model is lighter), and they
rode REALLY stiff. Still haven't got a straight answer if they are
legal for USCF mass start races and the $ is a bit high.
Ed came the closest to what I'm leaning towards - Nuke Proof Ti hubs,
but with an aero rim thats a bit lighter (forgot the name) and some
carbon fiber spokes.
As for the Magic Motorcycle treatments...well I was just kidding when
I said "money was no object". I can only afford to do one upgrade
this year, so I opted to reduce some rotating weight....maybe next
year.....
|
2501.21 | cool campy | UTROP1::BRUMMEL_BERT | Bert Brummel @UTO | Fri Mar 12 1993 09:07 | 14 |
| If you realy want to buy something COOL, AERO, LIGHT and
STRONG.
Try Campagnolo's new SHAMAL WHEELS
They are made of ALLUMIUM
Have 16 spokes made of stainless steel
Hub is Campy record with alloy body (super light-weight)
The rear Wheel with hub weigh about 1.3 Kg.
I don't know if you can use Shimano gocs on the used hub.
Bert.
|
2501.22 | | PAKORA::GGOODMAN | | Fri Mar 12 1993 09:19 | 6 |
| >> If you realy want to buy something COOL, AERO, LIGHT and
>> STRONG.
And very, very expensive... :*)
Graham.
|
2501.23 | | NOVA::FISHER | DEC Rdb/Dinosaur | Mon Mar 15 1993 07:59 | 3 |
| mais certainment, mon ami!
ed
|
2501.24 | price in Holland | UTROP1::BRUMMEL_BERT | Bert Brummel @UTO | Mon Mar 15 1993 09:19 | 10 |
| Well what is expensive when you get something so COOL, STRONG etc.
The price in Holland is about Fl 800,- ($ 450,-).
That's not expensive if you look at all the carbon wheels such as
the tri spoke and spengle wheel.
It sounds to me as a reasonable substitute.
Bert.
|
2501.25 | I HATE surprise wheel rebuilds! | NCBOOT::PEREZ | Trust, but ALWAYS verify! | Mon Jul 19 1993 18:06 | 46 |
| I'm having a LOT of fun with rims this summer *&^%$#$%^&^ !!!!!!!!
I have Mavic MA40 rims on the Cannondale. Last year I broke the rear
rim. It literally broke away at the sidewall adjacent to a spoke. Not
the eyelet pulling through or the spoke breaking (although I've done
that too), the rim base broke away from the sidewalls for a distance of
approximately 1 inch. I went into the shop where they made a quick
call to Mavic, spoke for 15-20 seconds then turned around and pulled a
new rim down off the wall (the shop said they were surprised Mavic was
so accomodating and surmised a problem with the rim).
I built the new wheel under their wheelbuilder's supervision (always
trying to learn to do things right so I wanted to see how a "pro" does
the tensioning and such), and it has been good until a couple months
ago. At that time I started pulling the nipples off spokes. Not
breaking the spokes, actually pulling the threads through the nipples.
Always on the side OPPOSITE the freewheel (where the spoke tension is
lower). I replaced both the spoke and nipple each time this happened
(so far 3 or 4 spokes).
Last Thursday on returning from a ride I checked the wheel when putting
the bike on the car and found the rim had broken again. In two places
approximately 90 degrees apart the rim has fractured adjacent to spokes
just like last year. Also, another spoke has pulled through the
threads. I picked up a new rim and spokes Thursday night and rebuilt
the wheel because I was heading out for a weekend bike trip Friday and
didn't have time to fool around fighting with the shop or Mavic.
Everything was fine for the 60+ miles on Saturday (didn't even need to
retension anything, no wobble or anything). Yesterday, after 25 miles
on absolutely flat, perfect, paved roads - no bumps, no curbs, no
potholes, no nothing, I checked the bike and found I'd pulled the
nipple loose on one of the off-side spokes again. I was riding with my
wife, TAKING IT EASY, and never exceeded 15 mph ALL DAY!
I ABSOLUTELY SWEAR I'm not doing anything irrational, banging over
curbs (heaven forbid) or anything other than normal riding on the road.
I even attempt to miss the occasional potholes we have here. Not hard,
not abusive, not anything out of the ordinary...
What is going on? I'm using DT 14 ga stainless straight-gauge spokes,
laced 4-cross on 36-hole Deore LX hubs. Tires are new Panaracer Tour-Guard,
and of course, the rims are MA40s. Do I need a different rear rim? If
so, what would be better? I'm not concerned about saving the last gram
on the bike since I'm not exactly svelte and I often carry additional
stuff on the bike...
|
2501.26 | wild guesses | JURA::PELAZ::MACFADYEN | | Tue Jul 20 1993 04:39 | 13 |
| Is the shop selling you poor quality spoke nipples? I'm amazed that a spoke
can pull through a nipple. Come to think of it, is the spoke length long
enough - perhaps the spokes are too short and aren't screwed in far enough
to the nipples?
Other than that, perhaps the spoke tension is way too high, or even way too
low. If it was too low, the spokes could go absolutely slack at one point on
the wheel rotation, then tighten up suddenly as the wheel turns and the
tension comes on. I'm theorising that a shock loading like that could jerk
the spoke out of the nipple.
Rod
|
2501.27 | I'm gettin' tired of replacing nipples too! | NCBOOT::PEREZ | Trust, but ALWAYS verify! | Tue Jul 20 1993 12:03 | 39 |
| >Is the shop selling you poor quality spoke nipples? I'm amazed that a spoke
>can pull through a nipple. Come to think of it, is the spoke length long
>enough - perhaps the spokes are too short and aren't screwed in far enough
>to the nipples?
DT 14 ga. stainless spokes with brass nipples (I skipped the alloy
nipples since according to the shop they have less strength). Spoke
length was determined by the shop using their calculator. When laced
there are no threads visible on the spokes, and the spoke end is
approximately 1/2-1 mm from the end of the spoke nipple (just at the
bottom of the screwdriver groove across the nipple. They APPEAR to me
to be the right length.
>Other than that, perhaps the spoke tension is way too high, or even way too
>low. If it was too low, the spokes could go absolutely slack at one point on
>the wheel rotation, then tighten up suddenly as the wheel turns and the
>tension comes on. I'm theorising that a shock loading like that could jerk
>the spoke out of the nipple.
I stopped at the regular shop last night and they replaced the rim.
While examining the old one they concluded this was some kind of fluke
since they they have heavier riders on these rims, stronger riders,
etc. and get very few failures.
I don't think its an undertension problem but anything is possible. The
shop has two people that are supposed to be very good wheel builders so
I'll take the wheel in when one of them is available and have him check
it out. They also have a tensiometer so while truing, tensioning,
etc., they can make sure the spoke tension is right.
I pulled another nipple out last night. In the past I've been changing
both spoke and nipple, but the shop said the failure was almost
guaranteed to be the nipple. So, I unscrewed the nipple some more and
found some brass filings in the spoke threads. I put on a new nipple,
re-trued the wheel and marked the spoke so I can tell if it fails
again. I don't know if it's useful but so far, AS FAR AS I CAN RECALL,
all the failures have been on pulling spokes. Much as I'd like to
believe its because of the huge amount of horsepower I'm generating I
don't think that's realistic... :^)
|
2501.28 | | NOVA::FISHER | US Patent 5225833 | Tue Jul 20 1993 12:51 | 4 |
| I have seen this flaw in MA40's before. One was mine, the other
belonged to Paul Morissettewho was then also a century maniac.
ed
|
2501.29 | | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Tue Jul 20 1993 12:53 | 10 |
| Dave,
It sounds like we're riding the same wheels. And, I weigh
in at around 295 pounds. I've never had an MA-40 break
or any real trouble. About all I have to do is retrue
the rear wheel every so often.
I wonder if it's just a bad batch of wheels?
Scott
|
2501.30 | Of course, tonight is another night! | NCBOOT::PEREZ | Trust, but ALWAYS verify! | Wed Jul 21 1993 10:02 | 15 |
| re -.1:
> I wonder if it's just a bad batch of wheels?
Could be some bad wheels. The shop certainly didn't question me at all
before pulling a new rim off the wall. Didn't even bother calling
Mavic, just threw the rim into the "defective" bin for the next visit
from the Mavic rep!
Yesterday, when I put the new nipple on I forgot to mention that I
applied a little of the purple Locktite (the hopefully REMOVABLE one)
to the threads... On last night's ride I hit SEVERAL significant
pavement cracks and potholes, and a couple unexpectedly rough railroad
tracks - and no spoke failures THIS TIME! I still want to have the
wheel set up and adjusted by a "professional" - just for the learning
experience if nothing else!
|
2501.31 | I put grease on my nipples | JURA::PELAZ::MACFADYEN | well, I ask you | Wed Jul 21 1993 12:12 | 11 |
| > Yesterday, when I put the new nipple on I forgot to mention that I
> applied a little of the purple Locktite (the hopefully REMOVABLE one)
I normally put grease on the spoke threads and in the spoke holes where the
nipple sits so that adjustment is smooth and easy, and so that future
maintenance is easier too.
Then again I haven't had the spoke breakage problems you're having.
Rod
|
2501.32 | Orchestra tonight, a break from the bike wars! | NCBOOT::PEREZ | Trust, but ALWAYS verify! | Thu Jul 22 1993 13:21 | 14 |
| Normally I use a light oil during assembly to make the installation and
adjustment easier and to minimize spoke twisting. This time, though,
I'm completely at a loss...
Was out last night for 20 or so miles and had several instances of
rough pavement - no pulling or damage again. I dropped the wheel off
at the shop last night after the ride for them to apply their wheel
building genius and magic touch. I'll see what their comments are
about my neophyte building techniques are tomorrow when I pick it up!
One comment made last night was that VERY OCCASIONALLY they've had
nipples from DT that weren't sized QUITE right and didn't fit tightly
enough onthe spokes. Seems unlikely to me but I'm willing to entertain
just about any thoughts at this point!
|