T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2195.1 | | IOSG::ELLISJ | John Lee Ellis - assembly required | Mon Feb 24 1992 09:15 | 2 |
|
Bert, does your MTB have elevated chain-stays?
|
2195.2 | ref. elevated | UTROP1::BRUMMEL_BERT | | Mon Feb 24 1992 09:31 | 11 |
| Ref.2195.1
John,
My MTB has no elevated chain-stays unfortunately
Otherwise I didn't have this problem.
And to buy a new bike is to expensive for me at
the moment.
Bert
|
2195.3 | | DOGONE::WOODBURY | | Tue Feb 25 1992 13:09 | 13 |
| The only time I have chain-suck is when the lube on the chain
washes off (that takes about an hour and a half of riding thru
the mud and beaver damms this time of year!). Keep it oiled.
Also, you may have too many links in your chain... This causes
slack which exaserbates the problem. When you run in the little
chain ring, don't run in the smallest of the freewheel chains.
My personal humble opinion (ie: Fat City biggot!) is that elevated
chain stays will only help prevent the paint from chipping - they
won't prevent the chain from leaping off the ring, nor will they
help you win any sprints or races!
mark
|
2195.4 | ..response to 2195.3 | CFSCTC::IVERSEN | | Tue Feb 25 1992 17:29 | 5 |
| Mark;
Is that your way of saying "...buy a Wicked" ????
R
|
2195.5 | ride fix gear? | WLDWST::SANTOS_E | | Wed Feb 26 1992 10:43 | 14 |
| try this put your chain in the largest rings front and back, this means
high front low rear. Push on the top of thechain towards the chain stay
tube your chain should deflect 1/2" to 1" if longer than that reduce
your chain lenght.
Also when you ride in the mud your chain will get heavier (but you know
that) what I do is I keep on the larger chain ring and top 2 lowest
in the rear, this keeps the deraileur tension on. Never use the lowest
chainring and highest rear gear combination.
Chain does not suck while you are pedalling.
Good Luck
Ed
|
2195.6 | | MOVIES::WIDDOWSON | I call it IO$_ACCESS | IO$M_ACCESS VMS | Wed Feb 26 1992 10:53 | 1 |
| For us non MTB types: What's chain suck ? Is it like Wheel suck :-)
|
2195.7 | | PAKORA::GGOODMAN | Number 1 in a field of 1 | Wed Feb 26 1992 11:59 | 9 |
|
Re.6
>> For us non MTB types: What's chain suck ? Is it like Wheel suck :-)
You get your face covered in oil instead of mud...
Graham.
|
2195.8 | yuck | NOVA::FISHER | Rdb/VMS Dinosaur | Wed Feb 26 1992 12:42 | 7 |
| chain suck is when your chain refuses to go straight from the bottom of
your chain ring to your deraileur. Instead a few links decide to stay
engaged to the chainring and follow upwards. If the chain ring is
small,as often happens when riding in the muck, the chain ends up
jamming between the rings and the chainstay.
ed
|
2195.9 | it's a chain-slack problem | CSCOA1::HOOD_R | | Wed Feb 26 1992 13:50 | 17 |
|
Ditto on the replies that say your chain might be too long,
and to keep is lubricated. Other things that cause chainsuck:
1) biopace chain rings (My opinion) due to the uneveness of
of the slack on the chain through the pedal cycle and 2) bad
shifting on a hill (watch that shifting to a smaller chainring
on the front shifter during hill climbs), 3) a derailleur
that won't take up the slack ( a malfunctioning or cheap derailleur).
My 1987 Stumpjumper came with a chainstay mounted U-brake. Shimano
makes a device for it called a Sharks-tooth that fits onto the
brake and DRAMATICALLY cut down on my chainsuck. U-brakes have
since been abandoned, so you may have to find some other way to
deal with it.
doug
|
2195.10 | My chain sucks | WLDWST::SANTOS_E | | Thu Feb 27 1992 12:25 | 8 |
| Now I am realy confused My humle self thought that CHAIN SUCK is
when your chain slops up and down and gets caught between the chain
stays and the tire, cause shi.mano has the shark tooth glue on stay
protector to prevent chain suck?
It seems to me that if the chains fall off the inner chainring , then
thats front deraileur adjustment problem.
I have boipace and I Hate it also.
Ed
|
2195.11 | | CSCOA1::HOOD_R | | Thu Feb 27 1992 19:33 | 21 |
|
I refer to chain suck as meaning "anytime the chain gets sucked
in between the tire and chainstay, or over the chainstay to
the outside". In either case, there has to be enough extra slack in
the chain before the slack can actually get caught up some where.
Front derailler adjustments really only determine how far the chain
gets pushed/pulled sideways (and those limits), but doesn't
deal with the slack in the chain. Shifting down to a smaller chain
ring will create (temporarily) a lot of slack in the chain (bottomside).
Pedaling backward (IMO a no-no) with ,say, a kink in your chain is
a good way to produce enough slack (topside) to get sucked in.
In any case, I've never seen a bike, except for bikes with elevated
chainstays, that did not occasionally get chainsuck. If you
adjust-your-chainlength-dont-pedal-backwards-shift-to-smaller-
chainrings-before-you-have-to-lube-your-derailleur-and-chain then you
can avoid a lot of problems.
doug
|
2195.12 | qualification of -1 | CSCOA1::HOOD_R | | Thu Feb 27 1992 19:36 | 8 |
|
As an adder-- when I say "I've never seen a bike" I should qualify
that to mean "I've never seen a mt. bike that was ridden over
rough terrain". I've never experienced chain suck (even once) on
my road bike.
doug
|
2195.13 | <- Thanks Doug -> | UTROP1::BRUMMEL_BERT | | Fri Feb 28 1992 02:59 | 24 |
| Doug,
Thanks for your information about this item.
This weekend I'm going to adjust my MTB, which means
1) The Biopace Chainrings will be changed in round Chainrings
2) The Chain slack wil be reduced
3) There wil be a sort of Shark tooth installed on
the bottom bracket, to prevent the chain damaging the Frame.
Thanks for all this information, I'll keep you informed about my
findings.
P.S. I have spoken to a salesperson from Shimano and Guess what
he was telling me about this subject.
Indeed, the same as you recommended.
He also told me that Biopace was going to be out of Production.
Just because they also believe Biopace is the most important
cause of all this.
Bert.
|
2195.14 | Try this thing by Ringle | MAIL::ALBERT | | Tue Mar 17 1992 18:46 | 18 |
| There is a very effective anti-chainsuck device made by Ringle that's
called, I believe, the Ringle Anti-Chainsuck Thing or something equally
imaginative. It's a machined and drilled aluminum plate that bolts on
the underside of the chainstays about 1" aft of the bb shell. It has
stairstep-like serrations along the edge that butts up near the inner
edge of the small chainring. It does a great job of preventing the
chain from being sucked upward and jamming between the chainring and
chainstay.
Trek is equipping some of their '92 MTBs with a similar device. I ride
regularly with an expert-class NORBA racer who also manages a shop in
town, and he swears by this thing. This is the type of guy who
meticulously maintains his bike, is a very skilled rider who knows not
to bail out into the granny ring under even moderate pedal pressure,
etc. His take on chainsuck, and I'm inclined to agree, is that in the
heat of a race you're occasionally going to suck the chain, even with
the best of planning. The little Ringle deal appears to be worth the
$25 and ~ 100 grams.
|