T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2138.1 | | NOVA::FISHER | Rdb/VMS Dinosaur | Tue Dec 03 1991 12:17 | 10 |
| I don't think they can do that retroactively. The guarantee
available at the time of the purchase is the one which you are
allowed to use. You can talk to your state's consumer protection
office. Also since they use the mail, the postal service is very
interested in mail fraud and is very willing to investigate complaints
and discontinue mail delivery to businesses.
It all depends on how much you want to fight for your $14.80.
ed
|
2138.2 | GIMME A BREAK! | WMOIS::GIROUARD_C | | Tue Dec 03 1991 12:52 | 34 |
| I would not call and complain. I think the policy and the change are
more than fair. They're in the business of volume and keeping prices
down FOR US as much as possible.
I'll bet the consumer is probably to blame for new return policy
anyway. People have a tendency to abuse those things.
I have never had a problem with them. They've been very (always)
helpful and have never screwed up anything I've ordered - I too do
a "ton" (more than I like to talk about) business with them.
If the policy will keep them competitive, I'll support it. I am not
entirely sure why everything gets returned, but a lot of times the
consumer may decide they no longer want it (unfair) or they may have
found one cheaper (unfair again).
The only reason to really return something (buyer beware) is if it's
received damaged... Even then, the return policy would not apply
given you can proove it was received that way (of course there's always
the misrepresentation of advertising - an expensive one to prove).
People who arbitrarilly return things due to their own negligence
or change of heart pump up the prices for all of us trying to take
advantage of the volume system.
I still think their return policy (still valid at the whim of the
consumer unless it exceeds 30 days) is more than adequate for the
average bear... Of course for those who lapse into 31 day comas it
may seem pretty Neo-nazi-ish :-)
Okay... flame off!
Chip
|
2138.3 | it's not what they did but how! | TEMPE::HUFFAKER | | Tue Dec 03 1991 16:39 | 24 |
| re.2
I agree about the change of policy in that it may make them more
competitive on cost and that they have the right and ability
to make those changes. Where I have a problem is in the way they
are doing it. I have in the past not bought from Colorado Cyclery
because they only had a 30 day policy so I bought from Nashbar
to get the guarantee. Now Nashbar is not honoring items purchased
under the old catalog and are not giving any indication (in fact with
my returned item they sent a "Spike Nashbar" with the old, no limit,
guarantee listed). Its kind of like buying a car with a 50,000 mile
warantee then for the policy to be changed to 12,000 miles a year
later and now I am out of warantee. I want the policy I bought under.
Since this was my first return to Nashbar in about 8 years of doing
business with them and to have it rejected because of a change in the
latest catalog really ticks me off.
Each time Nashbar has made a "positive" policy change they have
plastered it on the cover. In this case nothing is mentioned and even
the people on the phone don't know how to handle it. When I asked if
this was a policy change I got a "I cannot comment please refer to
issue #79" ususally the folks are pretty friendly. Anyway I sent off
a letter to Arni and will wait to see if I get a reply.
Mike
|
2138.4 | Ok, a small break. | NOVA::FISHER | Rdb/VMS Dinosaur | Wed Dec 04 1991 03:38 | 7 |
| Sorry Chip, but another reason for returning something is "product
does not meet reasonable expectations" or some such thing. Like a
wheel that falls apart quickly.
Other than that I agree.
ed
|
2138.5 | AGREEMENT... | WMOIS::GIROUARD_C | | Wed Dec 04 1991 07:16 | 22 |
| Absolutely Ed. And the law protects us from that return policy in
that the item must perform and (or) meet the advertised or reasonable
performance.
I've had particular experience here with other stuff (house - new -
the roof). This is in Mass, but I believe this is regulated by the
feds through the consumer division... Anyway, my roof leaked, it was
4 years AFTER the house warranty ran out (1yr) and the judge told
the guy to fix it and not be ridiculous...
I guess the system works sometime...
I also agree that a change in policy ought to be handled a little
better than it sounds like they did. I just found out from this note.
And I agree that granfathering the old policy for purchases pre-new
policy is the right/responsible thing to do. The good news is (with
maybe a little inconvenience) they took care of you.
I just thought the reaction was a little strong, but that's entirely
your business as a consumer...
Chip
|
2138.6 | agree | SANCHO::HUFFAKER | | Wed Dec 04 1991 13:24 | 13 |
| Yes, I agree that my reaction was strong for 14.80. It was more a
reaction to the "I cannot comment" to the direct question "has there
been a policy change?" Why not just say "yes and this is why...."
also at that point I had just asked about the status of the return
and pow! I am talking to a supervisor. I believe the people on the
line at Nashbar don't know how to deal with this, they seem really
uncomfortable talking about it. Thats why I think this is a higher
level issue at Nashbar (like Arni or someone) sending down a dictate
to the troops....like "do it" you deal with the customers but don't
say anything wrong....any way enough said and I am just going to wait
and see.
Mike
|
2138.7 | positive note | USMRM5::MREID | | Thu Dec 05 1991 07:46 | 5 |
| Only 30 days to return something @ Nashbar?
This is great news for local bike shops.
Mark
|
2138.8 | Performance still honors 100% satisfaction warranty | ASDG::SWAN | | Mon Dec 16 1991 14:04 | 13 |
|
I recently found that my heart rate monitor crapped out (again) and decided
to send it back to Performance where it was purchased. Even though I bought
it TWO years ago, I don't feel that I'm being unfair. One reason that I
bought it from Performance is that they make every atttempt to sell quality
products and back up their sales with a lifetime satisfaction guarantee.
(FWIW, I buy products from LL BEAN for the same reason).
When I called Performance and explained the issue, they said "No Problem...
just send it back and we'll credit your account". Now that's great service -
they just won my business for years to come!
-Steve
|
2138.9 | 101% satisfaction | MATE::PJOHNSON | | Tue Dec 17 1991 15:34 | 8 |
| I had a similar experience a few months ago with Performance. The
zipper on my 3-year-old neoprene booties blew out. I mailed them back,
they sent me some new booties PLUS a check for a dollar to cover the
price decrease over the years. I'm sold on Performance; and with their
price protection I always give them a chance to match the prices in
other catalogues.
Phil
|
2138.10 | average your savings vs lost | WLDWST::SANTOS_E | | Tue Dec 24 1991 12:24 | 17 |
| I use nashbar as my main vendor with the understanding of I am buying
for the price . Around the time you returned your items I did the same
thing on my last purchase . on their order/return policy sheet of the
winter catalog it says 30 days , I believe thats fair for items that
do not satisfy you as a customer . as far as wheels or electronics that
I believe is the manufacturer not nessesarily the vendors responsi-
bility at all cases , My gripe is the hidden cost of shipment cost and
hasle from the customers point of view when returning the items.So do
I want to pay retail or gamble? Performance does weird things their
culture states customer satisfaction , they will even price match any
add. Thats a great plus if theres a local outlet next to you. Sometimes
we just have to measure our response to protect our own future .
Imagine if you do cut nashbar off you will not get any more catalogs or
if you did you will want something thats a great deal then you will
miss out . Its good to voice out our disatisfaction to get better
service what is not good is if we burn bridges we all suffer later on.
regards.
|