T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1961.1 | here's one type | DELNI::BARWISE | | Thu Jun 06 1991 17:03 | 10 |
|
Quickly looking through the thrashbar, sorry, Nashbar catalog in my
office, I see what I think you're looking for. There are two
models by Onza with different bend styles. The costs are:
L-Bend (#OZ-BEL) 181 grams $43.
Ski-Bend (#OZ-BES) 158 grams $37.
I'm sure I've seen others in different catalogs.
rb
|
1961.2 | Check Performance or Nashbar catalogs | BAGELS::GOTANTAS | | Thu Jun 06 1991 18:05 | 13 |
| Hi Shaw,
I know what you're talking about, but I've never used them
and I've never seen any in titanium at those prices! The ones
that I have seen are made of aluminum or cromoly and the prices
range from $25 to $50 per pair. As .1 mentioned, look in the
Nashbar or Performance catalogs to see what they offer. Also,
check out the ATB handlebars made by Scott (same company that
makes ski poles).
Take care and stay upright...
Pete
|
1961.3 | | CSCOA1::HOOD_R | | Thu Jun 06 1991 18:56 | 28 |
|
Shaw,
Remember, too, that many bar-ends clamp onto the bar... you
effectively lose about an inch at each end. This won't be a
problem if you already have a fairly wide bar, but (if you
have a narrow bar) you may not like how much room they take.
I have talked to several people who enjoyed the new hand position,
but did not like the confined feeling they have in the normal
position. At the price they charge for bar ends, you may
consider the Scott AT (3,4,4Pro) bars. They provide an even greater
range of hand positions at only slightly more weight...
and they cost about the same. I ordered and AT4 from Nashbar for
$42.95.... it arrived yesterday after being backordered. BTW,
I had previously cut my bar (long before bar ends were
available ) and it was far too narrow for me to put on
bar ends, or I might have gotten those.
I don't know how much they will help your wheel lift problem,
though. If you lean too far forward, you lose traction on the
rear wheel. Too far back, and the front wheel comes up. It's
all a question of body balance, and is often unrelated to hand
positions. On loose or slippery surfaces, it's all a question
of balance! On any uphill, though, it's nicer to get your
hands out from under you.
Doug
|
1961.4 | I'll check 'em out this weekend! | SALEM::SHAW | Vertical Obsession... | Fri Jun 07 1991 09:23 | 14 |
|
Thanks friends for the replies. I am going to check out a few cycle
shops this weekend. I wonder if the clamp-ons are easy to
attach/dettach at will (I hope they are), that way I can keep them
in the bag and use them when required. I will check into the Onza
the ones that I saw from Onza were $200.00. The Scott handle bars
sound like a good idea. If they are as light as the ski poles they
make. For those of you that have ordered stuff from Nashbar, how long
do you have to wait for them, if it's four to six weeks delivery, I
won't have the patience.
Thanks again!
Shaw
|
1961.5 | try this- it's free! | ABACUS::SOFIO | | Fri Jun 07 1991 11:55 | 11 |
| For hill climbs, try this-
Stay in the saddle, and pull back hard on the handle bars,
while concentrating on keeping your elbows in.
Sounds strange, but MBA, etc. recommend it, and it does work. I ride
with a lot of people who use this technique effectively.
Have fun,
Ed
|
1961.6 | I'll try anything once! | SALEM::SHAW | Vertical Obsession... | Fri Jun 07 1991 16:01 | 8 |
|
RE:-1
Ed, I have been climbing hills for over four years and I never pulled
back hard on the handle bars while climbing, wouldn't the front end
lift off the ground if you did that?
Shaw-which-will-try-this-tomorro
|
1961.7 | It's not the bars | AIMHI::LARSON | | Fri Jun 14 1991 19:49 | 20 |
| Shaw,
I agree with Doug. The extentions tend to help with long, gradual
consistent hills and when spinning the flats. On short, technical climbs
(i.e. steep, rocky and rooted) I don't use them. I like the
traditional postition where you have easy access to the controls.
Climbing short, steep inclines successfully requires perfect body
positioning 100% of the time. Also, you must be in the right gear,
not necessarily the lowest. Too low a gear will make your front end
come up or spin the rear wheel. Try a higher gear and see if you
notice a difference. The only other factor I've noticed is consistent
pressure on the pedals. I seem to have much more success when I keep a
a rhythm than when I try to use brute force.
Mike
PS
If anyone has any input on the Scott AT-3's I'd be interested to hear
more.
|
1961.8 | Doing better in higher gears. | SALEM::SHAW | Vertical Obsession... | Mon Jun 17 1991 10:34 | 11 |
|
Mike, you might be right about not neccesarily being in the lowest gear
That might have contributed to my front end lifting and rear wheel
spining. I tried some pretty steep climbs this past weekend.
I did better, although occassionaly rear wheel spins, but I never had
to walk the bike up. It still feels that if the handle bar where
exetended out a little furthur over the front wheel, weight
distribution would have been better for some climbs.
Thanks for the advice.
Shaw
|
1961.9 | Got the AT-4s... | SALEM::SHAW | Vertical Obsession | Tue Jul 02 1991 14:39 | 14 |
|
I am psyched, I just went out and picked up the Scott AT-4 and some
new Gel Gripps. I like the idea of not being limited to one positions
and have 4 choices. It helps on long rides, but more than anything
else, I hope it the new bars would help distribute my weight better
on super climbs. I am planning on a climb on one of the ski areas
around and yes a gong ho, downhill! The down side is, I could not find
a bike shop that would have time to mount the bars for me. Every body
is back logged for the holidays. Next on the shopping list would be
a work stand and some descent tools so I wouldn't be at the mercy of
the bike shop mechanic.
Shaw
|
1961.10 | You might want to look at the Performance Catalog | AVIAN::KIRSCHBAUM | Have You Hugged a Parrot Today | Tue Jul 02 1991 15:58 | 11 |
|
I saw some nice workstands in the PERFORMANCE
catalog, they also had tool kits.
I put the profile bars on my bike and they
really helped last nite...
Speaking of last nite...it was marvelous
weather for bike riding!!
-dick
|
1961.11 | | CSCOA1::HOOD_R | | Fri Sep 06 1991 17:52 | 7 |
|
Well, after several hundred miles with my AT-4 handlebar, I think that
they are nice, but that you mostly only use the extra positions that
you could also get with bar ends.
doug
|
1961.12 | a few thoughts ... | LEGUP::SHORTT | John Shortt / DTN: 266-4594 | Tue Sep 10 1991 15:06 | 27 |
|
Just for info:
I know several people that tried AT-3s this summer, and are trading them
back for the flat bars and bar ends. Most find the flat section too
narrow and one found the bars just too soft (another rider found his
permanently bent from normal riding, no crashes). I ride with Hyperlite
bars and Onza "ski bend" ends and find them great. The key for me, whether
it be bar ends or the single bar models, is the ability to use more
biceps/chest by having a palms in grip. At least for certain climbs.
The further stretch will naturally put more weight out over the front
wheel for steering, while allowing me to remain seated more often. It
is true that some climbs are better on the flats, but it is nice to
have the option, and I've found this the exception rather than the
rule (unless it is very technical). Also, for rides over 25 miles
with lots of hills, the extra hand positions are great.
Another fellow I know, who finished 10th in the sport class circuit at
the Mt Snow Nationals, told me he felt he would never have done as well
without the bar ends (actually he said he wouldn't have finished, but I
doubt that). That was his first time using them. The circuit
had a good deal of climbing, mostly dirt road which seems to be made
for extensions.
john
|
1961.13 | | CSCOA1::HOOD_R | | Tue Sep 10 1991 16:11 | 9 |
|
After several hundred miles on my Scott AT-4, I've determined that
the extra hand positions used most often ( the sides and top corners
of the bar) can also be had with bar ends. Therefore, I don't think
that the Scott bars offer any significant advantage over bar ends.
Bar ends, on the other hand, could be easily removed without major
front end reconstruction.
doug
|