Title: | Bicycling |
Notice: | Bicycling for Fun |
Moderator: | JAMIN::WASSER |
Created: | Mon Apr 14 1986 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 3214 |
Total number of notes: | 31946 |
This is my first entry in this file. I discovered Bicycle Notes a couple of months ago and have really enjoyed reading through and catching up. The reason I an writing this note is to ask if anybody is willing to try a long distance appraisal and also for some friendly advice? I am looking at a used road bike that belongs to a friend and wonder if anybody can give an idea of its value. Neither I nor its current owner us have a good idea of the used bicycle market and I would like to know the range encompassing a fair price. Following are approximate specifications I drew up by inspecting and measuring the bike. I tried to get things right, but if you see something silly feel free to challenge what you think is in error. Manufacturer: Panasonic Type: Road Bike Color: Pearl White Weight: 13.6 Kg. (30 LSB) -- FRAME -- Size: 52 (20.3) Gear Inches Top Tube: 53.3 (21.0) | 40 52 Seat Tube: 54.0 (21.3) ---+-------- Chainstays: 44.0 (17.3) 14 | 77 100 Head Angle: 73 deg. 17 | 63 82 Bottom Bracket Height: 28.0 (11.0) 20 | 54 70 Wheel Base: 103.4 (40.7) 24 | 45 59 Fork Rake: 5.7 ( 2.3) 28 | 39 50 Trail: 14.2 ( 5.6) -- WHEELS -- Hubs: Front Shimano Quick Release Rear Shimano Quick Release, 120mm spacing Spokes: 36 Rims: ARAY 27 x 1-1/4 w/o HP, Chromed Steel Clinchers Tires: Panasonic 27 x 1-1/4, 85 psi -- COMPONENTS -- Brakes: Dia Compe, dual control levers Pedals: Open cage steel, 1/2" thread Headset: Seat Post: Saddle: Kick Stand: Aluminum Bar: SR Sakae Road Champion 43cm (17.0) aluminum* Stem: SR Sakae 12 cm (4.75) aluminum* -- DRIVE TRAIN -- Derailleurs: Shimano 600 front/50 rear Chain: Crankset: Tourney 170mm Bottom Bracket: Takagi, Cotterless Free Wheel: Shimano 14/17/20/24/28 Shifters: Shimano stem mounted, non-indexed levers * appearance is that of aluminum - could be alloyed with magnesium. Some background: The bike's owner has not ridden regularly in about five years. I just started riding last year after a twenty+ year hiatus. The intended use is for fitness riding on semi-country roads. I have been riding an OLD (mumble_make) 20" ten speed which weighs about 40 pounds with the basics, more with water bottle, tool pack etc. I'd like a spare bike and wouldn't mind cutting weight (now that I have my body weight down a bit). I haven't traveled over 25 (hilly) miles in a single ride yet but have visions of riding a century before the end of this coming season. Using information from magazines and advice found elsewhere in this file, I'd say I belong on a 48cm frame. In fact, when I stand over this one, the frame is really *close*. Maybe I should look for a smaller frame. At the very least, I would plan to change the tires to 26" dia. Anybody care to guess if changing to smaller tires will make enough difference to warrant the trouble and expense? I have ridden this bike and the riding position is quite comfortable for me. Handling is ok and the bike has obviously been well cared for. The lowest gear is just a bit high for some of the hills I travel. Here again, the smaller tires will help. Any advice will be greatly appreciated. Regards, John
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1884.1 | net-appraisal | DANGER::JBELL | Zeno was almost here | Tue Mar 19 1991 14:24 | 32 |
>Using information from magazines and advice found elsewhere in this >file, I'd say I belong on a 48cm frame. In fact, when I stand over this >one, the frame is really *close*. Maybe I should look for a smaller >frame. At the very least, I would plan to change the tires to 26" dia. >Anybody care to guess if changing to smaller tires will make enough >difference to warrant the trouble and expense? DON'T switch to 26 inch wheels!! You'll never get the brakes to work. Straddle the bike and lift it up. If you can't get both wheels at least an inch off the ground, then you should look for a different bike. This is a safety consideration. My guess as to the price of the bike is $170-$240 new, $45-$110 used depending on the condition and on things that I can't tell from here. Please be aware this is a total guess. I really don't know for sure, and I haven't looked at bikes in the past few years. The best bang for the buck is acheived by switching to aluminum rims. They will be lighter, take higher pressure tires, and stop better in the rain. Anodized aluminum rims are OK but cost more and aren't as good. Take off the "dual control levers" a.k.a "suicide levers". It's better to have one kind of brake grip that works, than to have a second that only half works. Later, you can put a wider range freewheel and derailleur to get the lower gears. -Jeff Bell | |||||
1884.2 | One ride will help you decide | NEMAIL::DELORIEA | Fixed till spring | Tue Mar 19 1991 14:40 | 21 |
John, I would suggest you go out an look at new bikes and take them for a ride. The newer bikes today are much more for the money than a lesser quality older bikes. A low end new bike today comes with indexed 7-speed freewheels and spacing. The Panasonic has only 120mm spacing, no 7 speed upgrade in its future. 700c Alloy wheel sets are light and strong plus the range of tires and makes seem to be more common than 27" sizes. The list goes on. Most important is frame size. Get a bike that fits. After 25 miles A clunker that fits will feel faster and be a lot more comfortable than a space age machine that is too big. Also there are good buys to be found in small frames. You can find a lot of left overs in small and very large frames. So call around and see what you money can get you. Check the Want Ad for bikes. There are many bikes bought for women, from their bike geek boy friends/husbands that never get ridden more than 50 miles and after a year of collecting dust they are in the paper getting sold. Being a 48cm you might find something there. Tom | |||||
1884.3 | No, it's not worth it........ | IDEFIX::HEMMINGS | Lanterne Rouge | Wed Mar 20 1991 02:46 | 5 |
It's been said, changing 27's to 700's probably won't work. If you think you need a 48, this one will undoubtedly be too long in the top tube, and lead to puny stems and funny handling. Let some one else buy it! | |||||
1884.4 | FAVAX::CRITZ | John Ellis to ride RAAM '91 | Wed Mar 20 1991 09:32 | 8 | |
My first thought yesterday was the same as Mr. Hemmings' thought: Let someone else buy it! You'd be better off to start with something new. Scott |