T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1879.1 | | RUTILE::MACFADYEN | Wasp in a blender | Wed Mar 13 1991 10:36 | 12 |
| Reply from a non-ATBer: the only rule of thumb I've heard is that an
ATB frame should be 2 to 3 inches smaller than your road bike frame.
If you normally ride a 24 inch frame (Gosh, isn't that big? Shouldn't
you be riding a smaller frame as suggested by (contd page 94)), then
your ATB size should be around 21 inches, which is as big as ATBs
normally get.
Given that ATBs have long seatposts, I have the impression that the
whole framesize thing is less hassle altogether with them.
Rod
|
1879.2 | No open standards in MTBs | OFFHK::MURRAY | Tom, Telecom AD and Architecture, MKO2-1/D9 | Wed Mar 13 1991 11:57 | 19 |
| I've been shopping for my first MTB too, and have discovered that whether the
top tube slopes down, up, or not at all affects what "size" you want. That
is, frames are not sized assuming an effectively horizontal seat tube.
The best solution I've run across was at the dealer who got me to straddle a
bike and then pick up the whole thing. He then eyeballed it for 3-5" of
ground clearance.
BTW, I ride a 23" road bike and on a horizontal top-tube MTB, the most
common advice I get is 17". It's also important that the top tube length
is correct. I haven't figured this out yet - I was surprised at the
amount of leaning forward I do on the bikes I sit on. I had imagined MTBs
would have a more upright seating position.
Now if somebody could only advise me on chainstay length. I see no replies
to my earlier note on this, from which I conclude that it's a mystery to
everybody.
Tom
|
1879.3 | Confused of Basingstoke | BEEZER::MCGOWAN | | Thu Mar 14 1991 04:48 | 20 |
| > The best solution I've run across was at the dealer who got me to straddle a
> bike and then pick up the whole thing. He then eyeballed it for 3-5" of
> ground clearance.
Have I got this right:
Top tube height above ground = inside leg measurement - 3-5 inches ?
I guess ATB frame size can't be as critical as road bike frame size, as the
above algorith seems somewhat imprecise - "3-5 inches"
When I was measured up for my road bike frame, the frame builder was talking
in terms of quarter inches.
I hadn't taken into account the sloping top tubes - I'll have another look at
this in the shop on Saturday.
Thanks for your replies everybody,
Pete.
|
1879.4 | FIT KIT | TYFYS::DAVIDSON | Michael Davidson | Thu Mar 14 1991 10:52 | 21 |
|
If the bicycle shop 'eyeballs' it, leave and go to another shop
that knows something about bikes. Go to a shop and ask for a fit kit.
They should measure you appropriately and apply the numbers to some
type of formula (don't know what it is, the one in the previous note
might be it but it doesn't look right).
For your information:
I'm 6'0", I ride a Specializied Rockhopper Sport which in 1990
was sized at 20". I also have a KHS Montana Sport which I have
had for 3 years and it is a 19". Both are almost identical in
size. It depends on how the manufacturer sizes their bikes!
So a Specialized might be different than a Trek, different than
a Cannondale, etc.
My girlfriend is 5'11" and she too was size with fit kit for a 20"
TREK 850.
Hope this helps.
|
1879.5 | It's tricky | CIMNET::MJOHNSON | Matt Johnson | Thu Mar 14 1991 11:09 | 13 |
| It depends totally on the bike. Radical bikes like the Bridgestone
MB-0 are so long that you can run 1-2 inches shorter than normal.
I'd guess that "par" size for you should be 18.5-19 inches, but
you need to ride it to know. (I ride a 61cm road and a 20" MTB.)
What you want to strive for is the same basic bar/seat/pedal
relative positioning as your road frame. The height is no problem,
as seatposts can be raised to the skies. The top tube length is
what's critical. You'll feel it when you get on a bike that's
long enough.
MATT
|
1879.6 | Fitting by test riding | DECWET::BINGHAM | John Bingham | Thu Mar 14 1991 13:47 | 20 |
| Go find the steepest hill you can negotiate on the mountain bike. Ride onto the
slope, stop and stand. If you can straddle the top tube comfortably (able to
lift the front wheel and not feel threatened by the closeness) then you are
close.
When I test rode mountain bikes I wondered how much smaller to go with the
frame compared to a fit-kit based custom road bike and found the answer to be
much smaller than I thought. I tackled some steep dirt slopes on test rides and
found out that the frame needed to be a lot smaller for me to be comfortable
when I reached a slope where traction was lost and I had to stop. I bought a
frame size based on riding up that slope. Since then I have found the size to
be very good for semicrazed riding on single track and long mountain downhills--
the beating it gets coming down logging roads that took four hours of 24 ring/
30 cog climbing to reach the top is pretty brutal. The smaller frame is stiff
enough and maneuverable on conditions that make the handle bars blur. The top
tube on the mountain bike is approximately 3/4 inch shorter than on my road
bike.
The answer to size depends on how gonzo you want to ride. The more gonzo the
smaller the frame. Jumping objects takes a smaller frame too.
|
1879.7 | Hope this helps! | SPKALI::DEPINA | | Mon Mar 18 1991 11:49 | 31 |
|
PROPER FRAME SIZING
FOR SPORT/TOURING AND RACING BIKES: There should be at least (1") of
clearance between the top of the top tube and the crotch of the intended
rider while he or she is standing with one leg on each side of the bicycle.
At least one inch of space between your crotch and the top tube is important
for safe, comfortable riding. For example, there can be times when in a traffic
situation you may need to stop suddenly. In a sudden stop you may have to put
both feet on the ground. When you stop in this manner, you need clearance
between you and the top tube. Such clearance also makes it safer and easier
for you to mount and dismount from the bicycle.
If there is less than one inch of clearance, the bicycle is too large for the
rider and should not be used.
FOR ALL-TERRAIN BICYCLES: OFF-ROAD RIDING on all-terrain bicycles requires
at least (3") of crotch clearance because of the rough conditions and the
constant necessity of hopping on and off the bike.
PROPER SIZE OF BICYCLE
RIDER LEG LENGTH LIGHTWEIGHT ALL-TERRAIN
26-28" ------ 16" (41cm)
28-31" 19" (48cm) 17" (43cm)
32-34" 21" (53cm) 18" (46cm)
33-35" 22" (56cm) 20" (51cm)
34-36" 23" (58cm) ----------
35-37" 24" (61cm) 22" (56cm)
|
1879.8 | Decided | BEEZER::MCGOWAN | | Thu Mar 21 1991 09:08 | 13 |
| Well after a lot of sitting on, sitting astride, lifting up and down, I
finally went for a 20 inch frame Specialized Stumpjumper.
The frame size is about right, as I've still got about 8 inches of seat
pillar out.
I think I'll raise the handlebars slightly, as they seem to be very low in
relation to the height if the saddle. I'd heard about 2-3 inches below
saddle height is ideal for general off-road riding. They currently feel
like I'm 'on the drops' all the time.
Thanks for your advice everyone,
Pete
|