T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1450.1 | Duability is a paramount | SVCRUS::CRANE | | Tue Mar 20 1990 15:54 | 39 |
|
Chris,
I'm just buying a mountain bike myself. I've been looking and
comparing and asking questions. I originally wanted a Specialized
Hardrock myself but as I learned more about what you get for that
price range I had to adjust aver upward to accomadate my needs.
I own a Specialized Allez road bike that I have been racing on
for 4 years and love it. As a result I would like to stay with
specialized for a mountain bike as well.
The reasons I am not going to buy a Hardrock are all component
related.
1. The bars are curved instead of flat and the stem was not
quite as good as a higher level bike. (I plan on abusing
this bike out in the woods and anywhere else I can go
so strength is a big consideration).
2. The rims were not nearly as strong as what you will get
with a higher priced bike (again think abuse !)
3. The Rockhopper Sport (one step above Rockhopper, one step
below Rockhopper Comp) comes with toe clips and round
chain rings. both a must for me.
4. Durability of Drivetrain Components goes up as you step
up to the higher end of the line.
5. I like the paint job better on the Rockhoppers.
its so completely different from buying a road bike. My only real
concern here is Durability. I can't wait to start puting the new
bike through its paces in the state forest and power lines near
my parents house !!
John C.
|
1450.2 | I agree! | WCSM::SPINICCI | | Wed Mar 21 1990 09:00 | 23 |
| RE:1
Hi John,
Yesterday after work I went out and hit the open trails with my
Hardrock. I put the thing through some pretty rough terrain at some
very high speeds and she held up pretty well. I am also concerned
about durability in the long run, and I too question the rims that
come stock on this bike. It seems that every time I purchase a new
bike, I go right out and start upgrading it from top to bottom even
though I tell myself that I won't do this before I buy it! I think
now that for the extra $75.00, I should have gotten the Hardrock
Sport. I say this because I have already put about $50.00 into my
Hardrock since I got it last week. You mentioned the fact that you
prefer the straight bars rather than the stock ones that come with
the Hardrock, and I will agree with that.(next on my list)
Oh well, I'll just have to make due for now. Maybe if I decide
to get serious about Mt.bike riding, the next bike will be more
of what I want up front. Thanks for your input again!
"Happy Trails"
Chris
|
1450.3 | Just the opposite | VERVE::BUCHANAN | Bat | Wed Mar 21 1990 13:19 | 41 |
|
I'd like to express a different view on an opinion that I've read several
times in this conference. That opinion is to buy a bike with cheaper
components and then upgrade a bit at a time, after all the frame is what's
really important.
No argument about the frame, it is important, but otherwise my opinion is
just the opposite, that is save your money and buy the best bike you can
and then DOWNGRADE as things wear out/break. The price of components on a
complete bike or even purchased as a group is much cheaper than buying them
one at a time and then what do you do with the old components throw them
out, sell them?
I bought my road bike 3 years ago and I went with the best stuff (IMO of
course) Dura-Ace, Mavic etc. As thing have broken or worn out I've made
the decision to replace them with Dura-Ace or something cheaper:
- I tore the front derailluer hanger off so I replaced it with a clamp-on
model. Dura-Ace about $50, an old Shimano 600 about $15. 600 was the
easy choice.
- Chain - Dura-Ace chain for about $35, no way!
- Bottom bracket - OK, I paid for the Dura-Ace.
- In my latest crash this past weekend I broke the brake lever off.
$90 for Dura-Ace ($129 for Campy Record!), no thanks the Ultegra will
do just fine.
- I just switched from a 42 to a 39 tooth inner chain ring. SR had
one for $14. Of course there was always Dura-Ace for $39 or Campy
for $55.
- New wheels, of course I want the good rims, but if I can save $75 by
going with Ultegra hubs that sounds like a good choice.
- Actually I do upgrade sometimes. When I broke the levers I also bent
the bars. So it's time to quit talking about the Modolo bars and go
and get them, so I did last night. BTW they will work with a Cinelli
1R stem but you have to saw the bolt back a little. The shop did this
for me no charge.
|
1450.4 | What's the frame | CLYPPR::FISHER | Dictionary is not. | Thu Mar 22 1990 08:18 | 4 |
| Sounds like a really good frame. With everything else getting
destroyed and the frame still usable, that is. :-)
ed
|
1450.5 | Can I have it in the front this time? | GSFSWS::JSMITH | Support Bike Helmets for Kids | Thu Mar 22 1990 10:36 | 12 |
|
Sounds like you could sum it up by saying ....
"No Matter What End You Start At, High or Low,
We are all going to end up somewhere in
the middle" ;-)
_Jerry
BTW - The folks in the Bicycle Industry regard this
phenomonema (sp?) as "taking it in the end"
or Shorts as they say in N.E. :-)
|
1450.6 | Hardrock or Trek 820? | HELIX::MCGRAY | | Wed May 08 1991 18:12 | 15 |
|
Hi there,
I'm going to buy a mountain bike (low range) soon... I don't
plan on going on the most difficult and bumpy trails, just
your ordinary off-road treks. I was thinking about either
the Hardrock or the Trek 820 ($329 and $319 respectively)
and would like opinions on what is the better choice.
They look about the same to me, and you get a free helmet
with the Hardrock now.
What d'ya think?
|
1450.7 | bikes are similar, helmet is good | OXNARD::KLEE | Ken Lee | Wed May 08 1991 19:33 | 6 |
| The Hardrock is a good buy, though it doesn't have the durability for
cross country (off-trail) use. The Trek is probably good too, but if
you need the helmet, go for the Hardrock.
Ken
|
1450.8 | any difference at all? | HELIX::MCGRAY | | Thu May 09 1991 16:26 | 9 |
|
So.... does that mean that the Trek 820 is also not durable enough
for off-trail? Can I only ride on dirt roads or something?
I guess I'd rather go for the sturdier of the two, if there is one.
(BTW, all Specialized mountain bikes at the Hardrock level and above
are coming with a free helmet these days)
|
1450.9 | | TYFYS::DAVIDSON | Michael Davidson | Thu May 09 1991 19:49 | 13 |
| The local mountain bike shops here in Colorado Springs who sell
Specialized bikes use the HARDROCK as their rentals. I don't see
why they wouldn't be alright for trails. I've used a KHS Montana
which approximately the same bike for the past 4 years and all I
ride is trails!
Locally, one of the backpacking stores has started selling mountain
bikes. They have BRIDGESTONE (don't laugh) with CROMOLY frames,
Shimino components with Mountain 300 LX deraillers - Price is a
mere $269. I've known several beginners to get this bike. Compare
it to the Hardrock if you can find it locally. You will find they
have the same components.
|
1450.10 | Hardrock Sport owner :-) | CSOA1::CONNER | Welcome to the jungle | Fri May 10 1991 15:41 | 22 |
| Hi,
In regards to your Hardrock question, I have a Hardrock Sport that I bought
last year. So far no problems. I take it off road pretty often but not
what you'd call hardcore stuff. I also carry my son who weighs ~40 lbs quite
often (he loves it). I weigh 225 so every time I get on the bike it's being
abused to a large degree :-) . I especially like the tamer tires that come
with the Hardrock Sport over the knobbier Rockhopper tires since about 75%
of my time is spent cruising around town.
The Hardrock Sport has the Suntour components which I personally like
because I can skip gears when shifting down. I keep the air pressure up
in the 50 psi range to help protect my rims and that still gives me a fairly
cushy ride with me and my boy both on it.
I shopped a lot and also narrowed it down to the Specialized and the Trek.
I liked the looks of the Specialized and the dealer and disliked the Trek
dealer so I made my final choice based on the dealer primarily. I imagine
either one would be fine for most riders.
Good luck and have 'em knock off $30.00 or so like I did :-),
Mike.
|
1450.11 | MTB suggestions | COOKIE::KELLER | | Mon May 13 1991 19:15 | 12 |
| fwiw - In the under $500 price range, I have been recommending folks take a
serious look at the Bridgestone MB-5. This bike was rated a 'best-buy' in
a recent issue of _Bicycling_ magazine at $499 list. A local CO Springs shop
had this one on sale recently for $419. Good frame materials and construction
as well as a very nice component mix.
You probably can't go wrong with a Specialized MTB either, though my impression
is that they tend to cost a little more than average. I am not sure if this
is still true, but Specialized frames were the same as Giant. (Made in same
factory with same materials) Last I noticed, the Giant bikes were a little
less expensive (though they may use a different components).
Greg
|