T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1183.1 | Ever Considered Trailering? | GSFSWS::JSMITH | I Bike Solo II | Thu May 25 1989 14:19 | 16 |
| While riding a bike with a baby in a seat on the front of
the bike might appeal to you from the obvious advantage of
being able to see the baby, you may be overlooking a more
important safety advantage in that if the seat is mounted to
the front axel it will be more difficult to turn and have the
bike respond to things in the road like pot-holes and debris.
Baby Carriers in general make a bike difficult to balance and
control even for experienced bike riders. Concerning how precious
the cargo is I'm supprised that people take such chances when
there are alternatives such as trailers and carrages that appear to be
so much safer. No flame intended, just my two cents. I'm actually
looking forward to the day when I can get my 4 year old onto the
back of a tandem so that we can enjoy the sport as a family.
Jerry
Jerry
|
1183.2 | cargo | USWAV1::HEE | | Tue May 30 1989 14:21 | 7 |
| Jerry,
Thanks for the advice, this is my first cargo and she is very
precious to us. I think the seats that we saw in Europe were attached
to the bar on a mans bike. Not sure it was so long ago.
Katherine
|
1183.3 | fine for E.T. | CSCMA::J_BUSH | | Wed May 31 1989 09:33 | 12 |
|
I agree with Jerry. Riding with any extra weight on a bike makes
riding less stable especially when that weight is over the front
wheel. (If you've toured with a front pannier you know how this
feels.) Add to that the additional problem of the child moving
around and you'll really have a tough time controling the bike.
Get a rear seat or a trailer and you and your cargo should be
safer. (You may have noticed while touring in Europe that many
people there don't like wearing helmets either.)
Jonathan
|
1183.4 | | PAGODA::HETRICK | George C. Hetrick | Wed May 31 1989 10:14 | 9 |
| > I agree with Jerry. Riding with any extra weight on a bike makes
> riding less stable especially when that weight is over the front
> wheel. (If you've toured with a front pannier you know how this
> feels.)
Oh, come on. She said it's over the top tube, not the front wheel. (and
according to tests done by Bicycling, front panniers increase front
stability.
|
1183.5 | Get a trailer | CSC32::T_DAWSON | Tomas Dawson DNT:522-4549 | Wed May 31 1989 10:33 | 8 |
| If safty is of concern do NOT cary the child in a bike seat. Get a
trailer. The trailer offers a much safer ride for the child. I use a
Berley (SP) and you can crash the bike and the trailer will stay
upright. Lots of trailers have roll cages around the child.
If you have any questions about the trailer send me mail at
CSC32::t_daWSON
|
1183.6 | Better to use a trailer, I think | TRUCKS::REEVE | Nicht neues im Westen What a Remarque | Wed May 31 1989 12:14 | 29 |
| There are still seats available here in the U.K. which attach to
the crossbar. They allow you to sit the kid between you and the
handlebars. There are, however, several reservations I would like
to make about their use.
It seems inevitable that any kid worthy of the name "kid" will do
some unexpected movement at just the wrong moment. If you're lucky,
this would just throw the kid onto the road. Otherwise, both of you
could spend several hours (days? months?) as the guest of the local
medical facility. When I say lucky, I mean in relative terms.
Also, I would expect that putting a hefty kid in that position will
change the centre of gravity of the bike. This might not mean too
much if you only pop out to the shops, but could again have the
potential for serious effects.
Lastly, there is no way any child under the age of 5 or 6 could
possibly be expected to know enough to hold on tightly while you
are pedalling around.
In case you haven't guessed, I'm not in favour of this particular
type of child seat. If only the Burley bicycle trailer was available
here! From my observations, I recommend a trailer, because they
give you much greater control over the activity of the kid while
you're in motion. I would never travel in a car with an unrestrained
child. I feel trying that on a bike is even sillier.
Cheers,
Tim
|
1183.7 | Another view | ANT::CRITCHLOW | | Wed May 31 1989 14:13 | 24 |
| How about some info about bike seats from people who actually use them
on a regular basis. Enough conjecture....
I have been using the rear type of seat for two years. No, my kid is not
5 or 6 he is 2 and a half. Yes he knows how to sit and to hold on etc.
Kids are not mental droids..... BTW, my son weighs 33 pounds. There is
no loss of stability.
My feeling is if you need (or prefer) to use a bike seat the rear offers
some very important safety advantages over the front. Firts and foremost
if you impact something head on it will be the bike, then you then the
kid to hit something. I would hate to end up smashing my kid into some
thing. The rear position is very stable if the seat is installed
correctly. This means low and not too far back.
Trailer *may* (big if in my opinion) be safer, but it may also
be less convenient. Like when rationing raisins and cookies. "Daddy pass the
bottle", or just having the many conversations we do just to keep the
riding fun.
Just my 2 cents....
JC
|
1183.8 | Another Seat Advocate | AQUA::ROST | It's the beat, the beat, the beat | Wed May 31 1989 17:22 | 20 |
| >>I have been using the rear type of seat for two years. No, my kid is not
>>5 or 6 he is 2 and a half. Yes he knows how to sit and to hold on etc.
>>Kids are not mental droids..... BTW, my son weighs 33 pounds. There is
>>no loss of stability.
I will have to say my circumstance is similar to yours, but that
I find that the bike is *definitely* less stable, and braking is
of course more difficult (switching from calipers to cantilevers
helped a lot). That is to be expected.
I looked into trailers briefly and gagged on the price tags, in
a few cases more than my bike!!! I know, why put a price on my
kids' safety, etc. One thing is for sure, the trailer will be more
stable but a lot heavier and make cornering, eh, *interesting*.
And try putting one onto your roof rack....
I don't have much problem with dumping the bike as the seats my
wife and I use have wide sides, the crash bars are padded, the
restraints enough to keep the child in the seat, and they of course
wear helmets (The L'il Bell Shell is great!).
|
1183.9 | EQUINOX TRAILER | AKOV11::FULLER | | Thu Jun 01 1989 12:01 | 11 |
| I just put together an Equinox trailer. Similar in design to the
Burley, the Equinox folds down in a few minutes. It weighs 18 lbs
complete. The attachment to the bike has a ball attachment so
the bike can lean or even fall over without tipping the trailer.
In addition, the trailer converts to a x-country ski trailer
for the winter.
Expensive, but we'll sure get the use out of it and will keep the
family riding together.
steve
|
1183.10 | stumped/rear or front? | USWAV1::HEE | | Thu Jun 01 1989 12:08 | 12 |
| As I mentioned in the beginning of my quest for a bike seat, my
Rachel is only 8 months old, weighing in at 18 lbs. I think everyones
answers seem to point to a rear seat or cart of some sort. I tend
to agree with all of you, however in Europe their were no rear seats,
only seats on the cross bar. I would enjoy hearing more about this
concept.
Also what prices are we talking about for any of the above seats?
Thanks
Katherine
|
1183.11 | I'll take a carrier any day! | ESKIMO::DESHARNAIS | | Thu Jun 01 1989 12:14 | 30 |
|
I gave this subject a great deal of thought a few years ago. I
decided to go with the rear carrier over the trailer for the following
reasons:
* Trailers are much wider then a bike with a child carrier,
which makes them use up more road. With the way people
drive these days, I'm just not comfortable taking
up that much space.
* Reaching back to hand my child something, like a water
bottle or some munchies, is much easier with a carrier.
* Pulling a trailer on level, paved road is great; that
is, until one of the trailer's wheels goes off the
shoulder...
* Pulling a trailer up hill is not my idea of a good
time.
* The price is ridiculous!
I must admit that there is some instability with a child carrier.
However, unless my 4 year old son throws himself from side to side,
I have never found this to be a problem. Also, my wife and I always
make sure the kids wear helmets.
Regards,
Denis
|
1183.12 | We are switching | CSDPIE::EDGERTON | | Thu Jun 01 1989 13:25 | 31 |
| My wife and I have used rear seat carriers for several years now,
and have decided to switch to a trailer for several reasons.
o Both kids want to see everything in every direction and are
_allways_ throwing themselves in every direction. This affected
my wife more than me, but on an uphill, it could be a real
danger at times.
o Daniel fell asleep in the rear seat and fell forward, resting
against my wife's back.
o My wife does not ride as much as myself, so she had less fun
with the weight.
o Tipping over. Even with the helmet, my older child, Eileen,
had a bad scare with falling over.
o I only pass water bottles when were stopped, and I saw a note
that one person had the bottles tied inside their trailer.
o Eileen is getting to big for the rear carrier, but is still
all over the road with her bike. She is safe on the bike
paths and like, but not for on-road longer riding.
o Price, Bike nashbar now has a trailer for $160.00 that I ordered,
UPS mushed the box on getting it to me, but it looked fairly
nice (you put it together yourself). Nashbar is sending a second
one and we will be using it. It won't do X-country, but is good
for the couple of rides a month we are likly to take.
Dave
|
1183.13 | Look for a used bugger! | MPGS::BRIGHTMAN | PMC 89:AUG 12-13 | Thu Jun 01 1989 15:32 | 15 |
|
Another thought about trailers I was told, but haven't tried is that it
will take a infant car seat if the child is too small for the trailer
inself.
I, too, had a rear carrier, but decide to look for a Bugger when we
found out number two was on the way. Also, the tought of my son
hitting-the-pavement didn't thrill me. I felt very comfortable riding
with him in the rear carrier, but feel much better pulling the
trailer. I just try to stay off the main roads.
Tim B
|
1183.14 | Trailer ++++ | CSC32::T_DAWSON | Tomas Dawson DNT:522-4549 | Thu Jun 01 1989 16:08 | 23 |
| More on the trailer:
o When I am pulling the trailer I find that the car traffic slows down
and gives me much more space.
o As far a weight is concerned, the trailer is only 19lb.
o It is very stable in cornering. (The type of trailer that attaches to
the rear triangle)
o The kids can have toys, blankets, food, and any other items they
might want to carry.
o On cold days the children can be in an enclosed compartment.
o One person can haul two kids, I pull both my two year old and 10
month old in the same trailer.
o You are much stabler at all speeds.
All in all I feel that my children's safety is worth the extra expense.
If you do use a trailer still have the child wear a helmet
|
1183.15 | good strength work | TLE::SCHUTZMAN | We are here and it is now. | Fri Jun 02 1989 09:13 | 37 |
| For the last 3 years we used a bike seat for my son. It cost about
$30, we bought some extra straps to make sure he was secure and didn't
tip over. These were just your standard cross shoulder straps.
We were able to ride this way from age 1 through 4. While we don't
ride a lot we were able to do a 100 mile in three day trip with him on
the bike and had a great time. He was able to see and we prefected the
art of passing the water bottle and drinking while riding.
At age 4 and 1/2 he was big enough that when he looked left to see a
cow the bike went left. When he looked right to see what his mother
was doing the bike went right.
So we bought a Bugger 4 (since we are expecting another one in the
fall). This cost $320 including a rain cover. Our son Steven loves
it, there is room for books and toys. It is much stablier. I have
been suprised at how little of the road it actually takes up. If you
measure the width of the bike from the outter tips of the peddles it
only addes about 1/2 a foot. Also cars move a lot further out of your
way.
The major problem with the Bugger is the weight. I go up hills in
about 3 gears lower then I used to. Now when I ride with my 15 year
old dauther she has to wait for me rather then me waiting for her.
Actually that is a benefit because it makes for less complaints on
family rides.
So based on my experience I would go with a bike seat for a young
child for as long as you feel stable riding it. Then a trailer is the
next thing to go to. Of course the best thing is when they get big
enough to ride themselves.
One last point on the bugger and young children, it is very hard to see
what the child is doing in the Bugger while you are riding. This can
be a problem with a young child where you never know what they have
found to put in their mouth. With the bike seat it is easy to see what
they are doing.
|
1183.16 | I think you "cited out of context" | BANZAI::FISHER | Rdb/VMS Dinosaur | Mon Jun 05 1989 08:35 | 7 |
| re:.4: I believe the part of study which indicated that front panniers
stabilized a bike, was for when the pannier's weight is centered on the
front axle. When the front loaded weight is much higher than then axle
as in a heavy handle bar bag or in the case of a youngster on the
top tube or handlebars, steering is shaky.
ed
|