T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1136.1 | I am not that rich | KRAPPA::ROWLEY | | Thu Apr 27 1989 02:09 | 4 |
| I made a mistake it should be under $2500
mike
|
1136.2 | Equipment addiction? | VENERE::JOHNSON | Truth is stranger than fiction | Thu Apr 27 1989 04:55 | 29 |
| If you already love your Trek, and you've sunk cash into the Dura Ace
8-speed drivetrain, I don't know what you have to gain. If you're
racing hard, your main interest should be in equipment that doesn't
break. A lighter axle isn't going to make you go any faster, but it
can make you more susceptible to a DNF. There's also a good chance
that you're going to crash the living daylights out of your race bike
one day, so it doesn't make sense to throw $2500 into it. Let a
sponsor do that!
I'm suspicious about what happened to your friend's tire. If it came
off the rim, then it wasn't glued on right. In fact, the rollout from
being unglued probably caused the blowout! I've had blowouts on
corners that destroyed the entire sidewall of the tire, without it
budging from the rim.
Also, before you invest, look at your inventory. If you're serious
about racing, you need at least three sets of wheels: racing, training,
and TT. You should have a range of chainring sizes, two freewheel
bodies, and a handful of cogs to match your gearing to the course.
Then maybe another frame the quality of your Trek -- used. Throw
in another set of bars, a bunch of tires, a workstand.... That's
a little over $1000 total. At this point, you're more race-ready
than you would be buying a new bike.
But if you want a new bike, you want a new bike. Walk into a bike
shop, state your needs, and tell them you have up to $2500 to spend.
I'm sure you'll be treated like royalty.
MATT
|
1136.3 | SUBJECTIVITY/EXPERIENCE | WMOIS::C_GIROUARD | | Thu Apr 27 1989 08:17 | 11 |
| Matt's right on (for my money). You sound like you're a pretty
experienced and knowledgeable guy (been 'round the track a few
times - so to speak). The questions you're asking are going to
provoke a myriad of opinions (in this case, opinions will become
synonmous to arguments). All of which will be based on extremely
subjective framework. Particularly unavoidable when we begin to
enter the stratosphere of cycling components.
The biggie is talking to shops and, using what you know/have ex-
perienced, and do what feels right. You'll almost never go wrong
when entering the "upper end" equipment bracket.
|
1136.4 | 36 is plenty | TALLIS::JBELL | Ceci n'est pas une pipe. | | Thu Apr 27 1989 10:35 | 14 |
| > I would like some input about the wheels, how many spokes
> would fit my needs. I am 6ft 1inch weight 190lbs.
Don't bother going to more than 36.
I weigh at least 50 pounds more than you plus what I happen to
be carrying in my panniers (which is harder on tires because
it's unsprung). My 36 spoke wheels have required very little
truing. Just make sure that the spokes are tight enough if you
build your own.
If your asking about getting fewer spokes.... I don't know.
-Jeff
|
1136.5 | Tubulars are addicting | MCIS2::DELORIEA | Common sense isn't | Thu Apr 27 1989 10:43 | 7 |
| I agree with Matt, your friends tubular wasn't glued on properly. I had the
lovely task of removing a flat tube this morning ( broke the collar around the
valve while pumping the thing up before my ride to work. Rush, Rush, Rats)
I thought getting the tube ON the rim was hard. I was ready to chew the thing
off the rim with my teeth. I guess I did a good job gluing it on.
Tom_Who_loves_tubulars_BUT_will_start_riding_to_work_on_clinchers ;-)
|
1136.6 | As far as wheels go | ANOVAX::GUYDISH | JOE | Thu Apr 27 1989 10:48 | 7 |
| As far as wheels go. Most of the bigger riders that race on the
same team as I do prefer 36 spoke Mavic GP4 wheels. They have proved
to be a very strong wheel. They also go with sew-ups because they
are lighter and we all know lighter means quicker acceleration.
As long as they're glued on the right way you should have no worries
about rolling a tire in a turn. Then there is always the price of
sew-ups vs. clinchers.
|
1136.7 | Say what? Who? Where? | USWAV7::CLELAND | Death metal? Gezundheit... | Thu Apr 27 1989 10:59 | 15 |
| I realize I'm off topic here, but...
But, but
69 MILES AN HOUR?
I seriously doubt it dude.
Show me the hill you did that speed on dude...
Just a friendly note to say, "Bulldinky"
No offense dude...
Face.
|
1136.8 | I don't believe the 69 either. | NOVA::FISHER | Rdb/VMS Dinosaur | Thu Apr 27 1989 11:20 | 17 |
| Yeah, I think 69 mph is a "computer error" Supposedly Lemond
et Hineault did 70 mph in some stage of The Tour (there is only one you
know) but they were slinging off each others slip streams coming down
some major mountain.
Best I've ever done on a single was 51.3. I had to brake for some
4 wheeler that had just passed me "because I was going to slow"
then he looked at his speedometer and hit the brakes.
Ok, nows the time for the "high speed" tall tales that ignore the
base notes subject.
I think 36 spokes will do you just fine but be sure to glue those
suckers on. And screw the valves tight they are rumored to open
by themselves around 150 mph.
ed
|
1136.9 | High Speed note being created | CESARE::JOHNSON | Truth is stranger than fiction | Thu Apr 27 1989 13:04 | 2 |
| I'm starting a special "High Speed Tall Tales" note to handle the
tangent. Please stick any high speed pearls of wisdom there...
|
1136.10 | | MEMORY::GOODWIN | in a spasm of lucidity... | Thu Apr 27 1989 13:37 | 8 |
| re: 0
I agree with .1 but if you have your heart set on a new bike you
could get yourself a custom frame and move you Dura-ace group to
the new bike, then put an ultegra or campy athena on the trek for
a second bike.
Paul
|
1136.11 | Body and Bike | BOOKIE::CROCKER | | Fri Apr 28 1989 12:52 | 51 |
| For someone your size, I'd be pretty leary about going too light on
equipment. The pros are usually riding rims that are close to 400gm
in the Tour, except for TTs. Axles (crank, wheel, and pedal) are all
steel, not titanium. Only a few teams ride frames that aren't steel,
in spite of advances in frame technology. I wouldn't go any lower than
32 spokes, except for TT wheels.
I've heard some great stories about sewup blowouts -- and usually the teller
was on a $15 tire. Bite the bullet and be ready to pay + or - $40 for
each top quality tire. Then use lots of glue, like close to a whole
tube for each tire, two layers on both the rim and the tire. Finally
don't ride all the time on 120psi. 95 to 105psi (except for TTs), and
your tires last longer, are better able to absorb a little road
shock, and give your wheel a bit better grip. Top quality sewups are still
more reliable than the lightest (19-20mm) clinchers. Use a heavier (23-25mm)
set of clincher tired wheels for training.
The best place to conserve weight is on yourself, a good example being
Eric Heiden. When he switched from skating to cycling after the 1980
Olympics, he was a good crit rider immediately, but he wasn't the greatest
in the hills. Eventually he went from 180 to 175, a loss of five pounds
and some redistribution of what was still there. He would have
finished the Tour on his last try if he hadn't crashed in one of the later
stages -- quite an accomplishment for someone who supposedly didn't climb very
well. I belive he is 6' 1" also, so take a look at your food intake. It's real
easy to say "When I bike, I can eat anything, and it won't show." (I'm a
third of the way through a box of the new Three Musketeers ice cream bars
myself) Most often the sentence should be, "When I bike, I won't eat anything
that doesn't contribute to my performance." Especially since your goal is
Killington, give some serious thought to slimming down a little more (but not
starving yourself). You're probably large-framed, but so is Heiden. Also,
put your size to advantage if you haven't already -- use 175mm cranks, or at
least 172.5s.
As for frames -- I've already implied that I favor steel, and I also favor
dealing with locals. That means buying a frame where it's relatively simple to
return it to the original builder for a repair or a new paint job.
Sachs, Serotta, and Marinoni are the first "locals" who come to mind.
Ask your dealer what kind of support you can get from the builder if you
damage your frame.
Finally, if you were going anywhere close to that speed, I hope you were by
yourself when you checked your speedo. I won't vouch for 69mph, but on
the descents from Brandon Gap and Sherburne Pass I've hit at list 50 by myself
on training rides. All you have to do is blink at that speed and you've gone
ten feet without knowing exactly where you are. Touch a wheel in front of you
when you're going that fast, and the results will be every bit as serious as a
high-speed blowout. Descending in a race, it's wiser to concentrate on
going faster than on how fast you are going.
Justin
|
1136.12 | How much are they asking nowadays? | CESARE::JOHNSON | Truth is stranger than fiction | Mon May 08 1989 10:24 | 5 |
| I'm curious about what prices are like in the U.S. these days.
How much does a complete, custom (steel, SLX or equiv) bike
with, say, Dura Ace 8-speed and good wheels/tires cost? $2000?
MATT
|
1136.13 | | VERVE::BUCHANAN | Bat | Mon May 08 1989 14:03 | 9 |
| All that time in Italy and he still wants Dura-Ace. Good for you!
Of course you can always spend more but I think you can still do it for $2000
or so.
Did you all see the proto-type Shimano brake lever shifter that Hampsted had in
the Tour of Americas? I saw it in the latest issue of Winning. It sounds as
if you twist the brake lever one way to shift one cog larger and the opposite
to shift one cog smaller. The advantage it that you can shift while standing.
|
1136.14 | Pros use SIS? | NAC::KLASMAN | | Mon May 08 1989 14:09 | 10 |
| < Note 1136.13 by VERVE::BUCHANAN "Bat" >
>to shift one cog smaller. The advantage it that you can shift while standing.
This would imply that they're using SIS. Can anyone confirm this? I know
they've got the stuff on the bikes, but I kinda figured they used friction
mode, not indexing. Wonder when one of them will try (and admit to using)
Biopace.
Kevin
|
1136.15 | I've lost touch with the American market.... | CESARE::JOHNSON | Truth is stranger than fiction | Mon May 08 1989 17:05 | 10 |
| Have the newer types of Columbus tubing made it across the ocean
yet? (I'm talking about TSX, MS, and MAX.) If so, what kind of
premium do they command over SLX?
Does the 8-speed Dura Ace freewheel use the same frewheel body as
the 6/7 speed? If not, are the new frewheels available in a
traditional form, or only as "freehubs"?
MATT
|
1136.16 | Basso MAX | MCIS2::DELORIEA | Common sense isn't | Mon May 08 1989 17:40 | 17 |
|
>> Have the newer types of Columbus tubing made it across the ocean
>> yet? (I'm talking about TSX, MS, and MAX.) If so, what kind of
>> premium do they command over SLX?
YA, Bicycle Alley is selling the BASSO Ascott MAX tubing with Shimano Dura Ace
8 speed for $2099. Frame set is $890, $150 over the SLX Loto frame.
>> Does the 8-speed Dura Ace freewheel use the same frewheel body as
>> the 6/7 speed? If not, are the new frewheels available in a
>> traditional form, or only as "freehubs"?
The 8 speed is a cassette type freewheel/hub with a wider spaced hub than the
Ultra 7(to fit the extra gear).
Tom
|
1136.17 | Shimano is notorious for making these kinds of "advances" | CESARE::JOHNSON | Truth is stranger than fiction | Tue May 09 1989 08:01 | 11 |
| >>> Does the 8-speed Dura Ace freewheel use the same frewheel body as
>>> the 6/7 speed? If not, are the new frewheels available in a
>>> traditional form, or only as "freehubs"?
>
>The 8 speed is a cassette type freewheel/hub with a wider spaced hub than the
>Ultra 7(to fit the extra gear).
Well, fooey on them! To upgrade would cost a fortune, for a relatively
frivolous feature.
MATT
|