[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference noted::bicycle

Title: Bicycling
Notice:Bicycling for Fun
Moderator:JAMIN::WASSER
Created:Mon Apr 14 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:3214
Total number of notes:31946

784.0. "Toe clip/cleat efficiency" by EUCLID::PAULHUS (Chris @ MLO8-3/T13 dtn 223-6871) Tue Jul 19 1988 14:46

	I like to go on the NVP Orientation rides - slow 10-12 mile rides for
 new members of the club.  They are a nice change of pace and a nice way to
 meet the new people.  I often end up sweeping the ride (riding at the tail 
 end and helping people with problems). It keeps me in contact with the way
 90% of bike owners regard the sport, with their $150 department store bikes.
 (I see more brake extension levers on one Orientation ride than on a 50
 person club major ride, for instance.)  The other thing I notice is a lack
 of toe clips and clip-in pedals.  When I try to explain why toe clips work,
 I feel that my understanding of them is a bit fuzzy.
	So, I have done some calculations on toe-clip vs. sneakers on the bare
 pedal, and vs. cleats/clip-in pedals.  Reply .1 to this note will detail
 my assumptions and methodology.  Reply .2 will discuss the spreadsheet method
 of doing these calculations.
	SUMMARY:  If you don't have toe clips, your feet tend to come off the
 pedals, UNLESS YOU PUSH LIGHTLY ON THEM ALL THE TIME. This means that you are
 pushing on the pedal lightly as it is coming back up.  This is fighting the
 major force you are applying with the other foot pushing the other pedal down.
 I assume that with toe-clips, you change the slight downward push to a slight
 upward pull.  The difference is major!  1/3 more power gets to the chain with
 this simple change!
	When you have cleats, you can put fore and aft forces into the pedals.
 I assume a slight forward push as you go over the top and a stronger backward
 pull as you hit bottom.  This can result in 1/4 again as much power as
 toe-clips only, 2/3 more power than bare pedals.  This is significant!!
  My numbers came out: bare pedals   60% of max
                       toe-clips     80% of max
                       cleats       100%
 each time using the same amount of downward push on the driving stroke, just
 getting rid of the downward slight push on the return stroke for toe-clips
 and adding the sight push and stronger pull for cleats.
	As I said, reply .1 gives my assumptions. They are summarized as
  35 pound downward power stroke
   5 pound keep-the-foot-on-the-pedal pressure
   5 pound upward pull with toe clips
   5 pound forward push with cleats
  10 pound pull back (scraping mud off shoes motion) with cleats.

	These may be off base for recreational riders, but I haven't got
  access to any good data.  Anyone care to expand, correct, etc on this?
	- Chris
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
784.1assumptionsEUCLID::PAULHUSChris @ MLO8-3/T13 dtn 223-6871Tue Jul 19 1988 14:4843
    	These are the assumptions that I used to calculate the relative power
  output of bare pedal vs. w/toe-clip vs. w/cleats.

	Key: 0 degrees is top, 90 deg is forward (middle of power stroke), 180
    deg. is bottom, 270 deg is at back coming up, etc.

 Bare Pedal: 5 # downward pressure everywhere except:
	     transition from 5 # to 35 # from 10 deg to 20 deg
	     35 # constant from 20 deg to 160 deg
	     transition from 35 # to 5 # from 160 deg to 170 deg

 Toe Clip:   0 # at 0 deg to 5 deg
             transition from 0 # to 35 # from 5 deg to 20 deg
             35 # constant from 20 deg to 160 deg
             transition from 35 # to 0 # from 160 to 170 deg
             0 # at 170 deg to 185 deg
             transition from 0 # to 5 # up from 185 deg to 190 deg
             5 # up from 190 deg to 350 deg
             transition from 5 # up to 0 from 350 deg to 355 deg
             0 # at 355 deg to 360/0 deg

 Cleat:      same vertical pressures as above (resultant = Pv X sin angle)
		plus the following horizontal forces (res. = Ph X cos angle)
	     transition from 0 # to -10 # at 135 deg to 155 deg
             -10 # from 155 deg to 215 deg
             transition from -10 # to 0 at 215 deg to 235 deg
	     0 # from 235 deg to 330 deg
             transition from 0 # to +5 # from 330 deg to 350 deg
             +5 # from 350 deg to 20 deg
             transition from +5 # to 0 # from 20 deg to 40 deg
             0 # from 40 deg to 135 deg

  Assumptions: 35 pounds is a reasonable downward push for continuous riding.
		(is this true? What horse-power does this equal? .10 Hp is
		typical for recreational riders).
	       5 pounds is a typical light pressure on the pedal for bare
		pedal riding. (is this too much?)
	       5 pounds is O.K. for pulling up on cleats. (is this too much?)
               5 pounds is O.K. for the forward push at the top when wearing
                 cleats
              10 pounds is O.K. for the backward pull at the bottom when 
                 wearing cleats (the scraping the mud off motion)
784.2spreadsheetEUCLID::PAULHUSChris @ MLO8-3/T13 dtn 223-6871Tue Jul 19 1988 14:4926
    	Setting up a spreadsheet to calculate pedal efficiencies:

  Column A: manual input - angle in degrees, 0 to 355 at 5 deg increments
         B: sin(col A)
	 C: cos(col A)
	 D: vertical force - manual inputs
         E: horizontal force - manual inputs (blank except for cleats)
         F: col D * col B
         G: col E * col C     (blank except for cleats)
	 H: col F + col G     Sum col H at bottom of col (H74)


	Set up: row 1 = labels
		row 2 = 0 deg
		row 3 to 73  replicate cells in row 2 Relative
		H74 = sum col H


	Caution: watch signs of horizontal force in cleat case.

	Numbers at H74 for my inputs: bare pedal 663
				      toe clips  890
				      cleats    1087

	Have fun!  - Chris
784.3Alfredo Binda must have used them...RDGENG::MACFADYENRoderick MacFadyenWed Jul 20 1988 10:0815
    Veeeerrry interesting!
    
    I don't feel like arguing about the forces and angles you've decided
    on, as I can feel great waves of ignorance sweeping over me. However,
    why can't I push forward if I'm using toeclips but not cleats? I think
    I can. Also, do people really pull up on the pedal when using clips?
    I'm not saying they don't, just wondering. 
    
    When I went to using toeclips, my greatest benefit was the increased
    confidence that my feet would stay on the pedal. Up until then, my feet
    would occasionally come off if I made a bad gear-change, a few times
    with nearly disastrous results. But after two years of use, I still
    hate feeling for the pedal while I'm pulling away from traffic lights. 
    
    Rod
784.4Biggest benefit is that they help beginners' foot positions.MENTOR::REGJust browsing; HONEST, I'm BROKE !Wed Jul 20 1988 18:1831
    
    	Just a coupla comments, no disagreement.
    
    1)	The weight of the rear leg somehow has to get from the bottom
    of the stroke to the top of its next stroke.  Whether this is done
    by lifting it with its own muscles or letting it rest on the pedal
    and having it pushed up by the other leg's downward force doesn't
    make much difference, i.e. net energy (perhaps I mean 'force', or
    'work' ?) requirement is the same regardless of the muscle group
    involved.  I think that beginners that are used to only/mostly walking
    tend to use all push down on the front foot; as they get into longer
    or harder rides that muscle group tires and they start to lift at
    least some of the rear leg's weight with its own muscle group, these
    are the  "new muscles I didn't even know I had"  that beginners
    don't seem to discover until they get beyond (I'd guess) ~15 mile
    rides.  Somewhen around the same time their endurance/stamina starts
    to build up too, so they build the general fitness base that enables
    them to last long enough to tire the front_leg_push_down muscle
    group.

    2)	I think that the heavily ribbed touring shoes can transmit as much
    fore & aft force as hard cleats, especially the ones that have what
    amounts to a hard rubber cleat moulded into the sole.

    3)	I don't know that I'm actually AWARE of pull back, pull up,
    push forward any more, though I SOMETIMES make a conscious effort
    and try to "think circles".  I know I pull up real hard on climbs,
    but that's another subject.
    
    	Reg    {ol' twin straps}
    
784.5How about some empirical evidence?BRMUDA::MJOHNSONThu Jul 21 1988 10:156
    I'm a big believer in toeclips and cleats, but I think you've
    overestimated their efficiency. I have some cheapo department store
    pedals I can put on my bike; I'll ride the Wayside Inn TT course with
    them and tennis shoes, and see what I get for a time. 
       
    MATT
784.6Test ResultsCIMNET::MJOHNSONThu Aug 18 1988 15:0445
    When I arrived at the Wayside Inn TT course last night, I knew that
    I wasn't going to set any personal records.  My racing wheels were
    in the shop, and it looked like it was going to rain.  I figured
    that it would be as good a time as any to test the toeclip efficiency
    theory.
    
    I pulled the Cateye clips and Christophe straps off of my beloved
    MKS RX-1 Race pedals, and slipped on a pair of running shoes for
    the race.  The sky kept getting darker.  By the time I started,
    there was a tremendous downpour.  It rained like crazy throughout
    the ride -- large pools of water collected on the road, and streams
    ran accross it in places.  I felt more like I was on a hydroplane 
    than on a bicycle.
    
    Riding without toeclips was difficult in the rain.  My feet kept
    wanting to slip off the pedals.  It was hard to spin, and even
    harder to feel comfortable on an out-of-the-saddle climb.  
    Nonetheless, I put in a respectable time: 23:55, for an average
    speed of 23.1 mph.  This compares with my best-ever time (in
    good weather, with toe clips) of 22:34, or 24.46 mph.  
    
    This means that the MAXIMUM speed loss due to not having toeclips,
    cleats, or straps was less than 6%.  If you compare my time
    last night with an "average" time I had over a course (about 22:55),
    the loss would be only 4% or less.  I think this is only fair,
    considering the weather -- I had to take the corners much slower
    than I usually do, and I had to brake in a couple of places where
    the standing water and cars presented problems.
    
    At 23 mph, a 6% speed difference translates into a much bigger
    power difference, but nothing like the 40% claimed in earlier
    calculations.  From the "seat of the pants", it felt like 10%
    or less.  
    
    So to conclude, I think that the performance advantages of toeclips
    are small.  That takes nothing away from them, however, since:
    
    o They make riding much more secure
    o They help spread the effort over more muscles
    o They provide performance advantages going up steep hills.
    
    MATT
    
    I think
    it's more reasonable to compare this time
784.7Still slippery when wetRDGENG::MACFADYENRoderick MacFadyenTue Aug 30 1988 13:174
    Ah, but have you included a factor for the heavy rain which would
    have improved your time?
    
    Rod
784.8Where the benefit *really* is, for skilled ridersSMURF::BINDERAnd the quarterback is *toast*!Thu Nov 03 1988 15:0221
Re: .0, .1, .2, .6

The numbers I've heard and seen in use by experts say there is, overall, 
a gain of up to 30% in efficiency.  You will note that I didn't say
"power".  The real gain is in the amount of energy you expend from your
muscles' reserve, and that shows up in the ability to ride a century
when you'd have been worn out after a half-century without clips/cleats.
And the phrase is "up to" because no two riders will achieve the same
exact gain - everyone's riding style is different. 

I can't ride the stationary cycle exercisers we have in the Wellness 
Center here at ZKO.  My feet won't stay on the pedals, not even the ones
with straps over the tops of the feet.  So my wind trainer gets a lot of 
use in the winter.

Re: .3

Yes, people who are used to clips/cleats do pull up on the backstroke.
That was one of the things my first skilled partner/coach taught me.

- Dick