T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
685.1 | Wouldn't have a mountain bike without them... | STAR::TEAGUE | I'm not a doctor,but I play one on TV... | Tue May 24 1988 14:33 | 10 |
|
Shimano Biopace is the only way to go for low-rpm pedaling, that's why
they're almost standard equipment on mountain bikes. Other copycat
semi-elliptical rings are NOT as good as Biopace.
I have ridden both round and Biopace chainrings on nearly identical
mountain bikes now. There is no comparison.
.jim
|
685.2 | ROUND CHAINRINGS | USMRM5::MREID | | Tue May 24 1988 17:58 | 16 |
| I hate Biopace chainrings. I had them on my racing bike, used them
for a year, and then got some round Superbe Pro chainrings this
year. I spin 90-100 RPM, and the round chainrings definitely make
spinning smoother & easier.
I have knee problems (chips in the joint), and find that the smooth
feeling of round chainrings is easier on the knees. If I were going
to climb Mt. Washington, hmmmm, I'd consider the Biopace, but for
racing there's nothing like round chainrings. I really tried to
like the Biopace too, because the ads said they were better on the
knees ...
Mark
PS - I'm selling my Biopace chainrings (42T & 52T) if anyone is
still interested! ($10 for the set). I'm in Marlboro,MA.
|
685.3 | Only for slow pedalling | LEROUF::WILSON | John in Valbonne, France | Wed May 25 1988 03:17 | 11 |
| I was thinking of getting a Biopace as well, and I asked a lot of
questions about them. it seems that if you pedal at high rpms (around
100rpm, which you should do most of the time on the road, training or
racing) Bipopace is a bad idee. This is because the momentum of
your feet is diverted by the eccentric shape of the chainrings. I
don't think that serious road racers use Biopace.
However for touring with heavy loads, or mountain biking, there
does seem to be an advantage.
John
|
685.4 | round-and-round | MAMIE::HAMEL | | Wed May 25 1988 09:08 | 12 |
|
Chris,
A good friend (John Light from Burlington) found that the
elliptical chain rings aggravated his knee problem. As in <.1>,
the smoother pattern of circular rotation seems to be the way to
go for those with uncooperative mid-leg joints.
Give me a call to talk some "bike talk".
Dean
|
685.5 | Spring Reruns... | STAR::TEAGUE | I'm not a doctor,but I play one on TV... | Wed May 25 1988 09:46 | 7 |
|
Sigh...this is sounding all too familiar, but I'm guilty, too.
See note 441...
.jim
|
685.6 | worked for me | NCVAX1::POPP | | Wed May 25 1988 10:40 | 8 |
| I also have bad knees, I started bikeing again 3 years ago, but
found my knees would not hold up to more than 10-15 miles of easy
rideing on a "normal" 12 speed raod bike. Last year on the advice
of a doctor I bought a Mt. bike with Biopace rings, by the end of
the riding season I found a 60 mi. day on the Mt bike to be not
in the least stressfull. I belive the biopace helped me re-build
knees (muscle problems). I also now find I can ride my normal road
bike 100 mi plus with no pain
|
685.7 | BIOPACE chainrings SOLD | USMRM5::MREID | | Wed May 25 1988 15:09 | 10 |
| re .2
I'm the one who hates Biopace, and wanted to sell my old BP chaindings;
I guess I didn't discourage everyone from Biopace, because after
I mentioned that I wanted to sell my Biopace chainrings, some people
were interested immediately!
The chainrings are sold ...
Mark
|
685.8 | I like Bio-pace for low-rpm too | BRAT::SMITH | Never say never, I always say. | Wed May 25 1988 18:49 | 11 |
|
I also think the Bio-pace are the way to go for low-rpm
pedaling, as they are shaped so as to increase your leverage
when the cranks are in a "poor leverage" position. But I
think the round ones are preferable for the faster stuff.
I've seen some mountain bikes where the inner and middle
chainrings were elliptical, and the outer (where you'd more
likely be doing your high-speed cranking) was round.
Mike
|
685.9 | Why not both? | AIMHI::JSMITH | Bikes Spoke_n Here | Wed May 25 1988 21:31 | 10 |
| I just converted my Cannondale to Bio Pace after holding out
for nearly a year to see how they developed. I'm now sorry
I waited so long. I'm a pretty heavy guy, whose always had
a hard time on tough hills. I still do, but with the Bio
Pace Small Ring (42 T) I was able to climb Mt. Vernon hill,
standing out of the saddle the entire time, which is something
I was never able to do before. As for those who like to spin
in the big gears, why not opt for both , i.e., Bio Pace Inner
for climbing and Round Outer for Spinning.
Jerry
|
685.10 | big round and small oval | CIMAMT::CHINNASWAMY | bicycling in pixel space,',',', | Thu May 26 1988 10:42 | 14 |
| RE -.1 :
I too have thought of the same thing. I primarily ride for fun and
sometime will attempt a citizens race. But when training I typically ovoid
a route with extremly big hills. If I had a small biopace ring and keep my
large 53T then I could cover both aspects. I usually don't use my small
ring expect for hills anyway. Does anyone know what biopace ring will fit
on a Sugino ALP crankset? The catalogues for the Shimano rings say that
they are for 600/Sante/Exage cranksets only.
thanx and hoping to be able to get up those massive hills!!!
mano
|