T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
611.1 | A vote for Bata | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Secure Systems for Insecure People | Fri Apr 08 1988 12:41 | 8 |
| I use Batas. I tried the Avocet and found it was too narrow for my
foot (narrow heel and wide toe.) The Bata is a bit too wide in the
heel for me, so I use a cut off skating ankle support to take up
the extra room. The Batas are cheap (~$10 from Nashbar) and last
reasonably well. I wore one pair for two years, including 3 weeks
where they were the only shoes I had with me.
--David
|
611.2 | Specialized over Cannondale | STAR::TEAGUE | I'm not a doctor,but I play one on TV... | Fri Apr 08 1988 15:32 | 12 |
|
I bought a pair of Cannondales 3 or 4 years ago and they were awful,
almost from the beginning. They looked dorky, were uncomfortable to
walk in, pinched my toes (they were the right size, but toe box was too
flat), and they were very heavy.
Last year I bought some Specialized 3400's (I think that's the model)
and have been very pleased with them. They don't have any of the
disadvantages of the Cannondales, plus they breathe much better.
.jim
|
611.3 | | BPOV09::DANEK | | Fri Apr 08 1988 17:50 | 15 |
| I have Duegi's. These were expensive and I don't know if they're still
available. What I liked about them was style (brown suede...looks like a
casual shoe), comfort, and sole stiffness (which is what a cycling shoe is
about). They're probably stiff enough to attach cleats...but I don't
recommend it.
Recently, I saw a pair of Nike shoes that looked VERY nice. They were on sale
for $19.00, regular $56.00...or something like that...the store didn't have
ANY in my size, though :-(. They looked like running shoes, but had stiff sole
(probably a steel shank) and ridges on the sole to grip the pedal well.
I'm looking around for a pair of these now. I'd use them on my ATB, and the
Duegi's on tours (if ever I get to do one again).
Dick
|
611.4 | avoid Cannondale shoes | NHL::SCHWABE | | Mon Apr 11 1988 12:21 | 4 |
|
I agree with .3 about the cannondales. Terrible shoes. The heal
was (is) real loose on mine.
Go with the Specialized or with Nikes.
|
611.5 | $19 for Nikes?? Wow!! | CSMADM::SCHWABE | | Tue Apr 12 1988 09:04 | 6 |
| reply to .3
The reply in .4 should have been directed to .2
Where did .3 see those Nikes on sale for 19 bucks? My wife is in
the market for some shoes and the price seems hard to beat!!
|
611.6 | Performance shoes | JETSAM::HANAUER | Mike... Bicycle~to~Ice~Cream | Tue Apr 12 1988 13:53 | 9 |
| I have a pair of Performance Pacers. Very happy with them.
Top model is only 29.95. They come in 3 widths and half sizes.
They seem to run about 1/2 size small; Performance will pay extra
shipping if you need to exchange.
Highly recommend them.
~Mike
|
611.7 | Got the Nike | MEMORY::FRECHETTE | Use your imagination... | Tue Apr 12 1988 14:16 | 8 |
|
Well I bought a pair of Nike Discovery touring shoes. They were
last years. They look nice and seem to work just fine. About 40
miles on them so far... I got them at Steve's Mass transit in Marlboro.
for $40. They had women's size 8,and 9 left...and they had a pair
of men's Nike Velo in size 9.
Melanie
|
611.8 | Avocet's and Bata's okay | CADSYS::CRABB | Charlie SEG/CAD HLO2-2/G13 225-5739 | Wed Apr 13 1988 00:58 | 6 |
|
I've used the Bata's, and they're fine.
My wife uses the Avocet's, and really likes those over
the Bata's.
|
611.9 | If the price fits wear it | MENTOR::REG | Keep left, except when not passing | Wed Apr 13 1988 17:00 | 9 |
|
I cleaned up on shoes at Supersports' getting out of business
sale. 60% off $39.95 got me 3 pairs for ~$48, should last seven
or eight years, at that price they fit real well (once I stuff half
the Sunday Globe into the toe). Avocet and Nike, but who cares
at that price ?
Reg
|
611.10 | Avocet | STP::ANDERSON | Have an adequate day :-| | Thu Apr 21 1988 18:33 | 8 |
| Before I rode through the Colorado Rockies last summer, I bought
a pair of Avocet's. They were the more expensive pair; I think
they cost $80. I rode 650 miles through Colorado and was *very
pleased* with them. They breathe and are a perfect fit. I didn't
bring any other shoes with me, so walked around on 'em, too, and
they are just as comfortable for walking!
Paul
|
611.11 | tap...tap...tap with Avocet | PBSVAX::HALBERT | Object-Based Systems Group | Thu Apr 21 1988 18:44 | 10 |
| I bought some Avocet's a few years ago that had a couple of ridges and
slots near the ball of the foot across the otherwise smooth sole. The
idea was that one of the slots would grip the edge of the rat-trap
pedal. But the shoe didn't fit tightly in the toeclip, and pivoted on
the edge of the pedal on every revolution, causing a little tapping
feeling at my toes. This was maddening and I sold the shoes. Adjusting
the toe clips with washers or by mashing them might have helped. I got
a pair of Coq Sportifs instead.
--Dan
|
611.12 | LOOK Touring Shoes | AIMHI::JSMITH | Bikes Spoke_n Here | Mon Jul 11 1988 13:57 | 11 |
| Has anyone had any experience with the new LOOK TOURING shoes.
They come with the standard LOOK cleats but the cleat is recessed
into the sole so that you can walk on a somewhat flat sole like
a traditional touring shoe. I haven't seen them in the stores,
only in the catalogs. Has anyone tried a pair? I've been plagued
with foot pain when I wear my Duegi cleated shoes so I've gone back
to my old Specialized touring shoes, but the slip-sliding around
under the toe clips is driving me crazy, and if I tighten the staps
my toes turn to 7-up in about 10 miles. I'm now contemplating the $125
investment in the new LOOK shoes and pedals.
Jerry
|
611.13 | Why not regular LOOK's? | UMBIKE::KLASMAN | | Mon Jul 11 1988 14:02 | 9 |
| < Note 611.12 by AIMHI::JSMITH "Bikes Spoke_n Here" >
Jerry,
What exactly is your foot problem? Why the LOOK touring shoes instead of
regular LOOK compatible shoes? You seem to be blaming the problem on the
super stiff sole, but is that really the problem?
Kevin
|
611.14 | Best of Both Worlds | AIMHI::JSMITH | Bikes Spoke_n Here | Tue Jul 12 1988 13:19 | 13 |
| According to an article by Lon Haldeman in the literature I
received upon joining the UMCA, Lon recommended a touring style
shoe because of the bigger toe box region that lets you flatten
out your toes and hence provide better circulation on long rides.
Lately, my limit seems to be about 60 miles before I have to get
off and remove my shoes to aleviate the pain. Also, I like the
idea of a touring shoe since I have a long walk from the parking
lot to the showers, when I ride to work. I look conspcuious enough
without having to imitate a penguin, which is what I resemble with
my cleats on. When I saw the Look Touring shoes I immediately
thought this has to be the *best of both worlds*. Any comments
are appreciated.
Jerry
|