T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
550.1 | Cateye measures in millionths... | RAINBO::WASSER | John A. Wasser | Thu Feb 18 1988 14:16 | 22 |
| > Could anyone give me the Cateye settings for a 27X700C.
Does that 27 mean 27" (as in 27x1.125) or does it mean 27mm
as in 700C x 27mm?
If you want your CatEye to measure kilometers and kph, the
setting is the circumference of the tire (NOT THE DIAMETER!)
in milimeters (millionth's of a km).
If you want your CatEye to measure miles and mph, the setting
is the circumference of the tire in millionths of a mile.
You can measure in inches and multiply by 15.782828 to convert
to millionths of a mile.
In either case you can approximate the circumference by
multiplying the diameter by Pi (3.14159 will do). Remember
that a 700C tire is not 700cm (or even 700mm) in diameter.
(27" * Pi * conversion = 1339)
The best method is to put a drop of paint on the tire and
ride forward on a smooth surface. Measure the distance
between paint spots to get the REAL circumference.
|
550.2 | | WINERY::MCALLISTER | Wish they all could be CA girls | Thu Feb 18 1988 16:23 | 7 |
| Thanks,
Now that the brain is jogged, I remember the 1339 number as it.
Might still try the paint trick just for fun. (not to mention the
accuracy).
dave
|
550.3 | Trial and error adjustments | FENNEL::HATCHER | | Fri Feb 19 1988 12:22 | 15 |
| Start with 1339, but then cover some distance that you are confident
that you know the actual milage, the adjust.
If you know, for example, that the distance from home to work is
15 miles (as measured in a car, or several cars) and you ride it
and the Cateye says 15.3 miles then you know how much you need to
adjust the 1339 setting.
If you do the rolling example, then make sure you do it on a hard
surface with you sitting on the bike and with the proper tire pressure.
I use 1325 and feel it's pretty accurate.
Bob
|
550.4 | I would never use a car to set a compuiter | DEBIT::FISHER | Holy DSRI, Batman! | Fri Feb 19 1988 17:48 | 2 |
| Automobile odometers are seldom as accurate as a CATEYE (once it's
adjusted). Cars are often off by 10%.
|
550.5 | More | NUTMEG::HATCHER | | Tue Feb 23 1988 14:24 | 6 |
| re .4 Right, that's why I said several cars. If both cars I own
clock a roughly 15 mile route within .05 mi then you can be pretty
sure it's right.
A cateye isn't inherently more accurate than a car odometer, they
both count wheel revolutions.
|
550.6 | accuracy? | NAC::CAMPBELL | | Wed Feb 24 1988 09:35 | 15 |
|
I'd have to think that a cateye is more accurate than a car. Yes
they both do count revoloutions, but with the cateye you can
"calibrate" it to your bike with your tires at a particular pressure.
The car speedo has been calibrated X years ago in a factory using
possibly different tires at a different pressure. Also the tread
wear on the tires is probably a substantial factor as well. Are
the tires the same size as those originally on the car? I'm sure
we could up with a couple of other variables as well.
I think cateye advertises a 99.9% accuracy or something like that
when you calibrate it the right way....
Stew
|
550.7 | Ya Might wanna know about your car too, though separately... | MENTOR::REG | Please don't ask about my new bike ? | Wed Feb 24 1988 16:06 | 33 |
|
re the last few. Car odo's can be accurate to within 1/10 of a
percent too; HOWEVER, as has been pointed out:
a) The drive gear needs to be exactly right for the axle ratio
and tire combination, I think there are typically a couple of dozen
different plastic speedo drive gears for each transmission.
b) Tire wear needs to be 'negligible', i.e. less than 1/10 of a
percent in rolling circumference if that's what you're expecting
from your measurement. I would guess that some nominal wear is
allowed for in the arithmetic, probably 10 or 15 thousand, EMPHASIS
I said "GUESS".
c) Tire pressure needs to be set correctly cold, and the tires
need to warm to normal running temperature.
You can get a good calibration of a car's odo by measuring mile
markers on an interstate. Set your tire pressures cold, as above,
drive at highway speed (whatever that is to you) for at least 20
miles, check at least three markers before sync'ing up on them to
avoid getting one that's placed wrong due to a bridge, intersection,
or whatever, then measure over a 10 mile distance, every 1/10 that
your odo is off represents 1 %, etc. If you're going to use this
to calibrate a Cateye then make the measured run under the same
conditions, preferrably as soon as you get off the highway and can
set up a measured 10 or 20 mile bike ride, this will leave the minimum
opportunity for params to change.
Having said all that I believe that it really doesn't matter
that much. How far I ride is only significant when compared to how
far I rode the previous week, month, year, whatever, i.e. its only
a relative measure, extreme accuracy doesn't matter THAT MUCH, to ME.
Reg
|
550.8 | | WINERY::MCALLISTER | Wish they all could be CA girls | Thu Feb 25 1988 10:57 | 7 |
| Having started all this, I must admit my point of view is closer
to Reg's. I simply want some idea of how far I went relative to
last time. I went with 1339 and it seems quite reasonable.
Thanks for all the help. I do appreciate it
Dave
|
550.9 | Plenty accurate... | MOSAIC::WASSER | John A. Wasser | Thu Feb 25 1988 13:04 | 8 |
|
How's this for accuracy:
A 27" wheel turns about 750 revolutions per mile. The Cateye
can be calibrated to the nearest 1/1,000,000th of a mile. The
maximum error per revolution would be 1/2,000,000th of a mile
and therefore the Cateye can be calibrated to an error rate of
.0375% (about 2 feet per mile).
|
550.10 | Confusion between accuracy and precision, AGAIN ! | HPSMEG::REG | Please don't ask about my new bike ? | Thu Feb 25 1988 17:34 | 20 |
|
re .9 Gee, I didn't know that anyone over the age of 12 rode
on 27 inch wheels.
Lessee, a millionth of a mile would be, Ummmm, well a mile is
1760 yards, or 5280 feet, or 63,360 inches; a millionth is gonna
be about 1 1/2 tenths of an inch, OK "150 thou" if thats how you think.
Seems this only gets to be meaningful if you are able to measure
the rolling circumference of your wheel to within; Ummmm<long pause>
0.150/750 inches, or 0.0002" Well, good luck with that one !
I'd rather stick with the long distance calibration ride and
reduce the error by division; course, I'd really rather ride than
do this nonsense, anyone else commuting by bike THIS week ?
Reg
{Does anyone over the age of 12 write programs in BASIC ?}
|
550.11 | | CADM::ROTH | If you plant ice you'll harvest wind | Fri Feb 26 1988 07:23 | 13 |
| I once had one of those things (it was a "Push") but it died in the rain
and I tossed it... but it was kind of nice for gauging my performance so
I might get another one if a really small one that's reliable exists.
Once I stayed in gear and counted pedal strokes on a measured mile
to test my wheel diameter. (It actually took me two tries to do it
since the first time I rode past the mile I lost count due to boredom
and had to retry on the way back!)
So much for TSD techno-dweebing... (great phrase that: one that really
ought to be better known to certain inhabitants of the AUDIO notes file.)
- Jim
|
550.12 | official Cateye Numbers | RMADLO::HETRICK | George C. Hetrick | Mon Feb 29 1988 16:18 | 9 |
| Here are some official numbers (I found my owner's manual):
magic wheel diameter
no
1308 26.4 (700 x 25C)
1327 26.8 (700 x 28C)
1339 27.0 (700 x 32C)
|
550.13 | 26 fat or 700 skinny, about the same... | MENTOR::REG | | Wed Mar 02 1988 16:17 | 16 |
|
I had the back wheel off of my ATB once and shoved a 700 wheel
in there just to keep it up off the ground (no, I wasn't in my fully
equiped fancy "workshop"). As a matter of curiosity I wondered
how different the rolling circumferences actually were. I took
it down the driveway and when I got to the road I set both wheels
so that the valves were each at the 6 o'clock position and then
started walking the bike in a straight line. I was expecting/hoping
that by fifty or so revolutions one wheel would have gone around
exactly one time more than the other, then I'd have a n/(n+1)
correction factor, (n+1)/n if you wish. It seemed I was in for a
pretty long walk, so I gave up and decided that I could just use
the 700 setting on the ATB wheels, "close enough".
R
|
550.14 | Cateye Vectra Computer | USMRM5::MREID | | Fri Apr 29 1988 16:32 | 16 |
| There's a new computer on the market; I haven't seen it in any biking
magazine or mail order catalog:
Cateye Vectra - 38 grams, total weight
- Curr speed, max speed, avg speed, elapsed time,
$ 39.95 total distance, & trip distance
- battery lasts 2-3 years
- waterproof
- 2 3/16 x 1 13/16 x 27/32 dimensions
- attatches easily to front fork/wheel
I found it in Frank's Spoke & Wheel, Framingham, MA on Rt. 9. (872-8590)
It's also in Frank's other 4 stores (Westboro, Waltham, Natick,
Sudbury).
Mark
|
550.15 | Cateye Vectra | RGB::JIM | Jim Pappas | Thu May 05 1988 00:38 | 4 |
| I also saw this in a bike shop. It is basically the same as a cateye
micro without cadance. Front wheel mount. Same price.
/Jim Pappas
|
550.16 | Welcome to the computer era | JUMBLY::MACFADYEN | Possibly meaningful | Mon Apr 24 1989 07:43 | 19 |
| I joined the computer age at the weekend and bought a Cateye
something-7000. I think it may be the same model as mentioned in .14,
except that it's handlebar-mounted. It measures total mileage (or
kilometreage) ever (currently 14.6 - wow), trip mileage, and current,
top and average speed. Best of all, I've been able to install it in
that flash way where the sensor wire spirals self-importantly up the
front brake cable - love it.
And I've found that computers are the cyclist's equivalent of in-car
telephones. They open up whole new vistas of crash-causing
distractions! I'll just ignore that looming artic while I find out the
current trip mileage...
I nearly got a Vetta model which added a clock to the Cateye functions,
but being a practical, scientific sort, I chose the Cateye anyway
because it looked better. Price was �29.95.
Rod
|
550.17 | Cateye Manual!!! | KAHALA::SURDAN | | Mon Aug 02 1993 14:36 | 20 |
|
I am not sure where to put this, so I'll try here.
I have a Cateye Micro I picked up a couple years ago. I have used
the basics for some time, but have picked up cycling lately and want
to use more features. Unfortunately, I have moved since the last time
I refered to the manual and it is now lost in the morass that is my
basement.
Soooo, I am hoping to find someone who has a manual that I could copy.
I am in the Pan Mass Challenge this weekend, and was hoping to use it
better for the race, so someone in the greater Nashua/MKO area would
be ideal.
I can be reached at KAHALA::SURDAN or dtn 264-4584
Thanks for the help!!!
Ken
|
550.18 | got it | KAHALA::SURDAN | | Mon Aug 02 1993 14:53 | 8 |
|
Well, that network can be really fast. I already have two offers
to help, so I should be all set.
Thanks!
Ken
|
550.19 | Calibration directions? | ODIXIE::NEWSHAM | James Newsham @ALF | Fri Jun 10 1994 19:01 | 5 |
|
A friend of mine just bought a bike with a CATEYE VECTRA cc-7000 computer. He
Doesn't have the manual for the computer. Can anyone give me directions on how
to calibrate this thing? Don't know what kind of tires he has so a few magic
numbers would help. Thanx.
|
550.20 | Setting the Vectra - from memory... | DECRAL::BODGE | Andy Bodge | Mon Jun 13 1994 10:28 | 21 |
| I just did this over the weekend - it goes something like this:
1. Measure the circumference of the tire in centimeters. (A 700Cx20 is
about 209 cm)
2. Put the computer in ODO mode, stopped (press the start/stop switch
on the right until the display doesn't flash, then press the mode switch
on the left until the display says ODO).
3. Press the mode switch simultaneously with the AC button (small button on
the back). A three-digit number appears and flashes.
4. Press the start/stop switch until the three-digit number matches the
measured tire circumference. (The numbers increase to the top of the range
and then wrap around to the bottom.)
5. Press the mode switch again to return to normal operation.
This assumes that my memory is correct and that your friend has the same
"Cateye Vectra" as I. I'll try to remember to bring in the manual tomorrow
in case this doesn't work.
|