T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
508.1 | I vote for both, about equally... | MENTOR::REG | | Tue Dec 29 1987 16:10 | 62 |
|
Me
'Coz its fun
bicycles first, due to age requirements for licences,
then motorcycles, then bicycles again, then...., well, I have
a few of each still in the garage, but the M/Cs have been idle
for a while now, I'll get back to them again tho.
a lot more parallels than most folks would imagine, but the
contrasts are as/more interesting. M/Cs don't require the same
kind of physical effort (unless you're racing) and in some ways
can free you for the other sensations of cycling pleasures. I don't
just mean speed and acceleration, though they count for a lot.
Its a much bigger machine, control inputs require a different set
of skills, practicing these skills can be a totally absorbing pastime
in itself, especially when you get into competition.
"noisy" ? I think not, unless you're talking about kids with
the baffles ripped out for "more power", outright racing machinery
(road or dirt), or poor/no maintenance. I think that I have never
had one that is as loud as the typical Briggs and Stratton lawn
mower, and I've had some *FAST* ones.
bicycling for exercise, see more of less. Motorcycles for speed
and distance, see less of more. Three figure speeds are a blast,
no doubt about it. I don't know many cars that could, for example,
get onto Rte 495 north bound at Rte 117 and be doing 100 + to join
(perhaps I mean "redefine" ?) the traffic stream from the ramp with
another couple of gears to go. You don't have to look back for
a gap, you chose just about any one you want from those ahead of
you. Irresponsible, right ?, well sorta. When I'm in motorcycle
phase (I've grown out of both vehicle types a couple of times) my
attitude is very much, "The only thing more dangerous than passing
EVERYTHING is being passed by ANYTHING." Car drivers seem to resent
motorcycles more than they do bicycles, probably because they're
farther out in the lane, and they pass where a car driver knows
its unsafe to be passed (what do they know ?). Physical fatigue,
endorphin addiction, sense of achievement in bicycling a certain
distance in a record (personal best, best this year, etc.) time
is a different set of "rushes", just as great.
Off road. M/Cs have taken a lot more heat than ATBs for ripping
up the environment and I think its been blown out of all proportion.
There are trails that I can ride without leaving a tire mark, hiking
boots make postholes there. I've been lost in the woods quite a
few times and not been able to trace my own wheelmarks. Yes, kids
that want to spit up mud/rocks with their tires will dig trenches,
but that isn't the way to get traction, or to find the land still
open next year (or even next week !).
At low amateur levels I've competed on each, never got seriously
hurt, always enjoyed the companionship/comraderie/contest.
In the M/C conference there's a lot more, "If you don't ride
this brand you must be stupid" attitude. Once in a while it gets
out of hand, but mostly its just kidding (I hope). I don't see
too much of that here, and I'm not looking to stir that pot either.
Reg [about dooo for a nooo...., Nah, I'd better not]
|
508.2 | Motorcycles are bicycles for lazy people | XCELR8::DELORIEA | | Wed Dec 30 1987 08:40 | 19 |
| I had five street machines and three dirt bikes. Not all at
once though. During this time I did a little bicycle riding but
not as much as I find myself doing now that I sold them all. The
bicycle was just for exercise, while the motors were for fun. The
pleasure of the street bikes were to see the senery smell the air
in as many miles as you felt like. I spent alot of time exploring
back roads all over the state. Also distances seem alot shorter
and time is not really considered. I also will admit I hate noisy
bikes, my bikes had there stock pipes left on and were kept quiet.
I sold my motorsports out of fear for my life and the high cost
of body parts in a small accident. SPEED MAKES MORTALS OF US ALL!
Now that I ride bicycles I find the same enjoyment I found on
motorcycles. The fresh air, senery and the exercise is a plus.
I would like to say that all (motor)bikers aren't "bikers"
Tom
|
508.3 | Taking a break from motorcycling | CASEE::CLARK | Ward Clark | Wed Dec 30 1987 13:02 | 28 |
| I've been motorcycle riding since '73 and have owned three street bikes
and two dirt/trail bikes. Until a few years ago, my street bike was
the family's "second car", allowing my wife to have our car while I
commuted on my (motor) bike. I rode nearly every day when there was no
danger of ice on the road, day or night, sunny or rainy, warm or COLD.
When I relocated to Valbonne, I decided to leave my motorcycles in the
USA. The roads here are beautiful but they're too dangerous for my
blood -- crazy, unpredictable car drivers (worse than Boston drivers)
and, most of the time, no shoulders. I'm looking forward to motorcycle
riding when I return.
After a year here, I've just taken up bicycle riding. It's nice to be
out in the wind again. That part is something like motorcycling.
As far as speed is concerned, I can go as fast as I want given that
(1) there's NOTHING under me (compared to a 650 pound touring bike) and
(2) I have no brakes. Well, actually, my bicycle does have brakes but
they don't compare to 3 disc brakes and a lot of rubber on the road.
Given that I was afraid to ride my motorcyle in France, I was surprised
to see how safe I feel riding a bicycle in traffic. French car drivers
are remarkably courteous to bicyclists, probably because it is part of
the culture and there are so many of them. It's also nice that if
there is an accident between a car and a bicycle, it's the car driver's
fault.
-- Ward (not commuting by bicycle yet)
|
508.4 | Suzi Suzuki, my '66 X6 | EUCLID::PAULHUS | Chris @ MLO 8-3/T13 dtn 223-6871 | Thu Dec 31 1987 12:32 | 8 |
| Did my motorcycle thing in the mid '60's. It was a Suzuki X6:
six speeds, 0 to 60 in 6.0 (using first 3 speeds), and a quiet
two-stroke. Fetched up against the tail of a station wagon with
no brake lights on rainy day and got religion (scar below left knee
is my reminder). I'd love to ride a motorcycle now a-days, but
only on roads with no cars or trucks on 'em. Since that ain't apt
to happen soon, I'll just wait for $10/gallon gas. (The motorcycle
guys have gotten smart re. fairings. Just had to add that.) - Chris
|
508.5 | Each has its uses... | VIKING::WASSER | John A. Wasser | Thu Dec 31 1987 13:02 | 22 |
| I started riding a bicycle in elementary school and did some
reasonably serious riding in high school. In high school I
bought my first motorcycle (Yamaha 175) from a friend and
rode it around town. I've had several old motorcycles since
then (always very used and cheaper than my bicycle). I didn't
do much bicycling between 1974 and 1986 and I didn't do
much motorcycling either.
I started serious bicycling again in the spring of 1986 and
bought another used motorcycle (1972 Honda) in the spring
of 1987. I ride the bicycle on club rides and weekend trips
and ride the motorcycle to work and on errands that don't
require luggage capacity (like to the Digital Family Picnic).
Your host,
John A. Wasser
P.S. Anyone interested in non-Harley-Davidson motorcycles
(Japanese, European, British) might want to look in the
MOTORCYCLES conference in the same directory as this BICYCLES
conference. I created it as an alternative to the name-calling
and bar-room manners of the original CYCLES conference.
|
508.6 | You can push a bicycle and still stay alive | CIMNET::MJOHNSON | Matt Johnson | Thu Dec 31 1987 13:38 | 26 |
| I raced open class motocross in High School. I lived in the
desert then, and I could ride my YZ400 pretty freely in any
direction of the compass.
The power-to-weight ratio of the machine was insane. There
were very few moments when you could push it to its limit.
The bike mainly tested the rider's sheer strength and nerves.
I never got seriously hurt, but I saw plenty of others go
down hard. Though I've never experienced the rush of power
that the motorcycle gave me in any other sport, I've resisted
getting back into it. In New England, there's little open
country for off-road riding, and competing with cars on the
highway is a losing proposition. Unless I move somewhere like
Arizona, I doubt that I'll ever own another motorcycle.
Bicycling, on the other hand, is a sport in which I can push
almost all the time. The satisfaction of it is totally
different. Sure, there are moments in competition (steep
descents, crowded corners, sprints to the finish) where
the rider's nerve gets abused, but, for the most part, performance
is something the rider has to get from his or her own body.
At its best, there's a smoothness, a silent harmony with the
road, which slips by rapidly and effortlessly. That's a
feeling I've learned to prefer as I've grown older.
MATT
|
508.7 | two wheels, the only way to fly... | CIMNET::PIERSON | | Thu Dec 31 1987 16:43 | 15 |
| Started as a workin bicyclist in school (5 mi country paper route).
took up again when I started at DEC (Long time back). Not at all
"serious" by todays standards. Got a BMW, hmmm, well, lets say
100k mi, back and let it go at that.
For "really seeing the country" NOTHING beats a bicycle. For routine
"use", I fear the "time compression" of powered transport has
advantages.
Congruence between the two? The one that struck me was the same
arguments over "helmet vs no helmet".
dave pierson
Raleigh SuperCourse
BMW R75/5
|
508.8 | Just wanna be outside ... | LORRI::MENARD | | Tue Jan 05 1988 10:52 | 26 |
| Does a 'motorcyclist who bicycles' count?
I've been riding a motorcycle for 4 years or so, and love the feeling
of really being outside -- makes the 'getting there' as much fun
as 'being there' (I hope that I don't sound like a commercial)
RE: .2,I think.
I have to also point out that not *all* motorcyclists are jerks!
Yes, I know that a few spoil it, but not all are bad.
I used to bicycle back in BC (you know, Before Car) and in a funny
sort of way, being on a motorcycle made me want to be back on a
bicycle. I'd forgotten how nice it is to ride outside, and enjoy
all the sights/smells/sounds (to some degree) of things as you go
by.
I'm not a serious bicyclist by any means -- I just like to be outside
doing something.
As far as riding the roads, though -- I live in the back woods of
New Hampshire -- you know, where there's no shoulder, and people
fly down the road at 15+ over the speed limit -- and I am less fearful
riding those roads on my motorcycle than on a bicycle!!
- Lorri
|
508.9 | A two wheel man at heart | SIMUL8::DM_JOHNSON | | Thu Jan 07 1988 08:16 | 33 |
| The priority order goes bicycle bike, motorcycle bike, car. I have
some rather old, low mileage vehicles.
I started as a kid with a bicycle. I didn't get a motorcycle until
I was around 30. Bicycles in MY city environment (12 years ago)
were not convenient. Long distance to work. No showers. No good
routes to take. The motorcycle was a compromise between the car
and the bicycle.
The bike gives me the physical exertion that I need as well as the
"feel." The motorcycle gives me the "feel" only in a different way.
There is wind, balance, skill, outsideness. At this point I wouldn't
give up either one. If I need to be in Manchester or Concord before
closing time I can take the motorcycle. If I have more flexibility
then I can take the bike. I use the same reasoning on the weekend.
If I'm taking a large mileage trip, Vermont, then the motorcycle is used.
For a lesser trip, I'll take the bicycle. I've done camping trips
on both vehicles and had the same amount of fun. The only difference
was the mileage.
I consider the safety hazards of both vehicles to be approximately
the same. Helmets of course. The basic belief that "they" are out
to get you so a certain amount of defensive riding.
While riding I've met other riders and there were about the same
percentages of jerks, uneducated and otherwise, riding on both
vehicles. I've also met about the same percentages of good
people on both vehicles.
I like my bike. I like my motorcycle. Anybody want to buy a low
mileage rx7?
Denny
|