T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
504.1 | Clusters wobble, dec has them *NOW* ! | MENTOR::REG | | Tue Dec 15 1987 13:14 | 7 |
| re .0 The wobble of the gear cluster may be due to the cluster
itself, not the axle, its nothing to worry about. At this price
range its probably a relatively cheap cluster, don't expect a really
good one on a bike costing much below about $500.
Reg
|
504.2 | Yes but... | CHARON::OLOUGHLIN | | Tue Dec 15 1987 14:34 | 19 |
|
I should say that it moves at 1/8, or maybe 3/16ths.
Yes I know I won't get true component quality. But at the same
time I'd think that the the cluster could turn true. Doesn't take
much, bearings attaching the cluster to axle. Big deal.
And again, this is for someone who was willing to purchase a bike
at Bradley's for $70. bucks. I went nuts.
So, who makes QUALITY? That cluster/axle never should have pass
QC. Cycle Pro? General? Ross? Fat City? Fuji? Peugoet <sp>?
Does it matter at all at $200.oo?
Rick. _Who_knows_nuttn_bout_bikes_
|
504.3 | Try Specialized... | TOMCAT::KLASMAN | | Tue Dec 15 1987 14:41 | 16 |
| < Note 504.2 by CHARON::OLOUGHLIN >
-< Yes but... >-
> So, who makes QUALITY? That cluster/axle never should have pass
> QC. Cycle Pro? General? Ross? Fat City? Fuji? Peugoet <sp>?
> Does it matter at all at $200.oo?
I've seen the same thing on real expensive bikes, so don't worry about it.
I don't know if you'll get much for $200 these days. For a low cost mtn bike
I'd go with Specialized...Hard Rock, Street Stomper, etc. They have a good
reputation, sell a ton of mtn bikes and use good components. I have a pair of
Rockhoppers and they're great: light, responsive and fun.
Kevin
|
504.4 | ? on wobble | SLDA::KIRICHOK | Hey frood, where's your towel? | Wed Dec 16 1987 12:10 | 9 |
| Yea, Specialized sounds like a good idea.
About the gear wobbling, is this the crank or the free-wheel?
As the saying goes (I hear it all the time from my friend):
'Parts on Mountain bikes are only rented.'
Matt
|
504.5 | Freewheel wobble is Normal | EUCLID::PAULHUS | Chris @ MLO 8-3/T13 dtn 223-6871 | Wed Dec 16 1987 12:37 | 7 |
| Don't worry about the freewheel wobble. Every one I've ever
watched does it. I've been told that this is intentional and helps
shifting. (If you are familiar with control theory, it's like a
mechanical dither added to the rear deralleure movement.)
More important things are frame alignment (does the rear wheel
follow in exactly the same track as the front wheel?, etc) workmanship,
quality of components, etc. - Chris
|
504.6 | Built in wobble? Okay. | CHARON::OLOUGHLIN | | Wed Dec 16 1987 16:25 | 20 |
|
Okay, I'll forget the wobble. Thanks for the information. As
far as the rest of the bike. It looks reasonable. This is the
best I can say for a $200 bike. The brakes are good. Alum wheels.
Not a heavy bike... but not light. (Meaning it's not 27lbs.)
Forgetting the wobble, it will fit the bill.
I'm thankful for the replies, I'm happy I didn't go down there
and raise hell about nothing.
Regarding the reply on spending more for better quality: Are you
sure you read the base note completly? Spending $500.oo on bike!
No way. That would be like buying a Rolls, when you wanted a Bug.
Remember she wanted a bike from Bradley's. Gawd, I can't do *THAT*
to her.
Anyone have a R-O-C-K bike for sale?
Rick. _I'd_rather_snowmobile_
|
504.7 | Is dither ever hysterical ? | MENTOR::REG | | Thu Dec 17 1987 12:22 | 14 |
| re .5 Well, yes I'm familiar with control theory, though more
electronic than mechanical. Is a "mechanical dither" something
to introduce the mechanical analogue of hysteresis into a mechanism ?
This reminds me of an electrical engineer here that I once heard
explaining something mechanical to another EE in EE terms. The
reason that it was so funney was that he must have used a dozen
terms from the mechanical vocabulary that the electronics folks
have borrowed/adapted to represent models of circuit behavior.
To hear this turned around again was just weird, I still don't know
why the others didn't catch the joke for a long time.
Reg
|