T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
462.1 | REEEL WEEEEL PROBLEMS, EH ? | MENTOR::REG | I think I may have AEIFS | Thu Sep 10 1987 17:17 | 10 |
| re .0 Summat's wrong ! I don't know who's trueing 'em for
you, but if they know what they're doing they should sense any wild
spots and tell you the rim is junk, else they don't know their trade !
Even if its at the weld..... ?????, Nah, I'm also somewhat at a
loss. Don't wish to tarnish anyone's reputation, so tell me by mail
who your wheel person is, I "*MIGHT*" be able to recommend a better
one.
Reg
|
462.2 | be true to your rim | SVCRUS::CRANE | | Fri Sep 11 1987 01:02 | 20 |
|
early in the season I was in a crash in the brodie mountain road
race. the result of this crash was a rear wheel resembled something
closer to a potato chip than a bicycle wheel.
I brought the wheel in to the shop that sponsors my team (bicycle
alley of worcester) and had a new rim (MA40) and spokes installed.
the first time I road the wheel it went completly out of true
and I had to spend 15 minutes to true the wheel myself.
The second time out the wheel went out of true again but a little
less severe this time. by the 5th ride and 4th truing session the
wheel had straightened out perfectly and i have not touched it in
over 2500 very hard miles.
So remember that going out of true 3 or 4 times at first is just
a sign of wearing in the spokes and the rim. and also it is not
wise to replace a rim without also replacing all the spokes. 36
spokes only cost me 5 bucks.
john c.
|
462.3 | | MPGS::DEHAHN | | Fri Sep 11 1987 12:07 | 21 |
|
Re: -2
Bull. Any good wheelbuilder will prestress the wheel MANY TIMES
before mounting the tire to the rim. There is no reason other than
INCOMPETENCE for having to "break in" the wheel while on the road.
Slight deflections will happen after a few hundred hard miles, but
not anything that requires going back to the truing stand for.
Re: .0
How large a deflection is the flat spot? More than a couple of mm?
It's extremely hard to get much less than 1 or 2 mm deflection in
the radial direction on *any* wheel. Is it over the valve hole or
the seam?
The GP4 is a heck of a strong rim. Assuming they used top quality
spokes, the blame is rest on the builder.
CdH
|
462.4 | That's re: .2 not re: -2 | MPGS::DEHAHN | | Fri Sep 11 1987 12:09 | 5 |
|
Sorry Reg....
CdH
|
462.5 | get a new wheel builder | GENRAL::SHROYER | | Fri Sep 11 1987 14:30 | 9 |
| Get a new wheel builder. The GP4 is a tank wheel. I have a pair
of them, weigh 175lbs, ride rough mountain roads and only do minor truing
to the rear wheel every 4-500 miles. If the wheel is stressed well,
you shouldn't have to do major re-truing. I think sometimes, wheel
builders are under a lot of pressure to produce many wheels fast.
As a result, they get sloppy.
Good luck.
|
462.6 | More details | CIMNET::JOHNSON | Matt Johnson | Fri Sep 11 1987 14:32 | 22 |
| Each wheel was built by a different builder in a different shop. The
second one (Ambrosio) I bought used at Laughing Alley bike shop. When
I brought it back with this flat spot after only owning it a week and a
half, the mechanic was hardly apologetic. He seemed to feel that I had
done something wrong. I'll get it back this evening - let's see
what he says...
The GP4 was a factory wheel that a mechanic at International Cycles
"adjusted" by hand when I bought it to get it absolutely true. At his
suggestion, I brought it back to be checked after a 100 miles and it
needed little or no adjustment. Months later, the wheel warped
way out of line (no loose spokes) and I took it in to the Bicycle
Exchange in Cambridge. The mechanic there diagnosed the problem
as a flat spot and made no promises about the wheel staying true.
Sure enough, though he managed to true it perfectly, it went again
in a couple of days. The problem is not at the seam or at the hole.
Stainless spokes - 14 gauge on the GP4s, maybe 15 gauge on the
Ambrosias... Campy hubs on the Ambrosias, Superbe on the GP4s...
I'm still stumped!
MATT
|
462.7 | | ENGINE::ROTH | | Fri Sep 11 1987 16:00 | 14 |
| It does sound inexcusable. I once made a set of wheels using Super
Champion Gentleman rims, stressed them the way I'd had recommended,
and they didn't need touching up for ages. If a beginner like myself
could make a set of wheels that stayed true...
I'm surprised that the factory wheel went out - those are usually pretty
tight. Maybe there was a manufacturer defect in the rim, or the rim
was damaged and they built the wheel with it anyway.
It is stories like this that convince me to continue to do work
on my car, bicycle, etc. myself - there are way too many incompetents
out there.
- Jim
|
462.8 | | MPGS::DEHAHN | | Mon Sep 14 1987 09:24 | 12 |
|
Most of the factory wheels I've seen are built way too loose. Matt,
it sounds like there were too many hands on the wheel, and not one
of them built it to begin with. Chalk it up as a learning experience.
Have the wheel relaced with new spokes and a new GP4 by someone
who has the time and patience to do a good job right at the start.
Then don't mess with it, other than *slight* touch up work.
Good luck,
CdH
|
462.9 | Paul's a decent wheel man.... | MENTOR::REG | I think I may have AEIFS | Tue Sep 15 1987 10:10 | 16 |
|
OK, I'll recommend Paul Randazzo. He takes the time and trouble
to tension the wheel three or four times before letting it out of
the shop.
Worst troubles I ever had with flat spots was when I finally
broke down and bought a free wheel bike, jumping railroad tracks
requires an entirely different technique than with a fixed. Three
years later and I *STILL* can't get the really long jumps that seem so
easy on a fixed, I've sorta given up on railroad tracks now. Errr,
reason I mentioned this ? just wondering if you're doing anything
different; new routes ?, new potholes ?, new tricks ?, more drafting
and not seeing the potholes in time ?
Reg
|
462.10 | How to stress wheel? | MEMORY::WORRELL | Leave no stone un-climbed | Tue Sep 15 1987 10:54 | 5 |
| Now, for us do it yourselfers:
How do you stress or tension a wheel after building, or trueing?
Glen
|
462.11 | One way to stress... | AKOV11::POLLARD | | Tue Sep 15 1987 12:29 | 6 |
| Stress DURING building. Grab parallel pairs of spokes and
squeeze them all through the process. This starts to hurt the
hands as you bring the tension up, though. That's the way I was
taught at the Bicycle Exchange. Are there other reliable methods?
John
|
462.12 | An excellent book on wheels | TALLIS::JBELL | Wot's..Uh the Deal? | Tue Sep 15 1987 13:02 | 14 |
| If you are planning to build your own wheels, then by all means get a
copy of _The_Bicycle_Wheel_ by Jobst Brandt. It's hardcover book with
a white cover that you can find in most good bike shops.
The book discusses most aspects of wheelbuilding from a mechanical
engineering perspective but nicely avoids the engineering jargon.
When describing how a wheel deforms under load, it includes
measurements and finite element modeling results rather than the vague
descriptions that I've seen in other books.
It (like reply 11) recommends squeezing groups of four spokes together
to release stresses. Leather gloves are good for this.
-Jeff Bell
|
462.13 | | ENGINE::ROTH | | Tue Sep 15 1987 13:15 | 13 |
| I will strongly second the recommendation for "The Bicycle Wheel"...
It was recommended to me too, and my first wheels were a success - I'm
not too bad with mechanical things, but would never have thought of
the many small points he goes into in the book.
I didn't mean to be misunderstood in my earlier reply about factory
wheels - they could be tighter, but you should be able to buy a set
and not expect to have to mickey-mouse around with retruing after
so short a time. Since they're machine built the consistancy is
pretty reasonable.
- Jim
|
462.14 | Or a thick stick; about 1 1/2 inches... | MENTOR::REG | I think I may have AEIFS | Tue Sep 15 1987 13:42 | 8 |
| re .10 & .12 (I think ?) Another way of stressing the wheel as
it is being built is to take a tool (i.e. screwdriver) with a fat
handle and push the handle down into the spoke crosses. This is
somewhat easier on the hands than the spoke squeeze trick and its
easier to be consistent when your hands don't hurt so much.
R
|
462.15 | Do you know, Vern? | AMUN::CRITZ | Ya know what I mean, Vern | Tue Sep 15 1987 13:51 | 5 |
| Reg,
What does AEIFS stand for?
Scott
|
462.16 | Wonderin' if anyone would be wonderin' about that... | MENTOR::REG | I think I may have AEIFS | Tue Sep 15 1987 14:40 | 14 |
| re .15 Well, Y'had t'ask didn't Ya ?
First clue follows:-
First and last letters are the same as what is probably the
most feared acronym of out time...., unfortunately the rest is
*REAL EASY* to guess now.
Reg
|
462.17 | | MPGS::DEHAHN | | Tue Sep 15 1987 15:20 | 18 |
|
Reg, I still don't get it.
The way I stress wheels:
Place it on the ground on the skewer end, then press around the
rim in even amounts, over each cross of the spokes. Then flip it
over and do it again. Repeat this process until the spokes stop
making noise. Retrue the wheel, checking dish. Then restress, reture,
restress.
All this is done AFTER lacing, dishing, tensioning and rough truing.
Otherwise you may stretch the spokes too much and ruin the wheel.
The Brandt book is great for the beginner, a good place to start.
CdH
|
462.18 | | MENTOR::REG | I think I may have AEIFS | Tue Sep 15 1987 15:48 | 9 |
| re .17 Sounds like another good way. You bring out the point
that the creaking is an indication of spokes settling in and that
when the procedure is repeated and the creaking stops then you're
about there. If the wheel creaks at all for the first 4 or 5
revolutions when it is ridden then its a sure sign that it was not
properly stressed (kinda like my home built wheels used to :^-)
Reg
|
462.19 | So that 's what that noise was | MEMORY::GOODWIN | I can finish if I don't drown | Tue Sep 15 1987 17:08 | 18 |
|
This discussion on wheels has been enlightning as to the problem
I am having with a set of wheels I picked up at Bike Nashbar on
Saturday. I was going to try tubulars and had gone in there to get
hubs rims and spokes. I was shown a set of built wheels - shimano
600 hubs, DT spokes, aryra rims, and national panaracer 280 kevlar
tires - for $48.00. Too good to be true; I thought so. I took my
new wheels and a new freewheel(which is another story) went home
and glued the tires on. A few hours later I wanted to try my new
wheels so I went for a quick spin. When I leaned on the bike I heard
some creaking from the wheels for the first few revolutions then
it stopped. Guess what, the wheels are out of true. I talked with
Nashbar today and it was explained to me that the wheels are machine
built and need fine tuning. I think it was real nice of them to
tell me that when I had already explained that I was new to biking
and didn't know much about wheel building.
paul
|
462.20 | Hatcher of evil plots starts to think Nashbash... | MENTOR::REG | I think I may have AEIFS | Tue Sep 15 1987 17:26 | 13 |
| re .19
That's a decent deal. The sales droid may not know the
differences, machine built doesn't have to mean not pre_stressed.
If I bought for this price I would expect to stress them myself.
I may pick a quiet day at Nashbar, look the wheels over, squeeze
a few (*ALL*) spoke crossings and ask to see how true they are on
a stand, etc...., $50 for a set of tubs, can't hardly go wrong, eh ?,
'specially if I can get them stressed and trued
Reg
|
462.21 | Another dissatisfied customer | GLIVET::DOYLE | Swim-Work-Run-Work-Bike-Sleep | Tue Sep 15 1987 17:28 | 18 |
|
I ordered a set of "built wheels from Nashbar a few months ago.
Mavic GP4's with specialized hubs. They were garbage. They were
constantly out of true, and I finally had to go to a shop and have
them rebuilt. You'd be better off asking for all the pieces, and
having them built by a reputable person. The price is hard to beat,
but the aggravation isn't worth the savings.
You don't know when it's gonna hit, but one day you'll notice
yourself getting dropped or working extra hard, and you'll look
down and see the wheel wobbling away... I've cursed myself for
being cheap more than once due to those wheels.
Have them checked by a pro.
JD
|
462.22 | why it works ..... | SUSHI::KMACDONALD | time to squeeze the donuts! | Tue Sep 15 1987 17:37 | 9 |
| I use the method mentioned by Chris for stressing wheels - flexing the
rims. When spoke nipples get really tight (i.e. when the spoke is quite
tight) the friction between nipple and the spoke threads can cause the
spoke to twist when the nipple is tightened further. Flexing the rims
allows the spokes to "unwind" since the tension is temporarily released
on the spoke. The creaking sound (whether pre-stressing the wheel or
riding it the first time) is the sound of the spokes unwinding ....
ken
|
462.23 | Try Performance for wheels | AQUA::OCONNOR | Allergic to Mondays | Wed Sep 16 1987 09:28 | 11 |
| I too have had the experience of trouble with my NASHASH wheels.
This is one of the reasons I have been somewhat disapionted with
my Road LP. The best wheels I have gotten mailorder I got from
Performance about a year ago. These wheels are still pretty true
and round. The best wheel builder I know of locally is the guy
at Open Air, name escapes me at the moment, but his hours are ones
that even a banker would envy. BTW I weigh 188+ and was coached
some time ago to use my weight, in other I don't spin a lot I slug
it out when climbing hills.
Joe
|
462.24 | | ENGINE::ROTH | | Wed Sep 16 1987 11:21 | 12 |
| The method mentioned in .17 is what I would have intuitively expected
to use, but in Brandt's book, he recommends against the method, claiming
that it has the risk of not equally stressing all the spokes, whereas
gripping the spokes in pairs you can get them all the same. However,
he does say it is effective in releasing spoke twist, 'accompanied by
reassuring sound...'
It's possibly somewhat academic though, since someone aware of the need
for stressing and who has a feel for mechanical work should be able to
make great wheels with any of these methods.
- Jim
|
462.25 | | RAINBO::WASSER | John A. Wasser | Wed Sep 16 1987 13:01 | 7 |
| > effective in releasing spoke twist, 'accompanied by reassuring sound...'
Bladed spokes not only have an aerodynamic advantage and are
easier to replace (hooked heads) but will also show twisting
when it occurs. That way the wheel builder can "unwind" the
twisted spokes as they are being tensioned.
|
462.26 | Don't understand creaking, feel it ain't spoke unwind | MENTOR::REG | I think I may have AEIFS | Wed Sep 16 1987 17:35 | 12 |
|
Hmmm, I gotta go do some 'rifmatic of this. I've always assembled
wheels with nipples that have been sitting in oil, if I could hack
up the math I'd show Y'all about film strength vs spoke tension
and prove that spoke unwinding is a myth. I've felt it when trueing
old or junkie wheels, but I just back off the spoke key to let the
twist out, and theres still creaking when I stress the wheel. This
leads me to believe that the creaking comes from somewhere other
than spokes unwinding, though I don't know where...
Reg
|
462.27 | Rider ERROR ? | MIST::IVERSON | There's a seeker born every minute | Thu Sep 17 1987 23:58 | 41 |
| re: .0
rear wheel flat spots
Although we have much maligned several *different*
wheel builders that have the *same* problem on one
person's wheel, I don't think we have questioned
Matt's riding technique enough to clear that as
a source of the problem.
In my extensive experience with multitudes of wheels,
I have personally found that flat spots in wheels
**that were round when installed on the bike**
are usually caused by rider error. (It is open
season on wheel builders for side to side "wobbles"
and loose spokes:-)
Matt, or anybody, if you have always used the "pinch"
method of tire pressure checking-- throw away your
thumb:-) and use a gage or pump with gage for awhile.
Using maximum rated tire pressure is critical for
the well being of your rims! I have found that
people that have not first calibrated their fingers
with extensive use of gages consistently *way under
inflate* their tires. Also "I just checked the
pressure last week" is not sufficient.
You also do not say how long you have been seriously
riding light weight equipment. Learning how to
avoid hitting bumps/holes or weight shift and
light rideing over the unavoidable unfortunately only
comes with time (and rims:-{ ). A more experienced
rider can safely ride over obstacles that would
total a less experienced rider. It doesn't take
an "accident" to trash a rim. (A flat spot is also
the most difficult damage to *effectively* correct.)
With limited information to go on, these are a
couple of my guesses as to possible contributing
factors. I hope they help.
Thom
|
462.28 | Hey Matt, 'fess up; are you a bad rider ? | MENTOR::REG | I think I may have AEIFS | Fri Sep 18 1987 09:29 | 7 |
| re .27 Well, I kinda asked in .9 if he'd changed anything else,
routes, closer drafting, etc. He did say it was the wheels, didn't
seem to imply that he was riding lightweight stuff off road.
I *ASSUMED* that he doesn't carry all his weight on his tailbone.
Reg
|
462.29 | Maybe my expectations are too high | CIMNET::JOHNSON | Matt Johnson | Sat Sep 19 1987 23:55 | 27 |
|
RE: .26
I use a Silca pump to get my tires up to at least 110psi before every
ride. Tubulars tend to demand that kind of attention. Still, you're
right to question my technique. If my riding style destroys wheels,
it's no use blaming builders.
However, even at my 190 lbs, I've been lead to believe that GP4 rims
are tough enough to take it. Many times in the past, I've ridden much
weaker 27" Rigida [sic] rims OFFROAD cyclocross-style without damaging
or misaligning them. I doubt I do anything much harder on my road bike.
Like everyone else, I hit potholes, frost heaves, railroad crossings,
and loose stones. I avoid what I can. Can anyone suggest an
alternative approach to New England roads?
Or maybe my expectations of the quality of racing/training equipment
are too high - when I pay for it, it sure seems expensive enough to
justify those expectations!
Status Report: After fifty miles, the Ambrosio wheel seems to be
holding - it's a little out of true, but nothing like it was after
the first couple of rides. I'm ready to buy a new GP4 rim for the
other set, and make learning how to build it a winter project. Who
knows? Though it cost me a few dollars, this experience may make
a better mechanic out of me...
|
462.30 | Roll on your own | MIST::IVERSON | There's a seeker born every minute | Mon Sep 21 1987 13:08 | 14 |
| re.29
Matt,
It sounds as though your inflation and riding technique can be
eliminated as a variable. I think you are taking the right approach
by learning to build your own wheels. I think you will find it to
be a good feeling riding on your own wheels, knowing how much care
went into making them. You will soon join the rest of us wheel
building "snobs" in not quite fully trusting "someone else's" wheels.
:-)
Thom
|
462.31 | Wanted: an INDESTRUCTIBLE wheel | CIMNET::MJOHNSON | Matt Johnson | Mon Apr 11 1988 10:58 | 20 |
| As I rounded a corner in heavy traffic yesterday morning, I
discovered a pothole straight in front of me. There was nothing
I could do but jump it -- my rear wheel caught its lip at
about 15 mph.
Crunch! My brake pads scraped hard against the wheel, now
buckled into a permanent oval. Another wheel gone!
I have not one, but two rear hubs now waiting to be laced up
to new wheels. This time, I don't want to mess around -- I
realize that potholes are a fact of life in Boston, so I'm
shooting for something INDESTRUCTIBLE.
Ambrosio Montreals definitely weren't enough. Even Mavic GP4s
weren't enough. Any recommendations? I've heard that
Campy Record Strada rims are tough as nails; Matrix ISO rims
look strong. Weight and aerodynamics don't interest me
anymore -- I want a racing rim my car could ride on.
MATT
|
462.32 | Does weight make a difference? | HPSVAX::MILLER | Vox clamantis in deserto. | Mon Apr 11 1988 16:57 | 17 |
| > anymore -- I want a racing rim my car could ride on.
I have heard that there's a shop in Indianapolis, called Gasoline
Alley, that sells Racing Rims that might fit your specs.
You'll have to give away quite a bit on weight, I'm sure, and I
would call ahead to be sure they have your size in stock.
I heard that Reg swears by them.
(Wasn't that you I heard swearing the other day, Reg?)
8-}
=-=-=-=-=-=-=g=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|
462.33 | | CADM::ROTH | If you plant ice you'll harvest wind | Tue Apr 12 1988 08:12 | 17 |
| You could make a set of 40 spoke tandem-grade wheels though that'll
require new hubs (sigh). But I think that it would always be possible
to damage a rim if it's hit hard enough. Obviously you have to tension
the wheel properly.
I've lost a few wheels due to such things as you describe (like
swerving away from a vehicle that abruptly turned right toward me -
into a curb!) and have just resigned myself to live with the problem.
Every couple of years it seems it happens. That's how I learned to build
wheels...
I don't know if this is sensible, but if a wheel *were* strong enough,
then an impact could damage a frame it seems. Maybe it's best to have
a reasonably strong wheel that's still somewhat comfortable to ride
and will 'give' in the event of disaster.
- Jim
|
462.34 | New Wheel Nirvanna | CIMNET::MJOHNSON | Matt Johnson | Mon Apr 18 1988 14:27 | 16 |
| The Laughing Alley bike shop in Allston sold me a pair of Mavic
SSCs--as far as I can tell, these used to be Mavic's best.
(They're blue, 395gr, and noticeably tougher than the old
Ambrosios.) I built one up at home myself (my first ever!),
using the bike frame as a truing stand.
In the process, I discovered a couple of reasons why the old
wheel was so fragile: 1) It was a 32 HOLE wheel. 2) The spokes
were 15 gauge. Since he didn't have any 32-hole rims in stock
Jim (the manager/owner(?) of the shop) traded my 32-hole rear
hub for a 36-hole model. (This kind of flexiblity is rare, and
appreciated!)
After a tough 75 mile ride on Sunday, the new wheel only needed
quarter-turn adjustments to five spokes. You could see my grin
from 50 miles away....
|
462.35 | | RICKS::SPEAR | The Culture Penguin | Wed Apr 20 1988 12:02 | 8 |
| I would keep away from Matrix rims in general. I have never heard anything
good about them, just plenty of gripes from use.net.
Try Rigida Scores - expensive but they seem tough. Of course out here in
Hudson the roads are better. There must be some advantage to living in the
sticks.
cbs
|
462.36 | Re-using spokes: bad idea? | RDGENG::MACFADYEN | Roderick MacFadyen | Tue Jul 05 1988 15:57 | 17 |
| I've built two rear wheels recently, very much helped by the information in
this file. But now I've got a few more questions that you might be able to
help me with.
The problem is the rear wheel on my commuting/touring bike. It came with
the bike and has been very reliable, needing negligible trueing in 2� years
regular use; it uses Wolber Super Champion modele 58 rims, stainless spokes
and a Maillard hub. The rim is quite worn now, and I think has lost
appreciable thickness; there's a very noticeable ridge on the side of the
rim at a point where the brakes have never touched. Also the rim picked up
a dent recently.
So I'd like to replace the rim. The question is, is it a bad idea to re-use
the spokes? A related question is, what is the correct order to lace spokes
onto a rim: all one side before the other, or alternating?
Rod
|
462.37 | Bicycle notes? No use to man nor beast! | RDGENG::MACFADYEN | Roderick MacFadyen | Thu Jul 07 1988 09:37 | 4 |
| Are these questions TOO DIFFICULT, or what?
Rod
|
462.38 | no the questions are easy but we don't do wheels till winter | NOVA::FISHER | Keep 'em rollin' | Thu Jul 07 1988 10:33 | 20 |
| I don't think it's a matter that the questions are too difficult. I
think it's that the questions have been answered once or twice by a
few people and they just do not feel like being redundant. I'll try to
be brief and be the redundant one.
Besides, in the hot weather we'd rather be riding or enjoying an Ice
Cream or a dip in the pool.
If you're going to spend time and money installing a new rim add a few
more bucks (~$10 per wheel) and get some new spokes the old ones have
done you some decent service but have seen their share of stress and
deserve a retirement. This statement might stir up some differences
of opinion.
I always install one side then the other, most articles I've read have
advised this. (in fact, I cannot think of any that advise otherwise.)
I would install the n that go this way, then the n that go that way,
then turn the wheel over and repeat.
ed
|
462.39 | EASY WHEEL BUILDING METHOD FOR BEGINNERS | AKOV11::FULLER | | Thu Jul 07 1988 11:16 | 7 |
| Another method if you are new to wheel building is to first loosen
all of the spokes on the original wheel. Place the new rim, must
be the same rim or take the same length spokes, next to the wheel
with the valve in the same position. Simple remove one spoke at
a time and place in new rim.
steve
|
462.40 | .39 is easy, but: | BANZAI::FISHER | Keep 'em rollin' | Thu Jul 07 1988 11:51 | 20 |
| If you do as in .39 and it's not the same type/model rim but does use
the same length spokes you have to check one more thing. Check that
the spoke holes are offset from the rims center line in the same way.
That is, look at a rim from the other side it will look like:
----------------------------------------
O O O O O < spoke holes
O < valve hole
O O O O < spoke holes
----------------------------------------
Sometimes you get a rim that's opposite, like:
----------------------------------------
O O O O O < spoke holes
O < valve hole
O O O O O < spoke holes
----------------------------------------
Then you cannot do as in 39.
|
462.41 | Re: last few | RDGENG::MACFADYEN | Roderick MacFadyen | Thu Jul 07 1988 13:16 | 6 |
| Thanks for the replies. I accept that your answers have been touched
on before, but this extra detail is helpful.
Anyway, it's not hot here (Reading UK).
Rod
|
462.42 | Video anyone? | AIMHI::JSMITH | Bikes Spoke_n Here | Thu Jul 07 1988 13:48 | 4 |
| Anyone have a wheel building video that they would like
to share. I promise to return it within the week.
Jerry
|
462.43 | Category I | NOVA::FISHER | Keep 'em rollin' | Fri Jul 08 1988 06:18 | 4 |
| Paul at Category I has a video made at the NECA a while back. Whether
or not he would lend it or has it in the shop, I don't know.
ed
|
462.44 | DEC Note Club Repair Tapes???? | CIMAMT::CHINNASWAMY | bicycling in pixel space,',',', | Fri Jul 08 1988 08:41 | 9 |
| I'd be willing to donate my vhs camera and taping services if someone
can hold a wheel building demo. Maybe we could go further and make up
a set of 'lectures'. Then circulate the tape(s) around to noters who are
interested. We would need some of you more advanced repairers out there
to hold the sessions.
Just a Thought
Mano
|
462.45 | | MENTOR::REG | Pointing fingers often backfire | Fri Jul 08 1988 13:06 | 2 |
| re .43 He loaned it to me once, said he'd appreciate feedback,
but he didn't.
|
462.46 | I'll do the first one! | AIMHI::JSMITH | Bikes Spoke_n Here | Fri Jul 08 1988 14:02 | 12 |
| re 462.44
I like the idea of building a repair video library to assist
neophites that would like to tinker, but don't want to spend a lot
of time learning the *wrong way* to do things (like myself). I'll
volunteer to do the first chapter on repairing a flat (Touring
Clincher), and then making the tape available to the next contributor,
with the stipulation that I get the updated copy back each time,
until we get a full tape on wheel repair topics. I'll lend the
tape out after I'm supplied with a blank VHS copy from the requestor,
with a one week time line. Does this sound workable and is there
enough interest to make a complete tape this way?
Jerry
|
462.47 | I'd like to see the tape | EAGLE1::JTHOMAS | Jeff Thomas | Fri Jul 08 1988 19:26 | 6 |
| re .44, .46
I'd definitely like to see such a tape, but (also definitely)
don't have enough knowledge to help make it.
Jeff
|
462.48 | Good idea! | PLDVAX::PKANDAPPAN | | Mon Jul 11 1988 11:08 | 7 |
| > -< I'd like to see the tape >-
> I'd definitely like to see such a tape, but (also definitely)
> don't have enough knowledge to help make it.
Same here! Speak up everyone (who wants to see and learn from these tapes)
before the volunteers come to their senses! 8*)
-parthi
|
462.49 | We're not *all* in New England... | CCYLON::SCHULDT | Larry Schuldt - WA9TAH | Mon Jul 11 1988 12:57 | 2 |
| A one week time line? Obviously, you have more faith in the US mail
than I do! Anyway, I'd certainly look forward to it, too.
|
462.50 | A point to note | BIS::MACFADYEN | Sharp at full aperture! | Fri Apr 14 1989 09:16 | 18 |
| I've learned a lot from this note, enough to encourage me to build a
few wheels that haven't broken yet. But there's one thing to be aware
of that I don't remember seeing mentioned here, probably because it's
just too obvious.
It's simply that when you're lacing up a wheel, you must be careful to
position the valve hole in one of the big gaps between spokes. That is,
the two spokes immediately beside the valve hole must lean away from
the hole rather than towards it. This means that when the wheel is
built, you'll have maximum ease of access to the valve with a pump.
I wasn't aware of this consideration until fairly recently with the
result that I've built two wheels with a spoke crossing above the
valve, which makes it difficult to get at the valve with a pump. When I
realised what I'd done I felt pretty stupid, but the wheels are
satisfactory otherwise so I'm not going to rebuild them.
Rod
|
462.51 | There's Type A and Type B Rims | CLYPPR::FISHER | Rdb/VMS Dinosaur | Fri Apr 14 1989 09:59 | 17 |
| The books usually make a big deal of valve hole posiitoning. I think
some even call rims Type A or Type B depending upon whether the holes
are (S for Spoke hole, V for Valve):
S S S S
V ... or V ...
S S S S
And then they give the lacing steps as a function of Type A or Type B
just as a cookbook might for some recipe variations.
I prefer to lace the wheel by forming a mental image of how it must
look when I get done and then start.
(I forget which of the above is A or B.)
ed
|
462.52 | trick wheel building | AKOV76::LAVIN | Oh, It's a profit deal | Fri Apr 14 1989 11:36 | 9 |
| If you're "just" changing the rim (not building new wheels), and the
spoke length is the same (ie., same type of rim or dumb luck) you can
use this trick:
Tape the new rim side by side to the old rim, lining up the valve hole
to the same position. Undo the spokes in the old rim and move them one
by one to the new rim. When complete, remove the tape and follow
through with the usual tightening and truing process. This can cut your
rebuild time substantially.
|
462.53 | RADIAL lacing? | MIMS::HOOD_R | | Wed Jul 28 1993 10:46 | 20 |
|
I just purchased a set of aero wheels from Nashbar. I did not specify
lacing.... I just assumed that the would be a standard 3 cross.
The rear wheel was a standard 3 cross, but the front wheel
was radial laced. I was quite surprised... and concerned that this
might not be as strong as a 3 cross. So what's the deal with radial
lacing... is it less strong? Will I have to retrue this wheel more
often... or be more careful when riding? I've looked around this
and cycle_racing and could not find any notes on lacing patterns and
their strengths. I can certainly send this wheel back if their are
strong opinions against them for normal riding...
Opinions?
doug
|
462.54 | | PAKORA::GGOODMAN | Rippled with a flat underside | Wed Jul 28 1993 11:40 | 9 |
|
It really depends on what you are riding them for and how well you
believed them to have been built. If you are going to do heavy riding
where you will carry a load (touring, commuting) or if you are on roads
that are notorious for their potholes, then I would consider changing
them If they are used for TTing, then I would be more than happy to
keep them as they are.
Graham.
|
462.55 | normal training/riding... | MIMS::HOOD_R | | Wed Jul 28 1993 12:50 | 11 |
|
I am just going to ride them.... about 1200-1500 miles per year,
roads are generally in good shape. I weigh about 170-175 and this
is a 32 hole radial spoked wheel.
I'll probably just ride the wheel anyway, and rebuild for $12 if it
becomes too much of a hassle.
doug
|
462.56 | MY STORY... | WMOIS::GIROUARD_C | | Wed Jul 28 1993 13:47 | 12 |
| I have a radially laced wheel and use it for TT'g only. They do not
hold up as well as triple cross and certainly aren't as strong. They
do go out of true very easily.
I live in a an area with so-so roads and wouldn't even dream of using
them for training or riding. In fact, I put on about 16 miles a week
between the TT (12 mi.) and warming up (4 mi.)... I've had to true it
already.
BTW I have a Campy Omega with 28 spokes (oval DT's 14gua.) on an A/C hub.
Chip
|
462.57 | TT's only, and even then... | RECV::YEH | | Wed Jul 28 1993 14:03 | 9 |
| I'd send it back. Radial lacing is really designed to reduce
wind drag and weight. In the process, they lose strength
(otherwise, all wheels would be of this style :-) The different
crossed spoke patterns are designed to distribute the load of
riding and road hazards over a larger section of rim and a larger
number of spokes. Radial laced wheels lack this advantage, and
therefore are inherently weaker. I would only use a radial laced
wheel for TT's, and only if the road is smooth. You'd be happier
and much safer with 3-cross.
|
462.58 | back it goes... | MIMS::HOOD_R | | Wed Jul 28 1993 15:11 | 12 |
|
You guys have convinced me to send it back. This will be my primary
front wheel and really has to hold up.
Thanks,
doug
|
462.59 | | NOVA::FISHER | US Patent 5225833 | Wed Jul 28 1993 16:57 | 6 |
| In defense of Nashbar, you did order "an aero wheel." If they
take it back, they are being nice-guys for a change.
(note that I'm not very fond of their wheels.)
ed
|
462.60 | | KIRKTN::GGOODMAN | Rippled with a flat underside | Thu Jul 29 1993 06:10 | 8 |
|
>> (note that I'm not very fond of their wheels.)
This would persuade me to take it back. Radial wheels need to be
built to a much higher quiality than 3-cross and if there is any doubt
in their ability, then take it back.
Graham.
|
462.61 | 3 cross standard... | MIMS::HOOD_R | | Thu Jul 29 1993 09:40 | 22 |
| > In defense of Nashbar, you did order "an aero wheel." If they
> take it back, they are being nice-guys for a change.
This is perhaps my fault for not specifically asking how they
build and aero wheel. Colorodo Cyclists and Performance both build
"aero wheels" with a 3 cross , UNLESS YOU SPECIFICALLY REQUEST RADIAL
LACING. Go into any bike shop and you will see the prebuild bikes with
aero wheels with a standard 3 cross. In my estimation, it is a defacto
standard to prebuild wheels in a 3 cross. In this case, I was wrong.
I also believe that if it is standard for Nashbar to radial lace an aero
front wheel, then they should state it in their catalog, and over the
1-800 line. LOTS of people ride 3 cross aero wheels.
The question is not if they take it back, but if they will rebuild or
swap it for me at no charge. I've bought a couple of sets of their wheels
and have no significant problem with them.
doug
|
462.62 | | PAKORA::GGOODMAN | Rippled with a flat underside | Thu Jul 29 1993 10:12 | 6 |
|
Unless I specifically requested something else, I would always expect
3-cross. But, a good bike shop should always ask and advise what you
need.
Graham.
|
462.63 | | NOVA::FISHER | US Patent 5225833 | Thu Jul 29 1993 11:11 | 11 |
| In my Colorado Cyclist catalog, "Aero" front wheel is always associated
with either a picture of a radial laced wheel or text that says
"radial."
Aside: when Nashbar built a pair of "Aero" wheels for Cathy Ellis'
RAAM attempt a few years ago, the mech. said something like
"We'll build you a really fast set of wheels" and then made her
a set of 32� 3X wheels. Her crew chief rebuilt them. I think
he made the front into a 16 spoke radial.
ed
|
462.64 | How do you count? | ODIXIE::RRODRIGUEZ | Shake that grits tree! | Thu Jul 29 1993 11:19 | 5 |
| Does the teeny-tiny cross, right at the flange count as a cross?
I asked for a three-cross pattern. Maybe I didn't know what I was
talking about(?) There were only two obvious crosses...
r�
|
462.65 | | NOVA::FISHER | US Patent 5225833 | Thu Jul 29 1993 12:01 | 3 |
| yep, the teeny tiny one is the first one.
ed
|
462.66 | a matter of semantics? | MIMS::HOOD_R | | Thu Jul 29 1993 12:04 | 23 |
|
ed, I guess some people refer to an "aero" wheel as a radially laced
aero rim. Others refer to an "aero" wheel as any wheel built with
and aero rim. Still others refer to an "aero" wheel as any wheel built
to be aerodynamic (bladed spokes, aero rim, reduced spokes). I guess
it's all a matter of semantics.
If I ordered a Campy Omega aero clincher on an Ultegra hub from
Colorado Cyclist, with no other instructions to the wheel builder,
they would be built three cross. If I order the same thing from the
prebuilt wheel section of Nashbar ,I get the front wheel laced radially.
(the customer road wheel section of CC states:"Wheels are laced
three cross unless otherwise specified. Radial lacing is offered as
a no-charge option on front wheels only."
re: last: the cross at the flange counts as a cross.
doug
|