T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
385.1 | Serotta's are Stiffer | MOSAIC::WASSER | John A. Wasser | Thu Jul 09 1987 13:49 | 13 |
| Stiffness is a function of material, tube diameter and tube
wall thickness. Maybe you can get your main frame tubes
made with iron pipe (as in plumbing). If you don't mind the
weight you could have a frame stiffer than anything available
off-the-shelf (except perhaps a K-mart Huffy...)
Seriously, Serotta Cycles builds bikes with a proprietary
tubing that flares at the bottom bracket to give stiffness
where it counts. See "Cycle Guide" (July 87?) magazine's
article on the 7-11 team bikes. Any racing team bikes you
see with Huffy or Muray labels are probably built by Ben
Serotta... look for the Serotta "S" logo engraved in the
rear brake bridge.
|
385.2 | Other factors than brand of tubes ... | SUSHI::KMACDONALD | Macarooned on a Dessert Island | Thu Jul 09 1987 15:45 | 6 |
| Stiffness of the overall bike is also due in part to frame geometry, lugs,
and how many coats of paint (<=== scratch that last ...). I don't care
whose tubes you use, if you use 65 deg. frame angles, it's going to ride
like an IHOP pancake. Frame height is important too, with taller frames like
mine sort of waving in the breeze ....
ken
|
385.3 | another common misconception | MPGS::DEHAHN | | Tue Jul 14 1987 09:45 | 14 |
|
The biggest factor in frame stiffness is THE BUILDER!
Proper mitering, choice of lugs, fit of lugs/tubes, quality of brazed
joints....these are the most important factors. A water pipe frame
brazed with viods and matched to lugs with .020 clearances will
be as loose as a Huffy LaGrande.
Given a high quality build, the hot tubing these days is Tange
Prestige. It's a new alloy (for bike tubes anyway) that is extremely
strong, so that the wall thickness is very thin, like 753 but stiffer.
CdH
|
385.4 | Raleigh Grand Prix '81 | MAGIC1::GRACE | | Tue Jul 14 1987 22:02 | 6 |
| When I crank my pedals, with the bike turned over or on a stand, the
bike does a dance (pulsates) all over the place. Assuming my bike
is balanced and the wheels are true, etc., is this caused by frame
flexing?
Russ
|
385.5 | true .NE. balanced | APOLLO::WORRELL | Leave no stone un-climbed | Wed Jul 15 1987 10:22 | 30 |
| I'm not sure what you mean that the bike is balanced, but true wheels
aren't necessarily balanced.
True only means that the rim is in the right place. If the tire,
innertube, spokes and rim do not have homogeneous density, then the
wheel may not be balanced even when true.
Of course, the VALVE STEM is the biggest non-homogeneity in the tube!
If the bearings are good and you spin the front wheel very slowly, and
watch it slow to a stop, it may rotate back and forth until it stops
with the valve stem at the bottom. NOT BALANCED, but weights may be
added to the high side.
Anybody got any recommendations?
Because of the freewheel, the rear wheel can't be checked this way
unless the chain is removed.
Note that if the wheels are BALANCED, their rotation will generate no
force to flex the frame. If the wheels are not balanced, and the bike
bounces, that may be due to the seat or bike stand flexing.
If I ever add a reflector to a wheel, I add it to the light (high) side
to try to keep it as balanced as possible.
Hope this is what you asked for.
Glen
PS - ever ride or drive a car whose wheels needed balancing?
|
385.6 | rim joint, also. | NOVA::FISHER | P-B-P qualified | Wed Jul 15 1987 11:17 | 10 |
| re: -.1, On some extremely light but cheap rims, it's not the valve
stem but the rim joint becausee the joint needs a minimal strength.
I saw this on some Matrix ISO's. The rim joint was 10 grams heavier
than the corresponding opposite side of the rim -- found by taping
two nickles to the opposite side of the rim with the wheel (no tire)
in a truing stand. After a tire was installed, the whole wheel
was very nearly balanced, about 2 grams heavier on the rim joint
side.
ed
|
385.7 | This works, but it takes time... | EUREKA::REG_B | N_ew E_ngland C_onservatory disks ? | Tue Jul 21 1987 15:11 | 37 |
| re .5 & .6
> Anybody got any recommendations ?
This isn't exactly a recommendation, but if you want wheels
that are balanced as well as true, here's a way of going about
it.
The weld opposite the valve stem more or less balances the weight
of the valve, if the wheel is true then it will be close to being
balanced anyway, unless you have lollipops (red, orange or white
reflectors, as recommended by CPSC and others) stuck in your spokes,
if you like these then get two per wheel so they more or less balance
each other. Spin the wheel in a trueing stand, or the upturned
frame, and note where it comes to rest, repeat a few times to see
if it is consistent, if not then you may already have a perfectly
balanced wheel (GOTO .END), or a dragging hub (GOTO MAINTENANCE.OTHER).
Having found the heavy side of the wheel (bottom, when it comes
to rest from a slow spin) add a couple of turns of thin solder to
the highest spoke (spoke h), if this isn't enough then do the same to the
next spoke (lets call this h + 1), if its still not enough then
add some to (h - 1). The wheel/tyre combination is pretty bad if
you need to go to (h + 2) and (h - 2), thats 5 spokes, usually the
balance point changes by that time.
I used to do this, I havn't done it for a long time, only you
can judge if its worth your while, currently I have better uses
for *MY* time. It seemed to be most worthwhile when I was riding
on cheap tubulars a *LOOOONNNGGG* time ago, I had the time, the solder
and very little money. I still don't have much money, have less
time, don't use much solder, but probably ride better tyres.
Reg
(Oh, don't worry about the solder flying off at 100 + KMpH due
to centrifugal or other forces)
|
385.8 | When is it frame flexing, then? | MAGIC1::GRACE | | Sun Jul 26 1987 22:20 | 5 |
| What I'm looking for is answers about when you know you have frame
flexing. I thought the pulsating was the frame flexing after I cranked
it and the pedals weren't moving! Is this wrong?
Russ
|
385.9 | Must be the rear wheel... | COLORS::WASSER | John A. Wasser | Mon Jul 27 1987 11:28 | 16 |
| > When I crank my pedals, with the bike turned over or on a stand, the bike
> does a dance (pulsates) all over the place. Assuming my bike is balanced
> and the wheels are true, etc., is this caused by frame flexing?
No. It means that your rear wheel is not balanced (most likely)
or your rear wheel bearings are bad (unlikely unless they also
rattle or don't turn smoothly).
It is not a problem of frame flex because the only force
being placed on the frame to flex it would have to come from
an out of balance wheel. A frame will not flex unless there
is a force (such as hard pedaling) acting on it. A perfectly
balanced spinning wheel applies no force to the frame.
To see a frame flex, stand it on it's tires and lean it away
from you. Put one foot on the bottom bracket and push.
|