T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
341.1 | Any comments, contrary opinions? | KIRK::JOHNSON | Aluminium siding on Tem Noon's Cabin | Fri Jun 12 1987 14:08 | 11 |
| This chain is only the latest in a series of experiences I've had
with Shimano components. Overall, I've found that the 105 series
and below are commodity stuff - designed to sell bikes in shops.
The 600EX components are all flash and no substance - they have
every latest feature, are light, and pretty, so they sell like
wildfire. Magazines give them good reviews, because they only have
to use them a couple of weeks. Salesmen inevitably push them.
The Dura-Ace stuff is strong, with noticably better bearings, and
some concern for longevity, but it is ridiculously expensive and
still prone to the faddish feature tendency of all Japanese parts.
|
341.2 | A bit o' gossip to bandy about .... | SUSHI::KMACDONALD | Macarooned on a Dessert Island | Fri Jun 12 1987 14:32 | 14 |
| Hmmmm...
Have been running Dura-Ace derailleurs for about 15 years now (the SAME
derailleurs). Seem pretty durable, and I like the way they shift.
Unfortunately, last time I LOOKED (read: not tested) the Shimano stuff,
I thought it looked like they had ruined it. Oh, well, let's see if I
can get 30 years out of a derailleur!
As for Sedissport chains stretching, one review at least a year or two
back put them as the LEAST (one of the least?) stretchy of a dozen or
so chains they tried..... Mine seem to last a long time, but that may
just be my riding habits.....
ken
|
341.3 | Chains don't stretch | ERLANG::BLACK | | Fri Jun 12 1987 18:14 | 13 |
| My two cents:
Cahins don't really "Stretch": they wear. In other words, all those
little plain bearings grind off some little peices of metal.
If you do what I do, and ride with your chain full of grit, you
will discover when you finally clean the beast that it has "stretched".
On the other hand, if you keep your chain clear, I think you will
find that it will last longer.
Like most things, you trade off money for time.
|
341.4 | | SHR001::DEHAHN | | Mon Jun 15 1987 10:08 | 17 |
|
Re: -1
It's not just grit that wears out a chain, it's your riding style,
weight of bike/rider, chainwheel/cog combos etc. not just how clean
you keep it. I used to go through one every three months (Sedisport)
and kept them real clean (sponsors like to see you on a clean machine).
Admittedly, the Sedis is not known to be a great wearing chain.
Re: Matt
In my experience, the Dura-Ace chain is the best one made, and it
should last you a long time. Whether it proves it's economical versus
a half dozen Sedisport, only time will tell.
CdH
|
341.5 | No problems with Shimano stuff | ARCHER::KLASMAN | | Thu Jun 18 1987 20:39 | 8 |
| I've been riding 600EX stuff for almost 3 years, with no problems whatsoever.
And I'm embarrassed to say that I really don't take care of my bike as well as
I should. Never had any problems with the Uniglide chain. I just change it
after 1000 to 1500 miles. You can buy almost 3 uniglide chains for the price
of 1 Dura Ace chain, so why not and replace it more often?
Kevin
|
341.6 | Clean chain is the sign of a sick mind :-) | SUSHI::KMACDONALD | Macarooned on a Dessert Island | Fri Jun 19 1987 10:14 | 11 |
| As far as bike chains go, cleanliness can be next to costliness. We
found that some methods of cleaning chains (like dunking them in solvent
baths) can actually destroy the chain prematurely by sort of rinsing the
grit INTO the rollers. Chain LOOKED great, but you could hear it grind
while just flexing it. Since them, I've adopted just hosing the chain
down with Tri-Flow or BreakFree, and wipe down the sideplates when it
gets lookin' too bad. Chain lasts a looooooooooooong time (not sure, but
I think the current Sedisport has been on for about 4 yrs. now). Might
be worth trying ....
ken
|
341.7 | When flexibility gets you in a jam... | KIRK::JOHNSON | Matt Johnson | Wed Aug 12 1987 13:05 | 29 |
| Last Saturday I was near the front of the pack in the last two
miles of a thirty mile race. As I rounded a corner and downshifted,
I heard a horrible grinding noise, and then, the crank wouldn't
turn at all.
I pulled over, and found that I had overshifted from the large to
small front chainwheel. The outside of one of the links had jammed
against one sprocket tooth, and had been drawn all the way up between
the crank and the right chainstay! I couldn't get the chain free
at all; there wasn't enough space between the chainstay and crank
to pull it back through. Later I used a chainbreaker to extract
the chain from where it was lodged.
Besides being tiffed over not finishing the race, I'm also concerned
that this could happen again. The chain actually seems to be TOO
flexible. I've been able to make it catch again just playing with
shifting the bike at home. Here's a crude illustration of what happens:
Jam
_____ /
Sprocket-> -|-|-|-\-_-_____
-----\ | | | |
Chain----> \-------
I didn't think chains were supposed to flex enough to get skewed
on a sprocket. This is an almost new Dura-Ace chain, too.
What can I do?
MATT (who's about to put a contract out on whoever invented Uniglide)
|
341.8 | | MPGS::DEHAHN | | Wed Aug 12 1987 16:37 | 11 |
|
Two things to try:
Adjust your front derailleur angle to keep the chainline straighter
Take a link out of the chain to add a bit more tension
I've never had a problem with too much chain flex....
cdH
|