Title: | Bicycling |
Notice: | Bicycling for Fun |
Moderator: | JAMIN::WASSER |
Created: | Mon Apr 14 1986 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 3214 |
Total number of notes: | 31946 |
I am looking for a bike in the $600-$800 range. Does anyone know any good or bad about Cannondales. I looked at the SR500 and SR800 the other day. The SR500 had all shimano 105 components and sold for 599.00 and the SR800 had Suntour Sprint components and was all black which really looked nice but sold for $860. I haven't ridden much for 2 years but use to be quite active cycling. Also the SR500 had a bioace freewheel. It was kind of egg shaped. Is there any benefit to this or is it just a gimmick ? Any comments appreciated.. Mark
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
228.1 | BIOPACE chainrings | ARCHER::KLASMAN | Mon Mar 09 1987 18:47 | 6 | |
I like the BIOPACE chainrings. I don't notice them when I'm spinning along at 90-100 rpm on the flats, but when I get in the hills, esp the steep ones, I feel they give me a little more power. Kevin | |||||
228.2 | Cannondales are good bikes | AQUA::OCONNOR | Tue Mar 10 1987 12:21 | 9 | |
Hi, I've got a 1985 SR900. I love the bike. Cannondales are well made, although the welding finish on mine was pretty ugly. One thing to note, Cannondales aren't all that light for an aluminum (sp?) bike. If you have any other specific questions about Cannondales I would be glad to answer them. Joe | |||||
228.3 | new geometry | CSC32::D_MARTIN | Tue Mar 24 1987 13:45 | 10 | |
One difference between the two bikes you are comparing is the frame geometry. The low end Cannondale has the same geometry as previous years models. All of the more expensive racing models have a new "criterium" geometry- 74/73 degree angles. (1987 models) I think the lowest priced racing model is being promoted as a "triathlon" type bike. I personally don't see much difference between the Shimano 105 and the more expensive 600 components: they both are excellent quality components. |