T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
204.1 | Never use your bike as a car bumper | ARCHER::KLASMAN | | Mon Feb 02 1987 12:24 | 9 |
| I'm thinking about the rack that mounts the bike with the front
wheel removed. It seems more stable to me, as the bike presents
a lower profile this way, and it seems that less stress would be
put on the headset.
My concern about trunk racks is using the bikes as a rear bumper...
Kevin
|
204.2 | Buy the upside-down system | AKOV05::FULLER | | Mon Feb 02 1987 13:02 | 14 |
| I use the Thule system where the bike is upside down. I chose
this system because:
o No risk of bike falling off of rack.
o No need to remove front wheel
o Cheapest of the thule bike systems
It does take the most strength to put on top of the car,
if you are small, it could make it more difficult.
steve
|
204.3 | Bumper mount rear rack | VIKING::WASSER | John A. Wasser | Mon Feb 02 1987 16:34 | 35 |
|
I currently have a trunk (hatchback) mount rear carrier. It
holds one bike very well and two bikes fairly well.
PRO:
It can be installed and removed easily.
You don't have to lift the bikes very high.
The bikes are carried upright.
The bikes are safe from low hanging obstructions.
It was both cheap and solidly constructed.
CON:
The bikes tend to block the view through the rear window.
One wheel sits in front of the exhaust pipe (on my car).
Cannot open the hatch when the bicycles are on it.
My second choice would be a roof rack where the front wheel
is removed. Between the handlebar pack and the foam grips
I don't think I could get my handle bars into an inverted
rack. The racks where the front wheel is not removed have
to clamp to a frame tube... water bottles and computer
wires get in the way.
In a choice between a roof rack and a rear rack, I think the
bikes would be safer on the rear. I expect that you are
more likely to encounter a low overhang (having forgotten the
bikes are on the roof) than to be struck from behind by another
car (or back you car into an object when you can't miss seeing
your bikes in the mirror).
My recommendation would be a rear rack that clamps to the
bumper and can be removed easily.
-John A. Wasser
|
204.4 | | MELODY::DEHAHN | | Mon Feb 02 1987 16:35 | 24 |
|
Since you already have the Thule bars then you don't need another
rack. The Allen (off the trunk) racks are prone to breakage. The
consequences are obvious.
Something to think about:
The upside down is great, but if you go into a hostile area you'd
better take down the wheels or you might be in for a rude surprise.
With the front-wheel-off or upright mounts you can get locking knobs
that will at least make it difficult to steal the wheels (and frame).
The bike should never fall off the rack with a front fork clamp
arrangement.
BTW I use a LaPrealpina bike/ski rack. Lost a front wheel on route
84 in CT when I hit a large pothole. The wheel bounced in front
of an 18 wheeler and was pronounced dead on arrival.
I never use those wheel holders anymore.
CdH
|
204.6 | Keep the rack secure too | JETSAM::HANAUER | Mike...Bicycle~to~Ice~Cream | Tue Feb 03 1987 09:04 | 9 |
| Just a general thought:
In most of the situations I have heard of, the bike does NOT fall
off the rack -- the whole rack, bikes and all, falls off the car.
Moral: Before each trip, check all clamps and straps.
~Mike
|
204.7 | Check exhaust clearance on bumper racks!!!! | SUSHI::KMACDONALD | Senior Yeast Herder | Tue Feb 03 1987 10:58 | 7 |
| re: .3 - If your wheel is in back of the exhaust, you have a problem
just waiting to happen. I have seen several cases where the exhaust
melted the tire, and the melted gunk is so persistent that the whole
wheel (except the hub) had to be replaced. If you use one of the bumper
racks, ALWAYS make sure that the wheels are away from the exhaust....
ken
|
204.8 | more on bikes as bumpers | ARCHER::KLASMAN | | Tue Feb 03 1987 12:24 | 8 |
| When I mentioned using bikes for a bumper as a negative to trunk
racks, I was mainly thinking of someone else backing into or otherwise
smashing the bike. Since I'm a canoeist, I'm used to having large
items on my vehicle's roof, so I don't worry about hitting low
overhangs. Never have!
Kevin
|
204.9 | Try a Hood Mount | ENUF::JSMITH | | Thu Feb 12 1987 09:21 | 13 |
| If your interested in a bumper rack, Nashbar has one on sale for
$15.00 that perminantely clamps to the bumper and has removable
stems. This makes getting the rack on and off a snap. I haven't
owned a roof rack bucause they appear to be difficult to install
and deinstall and I don't think I'd want to go thru a car wash with
one on. If your concerned about rear/trunk mounting, try mounting
the rack on your front bumper. This way the bike is always visable
to you and unless your traveling at night doesn't seem to interfear
with things. Also a hevy duty bike cable lock can be run thru the
cars grille, both wheels and the bike frame discouraging theft.
I used this set up on my Jeep Cherokee last summer without fear
of losing my bike in the MKO lot.
|
204.11 | | CHEAPR::NORTON | | Tue Feb 17 1987 09:14 | 15 |
| I have a Thule roof rack - the kind where the bikes ride right-side
up - on a Subaru wagon. I'm tall, but that rack is way up there!
I find it real hard to get the bike up that high, plus the clamp
that holds the bike on is very awkward.
It's usually a matter of trying to stand precariously inside the
car, hold the bike up with one hand while maneuvering that clamp
with the other hand. If you're less than 5'10", I wouldn't even
think about it.
I used to have a Cannondale roof rack where the bikes rode upside
down. The rack fell apart, but I found putting the bike on upside
down was much easier.
Kathy
|
204.12 | Point<---->Counterpoint | LSMVAX::MILLER | Marketing, the oldest profession | Tue Feb 17 1987 11:56 | 30 |
| I have now an old Schwinn upright roof rack that sits up there on big 2"
suction cups. The bikes sit in a gutter type facility and there's a removable
arm that attaches to the frame and (hopefully) keeps the bike secure.
The suction cups are all dried out, and getting replacements is proving
to be difficult. It looks stupid next to the grand wizzy high techie things
I see today, and certainly doesn't *GO* with my new car, much less my new
Counterpoint. But I AM used to it, and it HAS created a couple dents in
my roof so it fits perfectly, now. But maybe I should get a new one
for asthetic reasons.......
I dunno,
As I see it, The trunk carriers have the disadvantage of carrying the bikes
too low. I admit to scrunching a wheel going into a steeper than perceived
driveway a couple years back.
Then the roof racks are too high. If the bike sits upright, the bike sits
precariously way up there while you try to secure it before gravity takes
over.
If it's one of those quick release gizmos, you have the extra added attraction
of having to align the fork thingies with the carrier whatchamacallit without
skinning your knuckles down to the elbows.
Else you have the adorable upsidedown carriers, which treat you to a mess of
half squashed flys, bees and skeeters, as well as a half pint of rain water ...
as you tilt the bike down from on high.
Reg, I guess the only answer is t'hell with the BMWs! ride it there and
ride it back!
Besides, who can find a rack to fit the 56" wheelbase my new baby has?????
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-gary=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|
204.13 | To rack or not to rack? | RICKS::SPEAR | The Culture Penguin | Wed Feb 18 1987 15:11 | 15 |
| I plunked down big bucks for a Thule system for my GTI. I drove home from the
shop with it on my car and drive to Phila too. Put the bike on the rack on
the ground, but I never bothered putting the bike on the rack on the car.
Having a hatchback is just too convenient.
Over Xmas I drove to Florida and back and took my bike along. I had the rack
on until Phila, when I decided that it would fit inside with the bike, and
improve the car's Cd. I picked up a lot of presents and a girlfriend with
luggage in FL, and still had no problem fitting the bike and rack inside.
Moral: Don't buy a rack unless you neeeeeed it.
cbs
Anyone wanna buy a Thule rack (bike upright), never been used?
|
204.14 | Re: Visibility | ENUF::JSMITH | | Thu Feb 19 1987 13:05 | 15 |
| re: 204.9
Visibility isn't a problem if you have a car with a relatively tall
square hood/grill assembly (like my Cherokee) as the bike will
ride well below the hood with only the handlebars sticking up over
it. Granted this method of mounting won't work for every car.
Also the weight of the bike is supported by the bumper attachment
and the retaining straps, which can actually be attached to the
frame UNDER the hood so no damage is done to the grill work. As
pointed out in 204.13, a big concern for bumper mounting is scrunched
wheels from steep driveways and curbs. The only way around this
problem , wheather you mount your bike front or rear is to remove
one or both of the wheels. This method works for me, hope you
find a good solution for your particular situation.
|
204.15 | Drive to a Ride ? | EUREKA::REG_B | Moutain Man(iac) | Thu Feb 26 1987 11:45 | 13 |
| re .12 Yup, ride it there and ride it back. Driving to rides
always seemed a contradiction anyway, unless you live in the city
and need to commute to country roads. There's so much good riding
around here I'll probably never cover it all, still less tire of
it enough to want to drive to a ride. Well, I guess I'll drive
to the Time Trials this year, (wonder if any CPTs will be there ?)
Going on vacation is about the only time I *NEED* a roof rack,
and then I need it badly. I just got another vehicle, don't know
how to handle the bikes yet, its * HIGH ! *
Reg
|
204.16 | L.L.Bean Rack? | VIDEO::LEMIRE | | Tue Mar 03 1987 11:37 | 15 |
| I am thinking about purchasing a rear mounting rack from the L.L.Bean
catalog. I have a Jeep Cherokee and had hypothesized building some
sort of rack which would clamp to the top of the hatchdoor and to
the bumper. Then a few days later there it was in the Bean catalog
and it was shown mounted on a Cherokee!!! I couldn't believe it!
And the price looked quite reasonable (about $26.00).
My question is does anyone know if this particular rack is any good
(I don't know who builds it) and is this a good price? Thanks.
Tom
P.S. Regarding driving to a ride, in the summer I go to the Cape
just about every weekend (from Maynard) and I just don't think I'm
up for that kind of a commute �la cycle...
|
204.17 | Bean's = Customer Satisfaction | LSMVAX::MILLER | Marketing, the oldest profession | Tue Mar 03 1987 15:57 | 15 |
|
> My question is does anyone know if this particular rack is any good
> (I don't know who builds it) and is this a good price? Thanks.
Tom, for a 2 hour drive (3 if you drive like me) , you can go up there
and check it out. Bean's never closes. More importantly, if you get the
rack and decide later you don't like it, take it back. Their guarantee is
just what they say it is. No questions asked. You decide you don't want
the product...whenever...they refund what you spent.
I returned a jacket after about 5 years, knowing they'd laugh at me, but
wanting to prove they lied...and they not only returned my purchase price,
but also the postage I spent to send the jacket back!
Go ahead and try it. Unless you don't care for the hassle of sending it
back in the event you're dissatisfied, you can't go wrong!
And if you DO care about the hassle, go on up to look it over.
|
204.18 | LaPreAlpina = Hassles | ADVAX::CLOSE | | Fri Mar 20 1987 09:20 | 27 |
| Like Chris, I bought a LaPrealpina rack to mount on a GTI. It's
a vey sturdy, well-made rack, but it's a pain to use. It's quite
a process to fit the fork stays into the front-end mount. My wife's
bike is a Ross Super Gran Tour, with those weird non-dropout stays,
and that's nearly impossible to fit into the fork stay clamps.
I chose the cheaper rea wheel clamp on the rack, which is a strap
and buckle system. Big mistake. The things never really clamp tight,
and they're a pain to keep pulling, stretching, etc. The first time
we went anywhere with it we ended up on a dirt road. The bouncing
loosened the fork stay clamp on my bike. result: bike lifts up on
next big bump, then places sharp fork stay hard on the roof of my
shiny new GTI, and cuts a nice 6" long groove in the paint. It was
my fault for not tightening enough, but that means you have to really
crank down to tighten it enough.
Now I have an '86 GTI, with recessed rain gutters, so the Prealpina
won't work on this car at all. It will fit my wife's Dasher, though.
Like, Chris, I've found that whenever possible I end up carrying
the bikes inside the car. Even removing both wheels is still less
hassle than setting up the roof rack.
Moral: LaPreAlpina is a fine product, but think hard about how much
hassle you're willing to put up with before you go to any roof rack
that requires removing the front wheel.
DC
|
204.19 | | MPGS::DEHAHN | | Fri Mar 20 1987 12:51 | 8 |
|
Dave,
You can get new mounts for your existing rails for your gutterless
(not gutless) GTI, for either the roof or on the hatch.
CdH
|
204.20 | Gutterless Systems? | JOKUR::MITCHELL | | Mon Mar 23 1987 09:45 | 13 |
| I've been transporting my bike inside my cars for many years, it's
by far the best idea.
But now I have a shiny new T-bird, and to fit the frame into the
trunk, I might as well break it down for shipment by U.P.S.
Has anyone had any experience with the gutterless systems? Any
problems with anchoring the rack to the car? I've also seen trunk
mounted racks where the bikes travel as they would on a roof rack.
That is, they don't hang off the back of the car, but ride atop
the trunk. Has anyone had any experience with this type of set
up?
|
204.21 | Yakima does... | ARCHER::KLASMAN | | Mon Mar 23 1987 17:41 | 6 |
| Yakima has a relatively inexpensive conversion kit to gutterless
rack for their system ($20-$25?). But I bet you've got something
else...
Kevin
|
204.22 | | MPGS::DEHAHN | | Tue Mar 24 1987 07:36 | 6 |
|
A good friend of mine brings his bike to the races on a La Prealpina
trunk mounted rack on his Mercedes. Never had any problems.
CdH
|
204.23 | Disadvantage of Roof Rack | CHEAPR::NORTON | | Tue Apr 28 1987 12:10 | 7 |
| reply
It was bound to happen.
Bike on roof rack + automatic garage door opener =
very mangled wheel, dent over garage door, and very PO'd husband.
(He did it, not me!)
|
204.24 | What garage ?, I didn't think you had a garage ? | EUREKA::REG_B | Husqvarna Sonata for A# saw und Vood | Tue Apr 28 1987 12:43 | 3 |
| re .23 See, that's what Y'get for havin a fancy Layzee automatic
door opener.
|
204.25 | Jetta - Pre Alpina | HARDY::CONNELL | | Wed May 06 1987 11:40 | 14 |
|
For VW Jetta owners:
The later model Jettas have a rubberized rain gutter. I was about
to sell my old PreAlpina rack and buy a fancy Thule number. It
appeared that the PreAlpina would not fit on the Jetta.
After a little time and patience though, I discovered that the
PreAlpina does fit the Jetta. It looks initially like it won't
work, but fits fine. You just spread the two sections of rubber
with a dull knife as you insert the mounting clips.
Chuck
|
204.26 | Upside-down Thule | CAM2::BLESSLEY | | Tue Jul 21 1987 19:52 | 24 |
| I _think_ the original question was "which Thule adapter to use". I haven't
used the less expensive ones (upside-down handle-bar mount; fork mount). I have
the upright kind.
When I first bought it it was REALLY rigid. My car had a good gutter (still
does, as far as I know, I just don't own that car anymore :-), so the
rack was stable. The first year or so, the bike, once mounted, didn't
so much as even sway in the breeze.
Now, despite tightening it up, I find it moves disconcertingly from side
to side. I'm not afraid of losing the bike (or the rack), it's just that
I am sure it's moving from side to side when I corner takes a toll on the
rack.
I think I'd suggest the handlebar mount because of this.
I should point out that prices on Thule racks and accessories vary widely -
perhaps 20%, from mail-order place to place. One of the common ones had
consistently good prices, alas I can't remember which. Do a little
comparison shopping (if you're still in the market; I'm more than a little
behind in this file).
-scott
|
204.27 | THULE mailorder | ARMORY::MIKELISJ | Just browsing through time... | Wed Jul 22 1987 09:42 | 10 |
| I've decided on a THULE bike rack for my Blazer. I need the type that
attaches to my 'permanent' (nothing is permanent) roof rack. I called
Bike Nashbar and LL Bean but they don't have the model i need. I did
find the type in a bike shop yesterday but i'm trying to find one a little
less expensive than the $80.00 the bike shop charges. After adding the
two bike mounts for $32.00/ea., this system gets expensive, fast!
Does anyone have any other mail order places i could check?
-jim-
|
204.28 | Bike rack back stretches before rides... | EUREKA::REG_B | N_ew E_ngland C_onservatory disks ? | Thu Jul 23 1987 10:42 | 36 |
| re .27 I hope you're tall, like *REAL TALL* ! I have a Yakima
rack on top of a GMC (I know, G_eneric M_otor C_ar) Suburban, and
its a helluva reach to the inside (of four) bikes.
Actually I only have the Yakima rails, the rack is a homebrew
concoction of two add on kits of Bike Porta (I think thats right)
parts, the ones that stand up like big X'x.
The principle reasons for chosing Yakima vs Thule were:-
a) Round vs rectangular section rails offer more adjustment
capability, with some of the accessory kits this could be important.
b) The clamp bracket permits adjustment to fit non parallel
(before the acciDENT) rain gutters.
c) Conversion for cars without rain gutters (tower type ?)
would be a lot cheaper, not an immediate problem.
d) Jim O'Neil had both in stock, wasn't pushing either
one, side by side the Yakima appeared to be better quality (subjective,
paint quality can hide poor construction I know).
e) The Yakima seems to start out more expensive for the
basic rails, but gets cheaper than the Thule with just one bike
carrier on it.
f) Its a USA product. This wouldn't be a deciding factor
if it were in any way inferior, it just feels better buying "domestic"
vs "imported". OK, send me the political flames and tell me that
Yakima imports from wherever.
Reg
(Not trying to change your mind, just relating my own choice)
|
204.29 | Rent a Wrack? | TASMAN::EKOKERNAK | | Mon Sep 28 1987 14:28 | 9 |
| Here's a question: Does anyone rent car bike racks? My previous
one rusted out. But I want to take the bikes to Virginia over
Columbus Day weekend. I thought it'd be a chance to try a different
(newer) model before settling on a purchase.
Good areas are Worcester, Marlboro, Leominster.
Elaine
|
204.30 | No Wrentals in Wrentham, try Mawrlborough... | MENTOR::REG | | Wed Sep 30 1987 08:28 | 8 |
| re .29 I don't wrent, won't even consider liability issues,
I might lend. Its a hybrid design (polite euphamism for, "you'd
have to see it to believe it") incorporating Yakima rails and Bike
Porter add on kits. Like some of dec's products its design "evolved"
through a couple of generations.
Reg
|
204.31 | Home Brew | TALLIS::JBELL | Wot's..Uh the Deal? | Wed Sep 30 1987 11:50 | 14 |
| My favorite bike rack is not available in stores.
It is built of 2x4's and rain gutter brackets, and can hold up to four bikes.
It probably costs less than 25$ in parts. I think that they have the design
in the back of The_Complete_Bicycle_Book (the 2 inch thick white one).
I could lend it out, but only to people who own a car that is the same width
as a 1984 Renault Alliance, 1970 Duster or 1974 Malibu. (Those are the holes
that are already drilled in it.)
In addition to using it for bikes, I have used it for canoes, kayaks, skis,
washing machines and clothes dryers.
-Jeff
|
204.32 | Mustang GT roof rack questions | BEOWLF::STERN | | Thu Jan 21 1988 14:17 | 4 |
| I need to find out if the Thule will fit on an 87 Mustang GT. If not,
is there some rack that might work?
Chuck
|
204.33 | ROOF RACK FOR VOYAGER | USRCV1::RECUPAROR | | Thu May 12 1988 14:54 | 6 |
|
DO THEY MAKE A ROOF CARRIER THAT WORKS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE ROOF
RACK ON MY PLYMOUTH VOYAGER?
|
204.34 | | RGB::JIM | Jim Pappas | Fri May 13 1988 00:35 | 9 |
| RE: .33
I have a Dodge Caravan which is the same as your Voyager. I am 6'7"
tall which is probably (pure percentage here) taller than you. I
cannot imagine getting bikes on the top of the minivan. Are you sure
you really want to put your bike(s) there? It is hard enough getting
skis up there, never mind bikes. Just my 2 cents.
/Jim Pappas
|
204.35 | Use a regular roof rack, please! | ARCHER::KLASMAN | | Fri May 13 1988 08:37 | 17 |
| < Note 204.34 by RGB::JIM "Jim Pappas" >
I had a Mini Ram Van (no rear seat version of Caravan/Voyager). If they still
have rain gutters, any of the standard roof racks will work. I prefer
Yakima. I would strongly recommend NOT getting somthing that clamps to your
existing roof luggage rack. I cannot imagine it would be secure enough to
hold a bike. Not my bike, anyway. Due to its shape (tall profile), a bike
will exert much more leverage on a rack. Its ok to use ski racks that attach
to luggage racks because skis don't exert as much leverage.
BTW, I'm 5'5", and drive an Isuzu Trooper II, and I put bikes, canoes, skis,
etc on my Yakima roof rack all the time. Of course I need a step stool and I
stand on the window sills to get things arranged right. And a Trooper (4wd)
is much taller than a Caravan/Voyager.
Kevin
|
204.36 | then what do you use | USRCV1::RECUPAROR | | Fri May 13 1988 09:32 | 7 |
| RE: .34
If you don't use the roof racks what do you use.
Does plymouth make a mount for bikes either on the roof or on the
back.
|
204.37 | Ask your Plymouth/Dodge/Chrysler dealer.. | DR::BLINN | Opus in '88 (Penguin Lust!) | Fri May 13 1988 10:42 | 8 |
| > Does plymouth make a mount for bikes either on the roof or on the
> back.
Go to your Chrysler Corporation dealer and ask. If they aren't
helpful, get the phone number for Chrysler's "Direct Connection"
and call them; they handle lots of after-market accessory sales.
Tom
|
204.38 | THULE | USMRW2::DRIVETTS | | Fri May 13 1988 11:14 | 4 |
| Thule makes a rack with a high foot so it can clear factory/dealer
installed racks.
Dave
|
204.39 | | RGB::JIM | Jim Pappas | Fri May 13 1988 22:30 | 16 |
| Last year, I went to buy a rack to fit both my Dodge Caravan and my
Dodge Shadow. The Shadow does not have gutters so I would have
to get the gutterless type. I thought about the height of the Caravan
and decided that it was un feasable to have a roof mounted carrier.
.34 recommends using a step stool with a roof mounted rack but unless
you take the stool with you, it only helps while in your own driveway.
Usually when I travel, I dont have room for such a thing.
I finally decided to get a rear mount bike carrier. I bought the Rhode
Gear because it seemed like the best available. To tell the truth, I
never used it yet. All last year whenever I traveled with more than
one bike, I was alway's in someone elses car. My bike fits in the back
of my Shadow with the rear seat folded down.
/Jim Pappas
|
204.40 | It's simple, even for short folks. | MENTOR::REG | May Be ('til June 1st) | Tue May 17 1988 12:55 | 17 |
| re .37 Yeah, ask for Lee, say Dr Tom sent you.
I get four bikes on the top of a Suburban, it has running boards
(yeah, they look goofy, so what ?), but the trick is to just lift
the bike up over my head and walk sort of into the driver's seat
as if I'm climbing stairs (opening the door first, of course),
similarly on the passenger's side. Sure my balance is starting
to go just as I get up there, that's when timing plays its role,
just dump the bike into the channel and grab the rack with one hand,
securing it is the other hand's job. Getting it down is similar;
just stand on a seat, hold onto the roof rack with one hand while
unfastening the bike with the other, when everything is about to
come off, grab the bike at about the mid fork and mid seat stay points,
lean back (as if there's a choice at this point) and step down.
Reg
|
204.41 | Different strokes | CCYLON::SCHULDT | Larry Schuldt - WA9TAH | Tue May 17 1988 16:13 | 12 |
| I can also carry 4 bikes on my Suburban. I have found 2 approaches
that work (both different from yours, Reg).
1. Carry a short aluminum stepladder. Plenty of room for that
in the Suburban.
2. Stand in the door opening and have wife support your back
while reaching up and over.
Both of these worked fine for me, even last year with
#1 daughter's Free Spirit (massively heavy). FWIW #1 daughter got
smart and got rid of it!
|
204.42 | racks infor needed | TALOS4::JD | JD Doyle | Wed Jun 29 1988 17:52 | 9 |
| Anyone have any experience with, or comment on the Graber roof racks
advertised in the Mailorder catalogs. They look like a deal for
2 bikes with wheelholders, but how's the quality?
Just thought I'd ask before I drop double the price on Thule's
Thanks for any help
JD
|
204.43 | GRABBER vs THULE | USMRM5::MREID | | Thu Jun 30 1988 00:40 | 29 |
| RE: JD's Grabber racks
My brother has Grabber racks on his VW Rabbitt, and I have THULE
on my Mazda RX-7, so we can compare ...
Grabber fits MOST cars, but not all. Grabber didn't fit the RX-7.
Thule claims to fit all cars.
Grabber locks (lock rack to car) stink; you can actually undo them
with a little muscle. Thule has much better locks, that you can't
force }iopen.
Thule has a full line of accessories for the racks; Grabber has
some, but not as much as Thule.
Grabber holds the rear wheel (in fork mount model) with straps,
which don't hold as securely as thule's rear wheel clamp.
There are other things that are probably not significant, such as
Thule mounts slightly more securely to car, holds bike (both fork
mounts) to rack slightly more steady, just overall slightly better
quality.
BUT GRABBER IS CHEAP !!! I actually ordered the Grabber for my RX-7,
but when it didn't fit, I had to cough up $$$ for the Thule. Even
my brother with the Grabber has no doubt that Thule is better quality;
it's just a matter of how much $$$ you have to dish out!
Mark Reid
|
204.44 | Which Thule Bike Rack? | CAROL::FRAMPTON | Carol Frampton | Thu Apr 27 1989 14:28 | 6 |
| My husband and I have the Thule rack system for our x-country skis. We
would like to get racks for our bikes. Thule seems to make three
styles of racks - upright with all wheels on, upright with front wheel
off, and upside down. Which style do you think is best and why?
Carol
|
204.45 | It depends... | CURIE::HUPPERT | | Thu Apr 27 1989 14:52 | 26 |
| re: -.1
Part of the answer is dependent on the bicycles involved, and people
size. Some thoughts...
If you have ATBs without quick release hubs, you will find the upright,
both wheels on style best. Thule changed their upright design last
year (in my opinion for the worse). The problem with Thule's design
is that they didn't account for derailieur cables (the Yakima design
is very thoughtful in this respect) on your bike. With Thule you
have to work hard to keep the cables from scratching your paint
when you clamp the bike into jaw. In general, the upright design
is very convenient and quick. If you are in the Worcester, MA area,
you might check Fritz's Bike Shop in Boylston to see if he has good
deals on used carriers. A friend adapted Yakima GT carriers (their
upright solution) to a rectangular crossbars similar to Thule.
With a little ingenuity it can be done.
Another friend who is fairly short found the upside down style the
best solution for solo operation.
The upgright/front wheel off style may be the most stable design,
and has the least possibility of damage to your bikes finish. With
this style you must be careful to make sure the fork mount is properly
secured to your bike. Another friend bent her front fork dropouts
by not fully closing the lever.
|
204.46 | my choice is fork mount | IAMOK::WESTER | | Thu Apr 27 1989 14:57 | 15 |
| I have the one where you take the front wheel off. This means you
carry the front wheel in the trunk. I like this style the best,
I think it's the most sturdy.
If convenience and luggage space is your primary concern I would
choose upright with both wheels on.
Upside down with both wheels on looks like it would be difficult
to get your bike on and off. However, I've never tried this so
I don't know.
Whichever you choose, I'm sure you'll be satisfied. There's another
note in here which discusses the merits of Thule vs. Yakima. The
consensus seems to prefer Yakima, but Thule is still an excellent
system.
|
204.47 | Yakima on sale at REI | GENRAL::WISHART | | Fri Apr 28 1989 11:09 | 3 |
| By the way, REI has Yakima racks on sale the first weekend in May
- 20% off.
|
204.48 | Yakima vs Chicago's toll gates. | NOVA::FISHER | Rdb/VMS Dinosaur | Fri Jul 21 1989 10:53 | 10 |
| After the races in Capron, Ill., this past week, I was returning home
with the bikes securely mounted on my Yakima. At some toll-stop in
Chicago around 9pm Sunday, I threw my coins into the piggybank and,
when the gate lifted, I proceded. I noted the sound of wood hitting
the pavement. Apparently the gate's arm did not lift high enough and
caught on either the arm of my rack (atop a Plymouth Voyager) or the
locking cable. The rack and bikes were unharmed. Numerous cars were
then noted to be coming through the toll without stopping to pay.
ed
|
204.49 | I've wondered about this... | NAC::KLASMAN | | Fri Jul 21 1989 13:13 | 14 |
| < Note 204.48 by NOVA::FISHER "Rdb/VMS Dinosaur" >
-< Yakima vs Chicago's toll gates. >-
> After the races in Capron, Ill., this past week, I was returning home
> with the bikes securely mounted on my Yakima. At some toll-stop in
> Chicago around 9pm Sunday, I threw my coins into the piggybank and,
> when the gate lifted, I proceded. I noted the sound of wood hitting
> the pavement. Apparently the gate's arm did not lift high enough and
> caught on either the arm of my rack (atop a Plymouth Voyager) or the
Yeah... I steer to the right when exiting toll booths to try to avoid this
problem.
Kevin
|
204.50 | what about the front wheel? | RUSTIE::NALE | | Mon Apr 23 1990 16:17 | 13 |
|
For my fiance's birthday, I'm contemplating getting him
the Thule system where you take the front wheel off. However,
does it also have a place where you can put the detached front
wheel? He's got an Eagle Talon and there's barely enough room
for our luggage, much less two wheels. Besides, he'd freak if
he ever got grease on his upholstery.
By the way, he's already got the racks. He just needs the bike
attachment.
Sue
|
204.51 | QED | BANZAI::FISHER | Dictionary is not. | Mon Apr 23 1990 16:26 | 8 |
| Hello to the other side of the bldg,
You buy a wheel mount for the front wheel. Then hte quick release
clamps the wheel to the mount. If you have cable locks you pass the
cable through the wheel, else bungie the wheel to the rack -- just
for insurance.
ed
|
204.52 | Thanks, Ed... | RUSTIE::NALE | | Mon Apr 23 1990 16:45 | 2 |
|
...I shoulda just walked over and asked.
|
204.53 | Graber & Thule | CLT::LOPTSN::ferwerda | Displaced Beiruti | Fri Jun 08 1990 14:57 | 11 |
| Does anyone know if it is possible to put Graber acessories on a Thule or
vice versa? I need to be able to carry two adult bikes and one kid's bike for
now and can't really afford the $300+ that a all Thule system would cost. I
was thinking of getting a Thule rack (based on the assummption that it is
better quality), a couple of inverted-bike Thule carriers and a Graber
upright, but I didn't know if I would be able to adapt one to the other.
Anyone know about the adaptability or have first hand experience with the
Graber roof rack?
Thanks,
Paul
|
204.54 | Yakima | DUGGAN::HUPPERT | | Fri Jun 08 1990 16:16 | 9 |
| re: -.1
I don't know anything about Graber vs Thule, but (without trying to
start a battle) if your ever considering new equipment take a close
look at Yakima. Last weekend my bike was on another persons car with
Thule stuff, and it really made me appreciate the fact that I own
Yakima. Whats even better is that Yakima is make in the US, and its a
superior product in my opinion.
|
204.55 | Yakima where? | CLT::LOPTSN::ferwerda | Displaced Beiruti | Fri Jun 08 1990 17:53 | 5 |
| Can you tell me where I might get prices for and find Yakima stuff? I live
in New Hampshire. I tried Directory Assistance for an 800 number for
Yakima last night without luck.
Paul
|
204.56 | | SVCRUS::CRANE | | Mon Jun 11 1990 09:57 | 8 |
|
O'neils in Worcester is having somewhat of a sail on Yakima racks.
they are selling the the used Tour De Trump racks for like 20% off.
I went in the other day and priced a rack with locks for two bikes
and it came to about $235
John C.
|
204.57 | Thule vs. Yakima | TECRUS::JIM | Jim Pappas | Thu Sep 06 1990 23:24 | 77 |
| This is my best cut at Thule vs. Yakima rack systems.
While in Maine last week, I decided to break down an buy a
roof top bike rack for my Dodge Caravan. (I'm the guy who
said a Caravan was too tall for roof racks in an earlier
reply). I looked extensively at Thule and Yakima, and ended up
buying a Thule. I don't really want to start a religious
battle here, because both systems are top quality. I was
hoping to buy the Yakima, since it is a domestic, but for my
application the Thule was better.
The primary reason I ended up with Thule was because I wanted
the upright (wheels on) bike carrier. My wife and I each have
a Cannondale Mt bike, and I have a Cannondale road bike. The
down tubes on our bikes are 2". The Thule is designed to fit
up to 2" tubes and the Yakima is designed for 1.75" tubes. I
went back to the Yakima dealer 3 times to try the rack, but I
finally convinced myself that it just was not stable enough.
I had considered getting the fork mount carriers, but decided
against them.
Yakima claims their racks are 15% stronger than the
competition (which I assume is Thule). I could believe that
but it doesn't make too much difference since both Yakima and
Thule claim their racks are much stronger than the cars they
attach to. My Thule system is rock solid.
The Yakima ski attachments seemed nicer than the Thule since
they hold 6 pairs of skis/rack. The Thule only will hold 3
pairs/rack. You could fit 3 racks on the long Yakima bars for
a total of 18 pairs of skis!
The locks on Thule were much better. The upright bike carrier
on the Yakima does not lock. You need to use a cable which is
a pain in the neck. The Thule upright bike carrier locks the
bike to the carrier, and also locks the carrier to the bars.
This is done with a single key. All of the Thule keys are
double cut so they work when inserted either way. The Yakima
keys are single cut (this makes a difference when it cold,
snowing and dark).
The new Thule upright bike carrier was nicer than the Yakima
in my opinion. The Thule wheel hold down clamps handle both
mountain and road wheels without any adapters. The Yakima
requires an adapter to secure the road bike tires. I think
this is a problem if you carry both types of bikes, the
adapter is certain to get lost. The Thule wheel clamps also
fold up and out of the way which means you do not have to
fight with them when putting the bike onto the rack. After
you secure the down tube, you fold the wheel clamps over the
rims and the straps ratchet down. It is hard to explain but
it really works very nicely. The Yakima wheel straps flop
over the wheel channel and get in the way when trying to get
the bike into the rack. Both Thule and Yakima have quick
release down tube clamps but I liked the Yakima clamp better
(other than the fact it does not fit the Cannondale tubes).
Both Thule and Yakima claim the shape of their bars
(rectangular vs round) are best. I think it is a wash. Both
use cold rolled steel bars with a thick plastic coating. As
far as I could tell, only Thule galvanizes their steel (25
microns inside and out) which an advantage. I am not positive
that Yakima omits this, but I could not find it mentioned in
their literature.
When up in Acadia, we noticed hundreds of cars (from all over
the country) with roof mounted bike racks. From my informal
survey, I would estimate that Thule has about 80% of the
market share. I was surprised that it was so high. Yakima
was clearly the second most popular brand.
Bottom line: Both are really fine, and each have small
advantages over each other. Most of the differences are
minor in my opinion. If I didn't have Cannondale, or if I
wasn't set on the upright bike carriers, I would have had a
tougher choice.
|
204.58 | | TECRUS::JIM | Jim Pappas | Fri Sep 07 1990 12:46 | 10 |
| BTW,
For any of you with Thule racks and any interest in the luggage carrier
attachment, LL Bean has the larger of the two attachements on sale. It is
normally $55.00 and they have it $19.50.
I bought one while up at the store on Labor Day. They have free shipping if
you order by phone.
/Jim Pappas
|
204.59 | More on Yakima | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Uphill, Into the Wind | Fri Sep 07 1990 12:59 | 42 |
| To add a few points to Jim's note: I'm confused by your statement
that Yakima keys are single cut. Mine is quite clearly double cut.
I bought it a year or so ago, so they may have changed at some
point.
A really nice feature of the Yakima upright (with wheels on) clamp
is that it has grooves for the gear cables. On a Thule, you should
wrap the downtube in a rag that goes inside the cables, or the
clamp will rub the cables against the down tube destroying the
paint.
Another nice feature of the Yakima is that you can add or remove
accesories without removing the rack from the car.
I think Jim's right about the Yakima racks not being galvanized.
When the end cap fell off one of the rods I noticed some rust
before I replaced the cap.
I just got the Yakima Tandem rack (slightly modified) for my
Counterpoint. It's considerably harder to use than the single bike
mount. (And that was testing it inside, when it's on the car over
my head things should get really sporting.) The rack is a long (7'
or so) square steel bar. At one end is an axle to put the fork on
(raised 6" from the bar), and there is a sliding piece 10" high
that supports the rear bottom bracket. It's a nicely made piece
with plastic contacting the outside of the bottom bracket so
nothing rubs against the cables running under the bottow bracket.
There's a tab on the back of the bottom bracket support. A plastic
coated "T" drops between the chainstays and is screwed down to the
tab with a wing nut (and a spring). This is supposed to be enough
support. The rack attaches to the crossbars with two screws at
each cross bar, one on either side of the square bar.
To use this, you first get the bottom bracket support in the right
place (with tolerances around 1/8") and then put the bottom
bracket on its support, then lower the fork onto the fork support.
With the counterpoint's BMX style fork, this is a little tricky as
the fork extends below the wheel axle, and this extension gets in
the way while lowering the fork onto its support. We'll see if we
find it easier with practice.
--David
|
204.60 | RE-DESIGNED THULE UPRIGHT | WMOIS::DRIVETTS | Dave Rivetts, WMO, USCD, 241-4627 | Fri Sep 07 1990 14:14 | 5 |
| Thule has re-designed their upright carrier so it grabs the down tube
from underneath and the clamps grip the down tube from the side. The
cables, on most bikes, don't get in the way.
Dave
|
204.61 | | TECRUS::JIM | Jim Pappas | Fri Sep 07 1990 18:26 | 37 |
| RE: .-1 ULTRA::WITTENBERG "Uphill, Into the Wind"
> To add a few points to Jim's note: I'm confused by your statement
> that Yakima keys are single cut. Mine is quite clearly double cut.
> I bought it a year or so ago, so they may have changed at some
> point.
The keys I saw were single cut, although I cannot remember if
they are for the rack itself or for some accessory. The photo
in the Yakima brochure clearly shows single cut keys.
> A really nice feature of the Yakima upright (with wheels on) clamp
> is that it has grooves for the gear cables. On a Thule, you should
> wrap the downtube in a rag that goes inside the cables, or the
> clamp will rub the cables against the down tube destroying the
> paint.
Thule has a new upright bike carrier (I think model 549). The
clamp has groves for cables so that it will not scratch your
paint.
> Another nice feature of the Yakima is that you can add or remove
> accesories without removing the rack from the car.
This is the same as Thule. The bike rack for instance has "U"
bolts with quick release levers. The accessory clamps down on
the rectangular bars and can be moved/removed by releasing the
three quick release levers. It is designed such that when the
downtube arm is raised (and locked to the bike), the U bolts
cannot be removed which in effect locks the carrier to the
rack's crossbars.
It was the new upright bike carrier (and it's ability to hold
the Cannondale) which sold me on Thule. It is a really nice
design.
/Jim Pappas
|
204.62 | Glad I got Yakima | CLT::LOPTSN::ferwerda | Displaced Beiruti | Mon Sep 10 1990 11:05 | 22 |
| This past weekend my wife and I pulled into a place to stay around 11pm. We
were exhausted and forgot the bikes on the top of the car and didn't notice
that we were pulling into a low overhang. We heard the noise, stopped and
rushed out with a sinking feeling to find that no real damage had been done.
The seat of my bike had caught the overhang, but the since the Yakima bars
are round instead of square, the force just rotated the bike/rack attachments
back around the bar. This was enough for the bike to fit under the
overhang. If the attachments hadn't been able to rotate backwards I would've
seriously damaged my bike or the roof rack or the car.
Of course, if the overhang had been much lower it would have been a different
story, but in this case the round bars made a real difference.
Paul
PS. Given the money that these racks (Thule & Yakima), I suspect that anyone
who spends the money is going to be reasonably supportive of the brand
they bought (and the decision they made). I don't remember the technical
term for it but people usually end up favoring the brand that they bought
if for no other reason than to confirm their own cleverness at purchasing that
particular brand! 8-)
|
204.63 | Same Thing Happened to Me | GIGI::BUXTON | | Tue Sep 11 1990 16:11 | 14 |
| RE: -1
Same thing happened to me two weeks ago while on vacation in Wisconsin.
I was backing into a garage and forgot for the moment what was on top
of my van!!
Fortunately, the Yakima bars rolled enough to cause no damage.
I don't think this is a feature Yakima was counting on. I can't
imagine the Yakima marketeers sitting around a table thinking of
ways in which to help non-thinking types like me.......
BTW, my lock keys are double-cut also.
ricb
|
204.64 | | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Uphill, Into the Wind | Tue Sep 11 1990 17:39 | 9 |
| After seeing the recent discussion here, I've looked carefully at
bike racks on cars I see on the road. I've seen various features
on Thule and Yakima, so it may be that they change designs
frequently, so check both brands at the time that you're buying.
For me the decision is simple, the adaptor for a Counterpoint Opus
is ony available on Yakima.
--David
|
204.65 | Used both and like Yakima (but don't own C'dale) | DUGGAN::HUPPERT | | Wed Sep 12 1990 15:12 | 57 |
| I owned Thule, and sold it...
I now own Yakima. This should tell you where my bias lies.
Some rambling thoughts...
The upright Thule racks have gone through quite an evolution. Their
original upright bicycle carrier clamped the downtube much like the
Yakima GT carrier, but it didn't allow for deraileur cables (makes you
wonder if the Thule engineers actually ever use their own equipment).
It also had problems with fat tires where an adapter for the channel
was required. The tire tie-downs did flip out of the way, but the fact
they were based on a screw thread for tightening meant they were very
slow to use. I still prefer Yakima's wheel tie down, and find them
flexible enough that they don't impede my putting the bike on the rack.
Positioning the rack on the crossbars was difficult because the bike
carrier was "indexed" and would only allow connection at discrete
positions. Thule's second generation design was even worse. It has
all the bad features from the first generation design, plus an even
more awkward downtube clamp. Not only are your cables in the way, but
your water bottle rack is also in the way. Both first and second
generation designs used materials which wasn't up to the quality of
Yakima. As has been mentioned, the third generation design is quite
different. Its quite an improvement over its predecessors. In many
ways its similar to Yakima.
Some other observations:
In general I've found Thule's use of U bolts awkward and slow compared
to Yakima's nearly universal use of snap-arounds with one large
wingnut. There is a sense of symmetry and parts interchangability
around Yakima's use of snap-arounds, where the method of attaching a
Thule accesory is very device dependent (some require taking the
crossbars apart).
The design of Yakima's tower for gutterless cars is very slick. A one
piece molded nylon body with a cam which locks the towers onto the bars
which is independent of the mechanism which tightens the clips on the
door frame. The tower foot pads are fairly gentle on the car's finish.
My car still has the marks left behind from the black pads used on
Thule's gutterless towers. The Thule gutterless towers are inelegant
in comparison (use of multiple pieces, bent and crimped metal parts).
I don't know which bars are stronger: round or rectangular. I do know
that my Thule crossbars started to bow a slight amount. I've noticed
the same slight effect on some other Thule racks I've seen on the road.
My Yakima crossbars are very solid with no hint of fatigue.
My Yakima system uses double sided keys- I think the catalog uses very
old photographs.
My last area of discussion is very subjective- esthetics. To me, the
Yakima products appear to be a very well thought threw "system".
Basically, the Thule system has the same functionality, but the
implementation comes across as a kludge. In an exaggerated way it
seems like the difference between Bahaus (form follows function) design
and a Rube Goldberg creation. But then again, my feeling about this
aren't strong at all. :-)
|
204.66 | | TECRUS::JIM | Jim Pappas | Fri Sep 14 1990 00:26 | 41 |
| RE: -1
I pretty much agree with all of your comments. I think Yakima is a
first rate system.
>In general I've found Thule's use of U bolts awkward and slow compared
>to Yakima's nearly universal use of snap-arounds with one large
>wingnut. There is a sense of symmetry and parts interchangability
>around Yakima's use of snap-arounds, where the method of attaching a
>Thule accesory is very device dependent (some require taking the
>crossbars apart).
This is true, but remember that Thule accessories have been evolving
over a long time. Accessories purchased 15 years ago (or whenever
Thule started selling) still work with today's bars. Yakima system is
very consistent and slick, but they have been around for less time
than Thule. If you look at Thule's latest generation accessories, they
generally attach quickly and easily, often with quick disconnects. One
disadvantage of the Yakima snap around system is that the accessories
do not lock to the bars. This requires the use of a cable to lock down
your stuff.
Also, if you look [only] at Thule's latest generation components, you
will see that they are very well designed. The latest upright carrier
for instance does not require any adapters for mountain or road bikes.
As you say, the older Thule upright bike carrier was a poor design,
Yakima, when it hit the market, was clearly better, then Thule came out
with their current system, which I think is the best available,
Yakima's next generation will be better still, ... The wonders of
competition.
I have to agree with you on Yakima's system elegance. It is a well
thought our system (except for the necessity for the cable lock).
Maybe Yakima will come out with snap-around locks as part of their next
generation.
Bottom line: I find it hard to believe that you can go wrong with
either system.
/Jim Pappas
|
204.67 | Yakima fit on Mazda 626 (88-91) | ISLNDS::SCHWABE | | Wed Aug 07 1991 12:35 | 11 |
|
I want to get a roof carrier for my bikes. I own a 1989 Mazda 626. I
was leaning towards Yakima but a few weeks ago noticed the same style
car in the ACO parking lot and I wasn't the least impressed at how the
tower sat on the roof. The towers did not sit flat on the roof; about
50% of the pad was not touching the roof line where it slants towards
the door.
Is this the best fit for a Mazda 626 with a Yakima? If so I think
I'll look at the Thule. Does the person who owns that car read this
conference? If so I'd like to hear his/her comments.
|
204.68 | A Few Comments | RANGER::PEASLEE | | Wed Aug 07 1991 12:56 | 8 |
| I am looking at both Thule and Yakima and was told that the Yakima
actually is at a curve so that it will fit properly on sloped roof
lines so I am surprised at your comment.
Just FYI - I like the Yakima because there is a model that allows
you to (with an adapter piece) use it on cars with and without rain
gutters.
Just my two cents.
nancy
|
204.69 | is it me | JUPITR::M_NORTON | | Wed Aug 07 1991 15:44 | 12 |
| Hello,
That must of been my car. did it have a sign on that said
pro-bike. If it did it was mine. I had to set it up that way. One day I
drove my car with my bike on it onto a low roof. and bent the stuff up.
I have had no problem with it. But I can't find a dealler around that
sells that stuff local. I do alot of bike racing and I see about 75% of
the people use Thule bike rack.
I hope this help you out.
Mike
|
204.70 | Taurus applications, roof vs. trunk | WUMBCK::FOX | | Wed Aug 07 1991 17:49 | 12 |
| Any Taurus (sedan) owners out there? What do you use for a rack, and
how do you like (or dislike) it?
On the trunk mounted units - are they really so bad? What are the
major drawbacks with these? They are usually far less expensive than
the roof mounted ones, yet I see far less of these than the roof
mounted units.
I'm not interested in something to hold skis, or a boat, or anything
but a pair of bikes (maybe 3). Will a trunk mount do the trick, and
not damage the car or bikes under normal conditions?
Thanks,
John
|
204.71 | Yakima availability | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Uphill, Into the Wind | Wed Aug 07 1991 19:41 | 10 |
| RE: .69
I don't know where you are, but there are several dealers around
greater Maynard who sell Yakima. The ones I'm sure carry it are
Belmont Wheelworks, Lincoln Guide Service, and REI. I haven't
asked anywere else. For mail order, check Colorado Cyclist. I'm
sure one of the mail order companies carries it, but I'm not
certain which one.
--David
|
204.72 | Limit on number of bikes. | PAKORA::GGOODMAN | Number 1 in a field of 1 | Thu Aug 08 1991 03:29 | 8 |
|
One thing to keep in mind. The largest boot-mounted (I refuse point
blank to call it a trunk :) ) bike rack that I've seen can only take 2
bikes. If you want to be able to take a 3rd bike, it'll have to be roof
mounted.
Graham.
|
204.73 | Stability? | RANGER::PEASLEE | | Thu Aug 08 1991 09:33 | 5 |
| Some of the "trunk" racks I've seen can accomodate two bikes...just
barely, i.e. if the bikes aren't positioned just right they may
inadvertently get scratched in you hit a bump the wrong way.
The roof racks seem to provide more stability for the bicycle than
a trunk rack.
|
204.74 | The Yakima was more flexible ffor my situation | ELWOOD::HEITER | | Thu Aug 08 1991 09:42 | 13 |
| We purchased the Yakima system since we could use it on both cars, only having
to buy an extra set (2 pairs) of clips. One of the cars has a rain gutter, and
the other did not. The Thule system would have required the purchase of two
complete racks; the choice about shich one was a no-brainer. I had talked to
others about the racks before we bought the Yakima, many of whom had decided
on the Yakima system for the same reason we did.
When I assembled the rack, I was very impressed with the design and materials.
I have since looked at the Thule system, and was not impressed. Interestingly,
they both looked the same when I was getting ready to buy. Before the Thule
system people start flaming, let me state that the two systems will probably
have the same lifetime under comparable conditions. Flexibilty was the final
distinction between the two.
|
204.75 | Yakima ... better fit , cost less, made in USA. | ELMST::BARRETT | I've been Framed ... "PowerFrame" | Thu Aug 08 1991 10:37 | 1 |
|
|
204.76 | | K2TRC::MCKENZIE | A PhD in inhumanity... | Thu Aug 08 1991 11:02 | 22 |
|
As far as needing two Thule's for two cars, that's not my
situation. I bought a Thule for my wife's '89 Maxima. When it
came time to get a rack for my '90 Pathfinder, the Thule catalog
said I needed a different 'bar' (only difference was length).
I was able to use the same bar, but only had to purchase a foot
kit for ~%25.
When I purchased the bar, I did compare the Yakima to the Thule.
I didn't like the round bar on the Yakima, and (my opinion ONLY)
the method of attaching the bar to the feet looks flimsy. Now
I admit I didn't look at it with great scrutiny, but that was
my opinion.
I can't compare the fit of the Yakima vs. the Thule, but I can tell
you the fit of the Thule is rock-solid on either of our vehicles.
Price of the rack, to me, wasn't a factor. If I'm going to have
$600 to $1000 worth of equipment on top of my vehicle (bikes or
skis), I want to make sure it stays there.
Jim
|
204.77 | Thule here... | TOOK::C_PEREZ | The InFAMous Eight | Thu Aug 08 1991 13:52 | 13 |
| RE: .76
Jim, what you said basically sums up my feelings on the subject. I
own a VW Golf with a Thule (rain gutter attachment) and when it's on
my car, it's just like being part of the car itself!
When my bike is hooked up, if I grab the seat tube and try to move
the bike the whole car moves with it... I also didn't like the Yakima
round bar and how some of the attachments hooked up. When I put my
bike and ski's on the car *I* feel/know they are safe and IMHO, the
bottom line is that's what counts when getting a rack.
My 2�... -Craig
|
204.78 | | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Uphill, Into the Wind | Thu Aug 08 1991 14:52 | 11 |
| We've found the Yakima round bar to be a useful feature. In order
to get the bars far enough apart on an old Honda, the supports end
up so far back that the rain gutters are no longer level. With a
round bar this is no problem, but with square bars, the racks
would not attach squarely.
I do recommend the grab the bike and try to shake the car test for
any rack. That's my final check every time we load the bikes, and
I repeat it at each stop if we're driving a long distance.
--David
|
204.79 | Thule for Mazda 626 | VERGA::MACDONALD | Home of Digital Realtime Pubs | Fri Aug 09 1991 15:51 | 5 |
| RE: .67
I have a Mazda 626 and have been quite satisfied with my Thule roof
rack. I have a pair of Thule upright (keepa u wheels on) bike carriers
on it.
|
204.80 | Yakimas in the frozen north | NCPROG::PEREZ | Just one of the 3 remaining samurai! | Sun Aug 11 1991 01:01 | 19 |
| re .70:
The three Taurus sedans I know of here in MPO all have Yakima racks on
them (including mine). I looked at both Yakima and Thule, read all the
notes in here about both and decided from comments here that the Yakima
quality was better. The price difference between the two with two bike
mounts was about $100 (Yakima being cheaper). And, as far as solidity,
it feels like part of the car. I carry two bikes and my own version of
the Rocket Box with at least 60 pounds of camping gear and it is
absolutey solid.
I'm sure the Thule would have worked just as well.
The one thing I"ve noticed is that I have to use a spoiler on the rack
to prevent a loud moaning noise from the rack at any speed over 40 mph.
But, on the good side I cut out my own spoiler for less than $10 from a
2' X 4' plexiglass sheet.
We have a Saab in the parking lot with a Thule on it if that helps.
|
204.81 | Its ROLA for me | BALMER::MUDGETT | One Lean, Mean Whining Machine | Sun Aug 11 1991 17:29 | 11 |
| Greetings,
I wrestled with the options and bought a ROLA roof rack. I have
a DEC Ford Taurus and its wonderful. It looks perfect with the
car. Admittedly this same thing won't look as good on other cars
without the cannels that the Ford has. But the other ones look soooooo
awful! They look like (in my opinion) someone put a truss-type bridge
on the top of a car. The ROLA is somewhat pricey but then which one
isn't. Its available from NASHBAR.
Fred Mudgett
|
204.82 | Accord Hatchback suggestions?? | NOVA::RUBINO | | Tue Aug 20 1991 14:03 | 19 |
|
Well maybe somebody in this notesfile can help me out. I'm
just getting started with bikes and I'm looking for a rear mount
bike carrier for my car. Problem has been finding one to fit my
86 Honda Accord Hatchback. There aren't too many solid points towards
the bottom of the car. I've tried Rhode Gear, No go, and some cheaper
models like ProAction that I've almost got to hold using Carabiners
attached to the metal tow points under the car.
Does anybody have any suggestions? Anybody have an Accord hatchback
with a solution?
I've been told that the Graber Mountaineer might work.
mike
p.s. As far as roof racks go, Yakima is a "no fit" and Thule
needs all sorts of extra roof extenders and stuff, estimated
price of $300-$400 for 2 bikes!! Ouch.
|
204.83 | Yakima fits old Hondas fine | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Uphill, Into the Wind | Tue Aug 20 1991 14:19 | 5 |
| My wife has a 1981 Honda Accord (4 door) and the Yakima gutter
mount fits fine. I don't know what changes took place between the
81 models and the 86 models though.
--David
|
204.84 | Graber Mountaineer Fits | NOVA::RUBINO | | Wed Aug 21 1991 11:35 | 7 |
|
Well, a friend here at work loaned me the Graber mountaineer, and
it fits! It also is able to carry both bikes I need to tote around.
Looks like the problem is solved. Now, just to find a place that
has this carrier. Nashbar is backordered 3 weeks.
mike
|
204.85 | Landry's | NEMAIL::STEWART | | Thu Aug 22 1991 15:42 | 4 |
| Try Landry's on Rt. 9 in Westboro. They had several to choose from and
I recall seeing something from Graber.
Al
|
204.86 | Mix & Match Yakima and Thule (somewhat) | MR4DEC::HUPPERT | | Wed Dec 04 1991 23:13 | 18 |
| Yakima has recently added a new twist to the great Yakima vs Thule
debate - Yakima "Snap-Arounds" to fit Thule bars. With these you can
use Yakima accessories on Thule load bars. They are making two
varieties; one type fits bike racks, and the other style fits ski rack
attachments. Not all Yakima attachments will work with these
snap-arounds. For example, the fork mount bike rack doesn't use a
snap-around at the fork end, so this won't work.
Now you can buy the rack which fits best (in some isolated and rare
cases, Thule does seem to work better for some cars), and the best
add-ons (almost all Yakima accessories are superior to their Thule
equivalents :-)).
BTW- About 2 years ago someone showed an article in some Unix rag about
this small company in California making extensive use of CAD, Solids
Modeling and FEM in the design of their products. It was Yakima.
Unfortunately they have a small LAN of Sun workstations :-(
Is there a DEC sales rep who calls on Yakima?
|
204.87 | What about sporty cars? | ASABET::HOWARD | | Wed Feb 12 1992 13:07 | 7 |
| Are there any well known sporty cars which cannot accommodate a roof
rack? I've been told that Thule, Yakima,etc. make racks to fit
anything but I rarely see them on sporty liftbacks with short, rounded
roofs. The specific models I'm thinking of are the Mitsubishi Eclipse,
Mazda MX3, Geo Storm and Volkswagen Corrado.
Darnley
|
204.88 | | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Uphill, Into the Wind | Wed Feb 12 1992 13:36 | 13 |
| Ask the rack dealers and the car dealers (in that order). There
are lots of different adapters for good racks, and one of them
might work for you. I think the Yakima has the advantage here
because of the round tubes which allow the rack to mounted on
parts of the rain gutter which aren't horizontal.
Some car companies sell roof racks which you could mount the bike
mounts to.
One problem is that it is likely that the back end of the bike
rack would interfere with raising the lift-back.
--David
|
204.89 | availability | OXNARD::KLEE | Ken Lee | Wed Feb 12 1992 16:31 | 13 |
| Remember that you'll probably want to buy accessories (new carriers,
new car fittings, etc.) later, so make sure yours has good parts
availability in your area. Thule is widely available on the east
coast. Yakima is widely available on the west coast. Others have poor
availability anywhere.
Yes, some car manufacturers are selling racks for their cars. These
are mostly overpriced, of poor quality, and have poor
interchangeability with other cars. That's a pretty broad
generalizaiton, though, so you may want to check out individual models.
Ken
|
204.90 | | WMOIS::FLYE_N | | Wed Feb 12 1992 19:42 | 11 |
|
As mentioned before on a small car the bike rack will interfere with
the rear hatch.
I installed a Yakima for a friend on her Honda Civic CRX. The rear
hatch could only be lifted a few inches and the front tire of the bike
slightly obstructed the view out the windshield. Good thing she did
not own a tandem.
Norm
|
204.91 | OTHER ALTERNATIVES AVAILABLE... | WMOIS::GIROUARD_C | | Thu Feb 13 1992 06:11 | 7 |
| There are models that will fit onto trailer hitches (inexpensive
compared to stuff like Yakima's) that fold down if you need to
get into the back. There are also carriers for the front of the vehicle
that do not interfere with anything. Granted, they are not solutions
if someone want, to toss it on the roof...
Chip
|
204.92 | Talon & Thule | RUSTIE::NALE | Sue Nale Mildrum | Thu Feb 13 1992 10:10 | 7 |
|
My husband has got an Eagle Talon (basically the same as the Eclipse)
and has Thule racks on them. I don't think the bike accessory inter-
feres w/the hatch, at least not much. When we put skis on the roof,
however, we can only lift the hatch a foot or two.
Sue
|
204.93 | prevent rack from marring finish? | MIMS::HOOD_R | | Fri Apr 16 1993 11:56 | 17 |
|
I have a Yakima rack that I have taken off my Mazda and I am about to
put on my new Honda. The rack (an SST) left four ground-in-dirt pad
marks on my Mazda. If you've put a rack on your car, you know what
I mean (dirt/grime gets up under the pad and ground into the finish
on your car). Once on, I don't plan on taking the rack off for a LONG
time. Anyway, the instructions that come with the Y clips suggests
putting tape on the car where the SST mounts will sit to prevent this
from happening. My question is: What kind of tape?. I want something
that comes off , doesn't leave a mess that is not easily cleaned,
and doesn't mar the finish.
doug
|
204.94 | They're Meant To Be Easy to Remove/Install | LHOTSE::DAHL | Customers do not buy architectures | Fri Apr 16 1993 12:01 | 6 |
| RE: <<< Note 204.93 by MIMS::HOOD_R >>>
Why leave the rack on forever? It only takes about 45 seconds to attach my
Yakima rack to our car, and by not having it on all the time it doesn't get
rusty and bug-covered.
-- Tom
|
204.95 | No choice | MIMS::HOOD_R | | Fri Apr 16 1993 12:46 | 20 |
|
Believe me, I would rather not have the rack as a permanent fixture.
It destroys the look of the car. Unfortunately (fortunately?),
I use it four times a week, year round. If I take it off, I have
to store it. I live in a condo, and the space is just not there
(what, with three bikes, a wife, a baby and a dog...). I don't have time
after work to commute home, put on the rack go riding and take it off,
or time in the morning to put it on before work... and so on.... and
so forth. I often put my bike on the car in the morning (7:00 am) and
go riding on the way home from work, so the bike and rack sit on my car
all day once or twice a week anyway. Further, It would STILL require that
the roof contact points be clean before putting on the rack or the same
thing would happen. Anyway, I got a suggestion from over in CARBUFFS to use
striping tape . I am going to see if I can find some the same color as
my car and give it a try. I am interested in seeing if anyone in this
file has tried this and what they tried.
doug
|
204.96 | Help me Mr. Wizard... | AKOCOA::CJACQUES | Crazy ways are evident | Tue May 18 1993 08:24 | 28 |
| Boy, my head is spinning. I have a new Diamondback mtn bike (won
at raffle) and want to start into biking. I'm set for a couple hour
course in Groton for "beginners" but need to get out on this bike a
bit first. So I say, "I need a rack to get this thing out of Lowell
to "nice" places to ride". I think, "I'll just go into the BICYCLE
file and find some good ideas and price breaks".
HA! I just read 57 of the 95 notes in here and I think I'm trying
to understand Latin! I thought I'd just walk into a LECHMERE or
something and buy a rack. What a rude awakening this all is....
Ok, so please help me out. I know I want a rear mounting rack
because I'm a wimpy thing that has a hard enough time carrying my
bike down the three flights of stairs from my apartment - let alone
lifting it up over my towering height of 5'4" onto a roof rack.
I have a Pontiac Sunbird with one of those "built in" kind of useless
luggage racks. Am I going to have difficulty getting a rack on that?
Can I get something that locks? Is this going to cost me a fortune?
Now is the time for me to start spending money on it (I mean, what the
hell, the bike was free!), but I'm kind of limited on spending money.
Can you give a price range that I will be looking at?
Of course, now I've got to research helmets. Please tell me that will
be a lot less confusing (and that this will all be worth it :-) :-) :-)
cj *->
|
204.97 | Bike shop not Lechmere.. | SALEM::SHAW | | Tue May 18 1993 09:00 | 16 |
|
CJ, before you purchase the rack go buy a helmet! I 'm sure me and
99% of other riders will tell you this. The only times that I don't
were a helmet is when I'm off road on some nice country trail.
As for racks go, for trunk mount expect to pay anywhere from $45.00
to $100.00 for one that locks. I would guess that most probably
you will need to remove you laugage rack but wait till you try
some brands just incase you can work around it.
Your best bet is to go to a good bike shop in your area and check out
some brands and types. Once you have an idea what the different brands
offer and cost, it will make it easier to go through the used rack
adds in here and the papers.
Shaw
|
204.98 | | AKOCOA::CJACQUES | Crazy ways are evident | Tue May 18 1993 09:40 | 4 |
| I'd have to go out and check, but I suspect that luggage rack
is not removable. It's not one I installed, it came on the
car.
cj *->
|
204.99 | Test before you buy... | ODIXIE::RRODRIGUEZ | Shake that grits tree! | Tue May 18 1993 12:25 | 12 |
| Those luggage racks can be a bummer. A buddy of mine has
a TREK(3-Bike) trunk-mounted rack. He has a Mustang w/the
luggage rack. The slats on the trunk cause a problem.
The pads on the bracket that cushion the contact points aren't
hefty enough to lift the rack above the height of the slats.
That makes the rack tilt. He keeps his eyes out for thicker pads
so that he can upgrade the rack, but for $90, he should have
been able to find something...
r�
|
204.100 | InflaTION! | ALFA2::PEASLEE | | Tue Jun 08 1993 14:09 | 19 |
| I was in a rush this morning and didn't have time to put the
thule roof rack on the car so I took off the front
bicycle wheel and put my bicycle in the back seat of my car. The
bicycle is positioned upsidedown so that it is resting on the seat.
(The bicycle seat is resting on the car seat.)
Would this damage the bicycle in any way shape or form?
I have a difficult time holding my bicycle over my head - so
the roof rack isn't my first choice. I am thinking of
buying a trunk rack. From a security perspective, what would
make the most sense and provide the most stability for my
bicycle?
I have read most of the notes in this notesfile. One of the earlier
ones (from 1987) said I could get a decent rack for $15. ;^)
Thanks,
Nancy
|
204.101 | I'd worry about the car... | ODIXIE::RRODRIGUEZ | Shake that grits tree! | Tue Jun 08 1993 14:37 | 12 |
| Nancy,
I use a trunk mount rack. However, if security or weather
is in question, I remove the wheels and slide it into the trunk
on a blanket (I have a VW Fox).
Putting it upside down on the back seat shouldn't harm the bike,
but you can REALLY do a number on the interior of you car with
the chainrings.
r�
|
204.102 | | ROWLET::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow! | Tue Jun 08 1993 14:55 | 6 |
| re: .100
Why do you take the Thule rack off the car? I got a Yakima roof rack this
Spring and will keep it on the car until the end of October.
Bob
|
204.103 | :-) | MOVIES::WIDDOWSON | LO .BG,COPY32;TA .BG;ST | Tue Jun 08 1993 15:34 | 7 |
| I only put a rack on the car if the car is full of people, otherwise it/they
go in the boot (trunk). This means more wear and tear on the car (I
suppose - but I'm not in hurry to sell it) this way I'm guaranteed that the
bike will still be in the car after work (whether the car is still there
is, of course another matter).
I mean, which is more important to you, your car or your bike ? (:-)
|
204.104 | Two wheels are Superior to four! | ALFA2::PEASLEE | | Tue Jun 08 1993 15:55 | 10 |
| Re: 103
Heirarchy of importance:
1. Bicycle
2. Car
Re: 102 - I took the rack off because my car spent a week at the
"Park and Fly" parking lot outside of Logan Airport.
nmp
|
204.105 | | NOVA::FISHER | DEC Rdb/Dinosaur | Tue Jun 08 1993 19:44 | 6 |
| one way that damage can occur to the bike with the upside down
resting on its saddle, is if there is some object which can
rub against the saddle and if it rubs for HUNDREDS of miles.
It might wear a hole or something.
ed
|
204.106 | | ROCK::ROCK::FROMM | GUMBO!!! | Tue Jun 08 1993 23:49 | 17 |
| > Heirarchy of importance:
> 1. Bicycle
> 2. Car
ditto; actually, my bike is probably worth more $ than my car (seriously)
> I have read most of the notes in this notesfile. One of the earlier
> ones (from 1987) said I could get a decent rack for $15. ;^)
it depends on how you define "decent"; i now use a Thule roof rack that I
picked up in the WantAds; before that i used a rear rack that only cost me $20
new (in 1991); i stopped using it because i got sick of taking it on and off to
use it, and i was always nervous that i was going to be driving down the
highway and have the bike and rack fly off of the car; the bike is a lot more
secure and in place in my roof rack
- rich
|
204.107 | Rhode Gear | FLUKES::SUTTON | He roams the seas in freedom... | Wed Jun 09 1993 08:18 | 17 |
| I've used the Rhode Gear rear rack now for several years, and am quite
content with it. A year or so ago they made a minor modification which
keeps the pedal (or any other part of the bike) from rubbing against
the car, so I think it's an even better deal.
Aside from your problem of upper body strength to hoist a bike onto a
roof rack, I've always thought it better to have the car blocking the
wind/road crap from hitting the bike. Having it on the roof gives me
visions of sand-blasting it. I've never had a concern about either the
bike or the rack falling from the vehicle (assuming both are installed
properly), and I've travelled many hundreds of miles at freeway speeds
with it attached.
They ain't cheap (I think between $50-$100), but you get what you pay
for. I'd buy another in a second if I needed it.
/Harry
|
204.108 | | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Wed Jun 09 1993 08:32 | 3 |
| RE taking your rack off the car.
An empty roof rack adds about 10% to your fuel consumption
|
204.109 | | ROWLET::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts. is TOO slow! | Wed Jun 09 1993 09:48 | 9 |
| re: .108
I don't know if it's that much or not. Now that I'm running the A/C all the
time, my mileage has dropped from ~23 MPG to ~21 MPG. That's just about the
same drop as I got last summer. I suspect I'm losing ~.5 MPG due to the rack.
The increased wind noise bothers me more than the < $1.00/week increase in
fuel costs.
Bob
|
204.110 | What works for grease stains? | ALFA1::PEASLEE | | Wed Jun 09 1993 10:57 | 9 |
| Re: 107, Which model of the Rhode Gear rack do you have? I was looking
in the Nashbar catalog and noticed three or four different models.
I noticed alittle grease on my car's backseat (from my bicycle) so
I may just get a trunk rack. I could always lock my bicycle to the
tow loop thingie located on my car's under-carriage.
Thanks for the comments.
nancy
|
204.111 | Carpet Science | MIMS::HOOD_R | | Wed Jun 09 1993 11:17 | 9 |
|
>> -< What works for grease stains? >-
Carpet Science (??). It took 6 month old (non-trivial) grease stains out
of my dining room carpet with very little effort. I was amazed!
|
204.112 | My bike is NOT a 5 mph bumper! | NCBOOT::PEREZ | Trust, but ALWAYS verify! | Wed Jun 09 1993 14:14 | 29 |
| I have both a Yakima roof rack and the Rhode Gear trunk mount...
When I was working downtown and putting the car in an underground
garage I used the trunk rack because I couldn't fit the car in the
garage with the bike on the roof. BUT, my preference is to put the
bike(s) on the roof. I have Yakima B-strings for both bikes and they
do a great job of keeping grit, stones, bugs, and whatever from getting
on the bikes. In fact, with the covers, the bikes stay cleaner on the
roof than on the trunk.
I will not carry 2 bikes on my trunk rack. I have NEVER been able to
do so for any length of time without getting damage to one or the other
bike no matter how careful I am, or how much padding and covering I do.
On the roof nothing hits so no damage.
Even more importantly, when coming home the other day with the bikes on
the roof, I was struck in the rear at a stoplight by another car. No
damage to the car, BUT I could imagine what things would have looked
like had there been a bike or two being used as my rear bumper!
BTW: My Yakima rack went on 3 years ago - the only time it's been off
was when the car went through the carwash. At the end of summer I add
the ski carriers. When carrying camping junk I put the box on one
side. In either case I can carry 2 bikes and other stuff in comfort
and safety.
I ALSO hated the wind noise so I made a deflector from plexiglass and
attached it to the front bar - much reduced wind noise. Cost about $12
total!
|
204.113 | Cheap substitute for the Yakima/Thule fairing | ROCK::PRESTON | RISC -- the Reality is Sometimes Cruel | Wed Jun 09 1993 17:30 | 24 |
|
re.-1
Good idea to make your own fairing.... I think that both Yakima and Thule
charge upwards of $50 for just a black piece of plastic that clamps onto
the front towers to deflect the wind...
I always take the Thule off of my car when I don't plan on carrying the
bikes (one bike fits inside the car for short trips). I've found that
even with a borrowed fairing, the noise level inside was terrible when
I opened the moon-roof.
One question for those folks that never remove their racks... Have any of your
experienced any problems with the feet messing up the finish or your car. It
seems to me that after a few days of driving, some road grit ends up between the
feet and the car no matter how tight your torque it down. I invariably have
outlines of the feet on my roof when I pull the rack. My first assumption was
that the area under the feet was cleaner than the rest of the car hence the
outlines.
Surprise, it actually turns out that the outline is a line of hard packed
dirt some of which has pushed itself slightly under the feet.
/ron
|
204.114 | I'll get the model number tonight | FLUKES::SUTTON | He roams the seas in freedom... | Thu Jun 10 1993 08:12 | 20 |
| RE: .110
I'll check one of my catalogs tonight and get the model number of
that Rhode Gear rack; also, Rhode Gear sells this little security
cable doo-dad to lock your bike (and the rack) to the car. It's a
length of relatively thick wire cable with two big hard plastic
balls on the ends. You loop it around the bike/rack and shut the
two balls inside the trunk or hatchback.
I just use a Kryptonite cable-style lock when the bike is going to
be on there for any length of time or left unattended in public.
As for the comments about wear on two bikes, I've carried multiples
on mine a number of times without any significant problems. I've
still got it in my mind that the sandblasting from the wind up there
on the roof is more of a problem than the minor friction on the back.
To each his own....
/Harry
|
204.115 | Super Cycle Shuttle | FLUKES::SUTTON | He roams the seas in freedom... | Fri Jun 11 1993 10:49 | 4 |
| Okay, the one I'm thinking of is the "Rhode Gear Super Cycle Shuttle",
and it lists in the Performance catalog for $89.95.
/Harry
|
204.116 | Sport Utility Spare Tire Rack | CHIPS::LEIBRANDT | | Tue Nov 15 1994 10:07 | 16 |
|
I'm in the market for a bike rack for my '90 Nissan Pathfinder. I dislike
the idea of having to load my bike on a roof rack (and I'm 6'3") because
the vehicle sits so high. Other factors are cost, and the fact that a 2
bike rack should suit me fine. That said, I am thinking about purchasing
the type of rack that bolts to the spare tire (which in my case, swings
out of the way for access to the rear door). Any comments on these?
There seems to be at least two brands in the Nashbar/Performance catalog. My
choice seems to be limited by the width of the spare tire (10.5"). It
appears that the Rhode Gear is one of the few (only?) racks that mount
to such a wide tire. Any experiences with this rack? Other comments?
Thanks,
Charlie
|
204.117 | | NOVA::FISHER | Tay-unned, rey-usted, rey-ady | Tue Nov 15 1994 11:29 | 5 |
| I've heard them referred to as "not sturdy" but then I'm the kind of
guy who uses concrete to secure a mailbox post, 20 spikes to hang
a ladder on a wall (when 2 will do), etc. ...
ed
|
204.118 | | WMOIS::GIROUARD_C | | Tue Nov 15 1994 11:31 | 14 |
| I'd opt away from the rack if I were you. I've got a pick-up with a
cap now (not very comfortable with the security, but...). I used to
have a Bronco II and just loaded into the back. I loved the secure
feeling that unless they could get the rear lift open it would be
just about impossible to drag it out the front doors.
Also, it's out of the elements.
I don't know what your additional carry needs are, but given the
Pathfinder is a similar vehicle I'm assuming you have the room.
Just a suggestion...
Chip
|
204.119 | Good Points...Any More? | CHIPS::LEIBRANDT | | Tue Nov 15 1994 12:15 | 17 |
|
re: .117 Ed, point taken...The Rhode Gear is the first rack of this
type I've seem that has additional bracing and looks much
better than others I've seen. Maybe I can use concrete and
nails if it isn't sturdy enough :^)
re: .118 Chip, the rack will be used mainly for mountain bikes,
(can you say "muddy interior"...I know you can...) and for the
occasional family trip (wife and 1 toddler). Two bikes will eat
into cargo space (can't fold down both halves of rear seat with
little one in back seat, not to mention all that "kiddy cargo".
I agree that whenever possible, loading in the truck is the way
to go...especially with the road bike. Thanks and keep'em coming.
/Charlie
|
204.120 | I like the Rhode Gear that I have | EDWIN::HARVELL | | Tue Nov 15 1994 13:20 | 17 |
| I have a Rhode Gear Euro Shuttle that I use when the wife and I are going to a
race or ride thats far enough that we only want to take one car.
I find the rack to work well, be plenty sturdy (No problem at 80 on the wifes
car).
While the euro shuttle is a different system than what you are talking about I
believe that their products are well designed.
I don't ever leave my car with the bikes on the rack. When its just one of us
then the bike goes in the car.
One issue that I do have is that the rack itself has no lock and could easily be
removed. Hopefully no-one will decide to walk away with the rack itself as this
is not cheap either (but alot cheaper than the bikes).
Scott
|
204.121 | | MSGAXP::DCARR | | Tue Nov 15 1994 16:39 | 10 |
|
Isn't getting into the rear of your Pathfinder gonna be a problem when
the bikes are mounted on the rack? (The Pathfinder rear door swings up,
correct?). My suggestion would be to rethink the roof rack (though as
you mention, price _is_ a concern). I use a Thule rack on my 88 4Runner,
and cart 4 mountain bikes up there. Yeah, it's a bit of a stretch (I'm
5'10"), but I usually carry a small bench to stand on. It _does_ beat
the hell out of my gas mileage, but I know the bikes are secure.
-Dom
|
204.122 | | PCBUOA::KRATZ | | Tue Nov 15 1994 17:07 | 9 |
| Sounds like an extended cab [for the kid] pickup [for keeping dirt and
humans separate] with cap [for security, weather protection, doesn't
kill fuel mileage] is better suited to your requirements than the
Pathfinder, not to mention that a pickup probably would have been at
least $5k cheaper. However, while more useful, a pickup isn't nearly
as yuppyish, and isn't that what driving a Pathfinder/Explorer/Blazer/etc
is all about? ;-)
.02 kb
|
204.123 | I'll Keep my Pathfinder! | CHIPS::LEIBRANDT | | Tue Nov 15 1994 18:54 | 31 |
|
re: 121 The spare is mounted on a gate that swings off to the side to
allow access to the hatch of the Pathfinder (which does swing up).
That is one of the reasons I like this style of rack. The bikes
would swing out of the way. Never really thought about the gas
mileage issue with the roof rack. The rear mounted rack is a plus
here too...but limited to 2 bikes.
re: 122 I'm in the market for a bike rack, not a vehicle thank you :^).
Not to start (or finish) a debate on the merits of a Pathfinder
or Nissan extended cab pickup truck, but I have owned both. As a
matter of fact I paid much less (like about $5K!) for my Pathfinder
because I bought it used, at the right price. I do at times, miss
the pickup truck, when wanting to haul large (furniture) or dirty
(leaves!) cargo. However, I couldn't think about putting 4 (or 5)
adults in the pickup, (in the heated cab that is :^), as I do
transport more than just the wife and daughter at times. Hell, I
had the pickup drivers seat so far back, nobody could sit behind
me! Each has their pros and cons. Oh BTW, the pickup got about 3
MPG *less* than the Pathfinder (Both SE V6's) due to the truck
being geared lower...kb, please E-mail any additional comments or
questions regarding this subject directly to me at CHIPS::, as
this is really not the proper place...Any BIKE RACK comments?
Yuppyish and 5K Richer :^)
/Charlie
|
204.124 | looking for a roof rack. | KNGBUD::KUPIEC | | Mon Nov 28 1994 15:17 | 9 |
| I have a bike rack that mounts on the rear spare tire. I'm looking
at getting a roof rack for the bikes because there are a few things
thatbother me. 1) With the bikes on the rack I can't fully swing the
rear gate far enough to open the rear without the bkes hitting the jeep
2) I'd really hate to get rear ended with my bikes back there 3)
there's sometimes clearance problems with steep grades because the
bikes hang so far from the vehicle.
Chris
|
204.125 | Crunch! What was that noise? OH NO!!! | OOU812::LEIBRANDT | | Wed Nov 30 1994 13:02 | 18 |
|
re. -.1
Chris, what make of rack and model Jeep do you have? I appreciate your
feedback, and I was also worried about being hit. I've heard from two
people, with 2 different brand tire bike racks on their Pathfinders, and
they both love them. No problems opening the gate or hatch, and no ground
clearance problems. I don't like the idea of bikes being used as a rear
bumper either but if someone rear ends me, chances are, replacing my (NOT
Ultra expensive or custom) bikes is going to be their (insurance) problem.
It's my backing up into something that would be my problem :^). However,
IMHO, if *I* had a roof rack system, (with the bikes out of sight) I think
the chances of damage by pulling into my garage, a drive-thru with low
clearance (money machine or food), etc. are much greater. :^0
Thanks,
Charlie
|
204.126 | It's an Allen | KNGBUD::KUPIEC | | Thu Dec 01 1994 07:46 | 7 |
| I think the rack is an Allen, it slips over and attaches to the spare
on the Wrangler. The back door/spare of the Wrangler is one unit and
it swings open toward the passenger side. Whenever I need to get into
the back I have to take the bikes off before opening the rear door.
Also another problem is that the gas cap is behind the bikes when
loaded making it difficult to put gas in, this shouldn't be a problem
with the Nissan however.
|
204.127 | | STRATA::HUI | | Fri Dec 09 1994 09:32 | 20 |
|
If you are looking for a roof rack, I would recommend either Thule or
Yakama. Both systems are very popular and most shops carrier them and
their accessories. I know you might find a Grabber or Baracrafter unisport
system a little less expensive but it's thougher to find a shop to carrier
all their accessories.
I have had my Thule for over 7 years and I leave it on my car all winter
and most of the summer. I have not notice any damage to the paint job on
the roof of either car that the unit was mounter on.
Just so you won't be sticker shock. Be expected to pay $275 for a full
Thule system with 2 bike carrier and locks. But it's well worth the
investment.
|
204.128 | Pleased with my Thule... | MSGAXP::DCARR | | Fri Dec 09 1994 09:53 | 18 |
| Re: .124
If you're looking for a recommendation, I'll second the one made for the
Thule. As mentioned a few notes back I've got one and haul 4 mountain
bikes on my 4Runner. When I was shopping for a rack, I looked at both
Thule and Yakima, and decided on the Thule since I liked the mounting
system better. As the previous reply mentioned, it _is_ a bit pricey.
Mine was over the $500 range, which at the time exceeded the cost of
the fleet of Huffys I was carting around. :-) Now that we're carrying
Univegas, the bikes exceed the cost of the rack. The main thing I like
about it is the confidence I have knowing the bikes are safe up there
and aren't going anywhere.
Their mounting system is well designed, it takes less than a half hour
to install in the spring, and I usually remove it in the late fall. To
me, it was well worth the money.
-Dom
|
204.129 | Nashbar Rack | COOKIE::MUNNS | | Wed May 03 1995 16:06 | 15 |
|
Last summer I ordered a rack from the Nashbar catalog. A special ball
bolts into the trailer hitch on my Explorer. I have transported 3 mtn
bikes with this rack. When I want some security, I run cables through
frames and wheels and through a hole in the back bumper and lock it up.
The drawbacks to this rack are: 1) that it swivels slightly. Small
bungee cords from wheels to bumper solve this problem. 2) it flexes
horizontally. Don't put a bike with handlebars extenders next to the
back window. Bumps can make the extenders make contact with the
window.
For the price ($100) and quick install/deinstall (just push/pull the
locking pin), this rack works fine for those considering a
rack-in-the-back.
|
204.130 | Rhode Gear Spare Tire Shuttle | OOU812::LEIBRANDT | | Wed May 24 1995 16:08 | 33 |
|
I just wanted to give an update on my rack purchase. I bought the Rhode Gear
Spare Tire Shuttle. This is the only spare tire rack I've seen that goes on
a 10.5" wide tire (so my choice was limited rather ;^). I ordered it from
L.L. Bean ($89 FedX) and used a Christmas gift certificate (I *love* their
return policy too, just in case!)
The rack's frame goes over the top of the tire and uses (2) 1" nylon straps
with buckles to secure it to the tire. One strap goes around the tire's
circumference (which ends up in a tread groove when tightened) and the
other goes around the diameter. Their main purpose is to keep the rack from
turning or shifting on the tire. This years design has improved the bumpers
where the bike actally sits on the rack. The (4) bumpers used to be foam
and now they are heavy rubber (over plastic) with a strap which goes around
the frame tube. I also use bungee cords to secure the bikes better. I've
used it a couple of times (2 rather heavy ATB's) with no problems.
The one thing I have to get used to is the bouncing of the tire/rack/bikes
when on rough roads. No matter how secure, when you mount something to a
RUBBER tire (even a heavy duty All Terrain Tire, 6 ply?) you are going
to get some movement, however the rack has not shifted. I must admit that
I'm considering additional straps, or having heavier (and possibly wider
straps stitched on. Maybe I'll just add one or two of those ratchet cargo
straps for now...
I love being able to swing the spare's gate open (with bikes loaded) and
get into my tailgate. With the Pathfinder sitting so high, road clearance,
(to bike's tires) as mentioned in a previous reply, is not issue for me
(about 2' off the ground). I also use a 5' cable lock to lock the bikes
and/or rack to the tire/gate. (IMHO locks just help keep honest folks
honest). The biggest limitation I see is the two bike maximum.
/Charlie
|
204.131 | Where to buy Thule | HPCGRP::BURTON | DIGITAL INTERNAL USE ONLY | Wed Nov 01 1995 16:04 | 5 |
| I'm looking to purchase a Thule roof rack to carry our bicycles in the summer
and skis in the winter. Where is the best place to buy a Thule? Are there
any mailorder places?
Jim
|
204.132 | Goodales | APACHE::TAYLOR | | Thu Nov 02 1995 12:29 | 5 |
|
Goodale's in Nashua carries Thule racks.
/todd
|
204.133 | Try any EMS store... | EKLIPS::FIGLER | Forced Coexistance With Your Factory Wife | Thu Nov 02 1995 13:35 | 0 |
204.134 | Try County Stores in Milford NH | LJSRV1::HAYDEN | | Thu Nov 02 1995 15:34 | 2 |
| If you live anywhere near Milford, NH, try County Stores. Reasonable selection and I
found their prices to be better than anywhere else.
|
204.135 | also Belmont (MASS) Wheelworks | MPGS::MILLS | | Fri Nov 03 1995 10:40 | 3 |
| re .131
Wheelworks in Belmont is well stocked with Thule roof racks.
|
204.136 | REI in Reading | CONSLT::CORRIGAN | Hag at the churn | Fri Nov 03 1995 16:56 | 5 |
| And REI in Reading, Ma. Just off 128 on rt 129. Large selection,
can't comment on price.
Yakima sold there as well.
bob
|
204.137 | Convertable | REPAIR::CARTER | | Fri Mar 08 1996 09:06 | 6 |
|
Does any one know of a bike rack that will fit on a Peugeuot 205 CTI
Convertable ?
Does the standard Halfords rack fit ?
...Simon
|
204.138 | SDI's yer only man. | ENQUE::MCGOWAN | | Sat Mar 09 1996 11:58 | 13 |
|
I drive a VW Cabrio, and the only carrier I found which didn't
look like it would trash the soft-top was the SDI Carrier. It
mounts on the four nuts that hold on your license plate and
a webbing strap to your truck lid. I've been using it for about
a year now, and am impressed that it's still solid. I drive
pretty fast, and a lot of the places we ride require driving off
pavement for a bit. It is expensive though.
See the MTB Conference, Carriers note, for more details.
Peter
|
204.139 | oops, it's BDI Systems | ENQUE::MCGOWAN | | Mon Mar 11 1996 10:13 | 2 |
|
SDI, MDI... been programming windows way too long.
|
204.140 | BIC roof rack | SMURF::LARRY | | Tue Mar 26 1996 08:45 | 3 |
| Anyone have any experience with the BIC roof rack ?
Thanks,
Larry
|
204.141 | it's just OK... | EDWIN::TOMG::gulick | Those dirty rings !! | Tue Mar 26 1996 09:22 | 8 |
| Do you mean the kind where the bike is mounted upside down ?
I had one for 3-4 yrs with no problems but when I sold the car
that it fit and got a Thule for the new car, I was pleasantly suprised
as to how much easier it was to get the bike on/off the car.
-tom
|
204.142 | more thoughts.... | EDWIN::TOMG::gulick | Those dirty rings !! | Tue Mar 26 1996 09:45 | 7 |
| Now that I think about it some more...
I remember it was always a challenge to get my handlebars
into the grooves, they were just too small and would cut up
the bar tape. I doubt they would even take an MTB's bars.
-tom
|
204.143 | | BIRDIE::POWIS | | Tue Mar 26 1996 15:53 | 9 |
| Anybody have any recent experience with the current crop of
receiver-hitch racks? I saw some old notes referencing the Rhode
Gear, but there now "more substantial" looking units available
from Thule, Yakima and Softride.
I'm aware of the potential problems with rear-mounted bikes
(getting rear-ended, backing into something, etc), but we
just bought a Blazer, and putting 'em on the roof doesn't exactly
look like fun (I'm only 5'8")...
|
204.144 | Add two 2x4's to your ski rack! | RICKS::JACKSON | | Thu Sep 12 1996 15:49 | 19 |
204.145 | | BUSY::SLAB | Cracker | Thu Sep 12 1996 16:46 | 5 |
204.146 | options for long trip low budget | TAPE::SENEKER | which way to go? | Thu May 15 1997 15:12 | 24 |
| I want to take two mtb's about 1000 miles using a Acura Integra.
Normally I would take my pickup but not this time. I am just
starting the investigation the how or if I will be able to do this.
I have until May 20th to decide and take action.
Options:
o Get some type of car rack.
o Disassemble bikes enough to put in car.
o Don't take bikes.
I don't want to spend over $100 for a rack but from reading various
notes it sounds like this may not be possible. Also some notes
mention bike damage by carrying two at a time. It wasn't clear to
me what type of damage? I am also concerned about car damage, fit
around rear spoiler (if rear rack), and mpg impact (if roof rack).
Also, I think use of the car for bike hauling will be a rare event
as I plan to get a new truck in the next year and my older truck is
ok for under 50 mile trips. I am leaning towards disassembly of bike
to transport.
Thanks for any comments.
Rob
|
204.147 | | SMURF::LARRY | | Thu May 15 1997 16:11 | 24 |
| If I can ever afford a car that I care enough not to get scratched at
all I might consider a hitch rack. You have to buy a hitch of course.
I have seen people put a hitch on their cars where the ball connects
to a bar and the ball/bar can easily be detached. Leaving the
remaining hitch part virtually unnoticable. You then buy the hitch
rack for about $80.
I like this because:
1. the rack does not rest on the car.
2. the rack is not too high for us short folk and dont have to worry
about driving into the garage with bikes on.
3. still leaves the trunk accessable.
4. costs less than the roof systems. how much less depends on how much
the hitch costs.
Having said that I transport my bikes on a cheep trunk rack it works
fine.
There are also rear racks that should easily fit over the rear spoiler
e.g. the Rhode Gear Shuttle looks like it will.
-Larry
|
204.148 | inexpensive option | ZEKE::BURTON | Jim Burton, DTN 381-6470 | Thu May 15 1997 16:41 | 7 |
| Go to BJ's Warehouse and pick up one of the $35 trunk mount racks. Then go to
the hardware store and pick up some of the gray foam tubular pipe insulation
and some shock cords. Use the gray foam to go around any part of the bike that
might get scratched or that might scratch the car. We did that with great
success before we finally bought the Thule for the top of the car.
Jim
|
204.149 | | SMURF::LARRY | | Thu May 15 1997 17:16 | 6 |
| re. .-1 .... I basically agree with Jim.
One other trick I use... If I feel the bikes need extra securing to
the rack I will use an old tube after cutting off the valve ...and
after last years fiasco with my flatting grand prix's I have a lot of
them ;-)
-Larry
|
204.150 | | DANGER::ASKETH | Beware of Greeks bearing gifts... | Fri May 16 1997 14:15 | 11 |
|
> There are also rear racks that should easily fit over the rear spoiler
> e.g. the Rhode Gear Shuttle looks like it will.
Three or 4 years ago the *only* rear rack I could find to fit over my Supra's
rear spoiler was the Rhode Gear *Super* Shuttle, the Rhode Gear Shuttle wouldn't
work. I know they've changed over the years (but can't offhand picture the new
design) so this may be a moot point. The Super Shuttle had a bend in it that
the Shuttle didn't.
Barb
|