T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
51.1 | | SUSHI::KMACDONALD | Buy North Dakota Products | Thu Apr 24 1986 14:43 | 18 |
| I haven't paid too much attention to this area recently - last I recall,
though, sewups still had a rolling resistance/weight advantage over any
type of clincher. (If anyone has info to suggest this is no longer true,
please post it). If you only want to use 'em for TTs, I'd get a light
set of sewups and equip 'em with a nice set of silks...... use clinchers
for training.
A reduced # of holes should be no problem for someone as light as you
are. I used to occasionally see ads for spokes that had elongated cross
sections (ie narrow edge into the wind). No idea where you would find
'em nowadays.
There may be some things to do to the bike to increase TT performance -
a favorite of mine is to crank the rear dropout adjusters all the way
forward, shortening the wheelbase and making the bike stiffer.
Let us know what you decide and how it works out....
ken
|
51.2 | LIGHT WHEELS MAKE HAPPY WHEELS | AKOV05::FULLER | | Thu Apr 24 1986 17:29 | 29 |
| I recently built up a set of "fast" wheels and this is what
I came up with. For hubs I used 32 hole new campy aero
hubs (I got a whole groupo from Nashbar for $450), Araya
model 1 tubular rims, Alpina quasi flattened 18/10 spokes,
and my ever
favorite Victoria CX/CG tires. From riding these wheels
for about a month, they seem very strong and fast. I like
to stay with campy hubs because no spacing has to be changed
when switching wheels. I've had super luck with Victoria
CX/CG tires, the last pair I got at least 4,000 miles without
a blowout. If you go the tubular route, look for someone
else locally who needs the same tire and make a bulk order.
I personally think that tubulars provide a better ride than
these new high pressure clinchers and would be faster to
change in a Triathlon race and easier to carry a spare.
True aero spokes are made by DT but the hubs must be filed
out to accomodate the width of the spoke. This is a very
tedious process. Has anyone done this and would like to
comment? I have heard rumors that 32 spoke wheels are
actually stronger than 36 hole because spokes opposite
one another are in a perfect plane. Has anyone else heard
this?
Ambrosio makes a Aero clincher rim that I believe is
lighter than the Sun, its worth investigating.
happy wheel building
|
51.3 | Aerodynamics, not Weight | RAINBO::WASSER | John A. Wasser | Thu Apr 24 1986 17:53 | 10 |
|
From recent reading: In a time trial or distance event the
gain in speed attributable to aerodynamics is MUCH greater
than any gain you get from saving weight in the rims. This
means: go for aerodynamic rims, flat spokes, fewer spokes
and radial spoking (zero cross). You can (and should) fairly
much ignore the weight of the rims.
-John A. Wasser
(I'm not an expert, I just follow the literature)
|
51.4 | Maybe I should just train harder. | 8672::WOESTEHOFF | Keith Woestehoff | Thu Apr 24 1986 19:09 | 26 |
| Thanks for your opinions, I will keep everything that you said in mind
when I decide what to do.
RE: 1 Specialized has run a number of adds in bicycle/triathlon magazines
where they compare the rolling resistance of their turbo s and r tires
against other clincher and sewup tires. Of course they give the best
performance in their tests results. The only thing is, Clement or
Vittoria or some other tire maker may have their own test results
which show their tires are the best. Who really knows ? One other
interesting thing. Most of the increased performance in rolling
resistance comes from high pressure of 115 psi and not from the bald
tire.
RE: 2 My favorite bike shop said the same thing about filing the flat spokes
and would rather not do it. I found the Alpina Spokes in a Nashbar
catalog. They sound promising. Can I assume that the Alpina spokes have
no surprises and do not need filing ?
RE: 3 John, what was your source of info? I would like to read the article
if I can find it.
Any other opinions on time trial wheels ?
Forever trying to gain an extra 2 seconds,
Keith
|
51.5 | a slightly biased reply | APOLLO::DEHAHN | feel the spin | Fri Apr 25 1986 08:39 | 55 |
|
Some good stuff in this note.
First, let me steer you away from clinchers and into some real tires...
18mm sewups. They're what the pros are using. Very narrow, extremely
low rolling resistance. But don't forget that any tire with low
RR gets that way because the contact patch is smaller, and therefore
you have less "grip". So be careful with any tire like this, they
don't handle as well as a wider tire. I tried riding my 18mm wheels
at the Tour de Lowell one year, I've never been so scared on the
bike. If you're really serious about triathlons, then you won't
go with clinchers. Have you ever tried to mount one of those Kevlar
beaded tires? Try it when your hot, sweaty, and overly excited.
You casn change a sewup and be back on the road in less than 3 minutes
if you practice.
The BEST 18mm sewup rims are Assos, but they're big bucks, like
$140/pr. They weigh 290 grams and are deceptively strong. If you
can afford them, do so. I couldn't, so I went with Mavic CX18's
at around $70/pr. 310 grams, super strong, and they're Mavic. I
went the conservative route, using 32 holes, and I now regret it.
The Araya aero rims are light but soft, and everyone I know that
races on them doesn't have them very long. I don't know anything
you don't already know about the Matrix Iso.
As far as spokes go, some bladed spokes require hub filing and others
don't. If I remember correctly the Aeralpina's don't. Beware that
these spokes aren't as strong or as durable as, say, a 15/16/15
DT.
Wolber, National (Panasonic) and Dordoigne (I use these) make the
tires. More manufacturers probably do now. They're a bit more expensive
than a standard cotton tire but not as much as a Seta Extra. You
can really pump up those Dordoigne's, I use them at 160 lbs for
TT.
Roval makes a pre built wheelset, using their hubs, rims and spokes.
12 spokes in front and 18 in the back.
Recommendations:
Assos or Mavic CX18 rims - 28 hole
DT 15/16/15 stainless round spokes
National 18mm tires - 150 gram
Campy Nuovo Record hubs - there's no Super Record hub made today
GO FOR IT!
CdH
|
51.6 | More data on wheels | MOSAIC::WASSER | John A. Wasser | Fri Apr 25 1986 09:25 | 42 |
|
Some further reading (My sources can generally be attributed
Bicycling magazine somewhere over the last six months):
Drag reduction (in grams of drag at 30mph for front
wheel only):
18mm tire vs. 1" tire = 30 to 60
Aerodynamic rim vs Flat rim = 30
1 less round spoke = 4
1 flat spoke vs round spoke = 0.6
With a 18mm aero rim front wheel with 24 flat spokes (radial)
you can gain 16.9 seconds in 10 miles (1 minute 56 seconds in
100 kilometers) over a 1" flat rim front wheel with 36 round
spokes.
With a disk wheel you would gain 25.4 seconds in 10 miles and
2 minutes 59 seconds in 100 kilometers.
Moral: Get the narrowest aerodynamic rims and tires you can find.
Switch from round to flat spokes.
Remove as many spokes as you can.
(28 or fewer spokes are needed for road racing)
(24 or fewer spokes are needed for road time trials)
(fewer than 24 needed for track)
(12 spokes produces an almost unusably floppy wheel)
Prices (from Mike's Cyclery):
Assos 16mm aero rims, Campy NR hubs, DT flat spokes
(front) 24 spokes radial
(rear) 28 spokes radial on left, 2 cross on right
$310.00/pr.
Ambrosia Enervit Linticular Pro
Lens shaped disk wheel (limited production)
$1410.00 each
Ambrosia Enervit Pro
Flat disk wheel (production model)
$429.00 each
|
51.7 | | APOLLO::DEHAHN | feel the spin | Fri Apr 25 1986 12:14 | 19 |
|
>fewer than 28 needed for road time trial
>fewer than 24 needed for track
Not necessarily true. A 24F/28R is very unusual on the racing circuit,
almost all riders use 28F/28R or 28F/32R because a lot of these
TT's involve hills and rough roads, both excessive stresses for
sparsely spoked wheels.
As for the track, some kilo and pursuit riders use less than 24
spokes, but they're light, and have perfected their technique to
keep the wheels intact. Most sprinters use at least 32 spokes and
the real heavy ones (Vails,Gorski) use 36.
I wouldn't make these blanket statements for our everyday rider.
CdH_an_everyday_racer_but_not_this_year
|
51.8 | Drive train tips for TTs | MENTOR::REG | | Fri Apr 25 1986 12:49 | 38 |
|
Please may I extend/change the subject ? No ? Well, I'm
going to anyway:-
Lotsa good stuff here, but most of the respondents are making
some fairly reasonable assumptions about the rider's intended course
and capacity. Can we please hear more from him on this ? We havn't
talked much about other changes to the bike either, which is where I
want to extend/change the subject.
Most of what follows will probably already be known to the
originator, but may be of interest to other readers of this note,
it'll probably bore Chris DeHahn to tears.
From .0 I assume that this is for a fairly regular bike that
will be ridden at other times, i.e. the special wheels go on for
TTs, the rest of the week its a GP bike.
The greatest rim selection (widths, # holes, weight, etc.) are
available for tubular tires, particularly at the end of the scale
you asked about.
If it is a reasonably flat course then consider fairly high
gearing, you may be able to go to a five or six speed by moving the
outer chainrng to the inner position and abandoning the inner
chainring. It is worth making up a special cluster, you may be able to
got to only three or four sprockets once you know the course and
yourself very well. Try for straightest chainline on the gear that you
will use for the gentle up grades. Run your chain very slack, its
surprising how much drag a "properly tensioned" derailleur puts on the
drive train. It should look like its going to jump off, but if
it and the rest of the drive train are in good condition it won't.
Reg
(More later, gotta run !)
|
51.9 | In search of the ultimate bike | 8672::WOESTEHOFF | Keith Woestehoff | Fri Apr 25 1986 18:01 | 39 |
| I consider myself a more sophisticated cyclist than the average bicycle rider.
However, I must admit that I am impressed with the knowledge expressed by
those who have replied to this note. If anybody who reads this file is new to
cycling or wants to learn more, then this bicycle notes file is one excellent
resource. Much of the info given is better than can be obtained in many bike
shops. Well, I guess I should get back to the main topic.
RE .8 As the originator of this note I would welcome other advice about time
trial bikes in addition to wheels. First of all, I guess I should give
some more info on my bike as you asked. It is an Italian made Viner
Stellar Pro with steep angles (74 and 75 degrees I think) made of
Columbus SL tubing throughout. Superbe Pro derailleurs and pedals,
Ofmega Mistral crankset, Sedisport chain, ultra 7 freewheel. It comes
in at about 20 lbs even. I have 2 bikes, one is for bad weather, wind
trainers and touring. The Viner is for training and racing. I will
probably do about 7 races this summer and they will be on all types of
courses. I am a strong climber probably because of my light weight but
I seem to lose ground to my competitors on my descents. We have some
very big hills here in Colorado so I will probably want to use an
ultra 7 freewheel with a range of 13-24. I'm kind of lazy plus I don't
have very many good tools so I'll probably pass on changing freewheels
or going down to 1 chainring. However, I think your ideas are excellent
and I may try it some time if the race is important enough. I will not
be concerned with changing flats in most races because if I flat, I will
not be able to reach my goals. If the race is long, like a half
Ironman then maybe I could still reach my goals if I flat but I'll
only do 1 or 2 of those a year. Most of the time I will leave the pump,
spare tire etc. in the car.
Two other questions. It seems to me that I once read an article by John Howard
on time trials where he said that it is better to pound away with a higher
gear at a slower cadence than one would in a USCF race. Is this true? Is it
also true when climbing ?
What about pedals? Are the new pedals without clips and straps better for
aerodynamics and time trials?
In search of the ultimate bike,
Keith
|
51.10 | | APOLLO::DEHAHN | feel the spin | Tue Apr 29 1986 09:56 | 60 |
|
Re: Reg
I'm never bored by anything you say.
The Viner Stella is an excellent bike which was designed expressly
for light weight. They don't use the heavier Cinelli cast frame
components (BB shell, lugs) but lighter pressed ones. It is a very
good bike for road racing, although the geometry is a bit of overkill
for TT or triathlon, where a slightly longer and more relaxed position
is desireable. For your needs, though, it's great.
If you are having trouble on the descents, it's because you:
o are undergeared
o lack proper technique
o don't want to die
All of which are valid reasons! In Colorado, you can afford to carry
a 12 tooth gear. You've got the right derailleurs for the Ultra-7,
so why not pick one up? Out here in New England I usually carry
a 12-19, 12-22, or 12-24 depending on the terrain of the road course
(crits and TT's always 12-17 or 13-18). You won't use the 12 often
but when your in it you'll be glad you had it. At last years Greenfield
RR the finish was a slightly downhill field sprint and I didn't
have a 12, there was no "sprint" per se, it was just a windup of
your biggest gear. I just slipped back through the pack spinning
my 53-13 wildly.
Proper technique for descents is also important. Get your chin down
as far as you can. Slide forward in the saddle a bit to get more
weight over the front wheel. The G-forces you'll be fighting trying
to negotiate that turn at 50+ mph are staggering, you'll need all
your strength focused properly. Try to get as flat as you can on
the bike. Some guys use a tuck position with their hands on the
top of the bars and their elbows folded. That scares the heck out
of me, I like the feeling of more control so I'm always on the drops
with my elbows slightly bent.
And don't forget to be afraid. Overconfidence will kill you. A liitle
respect for your life doesn't hurt. Breakaways almost NEVER get
away downhill, they'll get caught real quick, so don't panic if
they're getting away.
As for Howard's theory, it corralates with his riding style. He
tends to push big gears most of the time. Personally, I'm a spinner
but in the TT I try and push the biggest gear I can at 85-90 rpm.
I find myself TTing against guys much bigger and stronger than myself.
So I try and use all my strength by pushing against the highest
resistance. I don't advocate this for everyone, I'm just saying
that altering my technique for this event works for me.
Best of luck in all your racing,
CdH
|
51.11 | More on (moron?) flat spokes | NATASH::WAGNER | | Fri May 23 1986 22:20 | 24 |
| The latest edition of the Performance Bike Shop Catalog lists a
true bladed spoke (as opposed to oval, where the aerodynamic benefit
is reduced) which do not require filing of the spoke holes in the
hub. This advantage is derived from the spokes having an "S" shaped
spoke head which is threaded into the spoke hole. This eliminates
the requirement of passing the entire spoke thru the hole. The
spokes come in boxes of 75, with alloy nipples, for $34.95. Address
fo PBS for those who are interested is:
Performance Bicycle Shop
P.O. Box 2741
Chapel Hill, N.C. 27514
phone orders:
800-334-5471
Before I sign off I should also mention that I have had no experience
with bladed spokes, nor have I ever used or seen this "S" shaped
spoke head before, so this is by no means an endorsement. I would
like to hear from anyone who does know about how these spokes are
in use.
Jim
|
51.12 | | GENRAL::WOESTEHOFF | It's the singer, not the song | Tue May 27 1986 13:19 | 27 |
| I just wanted to say thanks to everybody who has contributed to this note.
I feel that I have learned quite a bit by reading your responses.
Here's the setup that I finally got :
Campy N.R. 28 hole hubs.
Alpina aero spokes.
Sun Metal Mistral Aero 28 hole clincher rims.
Turbo R 115 psi tires.
Ultra light tubes.
12-24 ultra 7 freewheel.
Assembly was 3 cross in the back, 2 cross in the front.
Every now and then I do a time trial at the Air Force Academy with some
friends. I tried the new wheels and did the 12.5 mile circular course about
50 seconds faster than my previous best time. But who knows, maybe the wind
was at my back at critical points or maybe I was just in better shape. But
I do think that they made a difference at higher speeds especially during
the 4 mile descent on the Academy course.
I would have gone with the Performance spokes if I had know about them
earlier. I am also going to look into changing my outer chainring from a
52 to a 53.
Thanks again,
Keith
|
51.13 | crunch | APOLLO::DEHAHN | feel the spin | Wed May 28 1986 08:20 | 11 |
|
Going from the 52 to the 53 will take a few weeks to get used to
but is well worth it in the end. You can really notice the extra
top end in all your big gears. We've got a real moose on the team
that uses a 55, and, yes, I've seen him in the 12.
Good luck racing,
CdH
|
51.14 | FORGET IT | COMET::VOITL | | Mon Dec 09 1991 03:35 | 2 |
|
|