|
1)
ATM host SVC ATM switch PVC ATM switch PVC ATM switch SVC ATM host
-------- -------- --------- --------
No. To use SVC's at the endpoints, there has to be a signalling path
all the way through. If the middle switch supported it, you might be
able to use a virtual path to link the two end switches.
2) ATM host LANE ATM switch CIP ATM switch CIP ATM switch LANE ATM
host
---------- --------- --------- ----------
Again, no. If the hosts are getting IP connectivity via LANE, there
would have to be an IP router between the LANE based subnet and a
subnet that was using classical IP.
/gary
|
|
> 1)
> ATM host SVC ATM switch PVC ATM switch PVC ATM switch SVC ATM host
> -------- -------- --------- --------
>
> No. To use SVC's at the endpoints, there has to be a signalling path
> all the way through. If the middle switch supported it, you might be
> able to use a virtual path to link the two end switches.
I remmember that the signalling be doing by the host, when I setup the ATM
host
I should do "atmsig up ..." in alpha. So, if I have this alpha attached on
endpoints switches, work?
Thanks,
eric
[Posted by WWW Notes gateway]
|
|
Signalling on the two Alpha hosts is necessary, but not sufficient. As the
previous reply pointed out, in order to set up SVCs between two hosts, all
of the ATM switches between these two hosts must support signalling, and/or
trunking of VCCs (including the signalling VCC) over a virtual path.
|