Title: | Objectivist Forum |
Notice: | value given for value received |
Moderator: | UPSAR::THOMAS |
Created: | Thu May 14 1987 |
Last Modified: | Fri Apr 04 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 326 |
Total number of notes: | 5737 |
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
246.1 | Force Vs Incentive *not* Public Vs Private | WALLAC::LAYNE | Sat Feb 24 1990 08:53 | 73 | |
246.2 | Public 'ownership' does not work | RICKS::CHISVIN | Larry | Sun Feb 25 1990 18:30 | 33 |
246.3 | Eliminate *force* and Ownership doesn't Matter | WALLAC::LAYNE | Thu Mar 01 1990 07:54 | 174 | |
246.4 | There's no ownership in that story | MINAR::BISHOP | Thu Mar 01 1990 12:19 | 13 | |
246.5 | It won't PAY, or it won't pay AS MUCH? | WALLAC::LAYNE | Tue Mar 06 1990 06:08 | 71 | |
246.6 | This has been solved | MINAR::BISHOP | Tue Mar 06 1990 10:47 | 17 | |
246.7 | There are *Four* possible states of ownership, not just Two. | WALLAC::LAYNE | Wed Mar 07 1990 08:13 | 77 | |
246.8 | Universal rationality is not a market requirement | MINAR::BISHOP | Wed Mar 07 1990 17:24 | 32 | |
246.9 | Privatisation has failed in the past, more may be needed | WALLAC::LAYNE | Sat Mar 10 1990 03:50 | 227 | |
246.10 | MINAR::BISHOP | Mon Mar 12 1990 10:53 | 39 | ||
246.11 | Government stewardship is too risky | RICKS::CHISVIN | Larry | Mon Mar 12 1990 13:14 | 40 |
246.12 | Obviously I haven't properly explained my suggestion !! | WALLAC::LAYNE | Sat Mar 31 1990 09:49 | 187 | |
246.13 | You bet your money and takes your chances, 1 in 2? or 1 chance in 5? | WALLAC::LAYNE | Wed Apr 04 1990 09:30 | 119 |